Observations in Shear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings Presented by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

observations in shear wall strength in tall buildings
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Observations in Shear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings Presented by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Observations in Shear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings Presented by StructurePoint at ACI Spring 2012 Convention in Dallas, Texas 1 Metropolitan Tower, New York City 68-story, 716 ft (218m) skyscraper Reinforced Concrete Design of Tall


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Observations in Shear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

Presented by StructurePoint at ACI Spring 2012 Convention in Dallas, Texas

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Metropolitan Tower, New York City

68-story, 716 ft (218m) skyscraper

Reinforced Concrete Design of Tall Buildings by Bungale

  • S. Taranath
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Jin Mao Tower, Shanghai, China

88-story, 1381 ft (421m)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Motivation

Sharing insight from detailed analysis and implementation of code provisions

Sharing insight from members of ACI committees

Sharing insight from wide base of spColumn users

Raising awareness of irregularities and their impact

  • n design

Conclusions apply to all sections, but especially those of irregular shape and loaded with large number of load cases and combinations, e.g. Shear Walls

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Outline

Observations

P-M Diagram Irregularities

Symmetry/Asymmetry

Strength Reduction Factor

Uniaxial/Biaxial Bending

Moment Magnification Irregularities

Conclusions

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

P-M Diagram

Design

(Pu1 , Mu1 )  NG

(Pu2 , Mu2 )  OK

(Pu3 , Mu3 )  NG

Notice Pu1 < Pu2 < Pu3 with Mu =const 

One Quadrant OK if

Pu  0 and Mu 

Section shape symmetrical

Reinforcement symmetrical

z x y P M

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

P-M Diagram – Pos./Neg. Load Signs

All four quadrants are needed if loads change sign

If section shape and reinforcement are symmetrical then M- side is a mirror of M+ side

P (kip) Mx (k-ft) 700

  • 200

180

  • 180

(Pmax) (Pmax) (Pmin) (Pmin) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

P-M Diagram – Asymmetric Section

Each quadrant different

(Pu1 , Mu1 )  NG

(Pu2 , Mu2 )  OK

(Pu3 , Mu3 )  OK

(Pu4 , Mu4 )  NG

Notice:

Absolute value of moments same on both sides

Larger axial force favorable on M+ side but unfavorable on M- side

P (kip) Mx (k-ft) 40000

  • 10000

60000

  • 40000

(Pmax) (Pmax) (Pmin) (Pmin) 1 2 3 4

x

Mx>0

y

Compression

x

Mx<0 Compression

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

P-M Diagram – Asymmetric Steel

Skewed Diagram

Plastic Centroid ≠ Geometrical Centroid (Concrete Centroid ≠ Steel Centroid)

(Pu1 , Mu1 )  NG, (Pu2 , Mu2 )  OK, (Pu3 , Mu3 )  NG |Mu1 | < |Mu2 | < |Mu3 | with Pu = const

P ( kN ) Mx ( kNm) 4500

  • 1500

450

  • 450

(Pmax) (Pmax) (Pmin) (Pmin) 1 2 3

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

P-M Diagram –  Factor

Strength reduction factor = (t )

t n n

(c ) P usually ( P ) sometimes                 

Compression controlled fy Es 0.75 or 0.7 0.65 Spiral* Other 0.005 Transition zone Tension Controlled 0.9

c

1 c

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

P-M Diagram –  Factor

Usually

Sometimes

n

(c ) ( P )    

n

(c ) ( P )    

Sections with a narrow portion along height, e.g.: I, L, T, U, C- shaped or irregular sections

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

P-M Diagram –  Factor

(Pu1 , Mu1 )  OK, (Pu2 , Mu2 )  NG, (Pu3 , Mu3 )  OK Mu1 < Mu2 < Mu3 with Pu = const

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

P-M Diagram –  Factor

(Pu1 , Mu1 )  OK, (Pu2 , Mu2 )  NG, (Pu3 , Mu3 )  OK |Mu1 | < |Mu2 | < |Mu3 | with Pu = const

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

P-M Diagram –  Factor

(Pu1 , Mu1 )  OK (Pu2 , Mu2 )  NG (Pu3 , Mu3 )  OK Pu1 < Pu2 < Pu3 with Mu = const

P (kip) Mx (k-ft) 60000

  • 10000

70000

  • 70000

fs=0.5fy fs=0 fs=0.5fy fs=0 (Pmax) (Pmax) (Pmin) (Pmin) fs=0.5fy fs=0 fs=0.5fy fs=0 1 2 3

fs=0.5fy fs 0 1 2 3

t n n

(c ) M

  • r

( M )

  • r

                

          

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Uniaxial/Biaxial – Symmetric Case

3D failure surface with tips directly on the P axis

Uniaxial X = Biaxial P-Mx with My = 0

Uniaxial Y = Biaxial P-My with Mx = 0

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Uniaxial/Biaxial – Asymmetric case

Tips of 3D failure surface may be

  • ff the P axis

Uniaxial X means N.A. parallel to X axis but this produces Mx ≠ and My ≠

Uniaxial X may be different than Biaxial P-Mx with My = 0

c

1 c

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Uniaxial/Biaxial – Asymmetric Case

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Moment Magnification – Sway Frames

Magnification at column ends (Sway frames)

M2 = M2ns + s M2s

If sign(M2ns ) = -sign(M2s ) then the magnified moment, M2 , is smaller than first order moment (M2ns +M2s ) or it can even change sign, e.g.:

M2ns = 16 k-ft, M2s = -10.0 k-ft,  = 1.2 M2 = 16 + 1.2 (-10.0) = 4.0 k-ft (M2ns +M2s ) = 6.0 k-ft

M2ns = 16 k-ft, M2s = -14.4 k-ft,  = 1.2 M2 = 16 + 1.2 (-14.4) = -1.28 k-ft (M2ns +M2s ) = 1.6 k-ft

First-order moment may govern the design rather than second order-moment

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Moment Magnification – Sway Frames

Since ACI 318-08 moments in compression members in sway frames are magnified both at ends and along length

Prior to ACI 318-08 magnification along length applied only if

u u ' c g

35 r P f A  l

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Moment Magnification – M1

M1 may govern the design rather than M2 even though |M2 | > |M1 | and ACI 318, 10.10.6 provision stipulates that compression members shall be designed for Mc = M2 . Consider:

Double curvature bending (M1 /M2 < 0)

Asymmetric Section

M2

 OK but

M1  NG

M P

M2 M1 M2 M1

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Moment Magnification – M2nd/M1st

ACI 318-11, 10.10.2.1 limits ratio of second-order moment to first-order moments M2nd/M1st < 1.4

What if ratio is negative, e.g.:

M1st = Mns + Ms = 10.0 + (-9.0) = 1.0 k-ft

M2nd = (Mns + s Ms ) = 1.05 (10.0+1.3(-9.0)) = -1.78 k-ft

M2nd/M1st = -1.78  OK or NG ?

Check |M2nd/M1st|= 1.78 > 1.4 NG

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Moment Magnification – M2nd/M1st

What if M1st is very small, i.e. M1st < Mmin , e.g.:

M1st = M2 = 0.1 k-ft (Nonsway frame)

Mmin = Pu (0.6 +0.03h) = 5 k-ft

M2nd = Mc = Mmin = 1.1*5 = 5.5 k-ft

M2nd/M1st = 5.5/0.1 = 55  OK or NG ?

Check M2nd/Mmin = 1.1  OK

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Conclusions

Summary

Irregular shapes of sections and reinforcement patterns lead to irregular and distorted interaction diagrams

Large number of load cases and load combinations lead to large number of load points potentially covering entire (P, Mx , My ) space

Intuition may overlook unusual conditions in tall structures

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Conclusions

Recommendations

Do not eliminate load cases and combinations based on intuition

Run biaxial rather than uniaxial analysis for asymmetric sections

Run both 1st order and 2nd

  • rder analysis

Apply engineering judgment rather than following general code provisions literally

Use reliable software and verify its results

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Call: +1-847-966-4357 Email: info@StructurePoint.org