1 Aaro n Sm ith, L E E D AP Dire c to r o f Busine ss De ve lo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1

Aaro n Sm ith, L E E D AP Dire c to r o f Busine ss De ve lo pme nt, Hig he r E duc atio n

Unive rsity o f Ma ssa c huse tts - Amhe rst, Inte g ra te d De sig n Building

• 2500 SF o f Dynam ic Glass
• E

liminatio n o f blinds allo we d natural daylig ht and vie ws to nature into spac e to inspire de sig n stude nts

• Assiste d Sustainability g o als
• f L

E E D Platinum Am he rst, MA

T hre e Me g a T re nds

E ne rg y e ffic ie nc y/ susta ina b ility We llb e ing / pro duc tivity fo c us in b uilding s Sma rt e ve rything / I

• T

We bsite : w ww.viewg lass.c o m F

• unde d:

2007 L

• c atio ns:

He adquarte rs and R&D - Milpitas, CA Manufac turing - Oliv e Br anc h, MS E mplo ye e s: 400+ L aunc h: No v 2012 (pro duc t) E xe c te am: Pro v en Silic o n Valle y e xpe rienc e F unding : Gre ate r than $500m to -date

Silic o n Va lle y me e ts w o rld c la ss ma nufa c turing

Ro bust pro c e ss d e sig ne d fo r hig h yie ld

• I

n-line PVD

• Ve rtic al c o ate r
• ‘Best of breed’ equipment and

pro c e ss 5,000,000 SF annual c apac ity L

• c ate d in Olive Branc h, MS

> 12,000,000 d ata po ints c o lle c te d o n e ac h I G U

63 ‘critical to quality’ measurements

mo nito re d and c o ntro lle d

We’re naturally drawn

to da ylig ht e xpa nsive vie ws c o nne c t us to the

• utdo o rs

but the sun’s heat and

g la re re q uire de sig n c o mpro mise s b linds a nd sha ding struc ture s turn windo ws into wa lls

Daylight isn’t

g e tting thro ug h

59%

On a ve ra ge , 59% o f w i nd o w a re a w a s c o ve re d b y b li nd s o r sha d e s.

So ur c e : Ur b a n G r e e n Co unc il, the U.S . G r e e n Build ing Co unc il o f Ne w Yo r k, De c e mb e r 2013

Cle a r whe n yo u wa nt it

tints whe n yo u ne e d it Cle a r whe n yo u wa nt it

So inte llig e nt, it pre dic ts the sun to ma inta in c o mfo rt

Se a mle ssly tra nsitio ns thro ug h fo ur sta te s

Visua l lig ht tra nsmissio n: 58% So la r he a t g a in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.46 UV: 98% Blo c ka g e

T int 1

Visua l lig ht tra nsmissio n: 30% So la r he a t g a in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.23 UV: 98% Blo c ka g e

T int 2

Visua l lig ht tra nsmissio n: 10% So la r he a t g a in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.13 UV: 99% Blo c ka g e

T int 3

Visua l lig ht tra nsmissio n: 1% So la r he a t g a in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.09 UV: 99.8% Blo c ka g e

T int 4

T he te c hno lo g y o f c o mfo rt

G lass

So lid-state c o ating w ith nano -laye rs o f me tal

• xide s

Small e le c tric al v o ltag e c hang e s state s be tw e e n c le ar and tint

T C 01 E C 01 E C 02 T C 02 IC

Dura b ility

ASTM E-2141 Dura b ility o f Ab so rp tive Ele c tro c hro mic Co a ting s

He a t tre a tme nt

SGCC (ANSI Z97.1, CPSC 16 CFR 1201) He a t tre a tme nt / Impa c t re sista nc e

Impa c t re sista nc e

SGCC (ANSI Z97.1, CPSC 16 CFR 1201) He a t tre a tme nt / Impa c t re sista nc e

Se a l inte g rity

IGCC/ IGMA (AST M E-2190) IGU se a l inte g rity, g a s re te ntio n a nd fa c to ry q ua lity c o ntro l

100k

c yc le s o f te sting life time

>50yr

15

L

• ng -te rm dura b ility b y de sig n

I nte llig e nt c o ntro l

T he g lass pro vide s the tint, the syste m make s it I nte llig e nt

View’s Wiring Installation is Smart and Simple

• L

ine ardro p ne two rk

• One trunk line g o e s bac k to c o ntro l pane l
• All wiring be twe e n windo ws and c o ntro l pane l is lo w vo ltag e DC
• Pre -terminated plug connectors: “set it and forget it”

Pre -te rminate d c o nne c tio ns fo r g re ate r life time & re liability

Vie w I nte llig e nc e ™

Inte llig e nc e ™ uses the building’s design, orientation, latitude & longitude, local astronomical data, we athe r data, and o c c upant lo c atio ns to pro vide the pe rfe c t o c c upant e xpe rie nc e Windo ws are in the c o rre c t tint e ve n in c halle ng ing c o nditio ns: Brig ht, o ve rc ast, fast m o ving c lo uds, sunrise & sunse t

De sk

Θ

19

Ho w I nte llig e nc e wo rks

INSIDE

Gla re He a t L ig ht Se nso rs Da ylig hting

21

Ce nturyL ink T e c hno lo g y Ce nte r Mo nro e , L A

Visua l light tr a nsmissio n: 58% So la r he a t ga in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.46 Visua l light tr a nsmissio n: 1% So la r he a t ga in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.09 Visua l light tr a nsmissio n: 30% So la r he a t ga in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.23 Visua l light tr a nsmissio n: 10% So la r he a t ga in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.13

22

Clo v is Co nfe re nc e Co mmunity Ce nte r Clo vis, CA

Visua l light tr a nsmissio n: 58% So la r he a t ga in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.46 Visua l light tr a nsmissio n: 1% So la r he a t ga in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.09 Visua l light tr a nsmissio n: 30% So la r he a t ga in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.23 Visua l light tr a nsmissio n: 10% So la r he a t ga in c o e ffic ie nt: 0.13

Co ntro l

T he rig ht le ve l o f c o ntro l fo r yo u

Inte llig e nc e Wall inte rfac e

✓

Mo bile app

✓

Sc he dule c o ntro l

✓

Multi-zo ne c o ntro l

✓

L ig ht se nso r c o ntro l

✓

Auto m atic pre dic tive re spo nse

✓

BMS inte g ratio n

✓

Vie w U se r Co ntro ls

iOS, And ro id , Wall Sw itc h

F ie ld Ma na g e me nt Syste m

Re al time c lo ud base d site mo nito ring and manag e me nt

Fe ature s FMS

Re al ti m e he alth status

✓

Auto m ate d no ti fi c ati

• n

✓

Re m o te c usto m i zati

• n

✓

Re m o te di ag no sti c s/ re c o ve ry

✓

Auto m ate d SW do wnlo ad

✓

Analyti c s

Q3 ‘16

API fo r 3rd Party

Q4 ‘16

25

Va lue o f Dyna mic Gla ss in E duc a tio na l F a c ilitie s:

• I

nno vati

• n/ Sustai

nab i li ty o n Di splay – Re c rui tm e nt & F undrai si ng

• E

nvi ro nm e ntal Sustai nabi li ty – E ne rg y, CO2, HVAC, pe ak lo ad re duc ti

• n, waste re duc ti
• n
• Contributes to 5 LEED categories typically

increasing building rating one level

• Stude nt Pe rfo rm anc e – T

he rm al c o m fo rt, g lare re duc ti

• n, dayli

g ht, vi e ws to nature

• F

le xi ble le arni ng spac e s

• U

V Pro te c ti

• n
• Se c uri

ty thro ug h Natural Surve i llanc e

Sa ve s up to 20% in e ne rg y c o sts

E ne rg y sa ving s

Re duc ing lig hting e le c tric ity and HVAC by 20%

T ra ditio na l b uilding

L ig hting 35% Airflo w & p um p s 27% C o o ling 38%

Dyna mic b uilding

C o o ling 31% L ig hting 28% Airflo w & p um p s 21%

Sa ving s 20%

Pe a k L

• a d sa ving s

Re duc ing pe ak c o o ling lo ad by 23%

T ra ditio na l b uilding

Wind o w s 53% Wa lls & ro o f 4% I nterna l lo a d s 43%

Dyna mic b uilding

I nterna l lo a d s 43% Wind o w s 30% Wa lls & ro o f 4%

Sa ving s 23%

De sig n Suppo rt Ava ila b le fro m Vie w

Desig n a ssista nc e E ng ine e ring servic e s B enefits sum m a ry C o st a na lysis E nerg y m o d eling T herm a l c o m fo rt a na lysis Da ylig ht a na lysis Gla re a na lysis HVAC Sizing C usto m p ro jec t va lue p ro p o sitio n F ield Op era tio ns Pro jec t Ma na g em ent T ec h sup p o rt Oc c up a nt tra ining Oc c up a nt feed b a c k 10 yea r w a rra nty Pro g ra m m ing Zo ning a ssista nc e C o m m issio ning

E nd-to -e nd se rvic e s to g uarante e the be st dynam ic g lass e xpe rie nc e

Innovation in design Materials and resources Energy and atmosphere Indoor environment quality

L E E D fo r Sc ho o ls v4 – 34 po ints a c ro ss 5 c re dit c a te g o rie s

• Inte g ra ti

ve Pro c e ss (1)

• Op ti

mi ze e ne rgy p e rfo rma nc e (20)

• De ma nd Re sp o nse

(1)

• Envi

ro nme nta l Pro d uc t De c la ra ti

• n (EPD) (1)
• Ma te ri

a l Ingre d i e nts (HPD) (1)

• T

he rma l Co mfo rt (1)

• Da yli

ght (3)

• Qua li

ty vi e w s (1)

Integrative Process

• Inno va ti
• n (5)

Ma te ria ls T ra nspa re nc y

35

He a lthy & Suc c e ssful Stude nts

Multiple stud ie s have me asure d stud e nt be ne fits o f vie ws, d aylig ht and the rmal c o mfo rt:

• Daylig ht - Stud e nts in c lassro o ms w ith the mo st d aylig ht sho w e d a

21% impro ve me nt in le arning rate s1,2

• Vie ws - Re se arc he rs fo und an asso c iatio n be tw e e n ac ad e mic

ac hie ve me nt and c lassro o m vie ws to the o utd o o rs1

• G lare - Dire c t sun pe ne tratio n into c lassro o ms, e spe c ially thro ug h

unshad e d e ast o r so uth fac ing w ind o ws, is asso c iate d w ith ne g ative stud e nt pe rfo rmanc e , like ly c ausing bo th g lare and the rmal d isc o mfo rt1

• T

he rmal Co mfo rt – Re d uc ing air te mp by 1.8 F impro ve d stud e nt pe rfo rmanc e in te rms o f spe e d fro m 2 – 4% in all tasks3

21%

inc re ase in stude nt pe rfo rmanc e

1 Heschong Mahone Group. Daylighting in Schools. California: Pacific Gas & Electric; 1999 2 Heschong L. Re-Analysis Report: Daylighting in schools, additional analysis. California: New Buildings Institute, Inc.; 2001 3 Wyo n & Warg o c ki,, T

he E ffe c ts o f Mo de r ate ly Raise d Classr

• o m T

e mpe rature s; 2007

2-4%

inc re ase in stude nt pe rfo rmanc e

36

He a lthy & Suc c e ssful Sta ff & F a c ulty

Multiple stud ie s have me asure d human be ne fits o f vie ws and natural lig ht:

• Wo rke rs w ith vie ws w e re 6 – 15% mo re pro d uc tive than w o rke rs w ith no vie ws1,2,4
• 10 - 15% o f abse nte e ism c an be attribute d to w o rking spac e s w ith no c o nne c tio n

nature 2,3

• Ac c e ss to vie ws and d aylig ht is sho w n to impro ve o c c upant o ve rall w e llne ss5,6

10-15%

de c re ase in abse nte e ism

6-15%

inc re ase in w o rker pro duc tivity

1 He sc ho ng , L

• isa. He sc hong Mahone Group. “Windows and Offices: A Study of Office Worker

Pe rfo r manc e and the Indoor Environment.” California E ne r gy Co mmission: Pac ific Gas and E le c tric Co mpany. F air Oaks, California. 2003c .

2 Ro mm, Joseph J. and William D. Browning. “Greening the Building and the Bottom Line.”

Ro c ky Mo untain Institute . S no wmass, Co lo r ado . 1994.

3 Browning, W. et Al. “The Economic of Biophilia”. Terrapin Bright Green. 2014. 4 F

igue iro , Rea, Stevens. “Daylight and Productivity – A Field Study”. Lighting Research Center. 2002

5 Browning, W. et Al. “Patterns of Biophilic De sign: Impr

• ving He alth & We llbe ing in the Built

Environment”. Terrapin Bright Green. 2014.

6 E

dwards, L . and T

• rc e llini, P. “A Literature Review of the Effects of Natural Light on Building

Occupants”. NREL. 2002

37

CPT E D a nd Na tura l Surve illa nc e

# 1 Re c o m me ndatio n - Natural surve illanc e inc re ase s the thre at o f appre he nsio n by taking ste ps to inc re ase the pe rc e ptio n that pe o ple c an be se e n. Natural surve illanc e o c c urs by de sig ning the plac e me nt

• f physic al fe ature s, ac tivitie s and pe o ple in suc h a way as to

m aximize visibility and fo ste r po sitive so c ial inte rac tio n am o ng le g itimate use rs o f private and public spac e . Po te ntial o ffe nde rs fe e l inc re ase d sc rutiny and limitatio ns o n the ir e sc ape ro ute s. T

• p Strate g y - L

e ave Blinds Ope n – No blinds with Vie w!

Mo me ntum

Wo rkplac e He althc are E duc atio n Ho spitality

200+

pro je c ts installe d

310+

ac ti ve e duc ati

• n

pro je c ts

Medical Center

K e y c usto me rs

T

• ro nto , Ca na d a

1.8M sq ft Oa kla nd , CA 1M sq ft – 10 b uild ings Se a ttle , WA 35k sq ft Atla nta , GA 100k sq ft Olive Bra nc h, MS 150k sq ft Smyrna , T N 157k sq ft Ca lga ry, Ca na d a 98k sq ft Ha milto n, Ca na d a 100k sq ft Burlingto n, VT 100k sq ft

• Ft. Wo rth, T

X 58k sq ft I rvine , CA 70k sq ft Wa shingto n, DC 50k sq ft

Medical Center

Sa lt L a ke City, UT 230k sq ft Mo nro e , L A 300k sq ft I nnsla ke , VA 400k sq ft Sa n Die go , CA 30k sq ft Wa shingto n, DC 60k sq ft Po rtla nd , OR 120k sq ft Sa n Jo se , CA 500k sq ft L

• s Ga to s, CA

240k sq ft Mo unta in Vie w, CA 460k sq ft

Pro je c t Suc c e sse s

Humb e r Rive r Ho spita l To ro nto , Ont, Ca na d a Ce nturyL ink Mo nro e , L A, USA L inke dIn Co rp Offic e s Mo unta in Vie w, CA Ne tflix He a dq ua rte rs L

• s Ga to s, CA

Inte rnatio na l Tra de Ce nte r Ric hmo nd, BC, Ca na da Ove rsto c k Midva le , UT, USA No rth 1st a nd Bro ka w Sa n Jo se , CA

1.8m

sq-ft

300k

sq-ft

460k

sq-ft

240k

sq-ft

240k

sq-ft

230k

sq-ft

400k

sq-ft

Ame ric a Ce nte r Sa n Jo se , CA, USA

500k

sq-ft

26K

sq -ft

37K

sq -ft

63K

sq -ft

30K

sq -ft

100K

sq -ft

76K

sq -ft

53K

sq -ft

30K

sq -ft

Glass Are a Glass Are a Glass Are a Glass Are a Glass Are a Glass Are a Glass Are a Glass Are a

Arizo na Sta te Unive rsity, NZE Stude nt Pa vilio n

• 75,000 SF
• T

e c hno lo g y o n display to

showcase University’s goals for

C limate Ne t Ne utrality and sustainable building syste ms

• Dynam ic Glass allo ws m aximum

use o f spac e in the lo bby while m aintaining c o nne c tio n to

• utside e nviro nme nt
• Ne t Ze ro E

ne rg y Go al – use s no m o re e ne rg y annually than c an be pro duc e d o n site T e m pe , AZ

Unive rsity o f Ca lg a ry Sc hulic h Sc ho o l o f E ng ine e ring

C alg ary, Albe rta, C anada

• 8000 SF o f dynam ic g lass in a

hig h pe rfo rm anc e building

• Re plac e e xte rio r fins and

auto m atic shade s

• Supe rio r the rm al c o m fo rt o n

so uthe rn e xpo sure e nc o urag e s stude nt and ac ade m ic inte rac tio n

• Puts sc ie nc e and inno vatio n o n

display – faç ade display pro g ram de sig ne d fo r c usto m e r

• Assiste d Sustainability g o als o f

L E E D Go ld

E a st Ca ro lina U nive rsity Stude nt U nio n

Gre e nville , NC

• Build ing : 150,000 SF

(5 F lo o rs)

• G lass: 35,000 SF
• Re plac e d lo w -e , auto matic

shad e s and e xte rio r shad ing d e vic e s in o rig inal d e sig n

• Re d uc tio n in the rmal lo ad

and g lare

• Maintaine d visio n E

CU had c re ate d fo r stud e nts o n usability o f spac e

• L

E E D Silve r

Duke Clinic a l Re se a rc h- I nno va tio n Distric t

So uth Building Durham , NC

• Spe c ulative Offic e Build ing
• Build ing : 150,000 SF

(7 F lo o rs)

• G lass: 13,000 SF
• Pro d uc tivity g ains fo r fac ulty

and re se arc h te ams

• G aine d flo o r spac e d ue to

re d uc tio n o f the rmal lo ad s

• U

nd e r c o nstruc tio n

• L

E E D Silve r

Duke Re se a rc h I nstitute Sta ff Pro duc tivity Ca lc ula tio ns

Building a re a a ffe c te d b y the b e ne fits o f da ylig hting (o ffic e flo o rs o nly) 223,078 sf O ffic e o c c upa nt de nsity b a se d o n ASHRAEa nd DO E b e nc hma rk mo de ls 250 sf / pe rso n # o f wo rke rs in the b uilding (223,078 sf/ 250) 892 wo rke rs E mplo ye r c o sts pe r e mplo ye e ($70Kx 1.25 b urde n ra te ) $87,500/ ye a r T

• ta le mplo ye r c o sts o n e mplo ye e s (892 wo rke rs x $87,500)

$78M 6% inc re a se in pro duc tivity ($78M x 6%) $4.7M 15% inc re a se in pro duc tivity ($78M x 15%) $12M Diffe re nc e b e twe e n dyna mic g la ss a nd lo w-e + b linds = pro duc tivity x 59% $2.7M to $6.9M

Vie w Dynam ic Glass pro vide s a po te ntial

$2.7M - $6.9M (6 – 15%)

in pro duc tivity c o st saving s pe r ye ar

Unive rsity o f Ve rmo nt, Me dic a l Ce nte r – Inpa tie nt Building

• 180,000 SF ne w c o nstruc tio n
• Daylig ht and vie ws to L

ake C ham plain inc re ase we llne ss fo r patie nts and staff

• E

ne rg y saving s and the rm al c o ntro l pro vide d e ne rg y saving s to m e e t sustainability g o als Burling to n, VT

T ha nk yo u fo r yo ur time !

195 So uth Milpita s Bo ule v a rd Milpita s, CA 95035 v ie wg la ss.c o m

50

Add itio na l Ca se Studie s

So uthe rn Me tho dist Unive rsity, Dining Co mmo ns

Dallas, T X

• So uth fac ing with uno bstruc te d

vie ws o f surro unding re side ntial are a

• Inc re ase d usable flo o r are a by

re duc ing g lare – stude nts sit c o m fo rtably ne xt to windo ws

• Fle xible -use spac e – sc re e ns dro p

do wn fro m c e iling

• Assiste d Sustainability g o als o f

L E E D Go ld

Unive rsity o f T ulsa , He lme ric h Ce nte r fo r Ame ric a n Re se a rc h

• Pro vide s UV pro te c tio n fo r

artwo rk and installatio ns

• E

nsure s visual and the rm al c o m fo rt fo r visito rs

• Allo ws o wne r to c hang e tint o f

g lass to allo w fle xible use o f the spac e as the g alle ry is use d fo r c o m munity e ve nts T ulsa, OK

Co lo ra do Sta te Unive rsity, F

• t. Co llins

L

• ry Stude nt Ce nte r
• C usto m ize d daylig ht zo ne s
• E

nable s fle x-use spac e

• Uno bstruc te d vie ws and

inc re ase d usable flo o r spac e

• L

E E D Go ld Fo rt C o llins, C O

2013 T itle 24 Building E nve lo p e / Fe ne stra tio n Re q uire me nts Fo r No n-Re side ntia l Building s

All new building projects, other than acute care facilities, shall be designed, constructed, and commissioned to

• utperform the CBC energy-

efficiency standards by at least 2 0 % . The University will strive to design, construct, and commission buildings that outperform CBC energy efficiency standards by 3 0% or more, whenever possible within the constraints of program needs and standard budget parameters.

WWR Ma x. RSHGC Ma x. U-Fa c to r (Gla ss + Fra me )

• Min. VT

2013 T itle 24: Pre sc riptive Crite ria

0.77 0.41

• 40%

2013

0.25 0.49 0.25 0.42 0.25 0.42 40% 0.36 0.41 0.46 2008

F ixe d Windo w Curta in Sto ne wa ll

• r Sto re fro nt

Skylig hts

The va lue s a re fo r a re a we ig hte d pe rfo rma nc e ra ting (inc luding g la ss + fra me )

40% 40%

2013 T itle 24: Cha lle ng e s

• Me e ting pre sc riptive e nve lo p e c rite ria with the 2013 T

itle 24 re q uire me nts is mo re diffic ult c o mpa re d to 2008

• Ve ry fe w “clear low-e” glazing o p tio ns c urre ntly a va ila b le in the ma rke t

me e ts the pre sc riptive re q uire me nts

• Vi

rac o n – 1 pro duc t

• PPG - 1 pro duc t
• Guardi

an – 1 pro duc t

• Ne w re q uire me nts will fo rc e de sig ne rs a nd e ne rg y c o nsulta nts to e ithe r
• T

ake pe rfo rm anc e path fo r the e nve lo pe OR

• L
• we r Wi

ndo w to Wall rati

• (WWR)

VT (R) SHGC U-Fa c to r

2013 T itle 24: Co mplia nc e with Dyna mic Gla ss

Pre sc riptive Me tho d T itle 24 a llo ws pro je c ts to re c o g nize the lo we st SHGC (0.09) a nd the hig he st VT (58%) with dyna mic g la zing pro d uc ts

Title 24 (Fixe d windo w c o mplia nc e ) Curta in wa ll

T int 01 T int 02 T int 03 T int 04

0.42 0.46 0.40 0.10 0.01 0.46 0.26 0.40 Vie w Dyna mic Gla ss 0.25 0.36 0.58 0.09

Dynamic Glazing meets the pr esc r iptive r equir ements

Title 24 (Skylig ht c o mp lia nc e) 0.46 0.25 0.49 0.13

* Pe rfo rmanc e v alue s fo r a e ntire g lazing asse mbly assuming a hig h pe rfo rmanc e the rmally bro ke n frame

< 0.36 0.33

2013 T itle 24: Co mplia nc e with Dyna mic Gla ss

Pe rfo rma nc e Me tho d Use the lo we st SHGC (0.09) a nd the hig he st VT (58%) to c a lc ula te a nnua l e ne rg y Use switc h c o ntro l sc he dule whe n a pplic a b le Appro ve d mo d e ling so ftwa re

• 1. E

ne rg y pro

• 2. CBE

CC- Co m

• 3. IE

S Virtua l e nviro nme nt

Dynamic Glazing meets the per for manc e r equir ements

Ca se Study: Go a l

De sire d Building

• Hig h g lazing are a (70%)
• Hig h transmittanc e g lass
• Ac c e ss to vie ws and d aylig ht
• Oc c upant c o mfo rt
• E

ne rg y e ffic ie nt

• Minimal impac t to c o nstruc tio n

c o sts

• 2013 T

itle 24 c o mpliant

• 4 sto rie s, 80,000 sf
• Pac kag e d ro o fto p unit VAV
• CA c limate zo ne 3 – SF

