[PPT] - Overview of Performance Index Framework Overview of Performance PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

Overview of Performance Index Framework Overview of Performance Index Framework and Preliminary Accountability Projections

R I C H A R D S O N I N D E P E N D E N T S C H O O L R I C H A R D S O N I N D E P E N D E N T S C H O O L D I S T R I C T D I S T R I C T To serve and prepare all students for their global future. To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 2

 Purpose  Background

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) Overview
Why a Performance Index
Accountability Performance Index Review

 Findings

Preliminary Estimated Accountability Ratings

Hi hli ht d Ch ll

Highlights and Challenges

 Next Steps

Index 2: Student Progress
Public Release of Data
Public Release of Data
AYP Waiver Denial

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 3

 To review the Texas  To review the Texas

Accountability system for 2013 d id

li i

and provide preliminary

estimated results for estimated results for

Richardson ISD

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 4

 STAAR 3-8 and STAAR End of Course (EOC)

Reading: Grades 3-8 English I English II and English III

Reading: Grades 3 8, English I, English II, and English III

Writing: Grades 4 and 7, English I, English II, and English III
Math: Grades 3-8, Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II
Science: Grades 5 and 8, Biology, Chemistry, and Physics
Social Studies: Grade 8 World Geography US History World History
Social Studies: Grade 8, World Geography, US History, World History

 Three Levels of Performance

Level I – Below Satisfactory
Level II – Satisfactory or sufficiently prepared to proceed
Level II

Satisfactory or sufficiently prepared to proceed

Level III – Advanced or well prepared to proceed

 Level II was recently defined as equivalent to being postsecondary

ready for the EOCs ready for the EOCs

Student expectations are being phased in to the final recommended

standards.

 Phase 1: Spring 2012 and Spring 2013 Ph 2 S i 2014 d S i 2015  Phase 2: Spring 2014 and Spring 2015  Final Recommended Standards: Spring 2016 and beyond

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 5



Each measure of an index contributes points to an overall index score. There is one target and it applies to the total index score. The resulting ti fl t ll f th th th f k t rating reflects overall performance rather than the one area of weakest performance.

Area 1 Area 1 Area 2 rea 2 Area rea 3

Total Total Points Points Max Max Points Points

Group 1 75 80 25 180 300 Group 1 75 80 25 180 300 Group 2 20 60 90 170 300 Group 3 50 85 75 210 300 Total 145 225 190 560 900



Advantages:

eliminates the possibility of death by “single cell”

Total 145 225 190 560 900 62%

higher performance in one area can compensate for lower performance in a different

area



Disadvantages:

total index score meaning is not as clear
higher performance in one area can compensate for lower performance in a different

higher performance in one area can compensate for lower performance in a different area

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 6

Provides an overall summary of the Credits schools for demonstrating h Focuses on the economically Combines the following measures: school’s performance at the Level II (Satisfactory) performance progress on the student growth measure that will be developed for the STAAR assessments disadvantaged student group and two lowest performing race/ethnicity groups for the postsecondary readiness performance on STAAR (Level II Final Standard), performance standard on the STAAR across all grade levels and subject areas t t d STAAR assessments following the spring 2013 administration. for the campus/district, recognizing performance gains at two levels in these Standard), high school 4yr/5yr graduation rates, and RHSP/DAP graduates. tested. OVERALL PERCENT OVERALL PERCENT PASS PASSING MOVING STUDENTS MOVING STUDENTS FORWARD FORWARD groups. IMPROV IMPROVING ING PERFORMANCE FOR PERFORMANCE FOR LOWEST PERFORMING LOWEST PERFORMING POSTS POSTSECONDAR CONDARY Y READINESS READINESS GROUPS GROUPS

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 7

First Available First Available in in Available in Available in 2013 2013 Partial Partial implementation implementation in in Partial Partial implementation implementation in in (July) 2013 (July) 2013 2013 2013 at at Level II Level II Phase 1 Phase 1 implementation implementation in in 2013 2013 – – gains at ains at Level II Level II Phase 1 Phase 1

(Performance at (Performance at postse postseconda condary

implementation implementation in 2013 – in 2013 – 4yr yr and 5yr and 5yr graduation rates graduation rates and and grad rad ates Will Be Revised Will Be Revised 2014 2014 2014 2014

postse postseconda condary readin iness c ess cannot be t be included in included in 2013) 2013)

