MOS: Device Operation & Large Signal Model Lecture notes: Sec. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mos device operation large signal model
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MOS: Device Operation & Large Signal Model Lecture notes: Sec. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MOS: Device Operation & Large Signal Model Lecture notes: Sec. 4 Sedra & Smith (6 th Ed): Sec. 5.1-5.3 Sedra & Smith (5 th Ed): Sec. 4.1-4.3 F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012 Operational Basis of a Field-Effect Transistor (1)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MOS: Device Operation & Large Signal Model

Lecture notes: Sec. 4 Sedra & Smith (6th Ed): Sec. 5.1-5.3 Sedra & Smith (5th Ed): Sec. 4.1-4.3

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Operational Basis of a Field-Effect Transistor (1)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

P-type semiconductor Insulator Metal Dopent ions Holes (majority carries)

Consider the hypothetical semiconductor below: (constructed similar to a parallel plate capacitor)

Electrical contact

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Operational Basis of a Field-Effect Transistor (2)

  • If we apply a voltage v1 between electrodes, a

charge Q = C v1 will appear on each capacitor plate.

  • The electric field is strongest at the interface with the

insulator and charge likes to accumulate there.

  • Holes are pushed away from the insulator

interface forming a “depletion region”.

  • Depth of depletion region increases with v1.
  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

Depletion Region (no majority carrier)

  • If we increase v1 above a threshold value (Vt),

the electric field is strong enough to “pull” free electrons to the insulator interface. As the holes are repelled in this region, a “channel” is formed which contains electrons in the conduction band (“inversion layer”).

  • Inversion layer is a “virtual” n-type material.

Depletion Region (no majority carrier)

Inversion layer (“channel”)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Operational Basis of a Field-Effect Transistor (3)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

With inversion layer (v1 > Vt):

  • A current will flow in the channel
  • Current will be proportional to electron

charge in the channel or (v1 − Vt )

  • Magnitude of Current i2 is controlled by

voltage v1 (a Transistor!)

  • We apply a voltage across the p-type semiconductor:

(Assume current flows only in the n-type material, ignore current flowing in the p-type semiconductor)

No inversion layer (v1 < Vt):

  • No current will flow
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Operational Basis of a Field-Effect Transistor (4)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
  • We need to eliminate currents flowing in the p-type, i.e.,

current flows only in the “channel” which is a virtual n-type.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Channel width (L) is the smallest feature on the chip surface

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

MOSFET implementation on a chip MOSFET “cartoons” for deriving MOSFET characteristics MOSFET (or MOS): Metal-oxide field effect transistor NMOS: n-channel enhancement MOS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

NMOS i-v Characteristics (1)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
  • To ensure that body-source and body-drain junctions are reversed bias, we

assume that Body and Source are connected to each other and vDS ≥ 0.

  • We will re-examine this assumption later
  • Without a channel, no current flows (“Cut-off”).
  • For vGS > Vtn, a channel is formed. The total

charge in the channel is ) SiO (for F/m 10 45 . 3 9 . 3 insulator

  • f

y permitivit : insulator

  • f

Thickness : area unit per e Capacitanc :

2 11 −

× = = = = = = ε ε ε ε

  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x

tn GS

  • x

t t C L W C C )

  • V

WL (v C CV |Q|

slide-8
SLIDE 8

NMOS i-v Characteristics (2)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
  • vGS > Vtn : a channel is formed!
  • Apply a “small” voltage, vDS between drain & source.
  • A current flow due to the “drift” of electrons in the

n-channel:

DS OV

  • x

n D DS n t GS

  • x

n D

v V L W C i v V v L W C i ) (

,

µ µ = − = MOS acts as a resistance with its conductivity controlled by VOV (or vGS). V L W C g v g i

OV

  • x

n DS DS DS D

with µ = = Overdrive Voltage:

tn GS OV

V v V − =

slide-9
SLIDE 9

NMOS i-v Characteristics (3)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
  • When vDS is increased the channel becomes narrower

near the drain (local depth of the channel depends on the difference between VOV and local voltage).

Triode Mode

[ ]

2

5 .

DS DS OV

  • x

n D

v v V L W C i − = µ

  • When vDS is increased further such that vDS = VOV ,

the channel depth becomes zero at the drain (Channel “pinched off”).

  • When vDS is increased further, vDS > VOV , the

location of channel pinch-off remains close to the drain and iD remains approximately constant.

Saturation Mode

2

5 .

