optimizing pain management following open shoulder surgery
play

Optimizing Pain Management Following Open Shoulder Surgery Arjun - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Optimizing Pain Management Following Open Shoulder Surgery Arjun Meiyappan MD 1 , Ahmed Al-Mansoori MD 1 , Sumit Kanwar 1 MD, Manisha R Chand MD 1 , Colin McNamara MD 2 , Vani Sabesan MD 1 , Gregory Gilot MD 1 1 Levitetz Department of Orthopaedic


  1. Optimizing Pain Management Following Open Shoulder Surgery Arjun Meiyappan MD 1 , Ahmed Al-Mansoori MD 1 , Sumit Kanwar 1 MD, Manisha R Chand MD 1 , Colin McNamara MD 2 , Vani Sabesan MD 1 , Gregory Gilot MD 1 1 Levitetz Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL

  2. An Opioid Crisis Shoulder Arthroplasty One of the Most Painful Ambulatory Surgeries Requires Substantial Post-operative Pain-management Postoperative Pain Usually Controlled with Narcotics Opioid Addiction – An Epidemic in the US

  3. Objectives To determine which pain management protocol is most efficient at reducing the use of narcotics after surgery

  4. Liposomal Bupivacaine A novel non-opioid-based medication created for postoperative pain management for a multitude of orthopedic procedures Bupivacaine coated in Liposomal vesicles

  5. Methods A Prospective Clinical Trial of 47 Patients Who Underwent TSA, RSA or ORIF We looked at three different pain management systems for post-operative pain

  6. Methods Patients Were placed in 3 Groups: • Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine (LB) Group 1 (N=17) • Intra-articular Bupivacaine pump (pain pump-PP) Group 2 (N=16) • Periarticular Free Bupivacaine (FB) Group 3 (N=14) Outcomes Compared: Visual Analogue Score (VAS) Total Morphine Equivalents (TME) Opioid Related Symptoms Distress Scale (OR-SDS)

  7. Demographics Our cohorts were matched for for Age, Gender, BMI and ASA Class

  8. Results 24 hours No significant differences were found between the three groups at 1 day postoperatively based on VAS pain score and TME usage VAS TME p=0.86 P=0.12 10 60 53.05 51.82 9 50 46.63 8 7 40 6 5.18 4.78 30 5 4 3.11 20 3 2 10 1 0 0 Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump

  9. Results 48 hours At 2 days postoperatively a significant difference was seen in VAS scores On post hoc analysis LB (3.2) was lower when compared to the Pain Pump (5.3) and FB (5.7) VAS TME 10 60 9 50 8 40.2 39.7 7 40 5.7 34.3 6 5.3 MEQ 5 30 4 3.2 20 3 2 10 1 0 0 Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump

  10. Results 72 hours VAS scores also showed a significant difference in the third post-operative day. A post hoc analysis showed LB had a lower VAS score 2.5 when compared to the pain pump 5.1 and FB 5.1 groups VAS TME 60 10 9 50 8 7 40 32.2 31.8 6 5.1 5.1 30 5 30 4 2.5 20 3 2 10 1 0 0 Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump Liposomal Bupivacaine Free Bupivicaine Pain Pump

  11. OR-SDS No Significant Differences At All Points in Time Measured (p > 0.05)

  12. Conclusions Liposomal bupivacaine demonstrated lower pain scores at both 2 and 3 days postoperatively

  13. Conclusions However even with these lowered pain scores narcotic consumption did not differ between the groups as a result Thus There was no significant benefit seen from the use of LB in opioid reduction post shoulder surgery

  14. THANK YOU

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend