Organoruthenium Chemistry Dongmin Xu 03/02/19 d 8 , second-row, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

organoruthenium chemistry
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Organoruthenium Chemistry Dongmin Xu 03/02/19 d 8 , second-row, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Baran Group Meeting Organoruthenium Chemistry Dongmin Xu 03/02/19 d 8 , second-row, variable ox. states and geometries = versatile reactivity Ruthenium Hydrogenation Useful Reviews: d 8 second-row transition metal Oxidation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Organoruthenium Chemistry

Dongmin Xu Baran Group Meeting 03/02/19

Ruthenium

d8 second-row transition metal Silvery-white, metallic appearance Possible oxidation states: -2 to +8 Toxicity not well studied except RuO4 Density = 12.45 g/cm3, m.p. = 2334 °C (8th in metals) 6th rarest element in Earth’s crust (after Os, Rh, Ir, Re, Pd)

  • Named after Ruthenia, a Latin word that refers to Russia
  • Ru has 7 natural stable isotopes, along with 34 radioisotopes
  • Global production ~12 tons per year; projected world reserve ~5000 tons
  • Mostly as byproduct of copper, nickel, or platinum mining
  • Current market price: $266/ozt, or $8.55/g

Aldrich price: $112/g (200 mesh powder, 99.9% trace metal basis)

  • Percentage of Ru in mined platinum group metal mixture varies greatly
  • e.g. 11% in South Africa vs. 2% in certain parts of Russia
  • Parker 51 fountain pen has a 14K gold nib tipped with 96.2% Ru and 3.8% Ir

Fun Facts: Important events in the history of Ru:

  • 1650s: Platinum alloy (contains Pt, Ru, Os, Rh, Pd, Ir) was discovered
  • 1844: Karl Ernst Claus discovered ruthenium by dissolving crude Pt with aqua

regia and examining the residues

  • 1953: Djerassi discovered the oxidizing capability of RuO4
  • 1965: Allen and Senoff reported an unprecedented [Ru(NH3)5(N2)]X2 complex
  • 1987: TPAP was first synthesized by Ley and Griffith
  • 1992: Grubbs et al reported the first Ru carbene catalyst for olefin metathesis
  • Adding 0.1% Ru to titanium increases

its corrosion resistance by 100 times

  • Hardening of Pt and Pd; used in

manufacture of jewelry and electrical contacts

  • Ru-Mo superconductors

Applications: d8, second-row, variable ox. states and geometries = versatile reactivity

  • Hydrogenation
  • Oxidation
  • Ruthenacycle mediated reactions
  • Addition to Ru π complexes
  • Ru vinylidene mediated reactions
  • C-H activation
  • Metathesis
  • Olefin isomerization
  • Cyclopropanation
  • Radical addition
  • Ru-catalyzed click reaction
  • Cross coupling

Useful Reviews:

  • Murahashi, Chem. Rev. 1998, 2599.
  • Trost, Chem. Rev. 2001, 2067.
  • Alcaide, Chem. Rev. 2009, 3817.
  • Ru-catalyzed olefin metathesis:

Grubbs, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 4510. Hoveyda, JOC, 2014, 4763.

  • Photoredox: MacMillan, Chem. Rev.

2013, 5322. NOT covered in this group meeting:

  • Reactions using Ru as a Lewis acid
  • Photochemistry

Hydrogenation:

Chemoselective hydrogenation with H2: RuCl2(PPh3)3 (cat.) In the appendices:

  • Syntheses of common Ru complexes

“Compared to Rh, Ir, and Co, ruthenium complexes generally have less effective catalytic activities for hydrogenation of simple alkenes.” H2 (100 atm), 50 °C 94%

O Me O Me O Me O Me

Tsuneda, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1973, 279. RuCl2(CO)(PPh3)3 (cat.) H2 (14 atm), 158 °C 95% [Ru], ZrO2, ZnSO4 (aq) “bilayer catalytic system” H2 (50 atm), 150 °C >60%

  • Developed by Asahi

Chemical Co., Japan

  • >50000 tons annually

Nagahara, Rev. J. Surf. Sci. Technol. Avant-Garde 1992, 951. Fahey, JOC 1973, 80.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Organoruthenium Chemistry

Dongmin Xu Baran Group Meeting 03/02/19 Transfer hydrogenation:

O

tBu

RuCl2(PPh3)3 (1 mol%) MeOH, 150 °C, 5 h 78%

tBu

OH

(cis:trans = 1:4) M MH2

R OH R O H

A AH2 Pros: homogeneous reaction avoids hazardous H2 no pressurization needed Cons: limited scope lower efficiency than direct [H] no universal proton donor (screening needed)

N

Maitlis, J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, c7 RuCl2(PPh3)3 (0.25 mol%) HCOOH, 180 °C, 6 h 76% Watanabe, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1984, 2440.

