mic hig a n bypro duc t syne rg y
play

Mic hig a n ByPro duc t Syne rg y Christine V. Spitzle y, AI CP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mic hig a n ByPro duc t Syne rg y Christine V. Spitzle y, AI CP T ri-Co unty Re g io na l Pla nning Co mmissio n T ri-Co unty Re g io na l Pla nning Co mmissio n E st. 1956 L a nsing Clinto n, E a to n, a nd I ng ha m Co


  1. Mic hig a n ByPro duc t Syne rg y Christine V. Spitzle y, AI CP T ri-Co unty Re g io na l Pla nning Co mmissio n

  2. T ri-Co unty Re g io na l Pla nning Co mmissio n –E st. 1956  L a nsing  Clinto n, E a to n, a nd I ng ha m Co untie s  Po p. 450,000  Pro g ra mming T ra nspo rta tio n  E c o no mic De ve lo pme nt  Da ta  E nviro nme nt  L a nd Use 

  3. Christine V. Spitzle y, AI CP  B.S. Urb a n a nd Re g io na l Pla nning  25 ye a rs  E c o no mic De ve lo pme nt  T ra nspo rta tio n  L a nd Use  Air Qua lity  F a ir Ho using  Wa te r

  4. ByPro duc t Syne rg y  T a ke wha t is tra ditio na lly c o nside re d “wa ste ” a nd re purpo se it a s a n input.  Re duc e dispo sa l c o sts  Re duc e ra w ma te ria l c o sts  Pro te c t the e nviro nme nt  Sa ve na tura l re so urc e s  Sa ve mo ne y, inc re a se fina nc ia l via b ility

  5. E Ha rmo ny  Ma rke t to e ntitie s with wa nts/ ne e ds  Pro vide a fo rum fo r e xc ha ng e o f info rma tio n (Cre a te a pro file . Cha ng e a t will.)  Allo w fo r priva te de ve lo pme nt o f re la tio nships (Go o n a s ma ny da te s a s yo u wish)  L e g a l c o nc e rns a re b e twe e n invo lve d e ntitie s (Ma rria g e )  Disso lutio n o f re la tio nships a lso priva te (Divo rc e ) BPS Cha rt

  6. Our Visio n o f a Suc c e ssful BPS  Pa rtic ipa nts will re pre se nt dive rse e ntitie s  Will b e a c c e ssib le to b usine sse s, no npro fits a nd c o mmunitie s  Will b e susta ina b le

  7. So …. Ho w is ByPro duc t Syne rg y diffe re nt fro m the tra ditio na l “Wa ste E xc ha ng e Pro g ra m” ?

  8. ByPro duc t Syne rg y  “Old Sc ho o l” Wa ste E xc ha ng e ransfo rmatio n o f wa ste to ne w input o r  T pro duc t  So c ia l Applic a tio ns  E nviro nme nta l Me tric s  Susta ina b ility

  9. “Old Sc ho o l” Wa ste E xc ha ng e  Still ha s va lue  E xpe rie nc e d pa rtic ipa nts  Wisdo m fro m suc c e sse s a nd c ha lle ng e s  Ca se studie s

  10. T ra nsfo rma tio n o f Wa ste  T hinking a b o ut wa ste in ne w wa ys  E xpe rt “think ta nks” to c o nside r a lte rna tive s  Re de fine “re use ”  E x. T ire s

  11. So c ia l Applic a tio ns  Go o dwill/ Pe c kha m:  Jo b s  T ra ining  Go o ds  E nviro nme nta l Justic e  L a ndfill spa c e  Ra w ma te ria ls  Po llutio n

  12. E nviro nme nta l Me tric s to Qua ntify Be ne fits Re a lize d  L a ndfill Dive rsio n  CO2 Re duc tio n  E ne rg y Sa ving s  Ha za rdo us Wa ste Re duc tio n  Wa te r Use Re duc tio n  Re duc tio n in Virg in Ma te ria l Use

  13. Susta ina b ility  L o w c o st  Dive rse  E vo lving  Ope n fo rum  Disse mina tio n

  14. Sta te wide I nte re st/ Suppo rt  F lint Are a Re inve stme nt Offic e  Supplie rs Pa rtne rship fo r the E nviro nme nt  MDE Q—L a nsing , Gra nd Ra pids, De tro it

  15. Sa mple o f T ho se I nte re ste d in “Ne xt Ste ps”  GMB Co mmunitie s  GM  Wo rking Bug s  Go o dye a r  De mme r  T he Po la r Co mpa nie s  L BWL  CMS E ne rg y  F o rd  Ga g e Pro duc ts  Chrysle r  Ae vita s  Pro c to r a nd Ga mb le  Mo tt F o unda tio n  Do w  De tro it Dirt  Go o dwill

  16. T ra nspo rta tio n Ne two rk

  17. Mid-We st BPS Pro je c ts * Lansing Chicago * *Columbus

  18. I mpe tus fo r T CRPC’ s I nvo lve me nt  Gra c io usly de fine d a s a n: “Une xpe c te d Oppo rtunity”  T CRPC se e n a s lo g ic a l e ntity.  Cre a ting ne two rks o f susta ina b le pro g ra ms is wha t we do .

  19. I mpe tus fo r T CRPC’ s I nvo lve me nt  T CRPC’ s Gro undwa te r Ma na g e me nt Bo a rd’ s (GMB) g o a l is to pro te c t wa te r.  I de ntifie d suppo rt o f b usine sse s a nd o the r lo c a l e ntitie s in b e c o ming mo re “g re e n” a s a me a ns to a c hie ve this g o a l  Re c o g nize d:  I t ne e de d to b e fina nc ia lly via b le  Drive n b y use rs  Susta ina b le

  20. Mic hig a n ByPro duc t Syne rg y  F e b rua ry 2012  3 ye a r g ra nt $60,000 fro m E PA via MDE Q  50% ma tc h GMB  Go a l to c re a te a Mic hig a n BPS Ne two rk

  21. Ne w BPS F unding fo r 2013  $20K We llhe a d Pro te c tio n Gra nt – De lta Cha rte r T o wnship  $35K We llhe a d Pro te c tio n Gra nt – L a nsing Bo a rd Wa te r a nd L ig ht  Bo th will fo c us o n wo rking with b usine sse s to pro vide the m re so urc e s to impro ve the ir pra c tic e s a nd re duc e the ir risk to wa te r re so urc e s.

  22. MDE Q Ple a se Me e t MDE Q  T wo c o mple te ly diffe re nt pro g ra ms  Suppo rting sa me e nd g o a l  L e ve ra g ing pro g ra m do lla rs a nd re so urc e s

  23. Ultima te BPS Go a ls  Cre a te Mic hig a n BPS da ta b a se  Co ntinua lly re vie w po te ntia l syne rg ie s b e twe e n pa rtic ipa nts in Mic hig a n  Co ntinue to g ro w a nd sha pe BPS  Disse mina te pro c e ss a nd o utc o me s

  24. Cha lle ng e s  Sha ping the fra me wo rk witho ut sta rting fro m sc ra tc h  L e g a l  Pro mo tio ns a nd Ma rke ting  Disse mina tio n

  25. T ha nk yo u fo r yo ur c o nside ra tio n. Que stio ns?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend