Moreno Valley College Dialogue: Enrollment Management Hosted by - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Moreno Valley College Dialogue: Enrollment Management Hosted by President Irving Hendrick March 10, 2017 10:00 – 11:30am HUM 322

Agenda • Welcome & Context • Context – Dr. Hendrick • FTES & Budget – Dr. Jones • Data Considerations – Dr. Steinback and Dr. Foster • Strategies & Critical Dialogue • Interactive Discussion • Action Items & Next Steps • Closing Remarks

MVC is the “home college” for majority of our students • Percent of students who complete at least 60% of their attempted coursework at only one college • Moreno Valley College is clearly a unique case in RCCD • Vast majority of MVC students complete majority of attempted coursework at MVC = 3 of every 4 students • Norco and RCC students complete or attempt coursework at more than one college • Strengthening our culture so that MVC is College of Choice!

Local Student Enrollment 2000 1800 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 800 800 600 400 40% 400 50% 300 200 200 0 Moreno Valley USD ValVerde USD Graduates Enroll into PostSecondary Attend MVC Data Source: California Department of Education, CDE 2015; California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, CCCCO 2017

MVC serves Students of Color proportionally at higher rates than State and District levels Race/Ethnicity Enrollment by Percentage Race/Ethnicity CCC State Total RCCD MVC Norco RCC 11.89 5.87 8.09 African American 5.42 7.64 American Indian 0.40 0.32 0.28 0.25 0.37 Asian 11.00 4.90 3.14 6.32 5.03 Filipino 2.92 2.11 2.05 2.42 2.00 63.78 45.08 60.93 Latina/o 58.61 60.75 Multi-Ethnicity 3.76 2.31 2.89 2.32 2.09 Pacific Islander 0.41 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.37 Unknown 4.42 0.85 0.58 0.36 1.21 26.14 20.13 15.04 White Non-Hispanic 24.07 20.55 Data Source: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO), February, 2017

Region 9: Completion Rates (Spring, 2016) CA: #19 #24 #27 #48 #54 #62 #63 #74 #76 #81 #83 13 12.4 11.9 9.5 8.9 8.4 8.4 7.5 7.4 7.2 6.7 Chaffey Copper Mt Crafton RCC (#4) Mt. San Norco (#6) San COD (#8) Victor MVC (#10) Palo Verde (#1) (#2) Hills (#3) Jacinto (#5) Bernardino Valley (#9) (#11) (#7) Top Quarter of CA CCC Data Source: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO), February, 2017 Number of Degrees+Certificates/Unduplicated Headcount

Region 9: Average of Retention & Success Rates (Spring, 2016) CA: #5 #17 #23 #25 #58 #63 #74 #76 #92 #100 #103 83.6 81.5 81.1 81 78.4 78.1 77.7 77.6 76 75.1 74.8 Palo Verde Crafton Chaffey Copper Mt MVC (#5) Norco (#6) San Victor RCC (#9) Mt. San COD (#11) (#1) Hills (#2) (#3) (#4) Bernardino Valley (#8) Jacinto (#7) (#10) Top Quarter of CA CCC Bottom Quarter of CA CCC

Region 9: All Student Success Rates (Spring, 2016) CA: #6 #28 #39 #49 #62 #70 #98 #100 #102 #106 #111 76.9 73.5 72.5 71.3 70.7 70 67.3 67.2 67 66.6 64.7 Palo Verde Copper Mt Crafton Chaffey MVC (#5) Norco (#6) COD (#7) San Mt. San RCC (#10) Victor (#1) (#2) Hills (#3) (#4) Bernardino Jacinto(#9) Valley (# (#11) Top Quarter of CA CCC Bottom Quarter of CA CCC

Region 9: Latinx Student Success Rates (Spring, 2016) CA: #24 #27 #29 #39 #43 #58 #72 #85 #87 #93 #94 70.1 69.9 69.7 69 68.5 67.2 66.2 65.1 65 64.3 64.2 Crafton MVC (#2) Palo Verde Chaffey Cooper Mt Norco (#6) San COD (#8) Mt. San Victor RCC (#11) Hills (#1) (#3) (#4) (#5) Bernardino Jacinto(#9) Valley (#7) (#10) Top Quarter of CA CCC Bottom Quarter of CA CCC

FTES - Target vs. Actual Realized (2011-2016) 7000 6832.72 6800 6606.51 6573.26 6600 6473.19 6362.94 6400 6340 6262.44 6173.65 6200 6062 6043.21 6000 5800 5726.61 5600 5400 5200 5000 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Target Actual Data Source: Targets established via District Allocation Model; Annual Credit FTES Reported CCFS‐320 Report Note: In order to make district targets, FTES earned in summer sessions were reported for previous year every year but 2013‐2014