N H

Oxidation:

Ley-Griffith oxidation: TPAP, NMO RuO4 oxidation: often generated in situ with cat. RuCl3/RuO2 and NaIO4

nBu nBu

RuCl3 (2 mol%)

  • Oxidative cleavage of olefins

H O

17% (+ 80% unreacted SM)

OH O

88% Sharpless, JOC, 1981, 3936

  • Sluggish reaction due to formation of insoluble Ru-carboxylate complexes
  • Addition of MeCN causes rapid decomplexation of carboxylates and restores

catalytic activity of Ru NaIO4 CCl4-H2O RuCl3 (2 mol%) NaIO4 CCl4-H2O-MeCN “To our disadvantage, we organic chemists too often ignore even the most ele- mentary aspects of the coordination chemistry of the metals we employ as catalysts or reactants” – Barry Sharpless

  • Olefin dihydroxylation

RuCl3 (7 mol%) NaIO4 EtOAc-H2O-MeCN 0.5 - 3 min

OH OH

Shing, ACIEE 1994, 2312 58%

  • Low yield if diol too water-soluble; cleavage in the aqueous phase by NaIO4
  • Olefin epoxidation

Ph Ph N N Me Me Me Me

NaIO4 CH2Cl2-H2O RuCl3 (cat.)

Ph Ph O H H

90% Eskenazi, J. Chem. Soc.

  • Chem. Commun. 1985, 1111.
  • α-oxidation of ethers
  • Oxidation of allenes and alkynes
  • Oxidation of 1° and 2° alcohols
  • Degradation of aromatic rings to carboxylic acid
  • C-H oxidation

Oxidation via oxoruthenium species

C9H19 OMe

RuO2 (cat.) NaIO4 CCl4-H2O-MeCN

C9H19 OMe O O Ph O

83% 85% Sharpless, JOC 1981, 3936

  • Generation of Ru oxo species from peroxyacids

Run + ROOOH

* Can also be generated under aerobic conditions

Run+1 O OR O Run+2

Me

RuCl3 (cat.) AcOOH DCM-H2O-MeCN

Me O OH

67% Mechanism:

RuV O O RuIV H

H2O then β-H elim.

O OH

Murahashi, JOC 1993, 2929.

O Me CO2H

(if NaIO4 is used) 91% (If no H2O, get epoxidation instead)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Organoruthenium Chemistry

Dongmin Xu Baran Group Meeting 03/02/19

Ruthenacycle Mediated Transformations:

Alkyne + simple olefin: formal ene reaction

R

+ RuClCp(cod)

EtO2C R

DMF, 100 °C Trost, JACS 1995, 615. Mechanism:

R2 R1 R4 R3 Ru Ru R1 R2 Ha R3 R4 Hb Hb

β-H elim.

R2 Ha R3 R4 R1 RuH

cyclo- metalation R.E. PDT

  • Only Hb can easily adopt syn conformation with Ru
  • Thus, olefins with allylic protons yield 1,4-dienes, or a formal ene reaction
  • Sterics determines branched vs. linear selectivity
  • TMS/TES alkynes give excellent regioselectivity

50% (R = COCH3) (6:1 branched:linear)

Ph H

+

OH EtO2C

3 3

RuClCp*(cod) DMF, 100 °C

Ph H O

85% (3:1 branched:linear)

  • When no allylic protons are present:

Alkyne + norbornene: formal [2+2] +

R3 CpRu(MeCN)3PF6 R1 R2 R1 R3 R2

+

R3 R1 R2

A B R1 R2 R3 A:B Yield

TsHN TMS TMS TMS TES HO Me O nBu

>98:2 >98:2 >98:2 >98:2 78% 79% 61% 88%

CO2Me

7

n-pentyl

Me O OAc Ph Ph

+

CO2Me

4% Ru(cod)(cot) pyridine, 80 °C

Ph Ph CO2Me

85%

Ru R1 R2 H R3 R4

β-H elim.

R2 R3 R1 RuH

R.E. PDT

R4

Wantanabe, Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1991, 598. Dérien, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 2551

  • Ru forced to eliminate

with endocyclic hydride

  • Higher energy process,

not observed when allylic protons are present

CO2Me CO2Me

+ RuH2(CO)[PR3] (cat.) PhH, 80 °C

CO2Me CO2Me Ru R1 R2 H R3 R4

β-H elim.

