Improving the growth and yield of crops in Europe and South America - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

improving the growth and yield of crops in europe and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Improving the growth and yield of crops in Europe and South America - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Improving the growth and yield of crops in Europe and South America with polyhalite Eldad Sokolowski International Potash Institute, Coordinator for China


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Improving the growth and yield of crops in Europe and South America with polyhalite 杂卤石的施用促进欧洲和南美洲作物 的生长和产量的提高

1

Eldad Sokolowski International Potash Institute, Coordinator for China 国际钾肥研究所中 国区协调人

1st IPI Symposium on Polyhalite 第一届国际钾肥研究所硫酸钾钙镁研讨会 A New Potassium Fertilizer with Complete Secondary Nutrients 全中量元素解决方案 31 October 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Onion - Brazil

Treatments

  • 1. Zero potash (only N and P2O5)
  • 2. 100% KCl (13 kg/Mu K2O)
  • 3. 80% KCl / 20% Polysulphate
  • 4. 60% KCl / 40% Polysulphate
  • 5. 40% KCl / 60% Polysulphate
  • 6. 20% KCl / 80% Polysulphate
  • 7. 100% Polysulphate
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Onion

48,31 51,33 51,68 53,10 52,66 51,38 50,64 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Yield (t/ha) % Polysulphate in blend

Yield

Effect K2O + 3 t/ha Effect Poly + 1,8 t/ha

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Onion

y = -7,2588x2 + 6,5776x + 51,172 R² = 0,8304 50 51 52 53 54 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Produtividade (t/ha) % Polysulphate na mistura

Produtividade (t/ha)

y = -0,1938x2 + 0,2241x + 0,5594 R² = 0,7701 50% 55% 60% 65% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % Premium size % Polysulphate na mistura

% cebolas > 90 mm)

45% 58%

Yield(t/ha) Onion > 90 mm

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Banana

Treatments

  • 1. 100% KCl (13kg/Mu K2O)
  • 2. 80% KCl / 20% Polysulphate
  • 3. 60% KCl / 40% Polysulphate
  • 4. 50% KCl / 50% Polysulphate
  • 5. 40% KCl / 60% Polysulphate
  • 6. 20% KCl / 80% Polysulphate
  • 7. 100% Polysulphate
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

26,4 27,4 27,1 29,1 29,9 28,7 26,9 22 24 26 28 30 32

t/ha banana

% Polysulphate blend

Yield

Banana

Effect Poly + 3,5 t/ha

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Cabbage

Treatments

  • 1. Zero potash (only N and P2O5)
  • 2. 100% KCl (13 kg/Mu K2O)
  • 3. 80% KCl / 20% Polysulphate
  • 4. 60% KCl / 40% Polysulphate
  • 5. 40% KCl / 60% Polysulphate
  • 6. 20% KCl / 80% Polysulphate
  • 7. 100% Polysulphate
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Cabbage

Effect K2O + 2 t/ha Effect Poly + 17,2 t/ha

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Cabbage

59%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Sugarcane Brazil Ratoon, after second harvest

  • 11

T

Ammonium

nitrate

Ammonium

sulphate urea KCl

Gypsum

Poly sulphate S Ca Mg N K2O kg/Mu

1 13.3 67 8 2 25.5 13.3 8.7 8 3 25.5 13.3 67 8.7 8 4 19 13.3 8.7 8 5 19 13.3 67 8.7 8 6 8 15 13.3 8.7 8 7 25.5 11 10.5 2 1.3 0.4 8.7 8

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Sugarcane Brazil

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

3,19 3,39 3,72 3,58 3,26 3,33

Grains yield (t/ha)

Soybean – Brazil

MAP in furrow, MOP broadcast All treatments : 80 kg/ha P2O5 + 80 kg/ha K2O

Treatments 2 to 6 :+ 25 kg/ha S 213 kg/mu 226 kg/mu 248 kg/mu 239 kg/mu 217 kg/mu 222 kg/mu

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Polysulphate x Mobility of cations in soil profile

14

  • No tillage system or minimum cultivation
  • Limestone and fertilization in top soil
  • Single fertilizers applied before sowing and broadcasted on top soil
  • Fertility has been concentrated in top soil (0-5 cm) – P, Ca, Mg
  • Root concentrated in top soil, problems in root development, high

sensibility to water deficiency

Cerrado area  Grains system production

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Ca (and Mg) x Roots Soybean

15

Relationship: Root system x depth x Ca and Mg in soil x higher soybean yield

Root Length and depth (mm) Soil depth (cm)

Fields with lower yields

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Polysulphate in Higher Rates

16

  • Soybean sowed in pasture degraded area.

