massimo persic
play

Massimo Persic INAF+INFN Trieste for CTA Consortium Merate, Oct 6, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CTA Massimo Persic INAF+INFN Trieste for CTA Consortium Merate, Oct 6, 2011 CTA Ground-Based gamma-ray astronomy Physics questions left by the current instruments The Cherenkov Telescope Array Sensitivity Requirements Current


  1. CTA Massimo Persic INAF+INFN Trieste for CTA Consortium Merate, Oct 6, 2011

  2. CTA  Ground-Based gamma-ray astronomy  Physics questions left by the current instruments  The Cherenkov Telescope Array  Sensitivity Requirements  Current Status & Design Study, e.g.  Example MC simulation  Location Studies  Possible Schedule  CTA in Context  Conclusions With slides from: A.DeAngelis, G.Hermann, J.Hinton, W.Hofmann, M.Martinez, S.Nolan, S.Ritz, Th.Schweizer, M.Teshima, D.Torres

  3. Potentially 5 decades of energy accessible CTA via this technique (~few GeV to few hundreds of TeV) 1 decade of overlap with satellite experiments

  4. CTA

  5. CTA

  6. CTA H.E.S.S. II (1 st light 2012) MAGIC II (1 st light 2009)

  7. CTA  Green crosses indicate 205 brightest LAT sources  EGRET on the Compton Observatory found fewer than 30 sources above 10 in its lifetime.  Typical 95% error radius is less than 10 arcmin. For the brightest sources, it is less than 3 arcmin. Improvements are expected.  About 1/3 of the sources show definite evidence of variability.  Over 40 sources have no obvious associations with known gamma-ray emitting classes of objects.

  8. CTA The current generation of telescopes (H.E.S.S. / MAGIC / VERITAS) have detected >100 sources. Several more with HESS2 / MAGIC2 / VERITAS  Stellar Winds Sources  Supernova Remnants  AGN  Pulsar Wind Nebulae  Constraints on EBL  Binary Systems  Constraints on QG  Molecular Clouds  CR Electron Spectrum  Galactic Centre  No Counterpart/Dark Regular 70 GeV-20 TeV observations made with few % Crab sensitivity.

  9. CTA adapted by Hinton from Horan & Weekes 2003 Distance kpc Mpc Gpc Blazars Starbursts SNR/PWN Binaries Radio Gal. Pulsed Current Sensitivity Flux CTA Colliding +Dark Matter Clusters GRBs Winds Current instruments have passed the critical sensitivity threshold and reveal a rich panorama, but this is clearly only the tip of the iceberg What big science questions remain ?

  10. CTA  Determine: Origin of galactic cosmic-rays Whether γ -ray binaries emit via wind/jet  Study: Star formation regions Pulsars and PWN Studying Physics of AGN Jets  Constrain: Extragalactic Background Light Quantum Gravity Energy Scale  Discover: WIMP annihilation NT view of cosmological structure formation Dark sources / New source classes

  11. Spectral modeling of SNRs … . CTA Spectral degeneracy at HESS J1834-178 CTA uuu AGILE TeV energies GLAST D = 4 kpc low E thr ( ~10-30 GeV ) to discriminate VHE -rays: hadronic or leptonic ? CTA  improved low- E coverage, solve spectral degeneracy

  12. … and the origin of Galactic CRs CTA J1713.7-3946 Leptonic: E e ~ 20 (E ) 1/2 TeV ~ 110 TeV … but KN sets on ..  ~100 TeV Hadronic: E p ~ E / 0.15 ~ 30 / 0.15 TeV ~ ~ 200 TeV = 10 5.3 GeV Importance of improving statistics: 3 years of HESS data 1 year CTA: improved statistics at E > 100 TeV, to probe CR knee

  13. Measurement of diffusion coefficient (cf. diffusion-loss equation) CTA Aharonian + 2006 index ~ (strong NR shock) CTA  spatially resolved spectroscopy little variation across SNR young SNRs (t<t cool (p,e)): CRp spectrum = 1+2 + b diffusion coefficient: ( p A p b  measure ( p ) as a function of p

  14. … more in general: CTA CR – SN relation v Fermi-I mechanism  SNRs v SN rates, massive star formation Test: U p ~ ¼ ( SN ) ( E ej ) r s 3 70 GeV-20 TeV Arp 220  U p 475 eV cm 3 NGC 253  125 M 82  110 Early gals.: Milky Way  1  high U p M31  0.3  Gas heating LMC  0.2  M jeans affected? SMC  0.1

  15. CTA Most energetic explosions since Big Bang (10 54 erg if isotropic) Astrophysical setting unknown (hypernova?) Emission mechanism unknown (hadronic vs leptonic, beaming, size of emitting region, role of environment, … … ) Cosmological distances ( z >> 1)  Missed naked-eye GRB 080319B ( z =0.937) ---------------------------------------- MAGIC CTA  low E thr ~ 20 GeV to see GRBs !!

  16. 080319B  missed obs of “naked - eye” GRB CTA Intrinsically: Nearby: z=0.937 Brightest ever observed in optical Exceedingly high isotropic- equivalent in soft -rays Swift/BAT could have observed it out to z=4.9 1m-class telescope could observe out to z=17 Missed by both AGILE (Earth screening) and MAGIC (almost dawn) next BIG ONE awaited !!

  17. Quiescent states of low/intermediate-z blazars High states of high-z blazar CTA IACT CTA

  18. CTA PKS 2155-304 (H.E.S.S.)

  19. CTA

  20. Probing Quantum Gravity CTA

  21. Kjbvakj CTA E QG ~ 0.05 M P and no conventional explanations 

  22. … in general: CTA Mrk 501: Jul 9, 2005

  23. Evolution of cosmic star formation rate CTA Franceschini et al. 2008

  24. CTA

  25. CTA

  26. CTA Bottom-up cosmology: Smaller, denser gals. small galaxies formed have little/no SF – first, hence their density bigger, less dense gals. retains the cosmological do have strong SF. density at the epoch of their turnaround ( 1.8).  dSph MW satellite Baryon infall: SF  SN best candidates expl.  winds  most  UFOs exciting candidates of infalling baryons lost in small gals., but retained in bigger ones.

  27. CTA

  28. d~80 kpc Bergström & Hooper 2006 CTA total DM A v>, m : WIMP annihil. cross section, mass annihil. rate - ray flux N : -rays / annihil. cusped maximizes profile signal cored profile -ray flux r s = 7 – 0.2 kpc 0 = 10 7 – 10 9 M  kpc -3 2 r s 3 = 0.03 – 6 M  2 kpc -3 0

  29. _ bb CTA + - t t _ min. cored W + W - GLAST max. cusped MAGIC ZZ 1-yr exp. 40-h exp. Bergström & Hooper 2006 IACT neutralino detection: < A v> 10 -25 cm 3 s -1 Stoehr + 2003

  30. CTA  Higher Sensitivity at TeV energies (x10) Deeper observations  More sources & more extended spectra  Higher Detection Area Higher detection rates  Transient phenomena  Better Angular Resolution Improved morphology studies  Structure of extended sources  Lower Threshold (some 10 GeV) Pulsars, distant AGN, source mechanisms  Higher Energy Reach (PeV and beyond) Cutoff region of galactic accelerators  Wide Field of View Extended Sources, Surveys

  31. CTA sensitivity CTA tyuujunas hjv

  32. CTA … limitations …

  33. CTA

  34. CTA angular field resolution of view

  35. CTA

  36. CTA

  37. CTA

  38. CTA

  39. CTA Angular resolution

  40. CTA Space-based instruments only optical UV | X-ray | -ray | VHE -ray 10 -11 erg cm -2 s -1 ) Integral More sensitive 10 -12 Fermi GST Current Instruments 10 -13 F XMM 10 -14 10 -15 HST 10 -16 1 eV 1 keV 1 MeV 1 GeV 1 TeV 1 PeV Energy

  41. CTA Space-based instruments only optical UV | X-ray | -ray | VHE -ray 10 -11 erg cm -2 s -1 ) Integral More sensitive 10 -12 Fermi GST Current IACTs 10 -13 F CTA 10 -14 XMM 10 -15 HST 10 -16 1 eV 1 keV 1 MeV 1 GeV 1 TeV 1 PeV Energy

  42. CTA

  43. CTA

  44. CTA

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend