Performance of polyhalite as a multi nutrient fertilizer for potato - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

performance of polyhalite as a multi nutrient fertilizer
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Performance of polyhalite as a multi nutrient fertilizer for potato - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Performance of polyhalite as a multi nutrient fertilizer for potato in Brazil Simone da Costa Mello Crop Science Department- University of So Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil Potato Production in Brazil 2016 -Brazilian Institute of Geography


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Simone da Costa Mello Crop Science Department- University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

Performance of polyhalite as a multi nutrient fertilizer for potato in Brazil

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2016 -Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics- (IBGE) Potato Production: 3,851.398 ton Minas Gerais State (MG): 32.7% of total production São Paulo State (SP): 17.3% of total production Paraná State (PR): 21.3% of total production

Potato Production in Brazil

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Study- Potato- Tapira (MG) and Casa Branca (SP)

Site pH OM P K Ca Mg S g/dm3 mg/dm3 mmolc/dm3 mg/dm3 Tapira 5.5 37.2 74.1 2.2 28.2 8.9 29.9 Casa Branca 4.9 18.4 4.6 1.1 14.6 4.4 3.6

Soil Chemical Analysis of experimental sites

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Tapira (MG) Asterix variety - Long oval uniform red tubers with yellow flesh. French fries and processed products. Casa Branca (SP) Romeo variety – dark red tubers Fried foods, baked foods and purees.

Potato Varieties

slide-5
SLIDE 5

TREATMENTS K2O rate Blend N P2O5 Ca Mg S

  • ----------------------------------------Kg/ha---------------------------------------

Blend I 150 526 574 326

4-14-2 MOP + Urea + TSP + SSP

75 3750 150 526 574 326

4-14-4 MOP + Urea + TSP + SSP

150 3750 150 526 574 326

4-14-6 MOP + Urea + TSP + SSP

225 3750 150 526 574 326

4-14-8 MOP + Urea + TSP + SSP

300 3750 150 526 574 326

Blend II

150 526 65 19 102

4-14-2 Poly + Urea + MAP

75 3750 150 526 65 19 102

4-14-4 Poly + Urea + MAP

150 3750 150 526 130 39 204

4-14-6 Poly + Urea + MAP

225 3750 150 526 195 58 305

4-14-8 Poly + Urea + MAP

300 3750 150 526 260 78 407

Blend III

150 526 65 19 106

4-14-2 K2SO4 + Urea + MAP

75 3750 150 526 65 19 106

4-14-2 K2SO4 + Urea + MAP

150 3750 150 526 130 39 213

4-14-2 K2SO4 + Urea + MAP

225 3750 150 526 195 58 319

4-14-2 K2SO4 + Urea + MAP

300 3750 150 526 260 78 426

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fertilization pre-plant

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Planting of potato seeds

Planting potato seeds:

Tapira: September 4th, 2015 Casa branca: July 28th, 2016

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Evaluated characteristics

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Soil sampling

Soil sampling for each plot: 0-20 cm Period: pre-plant and after harvest Chemical analysis: pH, EC, K, Ca, Mg and S

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Sampling of f leaves

Sampling of petioles and leaflets (Young expadend leaves)

  • Tapira (MG): 36, 63 and 84 days after

planting (DAP).

  • Casa Branca (SP): 26, 40, 57 and 71 DAP
  • Chemical analysis – N, P, K, Ca, Mg andS
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Potato Harvest

Harvest: Tapira: January 18th, 2016 Casa Branca: November 5th, 2016 Size of tubers: < 28 mm 28-33 mm 33-42 mm 42-70 mm

slide-12
SLIDE 12

No commercial yield - Diseases

Spongospora subterranea Streptomyces scabies Meloydogyne spp. Pectobacterium carotovora supspp.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

No commercial yield - Physiological disturbs

Silking Lenticelose Greening Cracks

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Potato quality

Qualitative characterisits:

  • Starch
  • Hardness
  • Crunchiness
  • Dry mass
  • total soluble
  • reducing sugar
  • total soluble solids
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Results – Tapira (MG)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

1.33c 2.23b 2.8ab 2.78ab 3.17a 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

