p l a n n i n g c o m m i s s i o n
play

P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n 1 Item 3 Item 3 Item 3: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

F e b r u a r y 2 4 , 2 0 1 6 P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n 1 Item 3 Item 3 Item 3: Introduction of new Planning Commissioner Ivin Rhyne 2 I t e m 4 I t e m 4 Planning Commission Bylaws (Number E 2) Annually the newly


  1. F e b r u a r y 2 4 , 2 0 1 6 P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n 1

  2. Item 3 Item 3  Item 3: Introduction of new Planning Commissioner Ivin Rhyne 2

  3. I t e m 4 I t e m 4  Planning Commission Bylaws (Number E ‐ 2)  Annually the newly elected Chair shall be recommended by the Commission for appointment to the Sutter County Planning Commission  In the event the Chair does not wish to serve, the Commission shall elect a member  Recommendation shall be transmitted to the Council  Council shall forward recommendation to the Board of Supervisors 3

  4. I t e m 5 I t e m 5  Sign Code Update Workshop  No action will be taken tonight, rather the goal is to solicit feedback and direction  City Council workshop in 2011  Ad ‐ hoc sign committee was formed  Commission considered modifications in 2014 4

  5. Noteworthy topics  From Council workshop in 2011:  Moving mannequin signs  Temporary banners  A ‐ frame signs  Special events signs  Electronic signs 5

  6. Sign Code Update Goals  At a minimum:  Logical organization and user ‐ friendly format  Ensure that standards are clear, consistent and illustrated  Raise the Bar for Development Quality  Reduce the need for negotiated approvals  Employ graphics rather than words  Consolidate Standards 6

  7. Sign Code Update  Sign code is both what we want and often what we don’t want  Community may perceive that the City is proposing more stringent regulations, whereas we may simply be enforcing what we currently have 7

  8. Format  Underline: Proposed text  Strikethrough: Existing text to be deleted  Regular text: Existing text, no proposed changes 8

  9. Overview  Design Principles  Permits required  Exempt signs  Civic Signs  Garage Sales (24 hours after the conclusion of the yard sale; not permitted in the public right ‐ of ‐ way)  Holiday Decorations  Memorial Signs  Government Notices 9

  10. Prohibited Signs  Animated Signs  Flashing Signs  Fence Signs 10

  11. Fence Signs 11

  12. Prohibited Signs  Animated Signs  Flashing Signs  Fence Signs  Freestanding and Pole Signs 12

  13. Pole Signs 13

  14. Prohibited Signs  Animated Signs  Flashing Signs  Fence Signs  Freestanding and Pole Signs  Posters and Snipe Signs 14

  15. Snipe Signs 15

  16. Prohibited Signs  Animated Signs  Flashing Signs  Fence Signs  Freestanding and Pole Signs  Posters and Snipe Signs  Roof Signs 16

  17. Roof Signs 17

  18. Prohibited Signs  Animated Signs  Flashing Signs  Fence Signs  Freestanding and Pole Signs  Posters and Snipe Signs  Roof Signs  Vehicle Signs 18

  19. Vehicle Signs 19

  20. Proposed Regulations  Measuring Signs 20

  21. Proposed Regulations  Size and Types  Nominal changes are proposed for permanent signs (pages 16 ‐ 25)  Modification to text  Added graphics for Awning, Wall, and Projecting Signs 21

  22. Proposed Regulations  Electronic Signs  All signs on the parcel would need to comply with the code.  This may require that they remove existing signs.  4 or less businesses – ½ of the monument sign may be electronic  5 or more businesses – no more than 1/3 of the monument may be electronic  Enhanced landscaping 22

  23. Proposed Regulations  Agricultural Signs  Menus for drive ‐ thru’s  Gas Station Signs  Fuel prices may be electronic  Movie Theatres  Wall signs for movies may be electronic 23

  24. Proposed Regulations  A ‐ Frame Signs (Sidewalk Signs)  One per business  Not in front of other businesses  Within 50 ft. of the businesses  No more than 3 feet in height and max. of 2 feet in width – No lighting 24

  25. A ‐ Frame Sign 25

  26. Proposed Regulations  Window Signs  35 percent of the total window 26

  27. Proposed Regulations  Special Event  Banner, streamers, moving signs, inflatables, flags  One per street frontage  Plus, two flags per Major Street  Max. area is 60 square feet  No more than 30 days, 30 days between events  90 total days per calendar year  Comparable to existing regulations 27

  28. Special Event 28

  29. Proposed Regulations  Seasonal display 29

  30. Proposed Regulations  Temporary Subdivision Signs and Flags  Based on subdivision size  Generally, four per subdivision  Height limit: 16 feet 30

  31. Subdivision Signs 31

  32. Proposed Regulations  Permanent Flags  Maximum flag pole height: 25 feet  Residential: 24 square feet  Commercial: 32 square feet 32

  33. Proposed Regulations  Master Sign Program  New Process  Makes certain that signs are consistent and we do not have over ‐ signage 33

  34. Proposed Regulations  Nonconforming Signs  No proposed changes  Sign Maintenance  New standards  Definitions 34

  35. Item 6: Resource Efficiency Plan  State requirements of local governments  Numerous State bills to reduce Greenhouse Emissions  1990 levels by 2020  40% below 1990 levels by 2030  80% below 1990 levels by 2050  City retained ATKINS Consulting to help prepare the plan 35

  36. Item 6: Resource Efficiency Plan  City must demonstrate consistency with State goals; compliance with California Environmental Quality Act  Municipal Measures – City measures  Community Measures – Activities that the City can encourage  Title 24  New development will have a menu options; flexibility 36

  37. Item 7  Distribution of Guide to California Planning 4 th Edition 37

  38. Item 8 : Project Background  In 2014, applicant approached the City for the ultimate development of the project area  Project area is located outside of the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI)  SOI Expansion does not identify the official jurisdictional boundaries of a city, but rather designates the outermost physical boundary and service area of a city acting as a benchmark for future annexation decisions  City staff enlarged the proposed project area 38

  39. 39

  40. 40

  41. Budget  Agreement with ESA: $695,119  Applicant will pay $595,671, plus City staff time spent on the applicant’s portion of the project  City will pay remaining $98,448, plus staff time  City will be reimbursed as vacant property in the area is developed. Reimbursement will be dictated by development in the area  City portion will be paid via the General Fund Update account which has a balance of approximately $579,000 41

  42. South Yuba City Annexation  City has commenced preparation of documents  City will conduct neighborhood outreach 42

  43. 43

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend