NYC Supply Chain Regional Resiliency Assessment Program (RRAP) APA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1

NYC Supply Chain

Regional Resiliency Assessment Program (RRAP)

APA National Conference 2017 Sandra Rothbard

2

NYC EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (NYCEM)

Serves NYC through a five fold mission: 1. Plan and prepare for emergencies 2. Coordinate emergency response and recovery efforts 3. Educate the public about preparedness 4. Collect and disseminate critical information 5. Seek funding to support preparedness

3

NYCEM LOGISTICS

Move the right stuff to the right place at the right time

4

THE NEED

Lack of a common operating picture for the supply chain network in and around NYC

• 1. Players (public and private)
• 2. Roles and Responsibilities
• 3. License/Permits/Waivers/Laws for goods movement

day to day and during an emergency

5

PORT AUTHORITY OF NY & NJ (PANYNJ)

6

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (MTA)

7

NYC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (EDC)

8

NYC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (NYCDOT)

9

NYS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (NYSDOT)

10

FREIGHT RAIL

11

12

WINTER 2014

Source: http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/02/28/283451010/how-an-old-law-caused-a-modern-day-salt-shortage

13

Source: http://nypost.com/2016/10/05/freight-train-derails-at-amtrak-station-suspends-service/

FALL 2016

14

Regional Catastrophic Planning Team (RCPT)

EXISTING DATA

Infrastructure and Facilities Reports from 2010-2012

15

CURRENT LANDSCAPE

Organization Project/Resource

Mayor’s Office (ORR) Hunts Point Food Study (with EDC), Climate Change project, New York State Fuels RRAP (with DHS) DCP North Brooklyn Industry and Innovation Plan Open Industrial Uses Study EDC Springfield Gardens JFK Industrial Business Improvement District (IBID), Pending FASTLANE (USDOT) grant PANYNJ Goods Movement Action Plan (G-MAP) NJTPA (North Jersey MPO) Freight Forecasting Tool, Key Commodity Profiles project, Waterborne Transportation Resources Study NYMTC (NYC regional MPO) Regional Freight Plan NYSDOT State Freight Plan

And much more…

16

REGIONAL RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (RRAP)

A cooperative assessment of specific critical infrastructure to address a range of infrastructure resilience issues that could have regionally and nationally significant consequences.

1.

Focuses on threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences from an all-hazards perspective

2.

Identifies critical infrastructure dependencies, interdependencies, cascading effects, and resilience characteristics and gaps

3.

Assesses the integrated preparedness and protection capabilities of critical infrastructure owners and operators and emergency planning and response

• rganizations

4.

Coordinates protection

Homeland Security

17

RRAP - PROJECT DELIVERABLES

Interactive Tool

• Infrastructure database and question set responses for

facility operators and transporters

• Database of licenses, permits and waivers (LPW)

A series of reports which will include:

• 1. Qualitative resiliency assessment
• 2. Network analysis
• 3. Use and maintenance

18

BENEFITS FOR STAKEHOLDERS

• Government Agencies will have a better

understanding of the supply chain network (better decision-making)

• Common operating picture for the supply chain

industry (all modes all commodities) without silos

• Capture experiences during past emergencies

19

MILESTONES

December 2015 April 2016 June 2016 July 2016 September 2016 April 2017 Summer 2017

Database Development Data Collection DHS Site Visits Stakeholder Brief Finalization of Tool/Reports Stakeholder Kickoff

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

KEY OBSERVATIONS

• Complex Environment
• Need to retain industrial spaces for emergency

response

• Multi-modal capabilities are vital and should be

incorporated into contingency (COOP) plans.

31 31

THANK YOU

SANDRA ROTHBARD

DIRECTOR, SUPPLY CHAIN LOGISTICS NYC EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (until May 12)

FREIGHT MATTERS SANDRA@FREIGHTMATTERS.ORG

F ive Bor

• F
• od F

low

NYC F

• o d Distrib utio n

& Re silie nc y Study

Julie Ste in, Se nio r Vic e Pre side nt, NYCE DC APA Na tio na l Pla nning Co nfe re nc e Ma y 7, 2017

2

Study Sc o pe

3

Me tho do lo g y

5

K e y finding s

1. Size and struc ture of food distribution syste m

Appro xima te ly 19 billion pounds of food a re distrib ute d thro ug ho ut NYC e a c h ye a r fro m a ppro xima te ly 42,000 point of sale outle ts

2. Ge ographic distribution of food busine sse s

F

• o d b usine sse s be ne fit from the e ffic ie nc ie s of c luste ring, re c e iving shipme nts a nd

c usto me r pic k-up. Hunts Point is the large st ge ographic hub in NYC.

3. Pre pare dne ss

T he City’ s fo o d syste m is hig hly fra g me nte d a nd the re fo re is unlike ly to be

signific antly impac te d by disruption to a single distributor. Po int o f sa le o utle ts a re

mo re like ly to b uy insura nc e to a ddre ss risk ra the r tha n ma ke physic a l inve stme nts in re silie nc y

4. T ransportation 99% of last mile de live ry is do ne b y truc k, a nd 4 bridge s and 2 tunne ls c a rry o ve r 50%

• f fo o d vo lume into the c ity

5. F

• od Distribution Jobs

F

• o d distrib utio n jo b s c an be high quality, ac c e ssible industrial jobs a nd a re le ss a t

risk o f b e ing a uto ma te d re la tive to fo o d ma nufa c turing jo b s.

# 1 Size a nd Struc ture o f F

• o d Distrib utio n Syste m
• Approximately 19 billion lbs. of food are distributed throughout New York City.
• More than 50% of the last-mile food distribution into New York City begins from

within the five boroughs

• Distributor market share split will remain largely the same over next 10 years

Distrib uto rs

# 1 Size a nd Struc ture o f F

• o d Distrib utio n Syste m
• There are over 42,000 point-of-

sale outlets in New York City.

• Consumers access almost 40% of

annual food volume through independent restaurants and cafés.

• Chain supermarkets are the

second highest source of food volume despite having far fewer stores relative to other point-of-sale channels.

Po int-o f-Sa le Outle ts

# 2 Ge o g ra phic Distrib utio n o f F

• o d Busine sse s

Ma ny fa c to rs g o into lo c a tio na l de c isio n ma king , b ut distrib uto rs will g e ne ra lly pic k a lo c a tio n in Ne w Yo rk City if >50-60% o f c usto me rs a re lo c a te d within the c ity

Cluste ring is b e ne fic ia l to fo o d b usine sse s b e c a use o f e ffic ie nc ie s with re c e iving shipme nts a nd a c c o mmo da ting c usto me r pic k-up

# 2 Ge o g ra phic Distrib utio n o f F

• o d Busine sse s

# 2 Ge o g ra phic Distrib utio n o f F

• o d Busine sse s

Hunts Po int is the la rg e st g e o g ra phic hub in Ne w Yo rk City fo r fo o d distrib utio n

# 3 Pre pa re dne ss

• The city’s point-of-sale outlets keep 4 to 5 days of food in stock on average
• Because of the high fragmentation of the food distribution system, the food system

is unlikely to be significantly impacted by disruption to a single distributor; however, there are infrastructure and localized risks to the food distribution system

• Point-of-sale outlets are more likely to buy insurance to address risk rather than

make physical investments in resiliency

• Consumers face additional vulnerabilities if they are low-income, lack mobility, face

geographic isolation and/or have limited choices of where to purchase food every day.

# 4 T ra nspo rta tio n a nd T ruc k Ro ute s

• NYC’s food distribution

system relies on bridges and tunnels to reach their consumers, since 99% of last-mile distribution is done by truck.

• A combination of four

major bridges and two tunnels carry over 50%

• f total food volume.