R2 R3 R1 RuH R4

slower R.E. faster

R2 R1 R4 R3

  • Exocyclic β-H elimination will result in unfavorable anti-Bredt olefin
  • Steric bulk of norbornene accelerates reductive elimination, outcompetes

endocyclic β-H elimination RuH2(CO)[PR3] (cat.)

R R R R Fe(CO)3

then CAN

R R R R R R

iterative synthesis of ladderanes Alkyne + olefin + CO: formal Pauson-Khand

Et MeO2C MeO2C

Ru3(CO)12 CO (1 atm) DMF, 140 °C

R R O Et

via

Ru O Et

Mitsudo, JACS 1997, 6187 Warrener, JACS 1994, 3645 Mitsudo, JOC 1979, 4492 87%

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Organoruthenium Chemistry

Dongmin Xu Baran Group Meeting 03/02/19 Norbornene + propargyl alcohol: facile cyclopropanation Homo Diels-Alder: Formal [6+2] cycloaddition (stoichiometric): [2+2+2] alkyne trimerization: Enone-allene cycloetherification/amination:

OH

+

Me O

Cp*Ru(MeCN)3PF6 RuII

RuIV OH RuIV OH

  • RuIV

HO OH

R.E. β-OH elim. 1,2-M.I.

Me O

Takahashi, Chem Lett 1997, 1273 MeOH, rt (quant.) Takahashi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1999, 2475

  • BnHN

+ +

O Ph O

10% CpRu(MeCN)3PF6 15% CeCl3•7H2O DMF, 60 °C

Cy O Ph O N Bn

10% CpRu(MeCN)3PF6 15% TiCl4 DMF, 60 °C

  • OH

O H H H

72%

3

62% Trost, JACS 1999, 10842 Trost, JACS 2000, 12007

EtO2C

+ RuClCp(cod) (cat.) MeOH, reflux 91%

CO2Et

Mechanism:

Ru R Ru R

migratory insertion reductive elimination

R

Trost JACS 1993, 8831 Ru(nbd) 0 °C acetylene

Ru Ru

67% reductive elimination Formal [5+2] cycloaddition: RuII R.E.

R RuIV R

1,2-insertion

RuIV R R

Trost JACS 2000, 2379 Itoh, Chem. Lett. 1983, 499

MeO2C MeO2C Me

+

nBu H

Cp*Ru(cod)Cl (1 mol%) DCE, rt 85% 93:7 A:B

Me Me

A B Itoh, Chem. Commun. 2000, 549

nBu nBu

via

Ru R O Nu

n

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Organoruthenium Chemistry

Dongmin Xu Baran Group Meeting 03/02/19 Cycloisomerization of dienynes: Murai, JACS 1998, 9104

E E E E

(E = CO2Et) [RuCl2(CO)3]2 MePh, 80 °C, 4 h 84%

H H H H E E E E

Mechanism?

Addition to Ru π Complexes

Addition to alkynes: With halide:

CpRu X R

vs.

CpRu R

+

X–

anti- metalation syn- metalation Addition to π-allylruthenium complexes:

R X LnRu X R LnRu LnCpRu

covalent complex ionic complex

R' O R' O R R' O X X R' O R C6H13

+

Me O H

10% CpRu(cod)Cl SnCl4, Me4NCl DMF, 60 °C 10% CpRu(MeCN)3PF6 LiBr, SnBr4 acetone, 60 °C

Cl C6H13 Me O C6H13 Br Me O

  • Rationale for E/Z selectivity:

88%, 1:6.6 E:Z 72%, >15:1 E:Z Trost, JACS 1999, 1988. Trost, JACS 2000, 360

(Z) (E)

With water: acetone, rt 10% CpRu(MeCN)3PF6 CSA, H2O acetone, rt 5% CpRu(MeCN)3PF6

EtO2C EtO2C Me Ph O Ph O EtO2C EtO2C O Ph O EtO2C EtO2C Me

75% 60% Mechanism? Trost, JACS 2000, 5877. With carboxylic acid: With CO2:

H HO Me Me Me (dppe)Ru

2

Me Me O

PhCO2H, 70 °C

O Ph O OH Me Me O O Ph OH Me Me

68% Picquet, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1997, 1201

  • MeCN is a strong ligand, thus more ionic X–

H

nPrHN

PPh3, CO2 Toluene, 100 °C Ru(cod)(cot)

O N O

nPr

Mitsudo, TL 1987, 4417

Ru(CO)3Br

PhCHO Et3N

CO2Me Na MeO2C CO2Me CO2Me Ph OH

55% 70%

  • Ambiphilic nature of Ru π-allyl complexes

Watanabe, Organometallics 1995, 1945

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Organoruthenium Chemistry

Dongmin Xu Baran Group Meeting 03/02/19 Addition to Ru vinylidene complexes:

