Parcel Group 6: Carlos Bee Quarry RFQ Pre-Submittal Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

parcel group 6 carlos bee quarry
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Parcel Group 6: Carlos Bee Quarry RFQ Pre-Submittal Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Route 238 Corridor Lands Development Parcel Group 6: Carlos Bee Quarry RFQ Pre-Submittal Meeting Jennifer Ott, Deputy City Manager Monica Davis, Community Services Manager Meeting Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Request for Qualifications Process


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Parcel Group 6: Carlos Bee Quarry

RFQ Pre-Submittal Meeting Jennifer Ott, Deputy City Manager Monica Davis, Community Services Manager

Route 238 Corridor Lands Development

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Meeting Agenda

  • 1. Introductions
  • 2. Request for Qualifications Process
  • 3. Site Overview and Opportunity
  • 4. Development Requirements and Priorities
  • 5. Selection Process
  • 6. Timelines
  • 7. Questions and Answers
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Request for Qualifications Process

slide-4
SLIDE 4

RFP vs. RFQ

In December, the City issued a Request for Proposals with a detailed list of requirements for project: Received two responses Project and all the requirements were complex and uncertain Proposals did not meet City’s financial goals City decided not to proceed with either proposal The RFQ is an alternative approach that: Allows flexibility to collaborate with a qualified developer to resolve uncertainty and negotiate a mutually agreeable term sheet Provides more upfront certainty for developer and allows City to evaluate potential project tradeoffs

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RFP vs. RFQ

The RFP included a number of development requirements for submitted proposals The RFQ includes development requirements, as well as development priorities for future discussion and negotiation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RFQ Process

  • The selected developer will enter into an Exclusive Negotiating Rights

Agreement (ENRA) with the City:

  • Phase 1: Initial 6-month period to negotiate a mutually agreeable term

sheet, meet with third-party entities and community stakeholders to resolve uncertainties and evaluate potential tradeoffs

  • Phase 2: If successful, then an extension of an additional 12-

month period to negotiate DDA and obtain entitlements and third-party agreements (with two 3-month administrative extensions)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Site Overview & Opportunity

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Parcel Group 6: Overview

Assets and Opportunities

  • View corridors
  • Large developable land areas
  • Close proximity to CSUEB (~.3

miles)

  • Hayward Foothill Trail loop
  • Broad planning envelope (740-

1,630 units) Constraints

  • Steep slopes surround site
  • Lack of access
  • No existing infrastructure
  • PGE easement
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Parcel Group 6: Carlos Bee Quarry

  • Approved Master Development

Plan and certified addendum to General Plan EIR.

  • Provides developers with a

streamlined process and level of certainty Development Vision

  • Up to 500 townhome/multifamily

units and 500 student beds

  • Foothill Trail
  • Neighborhood park space
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Land Use and Development

Conceptual Planning

  • Townhomes
  • Student Housing
  • Multi-Family Housing

Environmental Review

  • Maximum Unit/Bed Counts
  • 500 Multi Family/

Townhomes

  • 500 Student Beds*

*Student housing impacts less than a housing unit; potential for less units and greater beds.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Other Site Aspects

  • Street and utility

infrastructure needed.

  • Connection to and

new intersection at Carlos Bee Blvd. will be required for any development.

  • MDP excludes

northern bridge and access to Highland neighborhood at this point.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Zoning & Flexibility of Product Types

  • Sustainable Mixed-Use zoning

applies:

  • 25-55 units per acre
  • 55-foot maximum building height
  • Multi-family dwelling units (2 or

more units)

  • Individual parcels within the

development may be developed at higher or lower densities than allowed by the General Plan, provided that the net density of the entire development is within the allowed density range and housing confirms with allowed housing types

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Net Density

  • Per the Hayward General Plan, residential density is calculated by

dividing the number of housings units on the site (excluding second units

  • n single-family lots) by the net acreage of the site
  • Net acreage excludes land required for public and private streets,

parks, and other public facilities. In this case, the areas that can be excluded for the purposes of calculating density, would be the public

  • r private streets within the development, area for parks and would

extend to any public trail areas, and other public facilities.

