mo more e 2 2 eat phase 2 spr t phase 2 spread ead sc
play

Mo More- e-2- 2-Eat Phase 2: Spr t Phase 2: Spread/ ead/Sc - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mo More- e-2- 2-Eat Phase 2: Spr t Phase 2: Spread/ ead/Sc Scaling Up aling Up Imp Improved ed Nu Nutri> tri>on on Car Care CFN Sept 21, 2018 Heather Keller RD PhD FDC Schlegel Research Chair Nutri<on & Aging,


  1. Mo More- e-2- 2-Eat Phase 2: Spr t Phase 2: Spread/ ead/Sc Scaling Up aling Up Imp Improved ed Nu Nutri> tri>on on Car Care CFN Sept 21, 2018 Heather Keller RD PhD FDC Schlegel Research Chair Nutri<on & Aging, University of Waterloo

  2. Th The P e Prob oblem em…

  3. Treatment works • Meal<me management • Ea<ng assistance • Nutrient dense food • Oral nutri<onal supplements • Die<<an counseling • (Baldwin & Weekes, 2011; Cheung et al.,2103 ; Kimber et al., 2015; StraTon & Elia, 2007)

  4. Th The S e Sol olu>on on: Th The In e Integ egrated ed Nu Nutri>on on Pa Pathway for Acute Care (INPAC) Keller et al, 2015; CFN Catalyst 2014-2015

  5. Th The ‘Mor e ‘More-2-E e-2-Eat’ Pr ’ Project Ph oject Phase 1 ase 1 Objec&ves: 1) Test and evaluate implementa<on process in 5 diverse hospitals in 4 provinces 2) To develop a virtual toolkit to support implementa&on of INPAC Funding: Canadian Frailty Network (2015-17) Keller et al. 2017

  6. CFN SIG 2015- 2017

  7. Co-i Co-inves es>gator ors/Col /Collabor orator ors for Imp or Implemen lementa> a>on on Stu Study y Co-inves&gators Collaborators • Barbara Liu • Bridget Davidson • Jack Bell • Joel Dubin • Paule Bernier • Marina Mourtzakis • Carlota Basualdo-Hammond • Richard Sawatzky • Leah Gramlich • Alies Maybee • Manon Laporte • Khursheed Jeejeebhoy • Donald Duerksen • Sarah Robbins • Sumantra Ray • Linda Dietrich • Pauline Douglas • Heather Truber • Lori Cur<s 8

  8. INP INPAC Car C Care Ac> e Ac>vi> vi>es Imp es Implemen lemented ed Ac&vity Implemented? Nutri&on screening at admission (with CNST) ✓ (All sites) Using SGA to triage pa&ents ✓ (All sites) MedPass used ✓ (All sites) Food intake monitoring and following up low ✓ (Most sites) intake Volunteers available during meal&mes ✓ (Most sites) Weights taken on admission ✓ (Some sites) Regular weights taken ✓ (Some sites) More food available for pa<ents on the unit ✓ (Some sites) Discharge planning ✓ (Some sites)

  9. Imp Implemen lementa> a>on on of Scr of Screen eenin ing a g at t Ad Admission mission

  10. Imp Implemen lementa> a>on on of Maln of Malnutri> tri>on on Diagn Diagnosis with osis with Su Subjec> jec>ve Glob e Global Assessmen al Assessment t

  11. Pa&ent Care Processes and Treatment Improved Propor&on of Pa&ents (%) Treatment/Care Baseline Follow -up Process Treatment 31 63 (advanced care) Medpass (oral 2 15 nutri<on supplement) Weekly weight 3 21 Food intake 1 32 monitoring Note: This is across the 5 sites. Not all sites focused on weekly weights or food intake monitoring. (Keller et al., Clin Nutr 2018)

  12. Pa&ent outcomes? Meal&me barriers to food intake Length of Stay (days) Site Baseline Follow-Up A 9 6 B 12 8 C 7 5.5 D 8 9 E 11 9 ( Keller et al., submiTed 2018)

  13. Spread Post M2E Phase 1 A year acer M2E Site Screening SGA 1 region region 2 hospital hospital 3 region region 4 region region 5 hospital hospital

  14. M2E Champions: Mei Trainees Tom, Marlis Atkins, Roseann Nasser, Donna BuTerworth, Brenda • Celia Laur Hotson, Marilee S<ckles-White, Suzanne • Renata Valai<s Obiorah • Tara McNicholl M2E Research Associates: Joseph • Sabrina Iuglio Murphy, Andrea Digweed, Lina Vescio, Chelsa Marcell, Stephanie Barnes, Shannon Cowan, Sheila Doering, Michelle Booth

  15. Th The K e Knowled edge T e To Ac> o Ac>on on Cy Cycl cle e

  16. Beh Behavi viou our Ch Chan ange Wh e Wheel: eel: Beh Behavi viou our Change T Ch e Tech echniques es • Educa<on: build skill • Enablement: consider exis<ng skills and opportuni<es Capability • Environmental restructuring: make it easy to do the right thing • Modeling: create a cultural expecta<on for the behavior Opportunity • Persuasion: make the behaviour a ‘good thing to do’ • Incen<visa<on: make it desirable to do the behavior Mo<va<on Michie et al, 2011