OV

  • x

n D

V L W C i µ =

slide-10
SLIDE 10

NMOS i-v Characteristics (4)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

For a given vGS (or VOV)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

NMOS i-v Characteristics Plot (1)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
  • NMOS i-v characteristics is a surface

* Plot for Vt,n = 1 V and µnCox (W/L) = 2.0 mA/V2

) , (

DS GS D

v v f i =

slide-12
SLIDE 12

NMOS i-v Characteristics Plot (2)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

Looking at surface with vGS axis pointing out of the paper* *Note: surface is truncated (i.e., vGS < 5 V)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

NMOS i-v Characteristics Plots

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Channel-Width Modulation

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
  • The expression we derived for saturation region

assumed that the pinch-off point remains at the drain and thus iD remains constant.

  • In reality, the pinch-off point moves “slightly” away

from the drain: Channel-width Modulation

( )

A DS OV

  • x

n D

V v V L W C i / 1 1 5 .

2

= + = λ λ µ

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Body Effect

  • Recall that Drain-Body and Source-Body diodes should be reversed biased.
  • We assumed that Source is connected to the body (vSB = 0) and vDS = vDB > 0
  • In a chip (same body for all NMOS), it is impossible to connect all sources

to the body (all NMOS sources are connected together.

  • Thus, the body (for NMOS) is connected to the largest negative voltage

(negative terminal of the power supply).

  • Doing so, changes the threshold voltage (called “Body Effect”)
  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

( )

| 2 | | 2 |

, F SB F tn tn

V V V φ φ γ − + + =

  • In this course we will ignore body effect as well as other second-
  • rder effects such as velocity saturation.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

p-channel Enhancement MOS (PMOS)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
  • A PMOS can be constructed analogous to an NMOS: (n-type body),

heavily doped p-type source and drain.

  • A virtual “p-type” channel is formed in a P-MOS (holes are carriers in

the channel) by applying a negative vGS.

  • i-v characteristic equations of a PMOS is similar to the NMOS with the

exception:

  • Voltages are negative (we switch the terminals to have positive voltages:

use vSG instead of vGS ).

  • Use mobility of holes, µp , instead of µn in the expression for iD
slide-17
SLIDE 17

MOS Circuit symbols and conventions

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

PMOS NMOS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

MOS i-v Characteristics Equations: iD (vGS , vDS ) & iG = 0

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

*Note: S&S defines |VOV |= vSG – |Vt,p| and uses |VOV |in the PMOS formulas.

PMOS (VOV = vSG – |Vtp|, λ = 1 / |VA| )*

[ ] [ ]

SD OV

  • x

p D OV SD OV SD SD OV

  • x

p D OV SD OV D OV

v V L W C i V v V v v V L W C i V v V i V λ µ µ + = ≥ ≥ − = ≤ ≥ = ≤ 1 5 . and : Saturation 2 5 . and : Triode : Off

  • Cut

2 2

NMOS (VOV = vGS – Vtn, λ = 1 / VA)

[ ]

[ ]

DS OV

  • x

n D OV DS OV DS DS OV

  • x

n D OV DS OV D OV

v V L W C i V v V v v V L W C i V v V i V λ µ µ + = ≥ ≥ − = ≤ ≥ = ≤ 1 5 . and : Saturation 2 5 . and : Triode : Off

  • Cut

2 2

slide-19
SLIDE 19

MOS operation is “Conceptually” similar to a BJT -- iD & vDS are controlled by vGS

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

Controller part: Circuit connected to GS sets vGS (or VOV ) Controlled part: iD & vDS are set by transistor state (&

  • utside circuit)
  • A similar solution method to BJT:
  • Write down GS-KVL and DS-KVL, assume MOS is in a particular state, solve

with the corresponding MOS equation and validate the assumption.

  • MOS circuits are simpler to solve because iG = 0 !
  • However, we get a quadratic equation to solve if MOS in triode (check MOS

in saturation first!)