75 150 225 300

K content (mmolc/dm3) kg/ha of K2O

Soil fertility – K content

slide-17
SLIDE 17

59a 41.5b 41.3b 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

POLY MOP K2SO4

S content (mg/dm3) 300 kg/ha of K2O

Soil fertility – S content

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Leaf nutrient - Ca and Mg contents at 36 DAP

10.6a 9.33b 8.55b

8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11

Ca conc. in the leaflets (g/kg)

300 kg/ha of K2O

POLY K2SO4 MOP

5.12b 6.81a 5.15b

5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8

1

Mg conc. in the petioles (g/kg)

300 kg/ha of K2O

POLY K2SO4 MOP Interation Source X rates at 36 DAP Ca - Leaflet Interation Source X rates at 36 DAP Mg - petiole

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Leaf nutrient - Ca and Mg contents at 63 DAP

10.6a 9.33b 8.55b

8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11

Ca conc. in the leaflets (g/kg)

300 kg/ha of K2O

POLY K2SO4 MOP Interation Source X rates - Ca - Leaflet Effects of K sources - Mg - Leaflet

5.72a 5.48b 5.15ab

5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6

1

Mg conc. in the leaflets (g/kg) Poly K2SO4 MOP

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Nutrient uptakes - tubers

15 30 45 60 75 90 75 150 225 300 Nutrient uptake by tubers (kg/ha) Kg/ha K2O K Ca Mg s

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Commercial yield

y = 0.0432x + 16.142 R² = 0.9968

15 20 25 30 35 75 150 225 300 Commercial Yield (t/ha) Kg/ha K2O

slide-22
SLIDE 22

15.23a 1.33a 14.31ab 1.24ab 13.56b 1.2b 5 10 15 20 Hardness (N) Crunchness (N/mm) POLY K2SO4 MOP

Quality potato

slide-23
SLIDE 23

12.63a 14.28a 12.39ab 13.53a 11.19b 11.42b 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 225 300 Starch content (g/100g) Kg/ha K2O POLY K2SO4 MOP

Quality potato – Starch content

Interation Source X rates

slide-24
SLIDE 24

17.96a 17.38a 15.78ab 16.43a 15.81b 15.59b

15 16 17 18 19 20 225 300 Dry mass (%) Kg/ha K2O POLY K2SO4 MOP

Quality potato

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Results – Casa Branca (SP)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

12.7 b 19.2a 9.5c 5 10 15 20 25

POLY MOP K2SO4

Ca content (mg/dm3) 75 kg/ha of K2O

Soil fertility – Ca content

slide-27
SLIDE 27

15.5 a 14.5 a 11.3 b 3 6 9 12 15 18

POLY MOP K2SO4

Ca content (mg/dm3) 150 kg/ha of K2O

Soil fertility – Ca content

slide-28
SLIDE 28

4.75 b 5.5 ab 6.5 a 2 4 6 8

POLY MOP K2SO4

Mg content (mg/dm3) 300 kg/ha of K2O

Soil fertility – Mg content

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Fertilizer Mg content in the leaflet at 26 DAT Mg content in the leaflet at 40 DAT S content in the leaflet at 57 DAT MOP 3.66 b 3.34 b 2.78 b SOP 4.31 a 4.84 a 3.63 a POLY 4.18 a 4.71 a 3.11 a

Leaf nutrient – Mg and S contents in the leafl flets

slide-30
SLIDE 30

27.8 a 24.3 b 27.9 a 24 26 28 30

POLY MOP K2SO4

Total yield (t/ha)

Total Yield

slide-31
SLIDE 31

y = -0.0005x2 + 0.1671x + 30.546 R² = 0.8929

25 30 35 40 45 75 150 225 300 Commercial yield t/ha Rates of K2O

167 kg/ha = 44,51 t/ha

Commercial yield

slide-32
SLIDE 32

18.53 b 20.29a 19.14 ab

18 19 20 21 MOP SOP POLY Hardness (N)

Quality potato

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Conclusions

a) The effect of polyhalite on commercial yield depends on the soil fertility, considering K, Ca, Mg and S as source of nutrients: The K rates improved the potato commercial yield at Tapira (MG). The amount of 167 kg K2O ha-1 improved the potato commercial yield at Casa Branca (SP) c) Polyhalite fertilizer improves the important characteristics of potato quality as starch content, hardness and crunchiness.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Thank you!!!