# 5 F

• o d Distrib utio n Jo b s

F

• o d distrib utio n jo b s c a n b e hig h-q ua lity, a c c e ssib le industria l jo b s

# 5 F

• o d Distrib utio n Jo b s

Distrib utio n la b o r jo b s a re le ss a t risk o f b e ing a uto ma te d re la tive to fo o d ma nufa c turing jo b s

15

Ne xt Ste ps

Pre pare dne ss and transportation de pe nde nc ie s

• Inte gr

ate and c oor dinate findings with o ng o ing studie s

• E

valuate pote ntial fo r a dditio na l re silie nc y me a sure s

• Ide ntify ways to suppor

t fo o d distrib uto rs a nd po int o f sa le

• utle ts during a n e me rg e nc y e ve nt
• E

ngage with c ommunity gr

• ups to disc uss the po te ntia l fo r

pa rtne rships to a dva nc e re silie nc y

F

• od syste m struc ture , distribution tre nds, c luste ring and jobs
• Co ntinue the imple me nta tio n o f the $150 million Hunts Point

F

• od Distr

ibution Ce nte r mode r nization plan

• T

e na nt the ne w 55,000 SF

food manufac tur ing hub a t the

Bro o klyn Army T e rmina l Anne x Building

• E

xplo re o ppo rtunitie s to inte g ra te additiona l mode s of fr

e ight tr anspor tation into the fo o d supply c ha in a nd distrib utio n

syste m.

T ha nk yo u!

• Five Borough Food Flow Report: nycedc.com/foodflow
• Julie Stein, Senior Vice President, NYCEDC

F re ig ht I n Ne w Yo rk City

Ame ric a n Pla nning Asso c ia tio n Na tio na l Pla nning Co nfe re nc e Ma y 7, 2017

Ne New w Yo York City t ty tod

• day…

y…

Incr creasi easing freight volumes Incr creasi easing cos

• sts

ts to

• consu

nsumers Over-relian iance ce

• n t

truckin ing

90+% of freight moved via truck freight Volumes to rise 35% between 2015 and 2040

NYC #1 in truck congestion costs at $14B

2

Re g io na l F re ig ht Ne two rk

3

CSX L ine No rfo lk So uthe rn Co nra il Othe r F re ig ht Ra il

Ma rine T e rmina ls

Airpo rts I BZs

T ruc k Ro ute s

*City Owne d Asse t

SMI As

Se a F re ig ht g a te wa y Urb a n distrib utio n c e nte r Air fre ig ht g a te wa y Ra il F re ig ht g a te wa y

4

Freight travels West est to East ast over limited chokepoints…

Verrazano Bridge George Washington Bridge

…creating directional imbalance. 292

292 million tons of freight

10

10.6 million truck trips

73

73 million tons of freight

2.6 .6 million truck trips

365 mil million ion tons

NYC F re ig ht Pro file

5

So urc e : F e de ral Hig hway Administratio n, F re ig ht Analysis F rame wo rk, 2007

T ruc k is the prima ry mo ve r

• f fre ig ht in NYC

F re ig ht is a n E c o no mic E na b le r

6

• F

re ig ht is the mo ve me nt o f g o o ds (c o nta ine r, b ulk) using a irpla ne s, o c e a n g o ing ve sse ls, tra ins, o r truc ks.

• T

ra nspo rta tio n c ho ic e s a re c ritic a l fo r e c o no mic c o mpe titive ne ss

• T

ra nspo rta tio n infra struc ture inve stme nts sha pe lo c a l a nd re g io na l e c o no mie s – Co mpe titive a nd sta b le firms – Co -lo c a tio n, jo b s – Alte rna tive tra nspo rta tio n mo de s

• Co mpe titio n fo r tra nspo rta tio n se rvic e s
• E

nviro nme nta l b e ne fits

• Co ng e stio n mitig a tio n

Ke y Sta ts

NYC is the la rg e st US c o nsume r ma rke t:

• NYC Gro ss Me tro p o lita n Pro duc t: $1.5T
• Austra lia Gro ss Do me stic Pro duc t: $1.5T

(NYCE DC E c o no mic Re se arc h & Analysis) $720B wo rth o f g o o ds mo ve thro ug h the re g io n

a nnua lly (Bro o king s I

nstitutio n)

Po rt o f Ne w Yo rk a nd Ne w Je rse y is the g a te wa y to a g lo b a l ma rke t: E xpo rt va lue : $47B I mpo rt va lue : $156B E xpo rt to nna g e : 14.7M I mpo rt to nna g e : 58.8M

(Po rt Autho rity o f Ne w Yo rk and Ne w Je rse y)

Longshore worker, New York

Shipping Association

$88,233 $88,233

Wholesale Trade

$53,4 $53,417

Transportation, Warehousing On average, an employee at the

Re Red H Hook Cont ntaine ainer Terminal l

makes

$7 $71,000 ,000

annually

$56,4 $56,479 79

Manufacturing

Jo Jobs i bs in NYC

308,0 ,000 freight-dependent jobs*

Th The B Bron

• nx

23,688 (+23%)

Queens

103,081 (+33%)

Ma Manhatta ttan

110,785 (-7%)**

Sta Staten I Island

7,712 (+86%)

Brook

• oklyn

63,278 (+15%)

*Freight-dependent = Wholesale trade, manufacturing, transportation, warehousing

Average freight-dependent wage is $69,404 $69,404

**Indicates change from 2012 to 2015 Source: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), Bureau of Labor Statistics

F re ig ht T ra nspo rta tio n: Cho ic e is Go o d, E c o no mic a lly

8

• F

irms b a se tra nspo rta tio n c ho ic e s o n fo ur prima ry fa c to rs:

1. Cost: the a mo unt o f mo ne y the firm must pa y to tra nspo rt the pro duc t 2. T ra ve l time: the a mo unt o f time to tra nspo rt the pro duc t fro m Po int A to Po int B 3. Re lia bility: windo w o f time in whic h the pro duc t must a rrive 4. Visibility: the a b ility to tra c k the pro duc t in re a l time a nd, a lso , e nsure its sa fe tra nspo rt a nd

a rriva l

• T
• b e suc c e ssful, tra nspo rta tio n c ho ic e s must b e a va ila b le

Air T ruc k T ra in Wa te r

L

• we r we ig ht, hig he r

va lue , Mo st time -se nsitive c a rg o Hig he r we ig ht, lo we r va lue , le a st time -se nsitive c a rg o

Ra ng e o f we ig ht a nd va lue Ra il inte rmo da l c o mpe titive with truc k o ve r lo ng e r dista nc e s

F re ig ht T ra nspo rta tio n: Cho ic e is Go o d, E nviro nme nta lly

9

• Ra il fre ig ht a nd wa te rb o rne fre ig ht

(b a rg e s) use le ss fue l tha n truc ks to mo ve the sa me to nna g e

514 450 59

100 200 300 400 500 600

Vessel Train Truck

Mile s One g a llo n o f fue l mo ve s o ne to n o f c a rg o :

Inve stme nt in multimo dal infr astr uc tur e is a ke y c o mpo ne nt o f a sustainable and r e silie nt c ity

• Old infra struc ture a nd o ve rre lia nc e
• n truc king ma ke s the re g io n

vulne ra b le in the e ve nt o f unfo re se e n disruptio ns

• Only 4 b ridg e c ro ssing s c o nne c t

Ne w Yo rk City to the Na tio na l Hig hwa y Syste m

*NYCE DC a nd the City a re wo rking c o lla b o ra tive ly o n the Ma yor’s 80x50 g oa ls b y e xpa nding ma ritime a nd ra il fre ig ht infra struc ture to pro vide a lte rna tive s to truc king g o o ds in the c ity.

F re ig ht’ s Shrinking F

• o tprint
• Histo ric a lly, the wo rking wa te rfro nt wa s the c e nte r o f

c o mme rc e . F re ig ht vo lume s ha ve a nd will c o ntinue to inc re a se , ye t the City’ s ma ritime / industria l fo o tprint ha s b e e n shrinking .

• Six City de sig na te d SMI

A’ s a nd 21 I ndustria l Busine ss zo ne s (I BZ) a c c o unt fo r a bout 9% o f the City’ s to ta l 304.6 mi2.

• F

re ig ht ha ndling te c hno lo g y inc re a se d te rmina l pro duc tivity a nd le d to de nsific a tio n o f ma ritime / industria l a re a s.

