New Activities of Emission Modeling New Activities of Emission - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

new activities of emission modeling new activities of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

New Activities of Emission Modeling New Activities of Emission - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

New Activities of Emission Modeling New Activities of Emission Modeling Integration of Climate Change Policy & Integration of Climate Change Policy & Solid Waste Treatment Policy Solid Waste Treatment Policy Toshihiko MASUI National


slide-1
SLIDE 1

New Activities of Emission Modeling New Activities of Emission Modeling

Integration of Climate Change Policy & Integration of Climate Change Policy & Solid Waste Treatment Policy Solid Waste Treatment Policy Toshihiko MASUI

National Institute for Environmental Studies 6th AIM International Workshop NIES 27-28 March, 2001

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Object of New Model Analysis

Evaluation of effects of environmental policies for both global environmental problems (climate change, ...) and domestic environmental problems (solid waste, air pollutant, water pollutant, ...) on economic activities and material balance

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Past & Present of This Analysis

  • 1998

Analysis using dynamic optimization model (EJOR; 15 sectors & 11 wastes)

  • 1999

Construction of recursive model (IGES; 32 sectors & 18 wastes)

  • 2000

Preliminary Analysis on Policy (JSCC; 33sectors & 18 wastes)

  • 2001

⇒Future directions Introduction of environmental-economic linkage model end-use module economic module material balance module Introduction of recursive economic model and its preliminary results Introduction of modification of economic model and its analysis Activities on AIM Workshop

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview of Economic Model

  • Computable General Equilibrium Model
  • Recursive Dynamics
  • Pollutant Generation and Treatment

– Pollutant is regarded as “bads bads”

  • Environmental Constraints:

– CO2 Emissions – Final Disposal of Solid Wastes

  • 33 Sectors, 31 Commodities, and 18 Solid Waste
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Model Flow (Sorry too Small!)

PTG UTL House- hold ACT(V) production PK PL POH PP(V,P) PM(H,V) PENE(V,”pro”) PY(U) PIWM PMWM RED(J,P) pollutant self management PA(P) PX(H) PXE(EN) PM(H,J) PENE(J,P) PZ PEK(P) PL SWS(F) sewage service activity PS(F) PM(H,”sew”) PENE(“sew”,”pro”) PP(“sew”,P) PEK(“sew”) PL PK POH IWM(W,WMW) industrial waste management activity PX(H) PM(H,”iwm”) PENE(“iwm”,”pro”) PP(“iwm”,P) PEK(“w_i”) PL PK POH PZ PIW(W,WMW) PXE(EN) MWM(W,WMW) municipal waste management activity PX(H) PM(H,”mwm”) PENE(“mwm”,”pro”) PP(“mwm”,P) PEK(“w_m”) PL PK POH PZ PMW(W,WMW) PXE(EN) IWS(W,WMW) PWIX(W) MWS(W,WMW) PWMX(W) IWX(W) MWX(W) PWI(W) PY(U) PWM(W) PY(U) MWG(J) IWG(J) PW(J,”w_m”) PW(J,”w_i”) EXD(U) ABR PEX(U) PDM(U) PIM(I) MRPA(J,P) self management PP(J,P) MRPS(J,F) PP(J,F) MRPE(J,P) discharge into env. PEV(P) PP(J,P) MRPW(J,S) PP(J,S) PW(J,S) PK PL PEK(P) PZ PCARB PEV(P) PDM(U) INV(U) PDM(U) PX(U) PIM(U) PINV(U) CAPF PCAP INFR(IVP) PSI(IVP) ECPF1(P) ECPF2 (P) PECP(P) PGI(U) GI(U) PDM(U) PX(U) PIM(U) CON(I) PDM(U) PX(I) PIM(I) PC(I) HOUSE PCON PENEH COH PDM(U) PIM(U) POH PS(F) PECH(EN) IOM(H,J) PDM(H) PIM(H) PM(H,J) PX(H) EAGG1(EN) EAGG2(EN) EAGG3(EN) PE(EN) PDM(EN) PIM(EN) PXE(EN) CEM(EN,J,D) CEMH(EN) PEC(EN,J,D) PECH(EN) PCARB PCARB EAH EAG(J,D) PENE(J,D) PENEH GWS HSS PWM(W) PS(F) PGS PGW HWS GSS PWM(W) PS(F) PDM(“mwm”) PDM(“sew”) PDM(“mwm”) PDM(“sew”) PDM(U) PE(EN) PE(EN) PE(EN) PE(EN) PCAP PSI(IVP) PECP(P) PGI(U) PTG PCON PDM(U) PIM(U) PGW PGS PE(EN)

Flow of goods see “commodities” in the model Activity see “sectors” in the model

PTG UTL House- hold ACT(V) production PK PL POH PP(V,P) PM(H,V) PENE(V,”pro”) PY(U) PIWM PMWM RED(J,P) pollutant self management PA(P) PX(H) PXE(EN) PM(H,J) PENE(J,P) PZ PEK(P) PL SWS(F) sewage service activity PS(F) PM(H,”sew”) PENE(“sew”,”pro”) PP(“sew”,P) PEK(“sew”) PL PK POH IWM(W,WMW) industrial waste management activity PX(H) PM(H,”iwm”) PENE(“iwm”,”pro”) PP(“iwm”,P) PEK(“w_i”) PL PK POH PZ PIW(W,WMW) PXE(EN) MWM(W,WMW) municipal waste management activity PX(H) PM(H,”mwm”) PENE(“mwm”,”pro”) PP(“mwm”,P) PEK(“w_m”) PL PK POH PZ PMW(W,WMW) PXE(EN) IWS(W,WMW) PWIX(W) MWS(W,WMW) PWMX(W) IWX(W) MWX(W) PWI(W) PY(U) PWM(W) PY(U) MWG(J) IWG(J) PW(J,”w_m”) PW(J,”w_i”) EXD(U) ABR PEX(U) PDM(U) PIM(I) MRPA(J,P) self management PP(J,P) MRPS(J,F) PP(J,F) MRPE(J,P) discharge into env. PEV(P) PP(J,P) MRPW(J,S) PP(J,S) PW(J,S) PK PL PEK(P) PZ PCARB PEV(P) PDM(U) INV(U) PDM(U) PX(U) PIM(U) PINV(U) CAPF PCAP INFR(IVP) PSI(IVP) ECPF1(P) ECPF2 (P) PECP(P) PGI(U) GI(U) PDM(U) PX(U) PIM(U) CON(I) PDM(U) PX(I) PIM(I) PC(I) HOUSE PCON PENEH COH PDM(U) PIM(U) POH PS(F) PECH(EN) IOM(H,J) PDM(H) PIM(H) PM(H,J) PX(H) EAGG1(EN) EAGG2(EN) EAGG3(EN) PE(EN) PDM(EN) PIM(EN) PXE(EN) CEM(EN,J,D) CEMH(EN) PEC(EN,J,D) PECH(EN) PCARB PCARB EAH EAG(J,D) PENE(J,D) PENEH GWS HSS PWM(W) PS(F) PGS PGW HWS GSS PWM(W) PS(F) PDM(“mwm”) PDM(“sew”) PDM(“mwm”) PDM(“sew”) PDM(U) PE(EN) PE(EN) PE(EN) PE(EN) PCAP PSI(IVP) PECP(P) PGI(U) PTG PCON PDM(U) PIM(U) PGW PGS PE(EN)

Flow of goods see “commodities” in the model Activity see “sectors” in the model

Household Production Activities Including activities for env. preservation Market Integration of recycled commodities and

  • rdinary commodities
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Model Overview

capital labor energy inputs for pollution management

  • ther inter-

mediate inputs solid waste household investment final consumption resource input environmental industry disposal recycling waste treatment resource input final disposal CO2 environmental investment intermediate management policy policy policy policy policy policy production activity market policy

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Economic Sectors & Commodities

ID contents ID contents AGR agriculture, forestry and fisheries WTR collection, purification and distribution of water MIN mining SAL wholesale and retail trade FOD manufacture of food FIN finance and insurance TEX manufacture of textile mill products EST real estate TRS transportation and communications SRV services CHM manufacture of chemical and allied products GOV government service NPS non-profit institution services SEW sewage service FMT manufacture of fabricated metal products MWM municipal waste treatment service MCH manufacture of general machinery IWM industrial waste treatment service COL coal mining and manufacture of coal products OIL crude oil production and manufacture of petroleum TRE manufacture of transportation equipment GAS natural gas production and manufacture of gas THE* thermal power generation HYD* hydro power generation OTH miscellaneous manufacturing industries NUC* nuclear power generation CNS construction ELE** electricity *: only sector, and **: only commodity. NMM manufacture of ceramic, stone, and clay products EMC manufacture of equipment for environmental preservation PLP manufacture of lumber, wood products, pulp, paper and paper products BMT manufacture of iron, steel, non-ferrous metals and products ELM manufacture of electrical machinery, equipment and supplies PRI manufacture of precision instruments and machinery

