New Urban Renewal Study Area Central City Housing Considerations - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Central City Housing Considerations

New Urban Renewal Study Area

Central City Housing Policies Urban Renewal Area Housing Strategies Emerging Housing Trends Affordable Housing Challenges Development Opportunities Considerations

Topics

Subtext Optional Style

1988 Central City Plan

1999 City Comprehensive Plan Housing Goals

Goal #4 Enhance Portland’s vitality as a community at the center of the region’s housing market by providing housing of different types, tenures, density, sizes, costs, and locations that accommodate the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of current and future households.

City Housing Polices

No Net Loss Affordable Housing Preservation (2001) Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness Permanent Supportive Housing (2004)  Schools/Family Housing (2006) Closing the Minority Homeownership Gap (2004) TIF Set Aside Policy – Sets minimum investment for affordable housing (2007)

• nal

Body Text

Diverse Housing Options

Lovejoy Station-new market rate and affordable units Old Town Lofts Neighborhoods

Street Car Lofts-transportation Museum Place-mixed Use Marshall Wells, a historic preservation condo project

Housing

• Affordable
• Mixed Use
• Preservation
• Traditional

The yards –affordable rental Headwaters-innovation

URA Housing Strategies Common Themes

Create a vibrant 24 hour community:

• Jobs-Housing-Retail-Recreation

Develop balanced communities with a diversity of people and housing options. Leverage City’s investment in infrastructure,

• i.e. schools, roads, retail centers, parks.

Make neighborhoods more dense to absorb population growth. Redevelop Vacant and underutilized property.

Downtown Housing Strategy

South of Burnside 2001-2006

Preserve or Replace Section 8 Housing Preserve or Replace Low-income Housing (non-section 8) Develop Mixed income and Middle-Income Rental Housing Develop Mixed and Middle Income Condominiums

Museum Place-mixed Use

In order of priority

River District Housing Strategy

North of Burnside 1999

Develop a range of housing options that reflect the income distribution of the City as a whole. Created varied options (i.e. size and tenure) for Mixed and Middle Income Condominiums and apartments. Establish Targets for housing development based on HUD Median Family Income categories. Encourage Homeownership. Clean up under utilized land to encourage development.

Sitka apartments-affordable to below 60% MFI

Recent Housing Trends

Lack of Capital Condo conversion cycle Foreclosures Falling wages and unemployment Demand for family housing Demand for middle income workforce housing Emerging demand for sustainability practices 20 minute neighborhoods Green Building Social Equity

Affordable Housing Preservation

Preserving already affordable housing from conversion to market rate.

Challenges:

Expiring Federal Section 8 & Low Income Housing Tax Credit contracts Rent increases & conversion of open market/privately owned to condos/rental or student housing Constrained Federal resources Limited local resources Aging inventory that require additional investment (maintenance, repairs and ongoing

• perations)

No identified funding source for future development

Preservation Opportunities

 6 Expiring Section 8 properties –

• 471 units-
• adequate funding needs to

be identified  Other expiring tax credit properties may need assistance

New Urban Renewal Study Area

Body Text

Redevelopment Potential

Current Housing

Development Opportunities ?

 Goosehollow  Neighborhood characteristics, needs?  South of Market  PSU student housing?  Connections to OHSU?  Employer Supported Housing?  Sustainability District?  North of Market  Support the retail core?  Supportive Infrastructure?  Northwest  Proximity to single family neighborhoods?  Connections to Pearl Neighborhood?  Potential to master plan?

Considerations for URA Boundaries

 Supports City Housing Policy

Redevelopment potential for housing Creates a vibrant community

Considerations for URA Boundaries

 Supports City Housing Policy

Provides housing of different types, costs, and locations that accommodate the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities

• f current and future households.

 Affordable Housing Preservation(Section 8 and Tax Credit)  No Net Loss of unrestricted affordable housing Timing of needs vs opportunities

Considerations for URA Boundaries

Redevelopment potential appropriate for housing

Affordable land Can be master planned Current conditions and distribution of housing Areas with potential to generate increment and support non- increment generating projects Infill redevelopment

Considerations for URA Boundaries

Creates a vibrant community

Supports a mix of housing, jobs, retail, recreation. Potential for mixed use/mixed income development. Has or could benefit from community amenities such as schools, parks, social services, retail. Attracts a diverse group of people by income and other measures.

Housing Opportunities Central City URA