of shoreface nourishment using autonomous behavior Per Srensen, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

of shoreface
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

of shoreface nourishment using autonomous behavior Per Srensen, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Assesment of the effect of shoreface nourishment using autonomous behavior Per Srensen, pso@kyst.dk Coastal sediments 2019, Tampa U.S.A. Safety aim Flood proned Safety buffer area Autonomous retreat Aim for profile volume Aim No aim


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Assesment of the effect

  • f shoreface

nourishment using autonomous behavior

Per Sørensen, pso@kyst.dk

Coastal sediments 2019, Tampa U.S.A.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Safety aim

Flood proned area Safety buffer

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Aim for profile volume

Profile retreat [m/year]

  • 2 0 2 4 6 8

Autonomous retreat Aim No aim 5 km

slide-4
SLIDE 4

General bar behaviour and nourishments

NO SOME MANY

Offshore migration [m] Life time [years] Migration speed [m/year] Offshore migration [m] Life time [years] Migration speed [m/year] Offshore migration [m] Life time [years] Migration speed [m/year] Bar 1 708 10 71 708 14 51 667 14 48 Bar 2 375 12 31 833 12 69 541 10 54 Bar 3 750 12 63 875 8 109 958 11 87 Bar 4 833 26 32 791 13 61 1167 20 58 Mean 667 15 49 802 12 73 833 14 62 Std. 174 6 18 62 2 22 245 4 15 No nourishments Line 5350 Some nourishments Line 5760 Many nourishments Line 5450

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Shoreface nourishment 2011: 310,000 m3 (400 m3/m)

Net longshore sediment transport 2.1 mill. m3/year Shoreface nourishment 2010: 728,000 m3 (57 m3/m) along the showed coast

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Deep water energy cross-/longshore transport

South North On shore

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Common coastal State Indicators

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Volume changes alongshore

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Bars (0.25 m)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Bars (0.25 m)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Bars (0.25 m)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Bar position nourished area

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Total volume

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusion and further work

  • Vital to know a coast autonomous behaviour, which

requires a lot of monitoring.

  • Define monitoring and indicators based on objective
  • Further coanalysis (EOF, PC ?) Netherlands, Germany,

Belgium, Denmark to get a better system understanding.

  • Include previous nourishments in the analysis.
  • Perhaps modeling.
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thank you for your attention