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Treated Solid Wastes

Contents ASH ash SLD sludge WOL slush, waste oil WAC waste acid WAL waste alkali WPL * waste plastics WPP * waste paper WWD * waste wood WTX * waste fiber and textile WAP * animal and plants wastes WRB * waste rubber SCM * metal trash, scrap metal WGC * waste glass SLG slag WCT construction and demolition waste DST dust, soot EXC animal excrement CRC animal carcass ID *: category of municipal waste.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Modification since Last Year

  • Base Year: 1990 ⇒ 1995

– Revision of Database

  • Time Step: 5 years ⇒ 1 year
  • Efficiency Improvement:

Exogenous ⇒ Change by New Capital Formation

  • Taxation: Not Expressed ⇒ Expressed
  • Capital Stock: Whole Sector ⇒ Individual Sector
  • Material Balance: Inconsistent ⇒ Consistent
  • English Manual: Nothing ⇒ Ver. 0 (almost finished)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Simulation and Parameters Modification

Database in 1995 Input-Output Table Energy Balance Table Waste Generation Table ・ ・ ・ Calculation in 1995 Parameters Calculation in 1996 Revision of parameters based on calculated new capital stock share Revision of parameters based on calculated new capital stock share Calculation in 1997 ... Scenarios *Efficiency of new capital *Change of preference *Environmental constraints *…

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Production Structure

  • f CGE Model

goods & service m activity intermediate goods 1 energy production capital labor pollution 1 value added intermediate goods n composed intermediate goods & service … input for pollution management pollution p … goods & service 1 … σ=0 σ=1 σ=0 σ=0 σ=0 electricity fossil fuel 1 fossil fuel CO2 emission (environmental resource) fossil fuel e … composed fossil fuel σ=0 σ=0 σ=0 produced recycled σ=0 σ:elasticity of substitution environmental capital labor energy intermediate goods σ=0 self management contract management discharge (environmental resource) σ=∞ Share of energy inputs depends on the diffusion

  • f capital stock
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Necessary Datasets for Model Development

Input-output table

Environmental industries are disaggregated for detailed analysis.

Energy balance table Pollutant generation, emission & reduction Solid waste flow

Quantity of solid waste generation, management, disposal, and recycle

Input for pollutant management

Including not only environmental investment but also energy, labor, and

  • ther inputs for pollutant management.

Make matrix

This matrix should be prepared when joint products*1 are modeled.

*1 joint products: technologically inseparable products ex. town gas and coke

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Necessary Data (1) –Input-output Table

Intermediate Demand Final Demand Goods A Goods B Goods Z Consumption Expenditure Fixed Capital Formation Export Import Output Goods A Goods B Goods Z Intermediate Input Wage Value Added Operating Surplus Indirect Tax

  • Subsidy

Depreciation Output XAB XBB XZB WB SB TB DB YB XBA XBZ CB FCB EXB IMB YB … … … :

Intermediate input

  • f Goods B to

produce Good Z YB=ΣiXiB+WB+SB+TB+DB YB=ΣoXBo+CB+FCB+EXB-IMB Environmental equipment, sewage, waste management service and so on are disaggregated for detailed analysis.

Fixed Capital Formation for Environment Preservation

Environmental Investment

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Necessary Data (2) –Energy balance table

Energy Type Energy 1 Energy 2 Energy e Indigenous Production Imports Primary Energy Petroleum Refineries Transfer Electricity : … : Total Sector A Final Consumption Sector B : Residential (Household)

Sector classification is the same as that in IO table. Energy balance table is used for estimation of energy related pollutant generation such CO2, SOx. Energy type is at least classified into energy goods in IO table.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sector A

Necessary Data (3) –Pollutant generation, reduction & emission

Industrial Sector Sector B Sector Z Household Generation Self Reduction Emission Pollutant a GBa SRBa EBa SRAa SRZa SRHa Contract Reduction … … CRBa GZa GHa … CRZa CRHa … EZa EHa … GAa CRAa EAa Generation Self Reduction Emission Pollutant p GBp SRBp EBp SRAp SRZp SRHp Contract Reduction … CRBp GZp GHp … CRZp CRHp … EZp EHp … GAp CRAp EAp Total SRTOTa GTOTa CRTOTa ETOTa SRTOTp GTOTp CRTOTp ETOTp … … … … … … …

GTOTp=ΣiGip+GHp Gip=SRip+CRip+Eip Treated pollutants depend on the analysis. To the environment Sector classification is the same as that in IO table.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Generation

Necessary Data (4) –Solid waste flow

Direct Reuse Intermediate Management Total Reuse Solid Waste a Solid Waste b Solid Waste s Solid Waste DRb WGb WMb TRb : Total Final Disposal TDb

WGs=DRs+DDs++WMs Treated solid wastes depend on the analysis. To the environment (Final disposal site)

Direct Final Disposal DDb Waste Management Reduction Reuse Final Disposal MZb MDb MRb DRs WGs WMs TRb TDb DDs MZs MDs MRs

WMs=WMs+MRs+MDs+ TRs=DRs+MRs TRs=DRs+MRs To the market (Recycled goods) From industry & household

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Necessary Data (5) –Input for pollutant management

Sectors Sector A Production Total Goods A Goods B Goods Z Intermediate Input Wage Value Added Operating Surplus Indirect Tax

  • Subsidy

Depreciation Output XAB XBB XZB WB SB TB DB YB XBA … … … : … … … … … … … Sector B : … Pollutant a Sector Z XBZ Pollutant p XABY XBBY XZBY WBY SBY TBY DBY YBY : XABa XBBa XZBa WBa SBa TBa DBa YBa : XABp XBBp XZBp WBp SBp TBp DBp YBp :

Xio=ΣpXiop+XioY Output of pollutant sub sector is equal to the quantity

  • f self reduced pollutant

YBp=ΣiXiBp+WBp+SBp+TBp+DBp Each sector is disaggregated into sub sectors such as production and pollutant self management.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Necessary Data (6) –Make matrix

Commodities Commodity A Commodity B Commodity Z Sector A Sector B Sector Z Sectors Total output YAB YBB YZB YB YBA YBZ … … … : Total output QB

Quantity of commodity Z produced by Sector B. QB=ΣcYBc YB=ΣaYaB YB, total output of commodity B, is equal to the total of IO table. By using IO table (commodities x commodity) and make matrix, U Matrix (matrix on commodity input by kind of economic activity) is calculated based on the commodity technology, which assumes that each commodity has its typical input structure, regardless of which industry is the producer.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Simulations

1. Evaluation of Environmental Policies

Recycled paper, low emissions vehicle, and environmental investment for waste management

2.

Evaluation of Production Activity Change

Increase of reused material input share

3.

End-use Model for Waste Management

Sewage sludge treatment Environmental constraints

CO2 constraint: Kyoto Target (CO2 emissions in 2010/1990 ⇒ 6 % reduction) Final disposal site: Government Target (Quantity of final disposal in 2010/1996 ⇒ 50% reduction)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Simulation Results 1(1)

  • 1. Evaluation of Environmental Policies

A) Enhancement of demand of recycled paper

and low emissions vehicle

B) Enhancement of environmental investment to

solid waste management

Background: Operation of several law for enhancement of demand of recycled commodities

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Simulation Results 1(2)

GDP Changes from No Policy Case

  • 100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 2005 2010 Year billion yen at 1990 price A)-1 Recycled paper A)-2 Low emission vehicle A)-3 Paper + vehicle B) Env. investment

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Simulation Results 1(3)

Change of CO2 emissions costs from No Policy Case

  • 21
  • 18
  • 15
  • 12
  • 9
  • 6
  • 3

3 2005 2010 Year %

A)-1 Recycled paper A)-2 Low emission vehicle A)-3 Paper + vehicle B) Env. investment

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Simulation Results 1(4)

Change of final disposal costs from No Policy Case

  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 2005 2010 Year % A)-1 Recycled paper A)-2 Low emission vehicle A)-3 Paper + vehicle B) Env. investment

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Simulation Results 2(1)

  • 2. Evaluation of Production Activity Change

A) Expansion of share of recycled material input B) Increase of waste collection cost C) Introduction of waste power generation

Background:

Targets of material reuse by government and business

  • rganization

Uncertainty of recycling activities –collection cost, additional cost, …

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Simulation Results 2(2)

Change of Waste Treatment

. E + 5 . E + 7 1 . E + 8 1 . 5 E + 8 2 . E + 8 2 . 5 E + 8 3 . E + 8 3 . 5 E + 8 4 . E + 8 4 . 5 E + 8 G e n e r a t i