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

Example 1: In the circuit below, RD = 1 k, and VDD = 12 V. Compute vo for vi = 0, 6, and 12 V. (µnCox (W/L) = 0.5 mA/V2 , Vt = 2 V, and λ = 0 )

DS D DS D D DD GS i

v i v i R V v v + = + = = = 10 12 : KVL

  • DS

: KVL

  • GS

3

V 12 10 12 : KVL

  • DS
  • ff
  • Cut

V 2 : KVL

  • GS

3

= = → + × = = → → = < = =

DS

  • DS

D t GS i

v v v i V v v correct Assumption V 4 V . 8 V . 8 10 4 10 12 : KVL

  • DS

mA . 4 4 10 5 . 5 . 5 . V 4 : Saturation Assume

3 3 2 3 2

→ = > = = = → + × × = = × × × = = = ≥

− − OV DS DS

  • DS

OV

  • x

n D OV DS

V v v v v V L W C i V v µ

Part 1: vi = 0

V 4

  • ff
  • Cut

in Not V 2 6 : KVL GS = − = → = > = = −

t GS OV t GS i

V v V V v v

Part 2: vi = 6 V

  • DS

v v =

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Example 1: In the circuit below, RD = 1 k, and VDD = 12 V. Compute vo for vi = 0, 6, and 12 V. (µnCox (W/L) = 0.5 mA/V2 , Vt = 2 V, and λ = 0 )

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

DS D DS D D DD GS i

v i v i R V v v + = + = = = 10 12 : KVL

  • DS

: KVL

  • GS

3

incorrect Assumption V 10 V 13 V . 13 10 . 25 10 12 : KVL

  • DS

mA . 25 10 10 5 . 5 . 5 . V 10 : Saturation Assume

3 3 2 3 2

→ = > − = − = → + × × = = × × × = = = ≥

− − OV DS DS DS OV

  • x

n D OV DS

V v v v V L W C i V v µ V 10

  • ff
  • Cut

in Not V 2 12 : KVL

  • GS

= − = → = > = =

t GS OV t GS i

V v V V v v

Part 3: vi = 12 V

  • DS

v v =

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Example 1: In the circuit below, RD = 1 k, and VDD = 12 V. Compute vo for vi = 0, 6, and 12 V. (µnCox (W/L) = 0.5 mA/V2 , Vt = 2 V, and λ = 0 )

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

DS D DS D D DD GS i

v i v i R V v v + = + = = = 10 12 : KVL

  • DS

: KVL

  • GS

3

[ ]

48 24 ] 20 [ 10 5 . 5 . 10 12 10 12 : KVL

  • DS

2 5 . V 10 : Triode Assume

2 2 3

  • 3

3 2

= + − + − × × × × = + × = − = = <

DS DS DS DS DS DS D DS DS OV

  • x

n D OV DS

v v v v v v i v v V L W C i V v µ V 10 = − =

t GS OV

V v V

Part 3 (cont’d): vi = 12 V

  • DS

v v = mA 8 . 9 10 12 V 10 V 2 . 2 ) (incorrect V 8 . 21

3

= → + × = = < = = = =

D DS D OV DS

  • DS
  • i

v i V v v v v

slide-23
SLIDE 23

NMOS Transfer Function (1)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

) , (

DS GS D DS D D DD i GS

v v f i v i R V v v = + = =

  • For vGS < Vt , NMOS is in cutoff: iD = 0

DD D D DD DS

  • V

i R V v v = − = =

vi can be applied directly to MOS There is no need for a RG .

slide-24
SLIDE 24

NMOS Transfer Function (1)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

) , (

DS GS D DS D D DD i GS

v v f i v i R V v v = + = =

  • For vGS < Vt , NMOS is in cutoff: iD = 0

DD D D DD DS

  • V

i R V v v = − = =

vi can be applied directly to MOS There is no need for a RG .

slide-25
SLIDE 25

NMOS Transfer Function (2)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
  • To the right of point A, vGS >Vt,

and NMOS is ON.

  • Just to the right of point A:
  • VOV = vGS − Vt is small. So iD is

also small and vDS is close to VDD .

  • Thus, vDS > VOV and NMOS is in

saturation.

2 2 2

5 . 5 .

OV D OV

  • x

n DD DS OV

  • x

n D

V R V L W C V v V L W C i       − = = µ µ

slide-26
SLIDE 26

NMOS Transfer Function (3)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
  • As vGS increase:
  • VOV = vGS − Vt becomes larger;
  • vDS becomes smaller.
  • At point B, vDS = VOV = vGS − Vt
  • To the right of point B, vDS <

VOV = vGS − Vt and NMOS enters triode.

  • Point B is called the “Edge of

Saturation”

Exercise: Use NMOS i-v characteristics (and DS-KVL) to find VGS|B and VDS|B

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Graphical analysis of NMOS Transfer Function

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
  • NMOS iD (vGS , vDS ) is a surface in the

3-D (iD , vGS , vDS ) space.

  • DS-KVL is a plane in this space.
  • Intersection of KVL plane with the iv

characteristic surface is a line.

  • NMOS operating point is on this line

(depending on the value of vGS.)