MVC Budget & RCCD Budget Allocation Model (BAM) Dr. Nathaniel Jones (Vice President, Business Services)

MVC Budget & District Budget Allocation Model (BAM) • MVC FY17 General Fund Budget is $36.5M • This budget allocation is largely based on an FTES target of 6,833 (23.1% of RCCD total of 29,579 FTES) • The state provides funding to community college districts primarily on the basis FTES, calculated on a growth model • Hence, RCCD’s BAM is based on FTES • FY18 FTES targets: MVC & NC (7,035.4) & RCC (16,385.5)

Implications of FTES Shortfalls • Reductions in MVC’s general fund budget • Decreased allocations for faculty and staff positions • Decreased allocations for equipment & network infrastructure • Lower probability of state funding for new facilities, which is based in part on fall WSCH

Some points to consider …. Dr. Robin Steinback (VPAA) Dr. Dyrell Foster (VPSS)

Student On-Boarding: Application, Assessment, Orientation, Enrollment , (2014‐2016) MVC Enrollment Data Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016 Completed Application, did not complete assessment, orientation or enroll for fall term 1314 1178 1102 Completed Application, completed assessment, did not complete orientation or enroll for fall term 155 127 464 Completed Application, completed/assessment completed orientation did not enroll for fall term 650 503 430 Unduplicated head count on day 1 of term 8774 8842 9036

MVC Financial Aid Support (2016‐2017) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 48% 50% 81% 40% 30% 50% 20% 10% 0% Pell Grant non-Pell Full-time Part-time Pell non-Pell Data Source: MVC Financial Aid; MIS Differential Files, March 2017

Students Employed (work hours per week) 30+ hours 22% None 35% 21‐30 hours 18% 1‐20 hours 25% Data Source: MIS referential files (2012‐2016 )

Moreno Valley Unified School District (Fall 2012 – MMAP ‐ ENGLISH 2016) 100% 100% 90% 90% 40 80% 80% 44 47 50 48 70% 70% 60% 60% 86 50% 50% 40% 40% 60 30% 30% 26 30 30 28 20% 20% 15 10% 10% 12 11 8 8 0% 0% Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016 MMAP ‐ Fall 2016 Transfer 1-step 2-steps 3 steps no placement Transfer 1 ‐ step

Moreno Valley Unified School District MMAP - MATH (Fall 2012 – 2016) 100% 100% 10 90% 90% 32 32 36 31 33 80% 80% 21 70% 70% 60% 60% 26 21 24 23 21 23 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 43 40 39 40 40 43 20% 20% 10% 10% 3 3 2 2 3 0% 0% Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016 Fall 2016 Transfer 1-step 2-steps 3+ steps no placement Transfer 1-step 2-steps 3+ steps

What might we discern from enrollment patterns, 2010-2016?

Student Unit Load (% by Category) Fall Terms, 2010-2016 10532 9829 8936 8220 8592 8697 9022 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 14 14 15 17 19 18 19 13 14 15 18 17 18 18 21 20 20 24 23 24 22 29 29 29 31 31 30 31 19 18 15 5 5 4 3 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <2.9 units 3-5.9 units 6-8.9 units 9-11.9 units 12-14.9 units 15+ units Data Source: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO), March, 2017

Number of Course Sections, Average Fill Rates (2010-2016) 1700 1700 1596 1521 1520 91% 1475 1500 1428 1370 1300 88% 83% 1100 78% 77% 81% 74% 900 700 500 300 100 2010‐2011 2011‐2012 2012‐2013 2013‐2014 2014‐2015 2015‐2016 2016‐2017 Data Source: RCCD Enrollment Management Dashboard, March 2017

Average Class Size (2010-2016) 33 32.03 31.94 32 31.14 31.14 31 30.72 29.82 30 28.82 29 28 27 2010‐2011 2011‐2012 2012‐2013 2013‐2014 2014‐2015 2015‐2016 2016‐2017

Average FTES per Section (2010-2016) 4.5 4.38 4.4 4.3 4.24 4.2 4.16 4.15 4.1 4.01 3.97 4 3.96 3.9 3.8 3.7 2010‐2011 2011‐2012 2012‐2013 2013‐2014 2014‐2015 2015‐2016 2016‐2017

FTES - Target vs. Actual Realized (2011-2016) 7000 6832.72 6800 6606.51 6573.26 6600 6473.19 6362.94 6400 6340 6262.44 6173.65 6200 6062 6043.21 6000 5800 5726.61 5600 5400 5200 5000 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Target Actual Data Source: Targets established via District Allocation Model; Annual Credit FTES Reported CCFS‐320 Report Note: In order to make district targets, FTES earned in summer sessions were reported for previous year every year but 2013‐2014