F l F ll i l t d and and grad graduates ates by diploma plan by diploma plan Full Fully expectation expectation moves to moves to Level II Level II Phase 2 Phase 2 Full lly y imp mplemen emented in 2014 – in 2014 – including gains at including gains at Level II Level II Phase 2 Phase 2 y implemented in implemented in 2014 2014 including including performance at performance at Level Level II Final inal and Level III and Level III Level Level II II Final Final Standard Standard

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 8

Eleme Elementary tary Eleme Elementary tary Junior High Junior High Junior High Junior High Eleme Elementary tary Junior High Junior High High School High School High School High School High School High School District District District District District District High School High School District District

2013 system requires campuses/districts to meet accountability targets for ALL Indices ALL Indices measured.

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 9

Met Standard Improvement Required p q

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 10

 STANDARD ACCOUNTABILITY: To be “Met Standard” campuses

and districts must meet expectations on all Indices.

Index 1: 50
Index 1: 50
Index 2: 5th percentile
Index 3: 55
Index 4: 75

 AEA ACCOUNTABILITY: To be “Met Alternative Standard”

campuses and districts must meet expectations on all Indices.

Index 1: 25
Index 2: 5th percentile
Index 3: 30
Index 4: 45

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 11

Campuses that receive an accountability rating of Met Standard are eligible for the following di ti ti d i ti i 2013 distinction designations in 2013:

Top 25%: Student Progress

A d i A hi t R di /ELA

Academic Achievement: Reading/ELA
Academic Achievement: Mathematics

C di i i d i i ill b b d Campus distinction designations will be based on campus performance in relation to a comparison group of campuses. g p p

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 12

Each campus will have a unique comparison group

f 40 other public schools. Comparison groups are

h b d chosen based on:

campus type,
campus size,
percent economically disadvantaged,
mobility rates (based on cumulative attendance), and
percent of students with limited English proficiency.

p g p y

Groups are to be published in early spring.

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 13

Top 25%: Student Progress

Based on performance on Index 2: Student Progress. Campuses that are

in the top quartile of their campus comparison group in performance

n Index 2.
2014 and Beyond: Top 25% Closing Achievement Gaps. See Chapter 13
f the 2013 Accountability Manual for information on the 2014 Top

25% Closing Achievement Gaps distinction designation 25% Closing Achievement Gaps distinction designation.

Campus Academic Achievement Distinction Designations (AADD)

The AADD recognizes outstanding academic achievement in

reading/ELA and mathematics on a variety of indicators including reading/ELA and mathematics on a variety of indicators, including completion of advanced/dual enrollment courses and SAT and ACT performance and participation, based on comparison groups of similar

campuses. AADD indicators are evaluated for All Students only.

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 14

 ELL/LEP:

2013: ELLs are excluded completely if they are in US schools 3 year

3 years s or

r

less less (for asylees/refugees exclusions extend through 5 years) less less (for asylees/refugees exclusions extend through 5 years).

2014: ELLs are excluded if they are in US schools Year

US schools Year 1 (for asylees/refugees that extends to those in US schools less than 6 years). All other ELLs will be included. Students testing in Spanish at Level II – Phase 2 Students testing in English will use the STAAR ELL Progress Phase 2. Students testing in English will use the STAAR ELL Progress Measure.

 Retest Results:

l h b l ll b l d d

EOC retest results within an accountability year will be included in ALL

Index calculations.

The 1st SSI retest results will be included in ALL Index calculations.

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 15

Texas has submitted a waiver to the federal Department of Education requesting that the state Accountability Performance Index System replace the federal AYP requirements. To meet federal requirements, system safeguards have been put in place. These safeguards ensure poor performance in one area does not go unaddressed, but do not result in a lowered rating. Data will be reported for all students and all student groups, including ELL and Special Education, that meet the minimum

50% at or above Level II-Phase 1 by subject and student group (performance measure)
95% participation in reading and math

size requirements.

p p g

Federal 4-year graduation rate of 78%
1% and 2% caps apply at the district level, but will not result in a recalculation of

performance to exclude exceeders performance to exclude exceeders

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 16

 Richardson ISD and all RISD campuses are currently

p y projected to be “Met Standard” on Index 1, Index 3, and Index 4 (where applicable). (See additional handout ) handout.)