  • If we look from the side (with vGS axis

pointing into the paper, we see contour plots of NMOS iD (vGS , vDS )

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Graphical analysis of NMOS Transfer Function

  • Every point on the load line

corresponds to a specific vGS value.

  • As vGS increases, NMOS moves

“up” the load line. A B C We see the transfer function if we look this way!

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
slide-29
SLIDE 29

NMOS Functional circuits

  • Similar to a BJTSin the active mode,

NMOS behaves rather “linearly” in the saturation region (we discuss NMOS amplifiers later)

  • Transition from cut-off to triode can

be used to build NMOS switch circuits.

  • Voltage at point C (see graph)

depends on NMOS parameters and the circuit (in BJT vo = Vsat)!

  • We can also built NMOS logic gate

similar to a RTL. But there is a much better gate based on CMOS technology!

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Complementary MOS (CMOS) is based on NMOS/PMOS pairs

  • Maximum signal swing: Low State: 0, High State: VDD
  • Independent of MOS device parameters!
  • Wide noise margin.
  • Zero “static” power dissipation (iD = 0 in each state).
  • Higher speed compare to a “RTL-type” NMOS inverter
  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

NMOS Inverter

  • Replace RD with a PMOS
  • “Effective” RD seen by Q1 is

controlled by vi :

  • “Infinite” RD when Q1 is ON
  • “Very small” RD when Q1 is OFF

CMOS Inverter

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Analysis of CMOS Inverter (1)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1

: KVL 2 & DS1 : KVL GS2 : KVL GS1

SD DD DS

  • D

D DS SD DD i DD SG i SG DD i GS

v V v v i i v v V v V v v v V v v − = = = + = − − = → + = − = −

Case 1: vi = 0

ON Q2 OFF Q1

2 1 1

→ > = − = ↓ = → → < = = | |V V v V v i V v v

tp DD i DD SG D tn i GS

ON Q2 OFF Q1

2 2 1 1

= → > = − = ↓ = → → < = =

D tp DD i DD SG D tn i GS

i | |V V v V v i V v v KCL

?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

A MOS in ON and iD = 0

  • nly if MOS is in triode and vDs = 0
  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

MOS ON: VOV > 0

  • MOS in saturation: incorrect!
  • MOS in triode:

5 .

2

= → = =

OV OV

  • x

n D

V V L W C i µ

[ ]

2 5 .

2

= → = − =

DS DS DS OV

  • x

n D

v v v V L W C i µ

When is iD = 0 ?

  • MOS is OFF (VOV < 0)
  • No channel is formed, no iD can flow
  • MOS is ON (VOV > 0)
  • A channel is formed, and iD can flow

but iD = 0 because no voltage is applied to drive iD !

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Analysis of CMOS Inverter (2)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1

: KVL 2 & DS1 : KVL GS2 : KVL GS1

SD DD DS

  • D

D DS SD DD i DD SG i SG DD i GS

v V v v i i v v V v V v v v V v v − = = = + = − − = → + = − = −

Case 1: vi = 0

& Triode in Q2 ON Q2 OFF Q1

2 2 2 1 1 1

= → = → = − = ↑ ↓ = = → → < = =

SD D DD i DD SG DD DS D tn i GS

v i V v V v V v i V v v

  • For vi = 0, vo = vDS1 = VDD (iD1 = 0, iD2 = 0 )
  • Gate remains in this state as long as vi < Vtn (Q1 OFF)

ON Q2 OFF Q1

2 2 1 1

= → = − = ↓ = → → < = =

D DD i DD SG D tn i GS

i V v V v i V v v

slide-34
SLIDE 34

OFF Q2 | | ON Q1

2 2 1

= → → < = − = ↑ → > = =

D tp i DD SG tn DD i GS

i V v V v V V v v

Analysis of CMOS Inverter (3)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

Case 2: vi = VDD

2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1

: KVL 2 & DS1 : KVL GS2 : KVL GS1

SD DD DS

  • D

D DS SD DD i DD SG i SG DD i GS

v V v v i i v v V v V v v v V v v − = = = + = − − = → + = − = − OFF Q2 | | & Triode in Q1 ON Q1

2 2 2 1 1 1 DD SD D tp i DD SG DS D tn DD i GS

V v i V v V v v i V V v v = = → → < = − = ↓ ↑ = → = → > = =

  • For vi = VDD, vo = vDS1 = 0 (iD1 = 0, iD2 = 0 )
  • Gate remains in this state as long as vi > VDD − |Vtp| (Q2 OFF)

