missile technology basics
play

Missile Technology Basics David Wright Senior Scientist and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Missile Technology Basics David Wright Senior Scientist and Co-Director, Global Security Program Union of Concerned Scientists June 19, 2014 dwright@ucsusa.org Outline Trajectory Basics: Phases of flight Speed, angle, range


  1. Missile Technology Basics David Wright Senior Scientist and Co-Director, Global Security Program Union of Concerned Scientists June 19, 2014 dwright@ucsusa.org

  2. Outline • Trajectory Basics: • Phases of flight • Speed, angle, range • Propulsion: • Thrust • Rocket equation and structural mass • Staging • Guidance and Control (G&C) • Guidance system • Steering • Reentry and Heating • Accuracy • G&C errors • Reentry errors

  3. Physics View of a Ballistic Missile

  4. Phases of Missile Flight • Midcourse Phase: for ranges > ~500 km, that part of the trajectory where atmospheric drag is negligible • Above ~100 km altitude • Can last 20-30 minutes for long ranges

  5. Ballistic Missile Trajectory

  6. Missile Range Designations • Short < 1,000km • Medium 1,000-3,000 km • Intermediate 3,000-5,500 km • ICBM > 5,500 km Range is not an intrinsic characteristic of a missile, since it depends on the payload. Example: U.S. Trident SLBM Fully loaded: 8 warheads (1,500 kg)  Range = 7,500 km Half loaded: 4 warheads (750 kg)  Range = 11,000 km

  7. Variation in Range with Burnout Angle Variation in Range with Burnout Angle 2500 Lofted 2000 Altitude (km) 1500 Maximum range Maximum range (minimum-energy) (minimum-energy) 1000 500 Depressed 0 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Powered flight Range (km)

  8. Optimum Burnout Angle vs. Range

  9. Optimal Burnout Speed vs. Range Optimum Burnout Speed vs. Range 8 Burnout Speed (km/s) 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 Range (km)

  10. Approximate Burnout Parameters

  11. “½ Rule” A missile that can launch a payload to a maximum range of R can launch that same payload vertically to an altitude of roughly R/2 300 250 • exact at short Altitude (km) distances 200 • holds approximately 150 even for long ranges 100 50 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Range (km)

  12. Structure of Liquid Missiles German V-2 Soviet Scud-B

  13. Rocket Propulsion M dV V e = exhaust velocity V e dM Conservation of momentum: Then: Mass flow rate out of the engine

  14. North Korean Missile Development Nodong 1,200 km/0.7t Musudan 3,000 km/0.75t TD-1 Scuds TD-2/Unha-3 (untested) 300-500 km/1t

  15. Evolution of North Korean missiles Changing V e : Mass Thrust Mass Propellant Range/ Missile V e M s /M p flow rate (kN) (tons) Mass payload (km/s) Scud, Nodong, and TD-2 use: (kg/s) (no payload) (tons) (km & kg) -fuel: kerosene Scud-B 2.3 58 130 4.9 3.8 0.29 300/1,000 -oxidizer: IRFNA (nitric acid) Nodong 2.3 130 290 14.3 12.4 0.15 950/1,000 TD-2 2.3 520 1200 71.3 64.0 0.11 2,000/1,000 Musudan is thought to be a version of (stage 1) Musudan the Soviet SS-N6 missile 2.7 96 254 18.6 17.1 0.088 2,700/1,000 (est) -fuel: UDMH -oxidizer: NTO (nitrogen tetraoxide) Titan II 2.9 803 2090 122 118 0.034 (stage 1)

  16. Evolution of North Korean missiles Increasing mass flow: Mass Thrust Mass Propellant Range/ Missile V e M s /M p flow rate (kN) (tons) Mass payload (km/s) (kg/s) (no payload) (tons) (km & kg) Scud-B 2.3 58 130 4.9 3.8 0.29 300/1,000 Nodong 2.3 130 290 14.3 12.4 0.15 950/1,000 TD-2 2.3 520 1200 71.3 64.0 0.11 2,000/1,000 (stage 1) Musudan 2.7 96 254 18.6 17.1 0.088 2,700/1,000 (est) Titan II 2.9 803 2090 122 118 0.034 (stage 1) Nodong engine is essentially a scaled-up Scud engine.

  17. Evolution of North Korean missiles Increasing mass flow: Mass Thrust Mass Propellant Range/ Missile V e M s /M p flow rate (kN) (tons) Mass payload (km/s) (kg/s) (no payload) (tons) (km & kg) Scud-B 2.3 58 130 4.9 3.8 0.29 300/1,000 Nodong 2.3 130 290 14.3 12.4 0.15 950/1,000 TD-2 2.3 520 1200 71.3 64.0 0.11 2,000/1,000 (stage 1) Musudan 2.7 96 254 18.6 17.1 0.088 2,700/1,000 (est) Titan II 2.9 803 2090 122 118 0.034 (stage 1) TD-2 first stage uses a cluster of 4 Nodong engines

  18. “ Rocket Equation” M V e = exhaust velocity dV V e dM dM     Conservation of momentum gives: MdV V dM or dV V M e e V M   f f dM            V dV V V V V ln M ln M Then: f i e e f i M V M i i   M i = initial mass M     i V V ln   e M   M f = final mass f

  19. Rocket Equation • Ignore the mass of the payload, and gravity • Initial mass = M i = mass of structure + propellant mass = M S + M P • Final mass = M f = mass of structure = M S • Δ V depends on the ratio M S /M P • One way to increase range is to add propellant. That makes the missile heavier and the forces greater. • If you scale both the propellant and structure up by the same factor, you don’t gain any velocity.