  17. Hospit Hosp ital St al Staff/Man aff/Manag agemen ement Op t Opin inion ions Ab s Abou out Makin t Making Ch g Chan ange e Accoun<ng for Climate Embedding Change into Current Prac<ce Involving Relevant Building People in the Change Strong Process Rela<onships Within the Building a Hospital Team Reason to Change Improving Nutri<on Care for Pa<ents Laur et al, 2017

  18. Key KT ac<vi<es Key Actors • Build team engagement • Staff discussion groups • Survey to understand KAP, barriers Champion • Lunch and learns Site • Tailor INPAC to specific unit Implementa<on processes/context Team • Collect data to evaluate and s<mulate change External coach • Learn about change management Co-champions • Use diverse behaviour change techniques • Ready-to-use resources • Build on early success

  19. INP INPAC Au C Audit it

  20. Implementa<on Sustainability Developmental Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 Period 5 Period 6 Sept – Dec Jan – Mar Apr – June July – Sept Oct – Dec Jan – Mar 2015 2016 2016 2016 2016 2017 N=546 N=867 N=848 N=837 N=832 N=1100 4 Audits/site 6 Audits/site 6 Audits/site 6 Audits/site 6 Audits/site 8 Audits/site Overview of the More-2-Eat Study Time Frames and INPAC Audit Data Collec<on (n=5036 pa<ents).

  21. INP INPAC Imp C Implemen lementa> a>on on T Toolkit oolkit m2e.nutri&oncareincanada.ca

  22. Wha What w t we think help e think helps sus s sustain/ ain/ spr spread ead (Laur et al, submiZed)

  23. Phase 2… Phase 2… (K (Keller eller, Lau , Laur, V , Vali> ali>s, Du s, Dublin lin, Ch , Chen en, Cu , Cur> r>s, Bell, Ra s, Bell, Ray, Gr , Gramlich amlich, , Morriso Mo rrison) n) • Can implementa&on be done within current resources? - 10 hospitals, 6 provinces - Phase 1 sites expand to 2+ further units - Sustain and replicate? - Phase 2 hospitals, 1 unit - RedCAP Registry for data entry and templates for reports - self managed - INPAC toolkit and resources - Training on behaviour change - Monthly telephone coaching - Community of Prac<ce Listserv Outcome data: LOS, readmission, in –hospital mortality CFN KT Funding 2018-2019

  24. Publica>ons from M2E to date 1. McNicholl T et al., Handgrip strength, but not 5m walk, is a useful func<onal measure to add to clinical nutri<on Assessment. Nutr Clin Pra<ce (accepted Aug 2018). 2. Cur<s L, et al., Low food intake in hospital: pa<ent, ins<tu<onal, and clinical factors. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018. doi 10.1139/apnm-2018-0064 3. Keller H, et al., Mul<-site implementa<on of nutri<on screening and diagnosis in medical care units: success of the project More-2-Eat. Clin Nutr. 2018: 1-9 doi 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.02.009 4. Laur C, e al., Nutri<on care acer discharge from hospital: an exploratory analysis from the More-2-Eat study. Healthcare. 2018; 6(1): 9. doi 10.3390/healthcare6010009 5. Keller H etl al., Update on the Integrated Nutri<on Pathway for Acute Care (INPAC): Post implementa<on tailoring and toolkit to support prac<ce improvements. BMC Nutr. 2018; 17: 2. doi 10.1186/ s12937-017-0310-1. 6. Laur CV, et al. Comparing hospital staff nutri<on knowledge, aqtudes, and prac<ces before and 1 year acer improving nutri<on care: results from the More-2-Eat Implementa<on Project. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018; 42(4): 786-796. doi 10.1177/0148607117718493 7. Valai<s R et al., Need for the Integrated Nutri<on Pathway for Acute Care (INPAC): gaps in current nutri<on care in five Canadian hospitals. BMC Nutr. 2017; 3: 60. doi 10.1186/s40795-017-0177-8 8. Laur C, et al., Changing nutri<on care prac<ces in hospital: a thema<c analysis of hospital staff perspec<ves. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1): 498 doi 10.1186/s12913-017-2409- 9. Laur C , Keller H. Making the case for nutri<on screening in older adults in primary care. Nutr Today. 2017; 52(3) :129-136. doi 10.1097/NT.0000000000000218 10. Laur C, et al.,. Malnutri<on or frailty? Overlap and evidence gaps in the diagnosis and treatment of frailty and malnutri<on. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017; 42(5): 449-458. doi 10.1139/apnm-2016-0652 11. Keller H et al., . More-2-Eat: evalua<on protocol of a mul<-site implementa<on of the Integrated Nutri<on Pathway for Acute Care. BMC Nutr. 2017; 3: 13. doi 10.1186/s40795-017-0127-5

  25. Ackn Acknowled wledgemen ements ts This research is funded by Canadian Frailty Network (known previously as Technology Evalua<on in the Elderly Network, TVN), supported by Government of Canada through Networks of Centres of Excellence (NCE) Program In-kind Support: Die<<ans of Canada Canadian Society of Nutri<on Management Canadian Nutri<on Society NNEdPro Global Centre for Nutri<on and Health Regional Geriatric Program of Toronto

  26. Ques<ons?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend