SLIDE 3 Ratings of Group Presentations Title:______________________________________________
Presentation scores will be based on the group performance as a whole rather than performances by individuals. Under each presentation area is a list of important factors to be
- considered. Comments and Area Scores will be circled by the evaluator to reflect the group
performance (see ratings below).
Rating: Excellent (10), Good (8), Ordinary (6), Marginal (4), or Deficient (2)
Name of Students:______________________________________________________________ Group :____________ Date:__________ Final Score:___________________ Group Presentation Area Comments Presentation Area Score Introduction: Attention grabbing? Goals/purpose stated?
- Group did an excellent, good, ordinary, marginal, or
deficient job getting audience attention.
- Goals/purpose: excellent, good, ordinary, marginal, or
deficient. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Content: Creative? Chemistry clearly explained? Scientific level appropriate? Organized? Smooth flow?
- Content was creatively presented in an excellent, good,
- rdinary, marginal, or deficient fashion.
- Presentation was excellent, good, ordinary, marginal, or
deficient in organization.
- Chemistry concepts were clearly explained, and at the
appropriate level (excellent, good, ordinary, marginal, or deficient) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Team Attributes Eye contact? Energy? Full participation?
- All (10), most (6), or few (2) of the group members presented
information equally and in a smooth fashion.
- Group showed excellent, good, ordinary, marginal, or
deficient energy and had excellent, good, ordinary, marginal,
- r deficient eye contact with the audience.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Illustration (Pictures and/or demonstrations): Creative and eye pleasing? Useful? Neat? Organized?
- Illustrations were neat and organized.
(excellent, good, ordinary, marginal, or deficient)
- Ilustrations were eye pleasing and creative.
(excellent, good, ordinary, marginal, or deficient)
- Illustrations added to the understanding of the topic.
(excellent, good, ordinary, marginal, or deficient) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Conclusion Summarized information? Provided references?
- Summary of information was excellent, good, ordinary,
marginal, or deficient.
- References were excellent, good, ordinary, marginal, or
deficient. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Overall Quality of Presentation
- Overall quality of the presentation was excellent, good,
- rdinary, marginal, or deficient.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1