Ru Cp Cl Ph3P Ph3P R

– PPh3

Ru Cp Ph3P Cl

  • R

Generation of vinylidene species:

Ru Cp Cl Ph3P R

1,2-hydride shift Quenched with O nucleophiles:

N CO2tBu

+

OH Me

10% CpRu(PPh3)2Cl (solvent) NH4PF6 100 °C

N CO2tBu O Me

44% Mechanism:

Ru Cp Ph3P Cl

  • R
  • Analogous to Corey-Fuchs

OH R' Ru Cp Cl

  • R

O R' H Ru Cp Cl O R R'

metalla- Claisen

Ru Cp Cl O R R'

reductive elimination

R O R'

Quenched with C nucleophiles: Trost, JACS 1990, 7809

  • RuLn

RuLn H O

5% RuCl2(cymene)PPh3 NH4PF6, CH2Cl2 89%

O

Merlic, JACS 1996, 11319 [Ru] 1,3

RuLn H

R.E.

C-H Activation

Ortho C-H activation:

O Ph TMS

+

O TMS Ph

76%, 2:1 E:Z RuH2(CO)(PPh3)3

N tBu

+

Si(OEt)3

Ru3(CO)12

N

75%

CF3 CF3 tBu Si(OEt)3

  • Other possible directing groups: nitrile, ester, oxazoline
  • Other possible transformations: allylation, acylation, sulfonation, etc.

N

+

Br

2.5% [RuCl2(C6H6)]2

N Ph

95% Murai, Organomet. Chem. 1995, 151 Murai, Chem. Lett. 1998, 1053 Useful review: Dixneuf, Chem. Rev. 2012, 5879.

Me Me

Inoue, Org. Lett. 2001, 2579 Meta C-H activation: Useful review: Frost, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 7145

2-py OMe

[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (2.5 mol %) Piv-Val-OH (30 mol %) K2CO3, dioxane 100 °C, 20 h 78%

N MeO O Me

+

O Me Br

Ackermann, JACS 2015, 13894

2-py

+ NBS [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (5 mol %) DMA, 80 °C, 24 h 52%

Me N Br Me

Huang, ACIE 2015, 15284

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Organoruthenium Chemistry

Dongmin Xu Baran Group Meeting 03/02/19 Principles of σ-activation:

RuII Ar RCO2 O O R N H

RCO2H

RuII Ar O2CR N RuII Ar O2CR N R R RuII RuIIIX R

  • N

R RCO2H RuII Ar O2CR N R RuIIIX RCO2K RuII KBr RCO2H X

sp3 C-H activation:

Me Me NC

RuH2(dmpe)2 (cat.) d6-benzene 140 °C

N H Me

98% Mechanism? Jones, JACS 1986, 5640

Olefin Metathesis

PhNO2 + CO + Ru3(CO)12 (cat.) ligand 160 °C

NHPh

59% Ligand =

N N p-tolyl p-tolyl

  • in situ reduction of PhNO2 to aniline by CO,

followed by allylic C-H amination Cenini, JACS 1996, 11964

Ru MesN N Ru S S MesN NMes O R R i-PrO O O N O +

MesN NMes Ru Oi-Pr Cl Cl Ru PPh3 PPh3 Cl Cl Ph Ph PCy3 Ru Ph Cl Cl PCy3 MesN NMes Ru Ph Cl Cl PCy3

Ru-1 First Grubbs catalyst “Grubbs 0” 1992 Ru-2 Grubbs I 1995 Ru-3 Grubbs II (Mes = 1,3,5-mesityl) 1999 Ru-4 Hoveyda-Grubbs II 2000 Ru-5 Grubbs Z-selective catalyst 2011 Ru-6 Hoveyda catechothiolate Z-selective catalyst 2013 Key players in this field: Major OM catalysts: Other notable events:

  • 1955: First instance of olefin metathesis, Ti-catalyzed ROMP of norbornene,

was discovered by chemists at Du Pont

  • 1965: First Ru-catalyzed ROMP with RuCl3•nH2O was reported
  • 1971: Chauvin proposed the [2+2] mechanism
  • 1987: Schrock reported a tungsten alkylidene complex for OM
  • 2009: First example of Z-selective OM was reported by Schrock and Hoveyda

H2O +

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Organoruthenium Chemistry

Dongmin Xu Baran Group Meeting 03/02/19 General mechanism:

M R1 R2

[2+2]