  20. Reducing Structural Mass Evolution of North Korean missiles Missile V e Mass Thrust Total Mass Propellant M s Range/ flow rate (kN) (tons) Mass payload (km/s) M p (kg/s) (no payload) (tons) (km & kg) Scud-B 2.3 58 130 4.9 3.8 0.29 300/1,000 Nodong 2.3 130 290 14.3 12.4 0.15 950/1,000 TD-2 2.3 520 1200 71.3 64.0 0.11 2,000/1,000 (stage 1) Musudan 2.7 96 254 18.6 17.1 0.088 2,700/1,000 (est) Titan II 2.9 803 2090 122 118 0.034 (stage 1)

  21. The Effect of Structural Mass Titan II 3 .5 3 .0 Musudan 2 .5 Nodong  V/V e TD-2 2 .0 Scud 1 .5 1 .0 0 .5 0 .0 0 .0 0 0 .0 5 0 .1 0 0 .1 5 0 .2 0 0 .2 5 0 .3 0 M S /M P

  22. Staging: An Example 1 Stage : Total mass = 111 t Propellant mass = 100 t M P = 100 t M S = 10 t Payload = 1 t Δ V = V e ln [ (100+10+1) / (10+1) ] = 2.3 V e M i M f

  23. Staging: An Example 1 Stage : Total mass = 111 t Propellant mass = 100 t M P = 100 t M S = 10 t Payload = 1 t Δ V = 2.3 V e 2 Stage : Total mass = 111 t Propellant mass = 100 t M P = 80 t M S = 8 t M P = 20 t M S = 2 t Payload = 1 t Δ V = V e ln [ (111) / (8+20+2+1) ] + V e ln [ (20+2+1) / (2+1) ] = 3.3 V e  Staging leads to 43% increase in velocity

  24. Chinese Liquid Rockets DF-3: similar in size but more capable than TD-2 first stage CZ- 1: China’s first satellite launcher -similar in size but more capable than Unha DF- 5: China’s first ICBM -much larger than Unha DF-3 DF-4 CZ-1 SLV DF-5

  25. Guidance and Control • Guided missile requires: – A way to control the direction of thrust during boost phase – A way to know the missile’s location and velocity during boost – A computer to know when it has reached the velocity, angle, and altitude to reach its intended target – A way to terminate thrust at that point

  26. Steering: Jet Vanes on a Scud and DF-2

  27. Steering Engines on Unha Steering engine Nodong engine exhaust Unha first stage (rear view)

  28. Guidance Antennas on a DF-2a

  29. Reentry

  30. How β Affects Reentry Speed 150 lb/ft 2 = 7.5 kN/m 2 2500 lb/ft 2 = 125 kN/m 2

  31. Reentry Heating Rate Drag ~ ( ρ V 2 )/ β For lower β , RV slows at higher altitude, where ρ is small Heating rate ~ ρ V 3 Reentry Heating Rate 60 50 Altitude (km) 40 Low  (high drag) 30 High  (low drag) 20 2 =  = 2 ,0 0 0 lb/ft 2 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 N/m 10 2 = 2 ,5 0 0 N/m 2  = 5 0 lb/ft 0 10 8 10 9 1 0 10 1 1 10 1 2 10  V 3 (J/m 2 s)

  32. Reentry Vehicles Low β : Mercury capsule Medium β : Titan reentry vehicle High β : MM-III reentry vehicle

  33. Sources of Inaccuracy • Uncertainties in location of launch point and target • Errors in calculating trajectory due to gravity variations, etc. • Guidance and Control errors • Errors in accelerometers • Errors in computing speed and location • Errors in thrust termination • Reentry errors • Unpredictable lateral forces due to: – Local winds, density variations – Non-zero angle of attack – Corkscrewing or tumbling – Asymmetries of reentry vehicle

  34. CEP: Circular Error Probable Statistical measure of accuracy Radius of a circle, centered on the mean impact point (P), that includes half of the impact point Sometimes called “Circle of Equal Probability” Distance between P and aim point is a measure of P systematic inaccuracy, called “bias”

  35. Typical CEPs • Scud-B: CEP ~ 1 km • Nodong: CEP ~ 4 km • DF-5 ICBM: 1-3 km • Trident II SLBM: CEP ~ 50-100 m

  36. Liquid vs. Solid Propellant Solid Propellant Motor Liquid Propellant Engine

  37. Chinese Missiles DF-5: Liquid, 183 tons DF-31A: solid, ~63 tons mobile DF-3 DF-4 CZ-1 SLV DF-5 DF-31A

  38. Difficulties of Solid Propellant • Very difficult to manufacture large solid motors • China • Developed solid 300 km M11 in 1970s (0.86 m diameter) • Deployed DF-31 ICBM in 2006 (2.25 m diameter) • France • Deployed solid 2,500 km M1 in 1971 (1.5 m diameter) • Deployed M51 ICBM in 2010 (2.3 m diameter) • Iran • Sajjil: 2,000 km range (1.25 m diameter) • North Korea • KN-02: 100 km range (0.65 m diameter)

  39. Iranian Missile Development Simorgh Shahab-1 Shahab-2 Shahab-3 Shahab-3M Safir Safir (similar to Unha) (Nodong) (Scud) ( untested )

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend