Metering Pump Station Flow Monitoring Presented by: Glenn Hummel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

metering
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Metering Pump Station Flow Monitoring Presented by: Glenn Hummel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Laser for Open Channel Flow Metering Pump Station Flow Monitoring Presented by: Glenn Hummel Presentation Objective Keep your Toolbox equipped with Flow Metering Solutions Introduce a New Technology for Open Channel Flow Measurement


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Laser for Open Channel Flow Metering

Pump Station Flow Monitoring Presented by: Glenn Hummel

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Objective

Keep your Toolbox equipped with Flow Metering Solutions

  • Introduce a New Technology for Open Channel

Flow Measurement

  • Review a Time Tested Approach for Pump

Station Flow Monitoring

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline

  • Overview of Open Channel Flow

Measurement (OCM) Technologies

  • Intro Latest Technology for OCM
  • Review Pump Station Flow Monitoring
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Open Channel Flow Measurement (OCM)

  • Empirical Formula – Manning Equation
  • Primary Device – Flumes & Weirs and Eq’s

– Both used Level Sensors: Floats, Bubblers, Pressure Transducers - all Contacting Ultrasonic (Non-Contacting)

  • Area Velocity

– Velocity & Depth Sensors

  • Better Accuracy
  • Portable, Easy to Deploy
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Continuous Wave Doppler (CWD)

[the economical workhorse]

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Pulsed Doppler (PD)

[higher accuracy, perf, & reliability at higher cost]

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Contact Sensors

The drawbacks of Contacting Sensor technologies are:

  • Reliability

– Blinding (loss of reading) – Silting (accuracy uncertainty) – Failure (damage / exposure)

  • Maintenance / Cleaning

– (cost)

  • Small pipes (feasibility)

– Sensor caused obstruction in flow – Debris, hydraulic issues

slide-8
SLIDE 8

These drawbacks associated with contacting sensors have driven technology to provide

“Non-Contacting”

measurement solutions

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Non-Contact vs Contact…Why?

  • Maintenance

– Blinding, Silting, Debris – Far fewer visits required by non-contacting solutions – Frequency & Costs (~$500 per site visit)

  • Safety

– Cannot get flushed down a sewer pipe if you are not in the sewer.

  • Large Pipe

– Difficult Installations

  • Flow Depths greater than 3 ft (tough for CWD)
  • Velocity over 3ft/second (equip wash-out)
  • Small pipes – <24” Low level flow measurement

– Shallow water depths with high velocities

  • Confined Space Entry for Maintenance

– Permits / Traffic Control / Manpower

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Non-Contact Radar

  • Very Intelligent approach. Sensor above the sewage.
  • Non-contact Level Measurement (Ultrasonic)
  • Non-contact Surface Velocity Measurement (Radar)
  • Advantages
  • Minimal maintenance
  • Above water installation
  • Low level flow measurement
  • Limitations

– Single Point, Surface Velocity Measurement does not yield velocity measurement representative of cross section – Dead band in ultrasonic level measurement – Required velocity profiling

–Only read velocity at the surface!

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Area Velocity

  • “Contacting” Meters

– Continuous Wave Doppler (CWD) – Pulsed Doppler (PD)

  • “Non-Contact” Meters

– Radar – Laser

  • Latest Advancement in Velocity Measurement

Technology

slide-12
SLIDE 12

LaserFlowTM

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introducing Isco’s Non-Contact Solution

LaserFlow

  • Non Contact Laser Velocity

measurement

  • Non Contact Ultrasonic Level

Measurement

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Basic Operation Sketch– Velocity Measurement

Laser Flow Sensor Original Laser Light, λ = 635 nm Return Doppler Signal Light Flowing Water Stream 45 Degree Angle θ ∆f = 2 V cosθ / λ V = λ * ∆f / (2 cosθ) where: ∆f = Doppler frequency shift V = Water velocity θ = 45 degrees λ = Laser wavelength V

14

Below Surface

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Ultrasonic Level Measurement Laser Velocity Measurement Single Point Velocity Method

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Theory of Operation

Below the surface 5000 Spectral Velocity Readings Return Doppler Signal Light

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Ultrasonic Level Sensor

  • Range 0 – 10 feet
  • 45˚ Deflector Plate
  • 10˚ Beam Angle

0-10 ft

  • Virtual Zero Dead band
  • Ultrasonic dead band is

exceeded by the time the signal reaches the bottom of the LaserFlow.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Design Concept

  • Peak to average relationship

– Peak velocity is typically below the surface of the water at lower depths – Moves away from the water surface at higher depths

  • Turbidity and TSS – Total Suspended

Solids

– Minimum 15 PPM

  • Balance

– 1/2” to 6” Below the surface in typical raw wastewater applications

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Ultrasonic Level Measurement Laser Velocity Measurement Single Point Velocity Method

Single point Velocity Method

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Ultrasonic Level Measurement Laser Velocity Measurement Multidepth Velocity Method

Multidepth Velocity Method

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Ultrasonic Level Measurement Laser Velocity Measurement Multipoint Velocity Method

Multipoint Velocity Method

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Ultrasonic Level Measurement Laser Velocity Measurement

Multipoint -Multidepth Velocity Method

Multipoint – Multidepth Velocity Method

slide-28
SLIDE 28

When do you use single point velocity measurement?

  • Uniform and consistent flow
  • Battery Life is a concern
  • Rapid Data Rate – 1 minute
slide-29
SLIDE 29

When do you use Multipoint velocity measurement?

  • Non-Uniform Flow
  • AC Power
  • Longer Reading intervals
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Submerged Condition

  • Measurement during Submerged condition

– TIENetTM CW area velocity sensor

  • Proven technology
  • Not a point velocity measurement
  • More accurate during surcharged conditions
  • Measurement can start on different conditions

– Variable Rate Data Storage

  • Laser Level
  • Laser Velocity
  • Laser Temperature
  • CW Level
  • CW Velocity
  • Laser cone design prevents water from reaching

the laser window

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Submerged Condition Measurement

TIENetTM Area velocity sensor connected to LaserFlow sensor Single cable from LaserFlow sensor

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Normal Operation

  • Laser velocity
  • Ultrasonic

Level (USLS)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Submerged Condition Begins

slide-34
SLIDE 34

LaserFlow Fully Submerged

CWD sensor reading velocity Pressure Sensor reading depth

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Redundant Measurement

A r ea V eloci t y (laser) L e v el (USLS) L e v el (p r essu r e t r ansdu c er) A r ea V eloci t y ( s o u n d w a v e)

TIENet Area Velocity sensor with a longer Cable 1,10, 23M

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Teledyne Proposed Solution Electronics

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Product Specifications

  • Level range accuracy

– 0.02 ft at 1 ft level change or less

  • Velocity range

– +/-15 ft/sec

  • Minimum depth for velocity

– 0.5”

  • Focus range of Laser

– 0.5” - 6” below the surface at 15 NTU /PPM

  • Turbidity / TSS range

– 15 - 1,000 NTU/PPM

  • Operating temperature

– Up to 140˚F

  • Battery Life @ 15 minute readings with single point, unidirectional

setup – 12 Weeks

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Product Specifications Housing Materials

  • Corrosion resistant ABS

plastic

  • IP 68
  • Anodized aluminum
  • Stainless steel

hardware

  • Ultrasonic Sensor

– Kynar (corrosion resistant)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Installation Requirements

  • Laser can be installed facing in the upstream or

downstream pipe.

  • Center the bracket over the flow stream.
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Installation Requirements

  • Install the LaserFlow sensor in the middle of the pipe,

parallel to the water surface.

  • Use the “Laser On” function to see where the beam hits.
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Permanent Mount

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Permanent Mount

  • Wall mount

bracket

– Vertical adjustment

  • X – axis

adjustment

  • or roll
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Permanent Wall Mount Street Level Installation Tool

Street level installation alignment tabs

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Level installation

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Locking handle

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Street Level Tool

Max length 23 ft

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Facing into the flow

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Facing away from the flow

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Temporary application

  • Spreader bar
slide-50
SLIDE 50

Stability of Mounting hardware

slide-51
SLIDE 51

How well does LaserFlow Technology Perform?