• Pre se rving ma ritime / industria l la nd use is e sse ntia l fo r:
• Ma inta ining middle c la ss jobs, a nd
• Pro viding o ptio ns to firms b ring ing g o o ds into the c ity
• K

e e ping c osts down fo r b usine sse s a nd c o nsume rs

10

L

• c a l Ca se Studie s

Ma nha tta n Be e r He a lthy Bra nd Oils Sims Ma lc a -Amit

L

• c ation

Re d Ho o k, BK

L

• ng I

sla nd City, QN

Sunse t Pa rk, BK Ja ma ic a , QN

Ope r ation

I mpo rts b e ve ra g e s via

c ontaine r ship to Re d

Ho o k Co nta ine r T e rmina l Use s r

ail to ship e dib le o ils

fro m Midwe st via ta nke r c a r a lo ng CSX ra il line

Bar ge s in re side ntia l

re c yc la b le s fro m NYC,

r ails o ut b a ile d

re c yc la b le s Re lie s o n air

fr e ight to

tra nspo rt dia mo nds a nd pre c io us sto ne s into the City (F T Z)

Public Be ne fits

Re duc e s a ir po llutio n a nd la ndside c o ng e stio n a nd pre se rve s jo b s in uniq ue b usine ss se c to rs

“Witho ut a re liab le and e ffic ie nt rail fre ig ht ne two rk, I wo uldn’ t b e ab le to so urc e the e dib le o ils that supply Ne w Yo rk re staurants, and c o ntinue to g ro w my b usine ss in L

• ng I

sland City” –Ja so n T ho ma s o f He alth Brand Oils

11

Ma trix (Sta te n I sla nd)

Glo Global Ma Mari ritime T Tre rends Regio iona nal I Investment nts Loc Local O Oppor pportunities

Pa na ma Ca na l E xpa nsio n

Ne o -Pa na ma x Ve sse ls I nla nd Po rts

Ba yo nne Bridg e Ra ising

Ha rb o r De e pe ning Ma rine Hig hwa ys SBMT is o pe n fo r b usine ss! Ho wla nd Ho o k MSW Ba rg e

Hunts Po int

Natio ional al Rail ail Tr Trends Regio iona nal I Investment nts Loc Local O Oppor pportunities

13

Do ub le Sta c k I nte rmo da l I nno va tio n Shifting Ma rke ts Cro ss Ha rb o r Ba rg e Se rvic e Ra il T unne l Ne w L

• ng I

sla nd T ra nslo a d F a c ility Sta te n I sla nd Ra ilro a d Sims Munic ipa l Re c yc ling

Freig eightNYC

14

• 20-year multi-modal strategy
• Goals to improve environment, streamline

freight movements, lower consumer costs

• Quantify benefits through benchmarking
• Align with Vision Zero, 80X50, OneNYC;

collaborate with NYCDOT

• Identify and pursue bold

bold infrastructure projects

• Urban Logistics
• Marine Highways
• Freight Corridors

T ha nk yo u!

Appe ndix

Sig nific a nt Ma ritime & I ndustria l Are a s

17

Appe ndix C

• De sig na te d in the 1992 Ne w Yo rk City

Co mpre he nsive Wa te rfro nt Pla n

• Wo rking wa te rfro nt use s ha ve lo c a tio na l

re q uire me nts tha t ma ke po rtio ns o f the Co a sta l Zo ne e spe c ia lly va lua b le a s industria l a re a s. T he se a re a s ha ve b e e n re c o g nize d b y the de sig na tio n o f the se ve n Sig nific a nt Ma ritime a nd I ndustria l Are a s (SMI As): So uth Bro nx, Ne wto wn Cre e k, Bro o klyn Na vy Ya rd, Re d Ho o k Co nta ine r T e rmina l, Sunse t Pa rk/ E rie Ba sin, K ill Va n K ull, a nd Sta te n I sla nd We st Sho re .

• T

he c rite ria use d to de line a te the se a re a s g e ne ra lly inc lude c o nc e ntra tio ns o f M2 a nd M3 zo ne d la nd; suita b le hydro g ra phic c o nditio ns fo r ma ritime -re la te d use s; pre se nc e o f o r po te ntia l fo r inte rmo da l tra nspo rta tio n, ma rine te rmina l a nd pie r infra struc ture ; c o nc e ntra tio ns

• f wa te r-de pe nd e nt a nd industria l a c tivity;

re la tive ly g o o d tra nspo rta tio n a c c e ss a nd

F re ig ht Sta tus Re po rt: Ra il F re ig ht

18

Appe ndix D

F re ig ht Sta tus Re po rt: Ma rine Ca rg o

19

Appe ndix E

F re ig ht Sta tus Re po rt: Air Ca rg o

20

Appe ndix F

F re ig ht Sta tus Re po rt: T ruc king

21

Appe ndix G

I nno va tio ns in F re ig ht

Ur ban Distr ibution / Air Car go Shor t- Se a Shipping (Bar ge ) High Spe e d F r e ight T unne l

Rhine Rive r Co ntaine r Barg e

HACT L (Ho ng Ko ng Air Carg o T e rminal)

Be twe e n L

• ndo n and Paris

22

Appe ndix H

Ma rine Hig hwa y De sig na tio n

• Ame ric a n Ma rine Hig hwa y Pro g ra m (USDOT

– MARAD)

• April 2015, c ro ss ha rb o r b a rg e se rvic e wa s re c o g nize d

a s a Ma rine Hig hwa y

• De sig na tio n he lps whe n so lic iting disc re tio na ry g ra nt

funding fo r c a pita l impro ve me nt pro je c ts.

• Be ne fits o f Ma rine Hig hwa ys:
• F

ulfills g oa ls se t forth One NYC: Dive rts c o nta ine r

a c tivity fro m a lre a dy c o ng e ste d re g io na l hig hwa y c ro ssing s to b a rg e s re sulting in sig nific a nt pub lic b e ne fits.

• Re duc e s VMT

: An e stima te d 95,000 truc k trips will b e re pla c e d, pre ve nting a ppro xima te ly 2,500 to ns

• f CO2 e missio ns.
• Provide s multi- moda l options for shippe rs: T

he de sig na tio n suppo rts e xisting c o nta ine r o n b a rg e se rvic e b e twe e n the Glo b a l Co nta ine r T e rmina l in Ba yo nne , NJ with the Glo b a l Co nta ine r T e rmina l o n Sta te n I sla nd. T he de sig na tio n a lso suppo rts future c o nta ine r o n b a rg e se rvic e fro m the Po rt Ne wa rk Co nta ine r T e rmina l to the Re d Ho o k Co nta ine r

23

Appe ndix I

F re ig ht T ra nspo rta tio n: Ra il a nd Ba rg e I nc re a sing ly Co mpe titive

• Ma ny b usine sse s re ly o n truc king fo r la st mile

de live rie s

• Be c a use o f ro a dwa y c o ng e stio n, so me firms a re

switc hing to ra il a nd wa te r o ptio ns

• I

n Ne w Yo rk City mo re tha n 100 firms re ly dire c tly

• n ra il ne two rk, wa te rwa ys to re c e ive g o o ds fo r

ma nufa c turing o r g o o ds pro duc tio n

• Pa ra dig m Shift in Po rt o f NYNJ
• Co nta ine r te rmina l o pe ra to rs (Po rt Ne wa rk – Re d

Ho o k) a re c ho o sing to re pla c e truc k trips a c ro ss the Hudso n with re g ula r b a rg e se rvic e

• Be ne fits inc lude re duc e d tra nspo rta tio n c o sts

a nd inc re a se d te rmina l e ffic ie nc y

• Optio ns in fre ig ht tra nspo rta tio n pro vide a le ve l o f

re dunda nc y during e me rg e nc y

200 400 600 800 Ba rg e + T ruc k to Na ssa u Co . fro m NJ T ruc k to Na ssa u Co . Ba rg e + T ruc k to Suffo lk Co . fro m NJ T ruc k to Suffo lk Co . Cost in Dolla rs

Ba rg e Co st T ruc k Co st Re d Ho o k Co nta ine r Ba rg e b e twe e n NYC a nd NJ

So urc e s: RHCT Manag e me nt Cost of Ba rg e Se rvic e vs. T ra ditiona l T ruc k Se rvic e Mode Cha ng e in tons move d 2002- 2012

T ruc ks 14% Ra il 7% Wa te r 39% Air 50% Multimo da l 23%

So urc e : Bure au o f T ranspo rtatio n Statistic s. Data re fle c ts natio nal statistic s

24

Appe ndix J

T e c hno lo g ic a l Adva nc e s in F re ig ht Auto no mo us ve hic le s

Auto no mo us truc ks e ve ntua lly ma y impro ve sa fe ty, fue l e ffic ie nc y a nd re duc e shipping c o sts fo r la st mile de live ry