  • n

i n 1 9 9 5 R e u s e i n 1 9 9 5 G e n e r a t i

  • n

i n 2 1 ( n

  • c
  • n

s t r a i n t s ) R e u s e

  • f

i n 2 1 ( n

  • c
  • n

s t r a i n t s ) G e n e r a t i

  • n

i n 2 1 ( n

  • p
  • l

i c y ) R e u s e

  • f

i n 2 1 ( n

  • p
  • l

i c y ) G e n e r a t i

  • n
  • f

A ) i n 2 1 R e u s e

  • f

A ) i n 2 1 G e n e r a t i

  • n
  • f

B ) i n 2 1 R e u s e

  • f

B ) i n 2 1 t

  • n

C R C E X C D S T W C T S L G W G C S C M W R B W A P W T X W W D W P P W P L W A L W A C W O L S L D A S H . E + 1 . E + 7 2 . E + 7 3 . E + 7 4 . E + 7 5 . E + 7 6 . E + 7 7 . E + 7 G e n e r a t i

  • n

i n 1 9 9 5 R e u s e i n 1 9 9 5 G e n e r a t i

  • n

i n 2 1 ( n

  • c
  • n

s t r a i n t s ) R e u s e

  • f

i n 2 1 ( n

  • c
  • n

s t r a i n t s ) G e n e r a t i

  • n

i n 2 1 ( n

  • p
  • l

i c y ) R e u s e

  • f

i n 2 1 ( n

  • p
  • l

i c y ) G e n e r a t i

  • n
  • f

A ) i n 2 1 R e u s e

  • f

A ) i n 2 1 G e n e r a t i

  • n
  • f

B ) i n 2 1 R e u s e

  • f

B ) i n 2 1 t

  • n

W G C S C M W R B W A P W T X W W D W P P W P L

Municipal waste Industrial waste

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Simulation Results 2(3)

GDP Change

  • 1

4

  • 1

2

  • 1
  • 8
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

2 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 6 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 2 1 Y e a r G D P c h a n g e t r i . y e n a t 1 9 9 5 p r i c e G D P L

  • s

s f r

  • m

e n v . C

  • n

s t . S c e n a r i

  • A

) S c e n a r i

  • B

)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Simulation Results 2(4)

GDP Change in each sector (2010/1995)

. . 2 . 4 . 6 . 8 1 . 1 . 2 1 . 4 1 . 6

A G R M I N F O D T E X P L P C H M N M M B M T F M T M C H E L M T R E P R I O T H C N S W T R S A L F I N E S T T R S S R V G O V N P S E M C S E W M W M I W M C O L O I L G A S T H E H Y D N U C G D P

N

  • c
  • n

s t r a i n t s N

  • p
  • l

i c y s c e n a r i i

  • A

) s c e n a r i i

  • B

)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Simulation Results 2(5)

Marginal cost of CO2 and final disposal

C O 2

1 2 3 4 1 9 9 5 2 2 5 2 1 Y e a r Y e n a t 1 9 9 5 p r i c e / t C N

  • p
  • l

i c y s c e n a r i

  • A

) s c e n a r i

  • B

) s c e n a r i

  • C

)

F i n a l D i s p

  • s

a l

1 2 3 4 5 1 9 9 5 2 2 5 2 1 Y e a r Y e n a t 1 9 9 5 p r i c e / t

  • n

N

  • p
  • l

i c y s c e n a r i

  • A

) s c e n a r i

  • B

) s c e n a r i

  • C

)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Simulation Results 3(1)

End-use model construction

– Sewage sludge* treatment from 1997 to 2026 – 26 technologies for treatment – Minimization of total treatment cost subject to upper limit of quantity of final disposal and material recycling demand

* Volume of sludge is 36 % of final disposal.

Background: Parameter modification by technology change

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Simulation Results 3(2)

Change of technology share

dehydrated cake compost drying incineration fusion carbonization I n 1 9 9 7 I n 2 2 6 F i x e d t e c h n

  • l
  • g

y a n d l

  • w

r e c y c l e d m a t e r i a l d e m a n d I n 2 2 6 I n t r

  • d

u c t i

  • n
  • f

a d v a n c e d t e c h n

  • l
  • g

y a n d e n h a n c e m e n t

  • f

r e c y c l e d m a t e r i a l d e m a n d

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Future Directions

  • Separation of some sectors

– Recycled paper, electric furnaces of crude steel, ...

  • Separation of intermediate treatment of solid wastes

– Incineration for reduction / other treatments for recycling

  • Apply this model to AIM collaboration countries

– Modification of model for wide use – Application to India with Dr. Rana

  • Apply to Material Balance Analysis

– Steel, paper, wood, carbon, ...

  • Integration with Bottom-up Model

– AIM end-use model / energy efficiency – Waste treatment technology model / solid waste treatment