Optimizing Pain Management Following Open Shoulder Surgery Arjun - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

optimizing pain management following open shoulder surgery
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Optimizing Pain Management Following Open Shoulder Surgery Arjun - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Optimizing Pain Management Following Open Shoulder Surgery Arjun Meiyappan MD 1 , Ahmed Al-Mansoori MD 1 , Sumit Kanwar 1 MD, Manisha R Chand MD 1 , Colin McNamara MD 2 , Vani Sabesan MD 1 , Gregory Gilot MD 1 1 Levitetz Department of Orthopaedic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Optimizing Pain Management Following Open Shoulder Surgery

Arjun Meiyappan MD 1, Ahmed Al-Mansoori MD 1, Sumit Kanwar 1 MD, Manisha R Chand MD 1, Colin McNamara MD2, Vani Sabesan MD 1, Gregory Gilot MD 1

1 Levitetz Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL

slide-2
SLIDE 2

An Opioid Crisis

Shoulder Arthroplasty One of the Most Painful Ambulatory Surgeries Requires Substantial Post-operative Pain-management Postoperative Pain Usually Controlled with Narcotics Opioid Addiction – An Epidemic in the US

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Objectives

To determine which pain management protocol is most efficient at reducing the use of narcotics after surgery

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Liposomal Bupivacaine

A novel non-opioid-based medication created for postoperative pain management for a multitude of orthopedic procedures Bupivacaine coated in Liposomal vesicles

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methods

A Prospective Clinical Trial of 47 Patients Who Underwent TSA, RSA or ORIF We looked at three different pain management systems for post-operative pain

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methods

Patients Were placed in 3 Groups:

  • Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine (LB) Group 1 (N=17)
  • Intra-articular Bupivacaine pump (pain pump-PP) Group 2 (N=16)
  • Periarticular Free Bupivacaine (FB) Group 3 (N=14)

Outcomes Compared: Visual Analogue Score (VAS) Total Morphine Equivalents (TME) Opioid Related Symptoms Distress Scale (OR-SDS)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Demographics Our cohorts were matched for for Age, Gender, BMI and ASA Class

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Results 24 hours

No significant differences were found between the three groups at 1 day postoperatively based on VAS pain score and TME usage

3.11 4.78 5.18

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump

VAS

P=0.12

51.82 53.05 46.63 10 20 30 40 50 60

Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump

TME

p=0.86

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results 48 hours

At 2 days postoperatively a significant difference was seen in VAS scores On post hoc analysis LB (3.2) was lower when compared to the Pain Pump (5.3) and FB (5.7)

40.2 39.7 34.3 10 20 30 40 50 60

Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump

TME

MEQ

3.2 5.7 5.3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump

VAS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results 72 hours

VAS scores also showed a significant difference in the third post-operative day. A post hoc analysis showed LB had a lower VAS score 2.5 when compared to the pain pump 5.1 and FB 5.1 groups

2.5 5.1 5.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump

VAS

32.2 31.8 30

10 20 30 40 50 60

Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump

TME

slide-11
SLIDE 11

OR-SDS

No Significant Differences At All Points in Time Measured (p > 0.05)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusions

Liposomal bupivacaine demonstrated lower pain scores at both 2 and 3 days postoperatively

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Conclusions

However even with these lowered pain scores narcotic consumption did not differ between the groups as a result Thus There was no significant benefit seen from the use of LB in opioid reduction post shoulder surgery

slide-14
SLIDE 14

THANK YOU