– Two weeks before sowing = 2,5 t/ha of dolomite limestone. – Sowing = 200 kg/ha of MAP onto furrow. – Sampling soil after soybean harvest (80 days after second fertilization), in the depths: 0-5 cm, 5-10 cm, 10-15 cm, 15-20 cm, 20-30 cm and 30 -40 cm. Treatments KCl Polyhalite KCl (70 kg K2O ha-1) (eq. To 70 kg K2O ha-1) Polyhalite KCl (70 kg K2O ha-1) (eq. To 70 kg K2O ha-1) Polyhalite Timing Aditional fertilization First trifoliate (V1) First flower (V6) Top soil

Vale (2016)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Calcium

Depth cm Polysulphate Control cmolc/dm3 % 0-5 3,40 2,62 0,78 29,8% 5-10 3,08 2,71 0,37 13,7% 10-15 2,65 2,04 0,61 29,9% 15-20 1,96 1,65 0,31 18,8% 20-30 1,55 1,30 0,25 19,2% 30-40 0,98 1,05

  • 0,07
  • 6,7%

0-20 2,77 2,26 0,52 22,9% 20-40 1,27 1,18 0,09 7,7% Ca average (cmolc/dm3) Increment in Ca availability Average for depths

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 Depth (cm)

Ca in soil (cmolc dm-3)

Polyhalite KCl

Polyhalite KCl

Vale (2016)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Depth cm Polysulphate Control cmolc/dm3 % 0-5 1,53 1,26 0,27 21,4% 5-10 1,63 1,43 0,20 14,0% 10-15 1,49 1,05 0,44 41,9% 15-20 0,97 0,76 0,21 27,6% 20-30 0,71 0,62 0,09 14,5% 30-40 0,44 0,36 0,08 22,2% 0-20 1,41 1,13 0,28 24,9% 20-40 0,58 0,49 0,09 17,3% Mg average (cmolc/dm3) Increment in Mg availability Average for depths

Magnesium

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

0,5 1 1,5 2 Depth (cm)

Mg in soil (cmolc dm-3)

Polyhalite KCl

Polyhalite KCl

Vale (2016)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Depth cm Polysulphate Control cmolc/dm3 % 0-5 1,95 1,77 0,18 10,1% 5-10 0,74 0,79

  • 0,05
  • 6,5%

10-15 0,56 0,62

  • 0,05
  • 8,3%

15-20 0,49 0,56

  • 0,08
  • 13,6%

20-30 0,38 0,23 0,15 66,7% 30-40 0,38 0,23 0,15 66,7% 0-20 0,94 0,94 0,00 0,0% 20-40 0,38 0,23 0,15 66,7% K average (cmolc/dm3) Increment in K availability Average for depths

Potash

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

0,5 1 1,5 2 Depth (cm)

K in soil (cmolc dm-3)

Polyhalite KCl

Vale (2016)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Depth cm Polysulphate Control mg/dm3 % 0-5 14,60 15,60

  • 1,00
  • 6,4%

5-10 15,00 14,50 0,50 3,4% 10-15 15,20 14,20 1,00 7,0% 15-20 15,80 12,90 2,90 22,5% 20-30 16,10 13,30 2,80 21,1% 30-40 16,50 11,90 4,60 38,7% 0-20 15,15 14,30 0,85 5,9% 20-40 16,30 12,60 3,70 29,4% S average (mg/dm3) Increment in S availability Average for depths

Sulfur

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

5 10 15 20 Depth (cm)

S in soil (mg dm-3)

Polyhalite KCl

Polyhalite KCl

Vale (2016)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Evaluation of polyhalite in soybean, maize and wheat soils of Argentina

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Product Fertilizer N P2O5 S K2O MgO kg/ha Check - MAP 58 6 30

  • Single

Superphosphate (SSP) 158 30 19

  • MAP + Gypsum

(34/66) 167 6 30 19

  • MAP+ Polyhalite

(37/63) 158 6 30 19 14 6 MAP+ Polyhalite (22/78) 258 6 30 38 28 12 MAP+ Polyhalite (16/84) 358 6 30 57 42 18

Whe heat in Centr t in Central al Pamp ampas, as, Ar Arge gentina ntina

Sandy Loam pH: 5.9 Organic matter: 2.9 % K: 480 ppm Mg: 270 ppm S-SO4: 7 ppm

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Strong response to sulfur

19kg S/ha

38 S 57 S 28K 42 K 12 Mg 18 Mg 12 K 6Mg

∆ S: 1,371 kg/ha 29%

slide-24
SLIDE 24

∆ S: 1,822 kg/ha 13% All treatments had the same P2O5

Str Strong r

  • ng respons

esponse to S e to S

No trend or difference due to K & Mg Soil K levels well above sufficiency Soil: Sandy Loam pH: 5.8 Organic matter: 3.6 % K: 440 ppm Mg: 260 ppm S-SO4: 6,5

Maiz Maize Cen e Centr tral al Pam ampa pas, s, Ar Arge gentin ntina

slide-25
SLIDE 25

19kg S/ha

Maiz Maize e in Nor in Northeas theast t Ar Argen gentina tina Str Strong

  • ng res

espon ponse se to S to S

∆ S: 1,303 kg/ha 24% No difference due to K & Mg In spite of low soil K, low yields made K levels sufficient Soil: Sandy Loam pH: 5.4 Organic matter: 3.2 % K: 195 ppm Mg: 130 ppm S-SO4: 3 ppm

slide-26
SLIDE 26

∆ S: 753 kg/ha 35% ∆ K-Mg: 665 kg/ha 27 % 1,9 kg Soy/kg Pyhte

So Soybe ybean an in in Northea Northeast st Argen Argentina tina

Soil K levels not sufficient

Soil

Sandy Loam pH: 5.2; Organic matter: 2.8 %

K: 90 ppm Mg: 110 ppm S-SO4: 3.3 ppm

slide-27
SLIDE 27

3.8 4.2 3,8 11.7 4.4 4.6 4,6 13,7

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 1ère coupe 2ème coupe 3ème coupe Total 1+2+3

Témoin Polysulphate 200 kg / ha

20.3 T FW 23.1 T FW 60,4 T FW 53,3 T FW 17.9 T FW 16.4 T FW

Alfalfa experiment–France

Dry matter Tons / ha

Toute la parcelle a reçu 300 U de KCL à l’automne

Luzerne en 3ème année

+ 16% + 10% + 23%

16.6 T FW 19,4 T FW

DM rate

The whole field received 300 U of GMOP in October Alfalfa in 3rd year

3rd cut 2nd cut 1rst cut Control

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

  • Movie

Polyhalite in tomato greenhouse: preventing Ca & Mg deficiencies under desalinized water, Israel

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Polyhalite in tomato greenhouse: preventing Ca & Mg deficiencies under desalinized water, Israel

Throughout the season

120 140 160 180 200 220 240

Marketable yield (ton ha-1) Control PS1 PS2 PS3

25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250

Marketable yield (ton ha-1)

A

Poly 1000 kg ha-1 Poly 1500 kg ha-1 Poly 2000 kg ha-1

During spring, from April to June

Yield

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Polyhalite in tomato greenhouse: preventing Ca & Mg deficiencies under desalinized water, Israel

Tomato stem diameter below the uppermost inflorescence on 23-May, 2017 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1000 1500 2000 Stem diameter (mm) Polyhalite (kg ha-1)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Polyhalite in tomato greenhouse: preventing Ca & Mg deficiencies under desalinized water, Israel

Poly 2000 kg ha-1 Poly 0 kg ha-1 Magnesium deficiency in leaves

slide-32
SLIDE 32