O & L A

Pa ths to me e t T itle 24: Optio ns Ove rvie w

E xte rnal Shadi ng U pg rade F ac ade + L i g hti ng U pg rade HVAC U pg rade Vi e w Dynam i c Glass U pg rade

Optio n 4 Optio n 1 De sire d b uilding Title 24 Ba se line Optio n 2 Optio n 3

Pa ths to me e t T itle 24: Co mplia nc e Ana lysis

Upg ra de Gla zing Are a Enve lo pe Asse mb lie s L ig hting Syste m Me c ha nic a l Syste m Co de % Be tte r T24 2013

E xterna l sha d ing (o verha ng + fins) 70% WWR Sha d ing + T itle 24 Gla ss T 24 T 24 0.7% 40% WWR T 24 T 24 T 24 0% 70% WWR T 24 T 24 T 24

• 5%

Sha d ing + SB 70XL Sha d ing + SB 70XL T 24 T 24

• 1.0%

70% WWR Sha d ing + SB 70XL + L E D (F a ç a d e + L ig hting ) Sha d ing + SB 70XL L E D L ig hting T 24 3.3% 70% WWR HVAC System T 24 T 24 VRF Air C o o led E q uip m ent 3.5% 70% WWR View Gla ss View Gla ss T 24 T 24 1.4% 70% WWR

Optio n 4

View Dynamic Glass has the lowest fir st c osts

$9 $16 $14 $8 $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 $18 E xte rio r Sha ding U pgra de F a c a de & L ig hting Upgrade HVAC Upg r a de Vie w Dyna mic G la ss U pgra de F irst c o sts ($/ sf b uilding a re a )

• Base line c o sts are fo r a 70% WWR building that is no t 2013 T

24 c o mpliant

• Additio nal sav ing s fro m blinds e liminatio n ($3/ sf building are a) and HVAC T

I

Pa ths to me e t T itle 24: I nc re me nta l F irst Co sts

$2 $2 $2 $1 $0 $0 $1 $1 $2 $2 E xte rio r Sha ding U pgra de F a c a de & L ig hting U pgrade HVAC Upg r a de Vie w Dyna mic G la ss U pgra de O pe ra ting Co sts ($/ sf b uildi ng a re a )

Pa ths to me e t T itle 24: Ope ra ting Co sts

View Dynamic Glass has the lowest oper ating c osts

• Ope rating c o sts inc lude c o st o f e ne rg y and 1% mainte nanc e c o sts fo r shade s, HVAC e tc w here applic able
• Additio nal sav ing s fro m blinds mainte nanc e (1% o f first c o sts)

Go ing Be yo nd 2013 T itle 24

Mor e than 10% savings qualifies for Utility Inc entives

Alt g o ing furthe r, Optio n 1 De sire d b uilding Title 24 Ba se line Alt g o ing furthe r, Optio n 2 Upg ra de Gla zing Are a Enve lo pe Asse mb lie s L ig hting Syste m Me c ha nic a l Syste m Co de % Be tte r T24 2013

L ig hting System + View Gla ss 70% WWR View Gla ss L E D L ig hting T 24 5.8% HVAC system + View Gla ss View Gla ss 40% WWR T 24 T 24 T 24 0% 70% WWR T 24 T 24 T 24

• 5%

T 24 VRF Air C o o led E q uip m ent 11.0% 70% WWR

De ma nd Re spo nse

T itle 24 Summa ry

O pe ra ting c o sts Re duc e s g la re Ma ximize s da ylig hting E na b le s v ie ws Inc re a se s the rma l c o mfo rt Ma inte na nc e Inc re me nta l first c o sts

Exte rna l sha ding Exte rna l sha ding + L

• w-e g la ss

+ L ig hting syste m HVAC syste m Dyna mic Gla ss

Pa rtia l Pa rtia l NA Ye s Pa rtia l Pa rtia l NA Ye s Pa rtia l Pa rtia l NA Ye s Pa rtia l Pa rtia l Ye s Ye s Me dium Hig h L

• w

Me dium $9/ sf $18/ sf $14/ sf $8/ sf $2.04/ sf $2.34/ sf $2.24/ sf $1.93/ sf Ye s No No Ye s

View Dynamic Glass is the most c ompr ehensive and ec onomic al faç ade solution to meet T itle 24 r equir ements