SLIDE 1
City of Cheboygan Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades 2020 SRF Project Plan
Public Hearing Presentation July 14, 2020
1
SLIDE 2
- Present State Revolving Fund (SRF) Project
Plan
- Provide a forum for Community Participation
– SRF Loan Program Overview – Project Plan and Alternatives – User and Overall Project Costs – Social & Environmental Impacts – Mitigation of the Impacts – Schedule – Questions
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions
PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING
2
SLIDE 3 WHAT IS THE SRF LOAN PROGRAM?
Provides low-interest loans (currently 2.0%) for planning, designing, and constructing eligible wastewater projects. Administered by EGLE Revolving Loan Section. To qualify, the City must:
- Must prepare and submit an EGLE approvable Project
Plan
- Provide a Public Hearing and Comment Opportunity
for the Plan
- Pass a Council Resolution adopting the Plan
Final EGLE approval and City acceptance of the loan is decided later in the SRF Loan Program.
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 3
SLIDE 4
WHAT IS A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (WWTP)?
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 3
SLIDE 5 HISTORY OF THE CHEBOYGAN WWTP
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 3
- The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is the City of
Cheboygan’s municipal wastewater treatment facility. – The WWTP provides treatment to all commercial and domestic (residential) wastewater. – Wastewater from homes and businesses is pumped from to the WWTP from the City of Cheboygan and Inverness Township. – treats it in accordance with its NPDES permit with subsequent discharge to the Cheboygan River.
- The plant was originally constructed in 1946.
- The plant was modified and/or expanded in 1975 & 1998.
SLIDE 6
PROJECT LOCATION
Wastewater Treatment Plant
SLIDE 7 WWTP UPGRADES PROJECT INTRODUCTION AND NEED
- The WWTP Upgrades – Need for Project
– NPDES Permit Compliance
Weak organic concentration of incoming sewage causes the WWTP to not meet 85% removal of organic load.
– Aging Infrastructure
Plant facilities suffer from equipment breakdowns that are due to age and condition.
– Inefficient Solids Disposal System
Unreliable system results in large buildup of solids at the plant.
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 4
SLIDE 8 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
– Not considered a favorable option – No Action will result in:
- Continued degradation of existing facilities
- Increasing difficulty in meeting discharge permit
- Risk of surface water quality issues
- More costly intervention in the future
- Compromise safety of workers and plant operators
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 5
SLIDE 9 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS cont’d
- Regionalization Alternative
– Not considered a favorable option – No Action will result in:
- Decommissioning the WWRP and piping to facility
- Unable to provide treatment to City of Cheboygan
and Inverness Township
- Closest facility is Alpena which would require 80
miles of forcemain & several pumping stations
- Time-consuming
- Use tremendous amount of energy consumption
from pumping stations Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 5
SLIDE 10
Existing Final Clarifier (not functional) and Chlorine Contact Tank
SLIDE 11
Existing Electrical Equipment and Water System Tank
SLIDE 12
Existing Rotating Biological Contactor (1/2 are not functional), Grit Tank and Raw Sewage Piping
SLIDE 13 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS cont’d
- Rehabilitate Existing WWTP
– Feasible, and considered the Preferred Alternative – Perform various improvements at existing wastewater treatment plant
- Most construction activities located at existing facilities of the
WWTP, except for the oxidation tank which will be a new facility just outside of existing WWTP grounds.
- Improvements shown on next figure
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 9
SLIDE 14
SLIDE 15 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS cont’d
- Rehabilitation of existing WWTP will provide:
– More Efficient Use of Energy and Capacity
Resizing and reconfiguring existing facilities (which require replacement) will reduce energy waste and operating expenses.
– NPDES Compliance
Rehabilitation and improvement projects will give the WWTP reliable infrastructure to meet the discharge limits and protect the water quality of the nearby river and lake.
– Replacement of Degraded Existing Facilities
Replacing failing equipment will provide more reliable operation, reduce maintenance/operating costs, and prevent treatment plant process failures.
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 9
SLIDE 16
WASTEWATER PLANT UPGRADES PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 11
SLIDE 17
WASTEWATER PLANT UPGRADES PROJECT USER COST ESTIMATES
Below is the project cost over a 20-year period: – This is NOT a proposed rate increase. – Option 1 is the user cost without 30% grant loan forgiveness. – Option 2 is the user cost with 30% grant loan forgiveness.
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions
Basis Annual Cost 30% Grant Loan Forgiveness Cost Monthly User Cost $16,000,000 $978,507 N/A $17.90 $16,000,000 $978,507 $684,955 $12.53
Option 1: Option 2:
SLIDE 18 IMPACTS OF PROJECT PLAN
– Positive Impacts
- Increase in jobs, and workers utilizing community
amenities and local contractors
– Negative Impacts
- Noise, dust, & traffic related to construction
- Long-Term Impacts:
– Positive Impacts
- NPDES permit compliance
- Removal of 85% organic load
- Improved efficiency and reliability at the WWTP
- Ability to continue adequate wastewater treatment
and public health protection
- Improved processing & reduced equipment wear
– Negative Impacts
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 13
SLIDE 19 IMPACTS OF PROJECT PLAN cont’d
- Irreversible Direct/Indirect Impacts:
– Non-recoverable resources (public capital, energy, labor & materials) committed to project are traded
- ff to provide necessary repair and replacement of
aging and worn-out structures and equipment – Possible construction damage or accidents
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 14
SLIDE 20 MITIGATION OF IMPACTS
- Mitigation of Short-Term Impacts related to
Construction Activities
– Comply with any required permits (soil erosion, endangered species, etc.) – Follow regulations related to disposal and handling of asbestos containing material, lead paint, and any contaminated soils/groundwater, if encountered
- Mitigation of Long-Term Impacts
– Activities will prohibit the disposal of soils in wetlands, floodplains, or other sensitive areas Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 15
SLIDE 21
WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SCHEDULE
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions Proposed SRF Schedule Task Completion Public Hearing Notice June 12, 2020 Draft Project Plan Available June 12, 2020 Formal Public Hearing July 14, 2020 Council Adoption of Project Plan July 14, 2020 Submit Final Project Plan to EGLE August 1, 2020 16
Task Engineering Services Timeframe WWTP Improvements Design Phase Aug 2020-Jun 2021 Construction Start Jun 2021 Construction End Dec 2022
SLIDE 22
QUESTIONS?
Overview Project Plan Cost Impacts Schedule Questions 20