New Tools for Aroma Barrier Testing Mika Vh-Nissi T. Hjelt, M. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

new tools for aroma barrier testing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

New Tools for Aroma Barrier Testing Mika Vh-Nissi T. Hjelt, M. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

New Tools for Aroma Barrier Testing Mika Vh-Nissi T. Hjelt, M. Jokio, R. Kokkonen, J. Kukkonen, A. Mikkelson 1 08.03.2007 What is KCL? Located in Espoo, Finland Founded in 1916 Staff 300 Research areas: Fibers


slide-1
SLIDE 1

08.03.2007 1

New Tools for Aroma Barrier Testing

Mika Vähä-Nissi

  • T. Hjelt, M. Jokio, R. Kokkonen,
  • J. Kukkonen, A. Mikkelson
slide-2
SLIDE 2

08.03.2007 2

What is KCL?

  • Located in Espoo, Finland
  • Founded in 1916
  • Staff 300
  • Research areas:

– Fibers – Papermaking solutions – Printing surfaces – End-use environment – Composite/ packaging materials

  • Owners:
slide-3
SLIDE 3

08.03.2007 3

Contents of presentation

Motivation

  • Motivation for barrier studies?
  • Why are aromas challenging?
  • How to measure aroma barrier?

Test methods used for aroma barrier studies Case: Effect of base paper and paperboard Concluding remarks

slide-4
SLIDE 4

08.03.2007 4

Motivation for barrier studies?

  • Need to optimize existing materials:

– Cost and environmental issues – Global business and new retailing channels – Current packaging solutions for new products

  • Need to develop new materials:

– New materials emerging – true performance? – Transformation from “passive” to “active” – Packaging concepts and processes changing

slide-5
SLIDE 5

08.03.2007 5

What makes aromas challenging?

  • Important characteristic of flavor and foods

– Even small inbalance detrimental to food quality

  • Aromas consist of volatile organic compounds

– From tens to over thousand different compounds

  • No widely accepted test methods or specifications

for aroma transfer into/ through materials

  • Correlation with other barrier properties at best

indicative

slide-6
SLIDE 6

08.03.2007 6

Permeation methods utilizing various detectors

  • For nonporous materials

(continuous flushing)

  • Reaching steady-state

permeation

  • Commercial systems based
  • n this have existed
  • Also porous substrates
  • No steady-state -

concentration gradient changes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

08.03.2007 7

Sorption methods

  • Solubility and diffusion of single materials
  • Only qualitative comparison of multilayer materials
slide-8
SLIDE 8

08.03.2007 8

Test methods used for aroma barrier

1) Gravimetric method

2) Desiccator method 3) Permeation cell AromaBar

Permeation

Solubility/ diffusion Diffusion (solubility)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

08.03.2007 9

Desiccator method - sorption/ desorption

Procedure:

  • Samples exposed to aroma
  • Allowed to desorb for specific time
  • Analyzed with HS-GC or extraction

Pros:

  • For aroma blends & single aromas
  • Diluted concentrations

Cons:

  • Porous materials more difficult
  • Not suitable for coated materials
slide-10
SLIDE 10

08.03.2007 10

Permeation cell – manual quasi-isostatic method

Procedure:

  • Two subcells, sample between
  • Samples removed manually with

gas-tight syringe and injected into CG

Pros:

  • For aroma blends & single aromas
  • Diluted concentrations
  • For uncoated and coated

paper/ board, and polymer films

Cons:

  • Manual sampling and leakages
  • No temperature/ humidity control
slide-11
SLIDE 11

08.03.2007 11

Sample transfer

  • ven

Test cell Cell

  • ven

Aromas

  • Transfer from vapor contact
  • Automatic gas sampling
  • For uncoated and coated paper

and board, and polymer films

  • Controlled temperature

and humidity

  • No interfering continuous

carrier gas flows

GC Control unit GC/ FID

2 1 3

1

Sample

2 3

Tem p. m ax. 1 5 0 °C Tem p. m ax. 6 0 °C

AromaBar – improved method for barrier tests

slide-12
SLIDE 12

08.03.2007 12

AromaBar vs. Permeation cell methods

Improved data quality: Concept same

  • Follow concentration in

receiving cell

  • Mathematical analysis to obtain

diffusion coefficients (D)

Improved repeatability

  • Standard deviation for 5 tests

with LDPE coated paper ∼ 10 %

  • Better control of test procedure

Improved usability Temperature/ humidity control

( ) ( )

∞ = +

⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + − + − + =

2 2 2 ) 1 (

4 1 2 exp 1 2 ) 1 ( 2 2 1 ) (

n n Max

L Dt n n L L M t M π π

slide-13
SLIDE 13

08.03.2007 13

One aroma compound not enough…

Aroma compounds: different structures/ polarities, representative, safe and suitable for GC analysis Stability of single compounds need special attention!

slide-14
SLIDE 14

08.03.2007 14

Diluted model solutions as aroma sources

w-% %

Diluted to lower vapor concentrations in order to avoid swelling of polymer (aim relative vapor pressures ≤ 10 % ) Lower concentrations for tests at elevated temperatures

slide-15
SLIDE 15

08.03.2007 15

Case

Role of base sheet in aroma barrier

  • ”Base sheet has no effect on barrier!”
  • PE and dispersion coated papers excellent barriers

against inert gases – w hat about arom as?

  • Possible to make some barrier already on paper

and paperboard machine? If base sheet has an effect on aroma barrier:

  • Diffusion coefficient calculated based on coating

thickness decreases

  • Is surface or total porosity more important?
slide-16
SLIDE 16

08.03.2007 16

Case

Set 1 Set 1 for Permeation cell and Desiccator tests Set 2 Set 2 for AromaBar

slide-17
SLIDE 17

08.03.2007 17

Case

Analysis of coated sheets from cross-cuts

Porosity profile of base sheet and total porosity, coating thickness and thickness distribution

slide-18
SLIDE 18

08.03.2007 18

Case

Base sheet decreases diffusion

Example from AromaBar tests with aroma blend

slide-19
SLIDE 19

08.03.2007 19

Case

Coating thickness variation not important…

slide-20
SLIDE 20

08.03.2007 20

Case

Surface rather than total porosity

  • f base sheet affects diffusion

Relative D of limonene vs. base sheet porosities

Relative D (limonene) of PE coating vs. base sheet porosities

AromaBar, 100 g/ m 2 sheets

♦ Permeation cell, 80 g/ m 2 sheets

slide-21
SLIDE 21

08.03.2007 21

Case

Aroma loss via solubility determined by polymer

  • Determined by polymer in

contact with aroma

  • Aroma compounds

compete over sorption sites

  • Solubility of compounds

(carvone and d-limonene) to fibers low

slide-22
SLIDE 22

08.03.2007 22

Concluding remarks

  • Aromas: numerous compounds at low concentrations

with different affinities to foods and packaging materials

  • New sorption and quasi-isostatic permeation test

methods for aroma vapor barrier developed

  • Base sheet decreases diffusion of aroma compounds

through PE coated sheets:

– Surface rather than total porosity of base sheet important – Potential to improve barrier further (e.g. HD paper)

  • Solubility of typical compounds (carvone, limonene)

into fibers low

slide-23
SLIDE 23

08.03.2007 23

Thank You for Co-Authors…

E-mail: name.name@kcl.fi

slide-24
SLIDE 24

08.03.2007 24

… laboratorians/ technicians who made it possible, … SUSTAINPACK EU-project for supporting part of this study, … and Borealis Polymers for providing us with polyethylenes