Examples of Actual Performance

  • Accuracy
  • Repeatability
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Single Point Velocity Method

Within 0.5%

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Omaha LaserFlow vs ADFM

Difference = 0.36%

slide-54
SLIDE 54

SAWPA comparison vs. OCSD reference Magmeter

slide-55
SLIDE 55

LaserFlow Applications

  • Collection System Monitoring

– Billing – Inflow and Infiltration

  • WWTP

– Permit Reporting:

  • Raw Influent
  • Final Effluent

– In plant pipes and channels

  • Hydraulic Modeling

– Highly Accurate & Reliable Data Sets

  • Industrial Discharge monitoring

– Harsh Chemicals and/or Environments

  • Storm water

– Large debris

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Summary

  • LaserFlow

– Advanced Laser Velocity Measurement – Multipoint Subsurface Velocity Measurement – The only non-contact flow measurement system that reads below the surface – Both precise and accurate – Easy to install and maintain – Excellent Submerged flow measurement option – Flexible Platforms

  • 2100 (Portable Battery Operated)
  • Signature (Permanent – Process Meter)
slide-57
SLIDE 57

Oh, by the way… …did you know?

  • CWD, PD, and LaserFlow sensors can be used

to measure and log Water Temperature?

– Help indicate source or distinguish between inflow

  • r infiltration
  • Some sensors can provide continuous logging
  • f velocity reading quality indicators.
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Lift Station Monitoring 4501

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Application

Any application where “fixed” speed pumps are moving fluid from point A to point B. & Where the pumps are activated when specific volume thresholds are met in the source!

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Purpose and Applications for Lift Station Monitoring

  • Wastewater collection system studies
  • Dry and wet weather flow conditions
  • Inflow and infiltration studies (I&I)
  • Capacity monitoring
  • Future planning
  • Billing measurement
  • Lift station performance studies
  • Proactive maintenance programs
slide-61
SLIDE 61

Lift Station Monitor Operation

  • Benefits:
  • Accurately measure within 1%
  • Influent flow
  • Pumping rates for each pump
  • Volume processed by the station
  • Diagnose
  • Abnormal pump station performance
  • Maintenance issues
  • Power issues
slide-62
SLIDE 62

Lift Station Meter Setup

  • Station information.
  • Wet well volumes calculated using
  • Wet well dimensions
  • Pump operation levels
  • Minimum requirement!!!
  • Rated pump capacity
  • Pump draw down test data
  • Single pump operation
  • Combination pump operation
  • Station meter programming methods
  • Volume method
  • Rated pump capacity alone
  • Rated pump capacity used when the station parameters

cannot be obtained

  • Pump capacity not learned nor updated… fixed!
  • Not as accurate!
slide-63
SLIDE 63

Principle of Operation

  • Wet well fills and empties
  • Monitors pump ON / OFF

intervals

  • OFF = FILL
  • ON = EMPTY
  • The volume and time

intervals are used

  • Algorithms applied to

calculate

  • Flow into and out of lift

station

  • Pumping rate of each pump
slide-64
SLIDE 64

3 methods of calculation

1 - Extrapolation Method

Calculation method in the 4501.
slide-65
SLIDE 65

3 methods of calculation 2 - Averaging Method

slide-66
SLIDE 66

3 methods of calculation 3 - Trending Method

Method used by the PC software

Pumplink uses the 5 preceding events and the 5 following events to calculate and determine “trend”

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Summary Report

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Monthly Report

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Daily Report

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Event Report

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Lift Station Monitoring Recap

  • Collection system studies
  • Dry weather analysis
  • Wet weather analysis
  • System planning/modeling
  • Station monitoring
  • Maintenance needs
  • Pump performance
  • Diagnostics – station performance
slide-72
SLIDE 72

QUESTIONS

  • For More Information Contact:

– Kip Koszewski kip@hesco-mi.com 586.978.7200 – Glenn Hummel glenn@hesco-mi.com 586.353.2242