Index 1 scores range from 58 to 98
Index 3 scores range from 56 to 94

de 3 sco es a ge

56 to 9
Index 4 scores range from 81 to 89

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 17

 Highlights:

g g

District performance in science was at 90% passing.
District performance in reading, math, and social

studies was in the mid 80s (84% 85% and 85% studies was in the mid 80s (84%, 85%, and 85% respectively).

The federal 2% cap was exceeded, however it was

h l th i i much lower than in previous years.

 Challenges:

District performance in writing was at 66%

District performance in writing was at 66%.
Index 2 results could change the expected ratings

for any and all campuses.

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 18

 Individual student growth data is expected to be

g p released to districts in mid-July. I d 2 l b i d hi d i

 Index 2 results can be estimated once this data is

available, but final accountability determinations cannot be sent until the standard is released by y TEA.

Recall the standard is expected to be set at the 5th

percentile percentile.

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 19

 Districts are scheduled to receive preview data for

p all Indices on August 1st. A bili i d di i i d i i

 Accountability ratings and distinction designations

for all districts and campuses will be released publicly by TEA on August 8th. p y y g

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 20

 There is still the possibility of the AYP waiver being denied.  AYP ratings will still have to be released. TEA does not or has

not published a back-up plan.

 If the waiver is denied, Accountability and Continuous

Improvement will have calculations following the old system for all campuses and the district. for all campuses and the district.

 If the waiver is denied, AYP Performance Expectations are

Reading: 93%
Math: 92%
Math: 92%

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 21

 The following slides provide details by  The following slides provide details by

Index for each of the four indices included in the state accountability included in the state accountability system.

RICHARDSON ISD | To serve and prepare all students for their global future.

SLIDE 22

STAAR Satisfactory Performance STAAR Satisfactory Performance

All Students Only
Combined over All Subject Areas
EOC at Level II Phase 1

performance standard for

Credit given for Satisfactory

performance (Level II) on:

STAAR Grades 3-8 English

and Spanish (2014) at Level II- p assessments administered in the spring and the previous fall and summer; S G d 3 8 d OC and Spanish (2014) at Level II Phase 1 performance standard for assessments administered in the spring;

STAAR Grades 3-8 and EOC

Modified and Alternate at Level II Phase 1 performance standard;

TAKS included in 2013 only:

Grade 11 results at Met Standard performance standard; standard;

STAAR L (linguistically

accommodated) are included based on years in US schools, standard; asylee/refugee status and English language acquisition beginning in 2014.

SLIDE 23

One point credit given for each percentage of students at the Met Growth Expectations level Growth Expectations level Two point credit given for each percentage of students at the Exceeded Growth Expectations level

SLIDE 24

One point credit given for each percentage of students at f the Level II-Phase 1 performance standard Same Assessments used in Index 1

Performanc Performance at at Level Level III is excluded III is excluded for 2013 for 2013 Accountabili Accountability. ty.

SLIDE 25

Measures o asures of Postsec stsecondary R ary Read adiness iness

Credit based on average of two

postsecondary indicators: p y 1) STAAR postsecondary ready performance (Level II Final Standard) and 2) high school graduation rates and diploma plans diploma plans Perfo Performanc mance at at a a postsec postsecondary ready ndary ready leve level (Level l (Level II II Final Final Standard) is excluded Standard) is excluded for 2013 for 2013 Accountabili Accountability. ty.

SLIDE 26

Campus # Campus Name Index 1 Score

(Standard: 50)

Index 2 Score Index 3 Score

(Standard: 55)

Index 4 Score

(Standard: 75)

Estimated Rating

999 RICHARDSON ISD 83 77 87 Met Standard 005 BERKNER HIGH SCHOOL 82 79 87 Met Standard 002 LAKE HIGHLANDS HIGH SCHOOL 81 79 81 Met Standard 052 LAKE HIGHLANDS FRESHMAN CENTER 76 71 85 Met Standard 004 PEARCE HIGH SCHOOL 90 82 89 Met Standard 003 RICHARDSON HIGH SCHOOL 86 82 89 Met Standard 050 APOLLO JUNIOR HIGH 82 76 Met Standard 047 FOREST MEADOW JUNIOR HIGH 74 69 Met Standard 042 LAKE HIGHLANDS JUNIOR HIGH 77 66 Met Standard 049 LIBERTY JUNIOR HIGH 78 74 Met Standard 051 PARKHILL JUNIOR HIGH 93 89 Met Standard 045 RICHARDSON NORTH JUNIOR HIGH 84 74 Met Standard 044 RICHARDSON WEST JUNIOR HIGH 85 84 Met Standard 048 WESTWOOD JUNIOR HIGH 86 82 Met Standard 135 AIKIN ELEMENTARY 76 80 Met Standard 101 ARAPAHO CLASSICAL MAGNET 89 85 Met Standard 144 AUDELIA CREEK ELEMENTARY 77 80 Met Standard 133 BIG SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 86 78 Met Standard 122 BOWIE ELEMENTARY 96 83 Met Standard 128 BRENTFIELD ELEMENTARY 98 91 Met Standard 102 CANYON CREEK ELEMENTARY 89 61 Met Standard 145 CAROLYN G BUKHAIR ELEMENTARY 68 76 Met Standard 127 DARTMOUTH ELEMENTARY 86 82 Met Standard 103 DOVER ELEMENTARY 81 89 Met Standard 143 FOREST LANE ACADEMY 68 72 Met Standard 120 FORESTRIDGE ELEMENTARY 83 87 Met Standard 104 GREENWOOD HILLS ELEMENTARY 76 69 Met Standard 105 HAMILTON PARK PACESETTER MAGNET 75 61 Met Standard 129 JESS HARBEN ELEMENTARY 84 83 Met Standard 107 LAKE HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY 88 83 Met Standard 115 MARK TWAIN ELEMENTARY 78 78 Met Standard 134 MERRIMAN PARK ELEMENTARY 87 80 Met Standard 108 MOHAWK ELEMENTARY 93 80 Met Standard 132 MOSS HAVEN ELEMENTARY 91 69 Met Standard 142 MST MAGNET 93 94 Met Standard 121 NORTHLAKE ELEMENTARY 70 73 Met Standard 109 NORTHRICH ELEMENTARY 85 84 Met Standard 110 NORTHWOOD HILLS ELEMENTARY 85 82 Met Standard 106 O HENRY ELEMENTARY 76 79 Met Standard 123 PRAIRIE CREEK ELEMENTARY 97 86 Met Standard 125 PRESTONWOOD ELEMENTARY 84 85 Met Standard 111 RICHARDSON HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 79 83 Met Standard 112 RICHARDSON TERRACE ELEMENTARY 82 79 Met Standard 130 RICHLAND ELEMENTARY 86 87 Met Standard 137 RISD ACADEMY 64 79 Met Standard 126 SKYVIEW ELEMENTARY 66 68 Met Standard 118 SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY 91 78 Met Standard 113 SPRING VALLEY ELEMENTARY 75 82 Met Standard 124 SPRINGRIDGE ELEMENTARY 86 86 Met Standard 114 STULTS ROAD ELEMENTARY 72 70 Met Standard 146 THURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY 58 56 Met Standard 116 WALLACE ELEMENTARY 82 77 Met Standard 117 WHITE ROCK ELEMENTARY 93 81 Met Standard 131 YALE ELEMENTARY 92 88 Met Standard

Accountability 2013: Projected Performance Index Score Summary

ACCOUNTABILITY ESTIMATES 2013 06/17/2013

SLIDE 27

RICHARDSON ISD PROJECTED RATING (with available information): MET STANDARD

Accountability 2013: Projected Performance Index Summary

83 77 87 50 100

50 Standard will be set at the 5th Percentile Index 1: Student Achievement Index 2: Student Progress Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness 75 55 38 Met Standard

Indicators meeting minimum size requirements Indicators BELOW Index standard

2 (4%) 50 Met Standard

Reading Indicators below 95%

Met Standard

Safeguard: Participation Summary Safeguard: Performance Summary Math Indicators below 95% District Safeguard: 1% and 2% Cap: Math District Safeguard: 1% and 2% Cap: Reading

Missed safeguard indicators will need to be addressed in an improvement plan.

Alternate Passers: 147 (1% Cap: 243) Modified Passers: 541 (2% Cap+1% Extra: 582) Passers Exceeding 1% Cap: Passers Exceeding 2% Cap (+ 1% space ) Alternate Passers: 166 (1% Cap: 249) Modified Passers: 618 (2% Cap+1% Extra: 580) Passers Exceeding 1% Cap: Passers Exceeding 2% Cap (+ 1% space ) 83 77 87 50 100

50 Standard will be set at the 5th Percentile Index 1: Student Achievement Index 2: Student Progress Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness 75 55

ACCOUNTABILITY ESTIMATE 2013 06/13/2013

SLIDE 28

RICHARDSON ISD Standard: 50

# % # % # % # % # % # %

21763 18231 84% 21261 18128 85% 10649 7029 66% 11244 10146 90% 9055 7709 85% 73972 61243 83% 5054 3903 77% 4902 3635 74% 2441 1337 55% 2463 2064 84% 2002 1538 77% 16862 12477 74% 63 56 89% 62 51 82% 31 23 74% 36 32 89% 32 28 88% 224 190 85% 1338 1162 87% 1249 1181 95% 689 518 75% 759 719 95% 633 584 92% 4668 4164 89% 7963 6147 77% 7789 6375 82% 4049 2271 56% 3976 3436 86% 3105 2440 79% 26882 20669 77% 19 16 84% 19 16 84% 10 6 60% 14 13 93% 12 11 92% 74 62 84% 6736 6429 95% 6661 6356 95% 3150 2667 85% 3704 3613 98% 3037 2894 95% 23288 21959 94% 584 514 88% 573 508 89% 275 204 74% 290 268 92% 233 213 91% 1955 1707 87% 12055 9175 76% 11721 9198 78% 5881 3212 55% 5837 4949 85% 4501 3469 77% 39995 30003 75% 2232 1226 55% 2125 1453 68% 1174 473 40% 802 527 66% 347 174 50% 6680 3853 58% 2603 1634 63% 2510 1572 63% 1179 480 41% 1063 659 62% 786 465 59% 8141 4810 59%

INDEX 1 SCORE:

# of Tests # of Tests

PROJECTED 2013 INDEX 1:

# of Tests # of Tests

2013 Index 1: Student Achievement

83

# at Level II Phase 1

Level II Phase 1 Level II Phase 1 Level II Phase 1 # of Tests # of Tests R M W S SS

18231 + 18128 + 7029 + 10146 + 7709

TOTAL

Level II Phase 1 Level II Phase 1 Level II Phase 1

Reading Math Writing Science

Met Standard

Social Studies

Econ. Disadv.

Pacific Islander White Two or More ELL

Spec. Ed.

Student Group

All Students African American American Indian Asian Hispanic

Yellow indicates Index 3 group for 2014.

ACCOUNTABILITY ESTIMATE 2013 06/13/2013

INDEX 1 SCORE: --------

Red Font indicates Safeguard target missed, must be addressed in improvement plan. indicates below minimum size indicates safeguard indicator

Safeguard: Participation and Cap Summary Participation Standard: 95

Am.Ind. Asian

Pac. Is.

Two + ELL Sp.Ed. 75 1815 23 621 4397 2841 76 1816 24 625 4404 2866 99% 100% 96% 99% 100% 99% 1 11 5 525 141 618 8 5 6 166 All Students Am.Ind. Asian

Pac. Is. White

Two + White ELL Sp.Ed. 76 1735 23 611 4184 2729 76 1740 24 618 4195 2762 100% 100% 96% 99% 100% 99% 2 10 8 114 541 7 5 3 147 9485

83

24730 24850 100% 618 166 24129

Total # Tested

Eco. Disadv.

99% 209 White 5676 5713 99%

21763 + 21261 + 10649 + 11244 + 9055

44 5500 5536 Hispanic

Alt Passers (1% cap = 249):

Met Standard

37

Afr. Amer.

All Students

Afr. Amer.

Math

14532 14468 9528 100% Total Students: Participation Rate: Number Participating: 321 64

Mod Passers (2% cap+1% extra= 580):

24262 99% 220 Participation Rate: 9225 Hispanic 9285 14036 113 100% 7024 7057 100% 60 42 6949 6973 100% 56 99% 14122 255 99% 35 98

Reading

447

Mod Passers (2% cap+1% extra= 582): Alt Passers (1% cap = 249):

541 147 59 Number Participating: Total Students:

Yellow indicates Index 3 group for 2014.

ACCOUNTABILITY ESTIMATE 2013 06/13/2013

SLIDE 29

RICHARDSON ISD Standard: 55

Am.Ind. Asian

Pac. Is.

Two +

181 3409 58 1404 210 3727 68 1633 86% 91% 85% 86% Assessments 2013 24535

2012 Two Lowest Performing Student Groups:

75%

Afr. Amer.

Writing Hispanic Total Pts. Social Studies

Hispanic

African American 77% 18354 19473 94%

White

% of Tests at Level II Phase 1 # of Tests at Level II Phase 1 # of Tests Taken 32782

Eco. Disadv.

Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps

ALL Subjects 2012 10004 8060 10338 13941 74% 16550 21545 4823 2780 Math

African American

% at Level II Phase 1: Reading Science

Max. Pts.

Economically Disadvantaged

Number of Tests: 9763 7863 Number of Tests: # at Level II Phase 1: % at Level II Phase 1:

Eco. Disadv. Rate:

81

c

Number of Tests: # at Level II Phase 1: African American Rate: 55% 1309 81% 81% 77 6139 4943 88% 4478 3323 81 3829 77% 2417 2034 5114 4205 79% 1972 1522 500 79 500 367 77% 77 2875 2372 3106 58% 58 88 3336 84% 74 5991 4802 3570 74% 55 84 387

ACCOUNTABILITY ESTIMATE 2013 06/13/2013

NOTE: For 2013 rates are equal to the percent of tests that meet Level II Phase 1 or above.

indicates below minimum size

Indicates small numbers analysis applied for Economically Disadvantaged student group.

PROJECTED 2013 INDEX 3:

% at Level II Phase 1:

Hispanic

# at Level II Phase 1: Hispanic Rate: 5148 84% 84 2340 86 81% 81 91 61 61% 91% 5169 86% 1880 3022 300 242 403 500

Met Standard

263 300 300 300

77 Index Score (total points divided by maximum points):

1500 Subject Total Points: 1157 241 Subject Max Points: 174 300 237

ACCOUNTABILITY ESTIMATE 2013 06/13/2013

SLIDE 30

RICHARDSON ISD Standard: 75

Am.Ind. Asian

Pac. Is.

Two + ELL

Sp. Ed.

4 160 2 55 98 127 5 173 2 58 136 167

80.0% 92.5% 100.0% 94.8% 72.1% 76.0%

4 90 29 5 99 38

80.0% 90.9% 76.3%

Am.Ind. Asian

Pac. Is.

Two + ELL

Sp. Ed.

16 140 9 52 165 161 17 143 9 53 193 196

94.1% 97.9% 100.0% 98.1% 85.5% 82.1%

4 90 29 5 99 38

80.0% 90.9% 76.3%

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness

All Students

Afr. Amer.

Hispanic White Total Pts.

Max. Pts.

Indicator

92.1%

563 782

88.7% 96.8%

701.1 800 195 201 455 4-yr Graduation Rate Total: 473.6 600 1400

94.4% 90.5% 92.7% 97.4%

Max. Pts.

842 474 551 5 yr Graduation Rate Total: 1212 2 1400 738.6 800 974 195 201 2133 452 635 808 Class of 2012

# of Grads:

# in Class:

4-yr Rate:

1964 398

88.1%

Class of 2011

# of Grads:

# in Class:

5-yr Rate:

Indicator 1977

All Students

2094 512 RHSP/ DAP

# RHSP/DAP:

# of Grads:

Rate:

1229 302 455 974

79.3% 64.6% 73.6% 88.9%

473.6 600 273

79.3% 64.6%

Afr. Amer.

Hispanic White

1229 302 84 273 512

Total Pts.

4-yr Graduation Score (graduation total points divided by maximum points): 1174.7 RHSP/ DAP

# RHSP/DAP:

# of Grads:

Rate: 88.9% 73.6%

429 511 820

ACCOUNTABILITY ESTIMATE 2013 06/13/2013

Am.Ind. Asian

Pac. Is.

Two + ELL

Sp. Ed.

NOTE: graduation score NOT contributing to the Index score will be struck through. 2013 Index 4 calculations do not include STAAR performance.

indicates below minimum size

PROJECTED 2013 INDEX 4:

Met Standard

5-yr Graduation Rate Total: 1212.2 1400 5-yr Graduation Score (graduation total points divided by maximum points): 87 87 Graduation Score/Annual Dropout Score (contributes the higher number of points to the index): Indicator

All Students

Afr. Amer.

Hispanic White

11-12 Dropout

# Dropouts Converted Rate

Total Pts.

Max. Pts.

#Students

Annual Dropout (annual dropout total points divided by maximum points):

Dropout Rate

Grade 9 - 12 Annual Dropout Total

ACCOUNTABILITY ESTIMATE 2013 06/13/2013