M R1 R2

cyclo- reversion

M

+ +

R1 R2

  • Homo- vs. cross-metathesis
  • Reversibility of OM complicates Z:E selectivity; post-metathesis isomerization

Principles of Z-selective olefin metathesis:

  • Step #1: Force a syn metallocyclobutane intermediate!
  • Step #2: Controll Z/E selectivity by steric gradient of the catalyst

S Ru S S ArN NAr Cl Cl Ru S S ArN NAr Cl Cl R3 R3 Ru ArN NAr S Cl Cl S Ru ArN NAr S Cl Cl R1 R2 R3 R2 R1 R3

more favored

R2 R1 R2 R1

(major) (minor)

R2 R2 R1 R1

less favored vs.

M

NHC large small

  • Some examples:

MesN NMes Ru Oi-Pr Cl Cl Cl Ru ArN NAr Cl R1 R2 R1 R2

vs.

Ru ArN NAr Ar Cl Cl Ar R2 R1

syn anti higher energy stereocontrol possible lower energy stereocontrol difficult

S Ru ArN NAr S Cl Cl R1 R2 Ar

syn

Ru ArN NAr S S Ar R2 R1

anti geometrically impossible

Ru S S MesN NMes O Cl Cl

vs.

R1 R2 Ru MesN N i-PrO O O N O +

− Grubbs & Houk, JACS 2012, 1464 Hoveyda, Organometallics 2016, 543

(Boc-Tyr) H N N H H N N H CO2Me O O Bn O H N NH NH CO2Me Bn O O N H O (Boc-Tyr)

2 mol% Ru-6, 20 eq.

Me Me

THF (0.25 M), rt, 12 h then 10 mol% Ru-6 THF (50 mM), 35 °C, 24 h 72%, >98:2 Z:E Hoveyda, JACS 2017, 10919

O O

+ Ru-4 Ru-6 Ru-5 Ru-5 (2 mol%) THF (0.5 M) 35 °C, 5 h (4 equiv.)

O O O OMe

8 8

OMe O

84%, >95:5 Z:E Grubbs, Chem. Sci. 2014, 501

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Organoruthenium Chemistry

Dongmin Xu Baran Group Meeting 03/02/19

Other Transformations

Cyclopropanation: Tandem RCM-Kharash addition: Photochemistry (NOT covered) Ru-catalyzed click reaction: Cross coupling:

Ph OtBu O N2

+ [Ru] (cat.) DCM, rt

Ph CO2tBu Ph CO2tBu

97 : 3 94% ee 87% ee 65% yield

N N O O N iPr iPr Ru Cl Cl

[Ru] = Itoh, JACS 1994, 2223. Useful review: Johansson, Chem. Rev. 2016, 14726.

Ph Ph N3

+ Ru(OAc)2(PPh3)2 RuHCl(CO)(PPh3)3 RuH2(CO)(PPh3)3 RuCl2(PPh3)3 Cp*RuCl(PPh3)2 Cp*RuCl(cod) Cp*RuCl(nbd) [Cp*RuCl2]2

N N N Ph Ph N N N Ph Ph

1,4-disubstituted 1,5-disubstituted

  • Mechanistic studies point to the formation of a Ru acetylide complex

H N O CCl3

5 mol% Grubbs-I MePh, 155 °C, 2 h

H N O CCl3 H N O Cl Cl Cl

85% Snapper, JACS 2005, 16329

H N O CCl3

5 mol% Grubbs-I styrene MePh, 140 °C, 2 h

H N O Cl H H Cl Ph Cl 78%, dr = 1:1 Br

+ MeMgBr RuCl2(PPh3)3 (cat.) PhH, 80 °C

Me

Murahashi, JOC 1979, 2408 Tandem RCM-hetero Pauson-Khand:

O N

76% 10 mol% Grubbs-II MePh, 100 °C, 1 h then NaOMe (20 mol%) CO (7 atm), 180 °C, 30 h

O O Py

Snapper, JOC 2011, 3644 Useful review: MacMillan, Chem. Rev. 2013, 5322

RuII N N N N N N

  • Reduction
  • Oxidation
  • Radical cyclizations
  • Cycloadditions
  • Addition to arenes

…… hv

RuIII N N N N N N

*

eg* π * t2g eg* π * t2g

  • xidant

reductant Ru(bpy)3+ Ru(bpy)33+ “It is amazing that so much has been done with only a handful of ruthenium complexes as the actual catalysts. The obvious scope of possibilities for catalyst design strongly reinforces the notion that immense opportunity abounds.’ – Barry M. Trost

slide-10
SLIDE 10