  • Areas that would not be able to be excluded include steeply sloped

areas based on this definition, unless perhaps those areas would be utilized for either streets, parks/trails or public facilities and infrastructure.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Anticipated Entitlements

Site Plan Review Tentative Map Final Map

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Development Requirements and Priorities

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Development Requirements

  • 1. Plan Consistency
  • Developers will be required to develop projects consistent with

Master Development Plan and existing General Plan and zoning

  • 2. Foothill Trail and Parkland Dedication Requirements
  • Developers will need to construct the 16-foot wide multi-use trail throughout

their proposed development and minimum of 1.5 acres of park space.

  • 3. Affordable Housing Requirements
  • Developers will be required to develop on-site affordable units in accordance

with the Affordable Housing Ordinance requirements.

  • 4. Green Development
  • Developers must incorporate green building and landscaping elements that

reduce use of energy, water, and natural resources.

  • Includes making each home solar powered to meet new CA Building Standard

Commission’s requirement.

  • No gas utilities.
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Development Requirements, 2

  • 5. Infrastructure Upgrades
  • Developers will be required to construct all of the necessary water,

stormwater, sewer, and street improvements to serve the new development.

  • 6. Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
  • Developers must propose and implement a robust TDM program that details

strategies on how the development will promote walking, biking, and taking transit to reduce trips in single occupied vehicles. A minimum of 10% trip reduction is required for this development.

  • TDM Plans may include:
  • Transit access to Downtown Hayward/BART
  • Car share
  • Electric Bike Share
  • Strict on-street parking regulations and enforcement
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Development Requirements, 3

  • 7. Financing Mechanism for Ongoing Expenses
  • The City will require the future development to establish a financing

mechanism to provide funding for the on-going maintenance and protection of the Hayward Foothill Trail segment and neighborhood park and the ongoing implementation of the approved TDM program.

  • 8. Hayward Resident Priority Preference Plan
  • Developers will need to include a plan which grants a priority

preference for Hayward residents to purchase or lease market rate units in instances where all other financial considerations are equal, if possible.

  • Must be pursuant to applicable state and federal Fair Housing laws.
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Development Priorities

  • 1. Diversity in product types and student housing - there is a

desire for a mix of product types and densities, especially for much-needed student housing given 0.3-mile proximity to CSUEB

  • 2. Community Workforce Agreement (CWA) - there is a

priority to negotiate a CWA with the Building Trades Council

  • 3. HAPA Bayview Village project understanding - the City

acknowledges and supports the Bayview Village concept and its sustainable values

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Statement of Qualifications

  • Cover Letter
  • Description of Project Team
  • Relevant Development Project

Experience

  • Comparable projects
  • Public land transactions and public entity

collaboration

  • Inclusionary affordable housing
  • Infrastructure development
  • Community engagement and outreach
  • Relevant Financial Capacity
  • Project Understanding and Approach
  • Acceptance of Conditions
  • Due June 25, 2020 by email
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Selection Process

  • City will evaluate each Statement of Qualifications
  • Evaluation based on the following components:
  • Technical capability and relevant experience of team
  • Developer Experience with complex projects with public/private

partnerships

  • Demonstrated experience in addressing stakeholder feedback
  • Evidence of financial capacity, resources, relationships, and
  • rganizational structure
  • City will also conduct additional due diligence and reference

checks outside of criteria listed in the RFQ.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Timelines

Pre-Submittal Meeting June 11, 2020, & June 18, 2020 Statement of Qualifications Due Date June 25, 2020 Review of Proposals July 2020 Short List Interviews July/August 2020 Recommendation & ENRA Authorization September 2020 ENRA Period – Phase 1 September 2020 – March 2021

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Questions & Comments?