“Ub e r fo r truc ks” e g : Ca rg o ma tic

Co nne c ting shippe rs a nd truc k drive rs to o ptimize d unuse d spa c e in truc ks a lre a dy o n the ro a d

Ne xtGe n

Pro vide s sa te llite -b a se d na vig a tio n syste m to a llo w fo r mo re e ffic ie nt flig ht pa tte rns a nd sho rte r he a dwa ys a t ta ke -o ff a nd la nding

T ruc k Appo intme nt Syste ms

Se a po rts a ppo intme nt syste ms a llo w po rts to ma na g e the flo w o f truc ks thro ug h the ir g a te s, inc re a sing e ffic ie nc y within the po rt

Auto ma te d T e rmina ls

Allo w fo r sho rte r a c c e ss time s to c o nta ine r sta c kya rds a nd impro ve d la nd utiliza tio n

Ra il Sma rt T e c hno lo g y

Auto -pilo t syste ms sig nific a ntly re duc e e missio ns, minimize do wntime a nd lo we r o pe ra ting c o sts.

25

Appe ndix K

Jo b s in F re ig ht

Ab o ut the industry

• F

re ig ht de pe nde nt jo b s (ma nufa c turing , tra nspo rta tio n, who le sa le ) re pre se nt the 5th la rg e st se c to r in NYC, b e hind He a lth Ca re , Pro fe ssio na l/ Sc ie nc e / T e c h, F ina nc e / I nsura nc e a nd E duc a tio n

• T
• ta l fre ig ht de pe nde nt jo b s:

200,000+

• Me dia n wa g e : $70,000
• 66% o f wo rke rs ha ve le ss tha n a

c o lle g e de g re e

• Gre a te r o ppo rtunitie s fo r

a dva nc e me nt c o mpa re d to o the r se c to rs (re ta il, he a lth c a re )

• F

re ig ht e mplo yme nt in 2014 wa s

F r e ight pr

• vide s go o d-paying jo bs to r

e side nts with all le ve ls o f e duc atio nal attainme nt

Ste ps to g ro w fre ig ht re la te d jo b s

• Pre se rve a nd de ve lo p industria l

site s & infra struc ture

• F
• ste r inve stme nt in ke y g a te wa ys

– e .g . JF K , Glo b a l Co nta ine r T e rmina l Ne w Yo rk, Hunts Po int

• Re fo rm re g ula tio ns

– e .g . 53’ truc k rule c ha ng e

• De ve lo p c a re e r

a nd te c hnic a l e duc a tio n

• ppo rtunitie s in

supply c ha in ma na g e me nt with NYC pub lic sc ho o ls

So urc e : NYCE DC E RA, 2014

26

F irms Re lying o n Ma ritime a nd Ra il F re ig ht

27

Appe ndix M

CONFIDENTIAL

1

American Planning Association 2017 Conference

The Resiliency of NYC Supply Chains: Enhancing Resiliency of NYC’s Energy Systems

CONFIDENTIAL

2

Gas Restoration Milestones

Days 0 = Oct 29 Con Edison National Grid Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day 10 Day 11 Day 12 Day 13 Day 14

Energy System Disruptions

Events such as Hurricane Sandy and Hurricane Irene caused significant disruptions to the region’s energy systems

2

Sandy had significant and diverse impacts across New York City’s… Natural Gas Distribution Electric Network Liquid Fuels Supply

Service Restoration Begins Restoration complete except for customer-side outages

CONFIDENTIAL

3

Energy System Resiliency Efforts Overview

Prior to and since Sandy, NYC has coordinated and led various energy system resiliency efforts

3

• 3. Infrastructure: Climate Resiliency Design Guidelines
• 1. Utilities: Storm Hardening
• 2. Liquid Fuels: Improving Supply Chain Resilience

CONFIDENTIAL

4

Utilities: Con Edison Overview

Con Edison is a private, investor-owned utility that provides electric, gas and steam services to all or a large portion of NYC residents

4

CONFIDENTIAL

5

Utilities: Storm Hardening Collaborative

The Collaborative is a stakeholder-based process to guide and inform Con Edison’s thinking and prioritization of resiliency investments and climate risks

5

Key outputs:

• Agreed-upon investments in

electric, gas, steam and telecom projects

• Flood protection standard of FEMA

100-year floodplain + 3’ feet

• Risk and asset prioritization model

informed by a societal CBA

• Commitment to in-depth climate

change vulnerability study Con Edison Collaborative Timeframe: 2013-2016

CONFIDENTIAL

6

Electric

Utilities: Con Ed Storm Hardening Projects

Investments focused on minimizing and mitigating the effects of flooding, surge and wind to critical equipment and supporting a fast, flexible system recovery

6

• Coastal network (e.g., submersible equipment, sectionalizing)
• Overhead distribution (e.g., reduce feeder segment size)
• Substations (e.g., floodproof and/or elevate critical equipment)
• Transmission system reinforcement (e.g., upgrade towers)

Gas Telecom Steam

• Harden Radio Sites
• Extension of CCTN (enables secure SCADA, voice and video)
• Elevation of Telecom Equipment
• Generating stations
• Steam distribution

Project Areas

• Distribution system (e.g., LPP replacement)
• Tunnel Reinforcement
• LNG Plant Hardening

CONFIDENTIAL

7

Adapting the Model to National Grid

7

Key Objectives 2017:

• Deep dive on what happened during Sandy to NG’s system to inform

future planning

• Inform utility hardening and long-term planning with latest climate

change projections

• Develop flood design standard for above ground assets
• Develop recommendations for prioritizing resiliency investments
• Learn from utility pilots (e.g., flood zone packages, ROVs, etc.)

CONFIDENTIAL

8

8

Liquid Fuel Storage Sites [A Stronger More Resilient New York]

Liquid Fuels: Coastal Locations

CONFIDENTIAL

9

Liquid Fuels: Sandy’s Impacts

Hurricane Sandy disrupted all major components of the regional fuel supply chain

9

Sandy’s Impacts on the Liquid Fuel Supply Chain

• Refineries
• Pipelines
• Port and waterways
• Terminals
• Gas Stations

Lessons Learned

• Liquid fuel distribution is highly

dependent on electric power supply

• Local (NYC) regulatory authority in

this space is limited

• Major fuel infrastructure is located

in New Jersey, outside of NYC and New York State jurisdiction

CONFIDENTIAL

10

Liquid Fuels: Resiliency Initiatives

Initiatives address priority areas that were identified by stakeholders post- Hurricane Sandy

10

Key NYC Initiatives

• Assess key facilities for climate

vulnerability (with NYS)

• Develop a communications

protocol to enhance situational awareness

• Develop City emergency fuel plan

Key State Initiatives

• Provide backup generators to

critical gas stations

• Establish State reserve

Key Federal Initiatives

• Establish Federal reserve

CONFIDENTIAL

11

Goals:

• Institutionalize resiliency in capital programs.
• Establish consistent design standard for using climate

data across City agencies to account for:

• extreme heat;
• extreme precipitation;
• coastal storms; and
• sea level rise.
• Make upfront investments in resiliency that provide long-

term benefits:

• preserve health and safety;
• avoid losses from damage; and
• maintain the services New Yorkers rely upon.

11

Infrastructure Resiliency

Climate Resiliency Design Guidelines

CONFIDENTIAL

12

Climate Resiliency Design Guidelines

12

DDC DOT DEP DCP DPR

NYC BUILDING CODE AND ENGINEERING STANDARDS NEW YORK CITY PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (NPCC)

Forward-looking climate data

• NOAA Atlas 14
• NWS Climate Normals
• ASHRAE Climate Zones
• Etc.

Historic climate data City Agency Guidelines

ORR Climate Resiliency Design Guidelines

CONFIDENTIAL

13

Climate Resiliency Design Guidelines

13

Who will use the guidelines?

• City agencies.
• Engineers, architects, and planners.

What kinds of projects?

• Buildings and infrastructure.
• City of New York - new capital construction and

major rehabilitations.

What kinds of assets are not included?

• Coastal protection projects.
• Private developments.

What’s next?

• Pilot test guidelines.

CONFIDENTIAL

14

nyc.gov/resiliency @NYClimate