OFF Q2 | | ON Q1

2 2 1 1

= → → < = − = ↑ = → > = =

D tp i DD SG D tn DD i GS

i V v V v i V V v v

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Transfer function of a CMOS inverter

  • Transfer function is “symmetric” for matched transistors:

Vtn=|Vtp| & µn (W/L)n = µp (W/L)p

  • During transition from one state to another, iD > 0
  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012
slide-36
SLIDE 36

CMOS NAND Gate

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

Truth Table v1 = 0 v2 = 0: vo = VDD v1 = 0 v2 = VDD : vo = VDD v1 = VDD v2 = 0 : vo = VDD v1 = VDD v2 = VDD : vo = 0

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Analysis of CMOS NAND Gate (1)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

GS2-KVL GS3-KVL GS4-KVL

GS1-KVL:

1 1

v vGS =

GS2-KVL:

1 2 2 1 2 2 DS GS DS GS

v v v v v v − = → + =

GS3-KVL:

1 3 1 3

v V v v v V

DD SG SG DD

− = → + =

GS4-KVL:

2 4 2 4

v V v v v V

DD SG SG DD

− = → + =

KCL:

4 3 2 1 D D D D

i i i i + = =

DS-KVL:

4 3 1 2 4 SD SD DS DS SD DD

v v v v v V = + + =

3 4 2 1 SD DD SD DD

  • DS

DS

  • v

V v V v v v v − = − = + =

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Analysis of CMOS NAND Gate (2)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

2 1 3 4 DS DS SD DD SD DD

  • v

v v V v V v + = − = − = & Triode in Q4 ON Q4 | | & Triode in Q3 ON Q3 | | ? Q2 OFF Q1

4 4 2 4 3 3 1 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1

= → = → > = − = = → = → > = − = = → − = − = = → → < = =

SD D tp DD DD SG SD D tp DD DD SG D DS DS GS D tn GS

v i V V v V v v i V V v V v i v v v v i V v v ON Q4 | | ON Q3 | | ? Q2 OFF Q1

2 4 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 1

→ > = − = → > = − = → − = − = = → → < = =

tp DD DD SG tp DD DD SG DS DS GS D tn GS

V V v V v V V v V v v v v v i V v v ON Q4 | | ON Q3 | | ? Q2 OFF Q1

4 2 4 3 1 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1

= → > = − = = → > = − = = → − = − = = → → < = =

D tp DD DD SG D tp DD DD SG D DS DS GS D tn GS

i V V v V v i V V v V v i v v v v i V v v

  • For v1 = 0 & v2 = 0, vo = VDD (iD1 = iD2 = iD3 = iD4 = 0)

Case 1: v1 = 0 & v2 = 0

DD SD DD

  • V

v V v = − =

4

Note: Since vDS1 ≥ 0, we can say vGS2 =vDS1 < Vtn and Q2 is OFF!

4 3 2 1 D D D D

i i i i + = =

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Analysis of CMOS NAND Gate (3)

  • F. Najmabadi, ECE65, Winter 2012

2 1 3 4 DS DS SD DD SD DD

  • v

v v V v V v + = − = − = & Triode in Q4 ON Q4 | | OFF Q3 | | OFF Q2 & Triode in Q1 ON Q1

4 4 2 4 3 1 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1

= → = → > = − = = → → < = − = = → → < − = − = = → = → > = =

SD D tp DD DD SG D tp DD SG D tn DS DS GS DS D tn DD GS

v i V V v V v i V v V v i V v v v v v i V V v v

Case 2: v1 = VDD & v2 = 0

DD SD DD

  • V

v V v = − =

4

ON Q4 | | OFF Q3 | | OFF Q2 ON Q1

2 4 3 1 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 1

→ > = − = = → → < = − = = → → < − = − = → > = =

tp DD DD SG D tp DD SG D tn DS DS GS tn DD GS

V V v V v i V v V v i V v v v v V V v v ON Q4 | | OFF Q3 | | OFF Q2 ON Q1

4 2 4 3 1 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1

= → > = − = = → → < = − = = → → < − = − = = → > = =

D tp DD DD SG D tp DD SG D tn DS DS GS D tn DD GS

i V V v V v i V v V v i V v v v v i V V v v

4 3 2 1 D D D D

i i i i + = =

  • For v1 = VDD & v2 = 0, vo = VDD (iD1 = iD2 = iD3 = iD4 = 0)

Exercise: Complete the analysis of the truth table of this NAND gate