Machine learning for Raman amplifier design and quantum phase - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

machine learning for raman amplifier design and quantum
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Machine learning for Raman amplifier design and quantum phase - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Machine learning for Raman amplifier design and quantum phase estimation Darko Zibar 1. Machine learning in photonic systems (M-LiPS) group, DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby email: dazi@fotonik.dtu.dk


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Machine learning for Raman amplifier design and quantum phase estimation

Darko Zibar

  • 1. Machine learning in photonic systems (M-LiPS) group, DTU Fotonik, Technical University of

Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby

email: dazi@fotonik.dtu.dk

slide-2
SLIDE 2

08/12/2018 2

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Acknowledgements

  • Francesco Da Ros
  • Simone Gaiarin
  • Hou-Man Chin
  • Molly Piels, Juniper
  • Tobias Gehring, DTU Physics
  • Nitin Jain, DTU Physics
  • Ulrik L. Andersen, DTU Physics
  • Andrea Carena, Polotecnico Di Torino
  • Bernhard Schmauss, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg
  • Rasmus Jones
  • Julio Diniz
  • Martin Djurhuss
  • Jakob Thrane
  • Jesper Wass
  • Nicola De Renzis
  • Giovanni Brajato
slide-3
SLIDE 3

08/12/2018 3

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Research topics

  • Nonlinear Fourier Transform techniques for optical communication
  • Noise characterization of lasers and frequency combs, (Menlo systems, UCSB, NBI)
  • End-to-end machine learning
  • Machine learning for optical fibre sensing (collaboration with Friedrich Alexander

University of Erlangen-Nurnberg)

  • Quantum phase estimation (collaboration with DTU Physics)
  • Receiver design for quantum communication (collaboration with DTU Physics)

The focus of the group is on the application of machine learning techniques to

  • ptical communication, quantum communication and optical sensing
slide-4
SLIDE 4

08/12/2018 4

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Outline

  • Machine learning in physical sciences
  • Inverse system learning
  • Inverse system learning for Raman amplifier design
  • Optical phase tracking framework for frequency combs
  • Quantum phase estimation
  • Conclusion and outlook
slide-5
SLIDE 5

08/12/2018 5

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Machine learning in physical sciences

slide-6
SLIDE 6

08/12/2018 6

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Machine learning in physical sciences

slide-7
SLIDE 7

08/12/2018 7

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Machine learning in optical communication

  • Optical performance monitoring
  • Quantum communication
  • Amplifier design
  • Laser noise characterization
  • Impairment compensation
  • End-to-end learning
  • Network optimization
  • Network failure detection
  • D. Zibar et al Nature Photonics, (11) 749-751, 2017
slide-8
SLIDE 8

08/12/2018 8

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Supervised learning: deep neural networks

Neural network learns the input-output mapping, ,using training data and perform prediction for new input data: input

  • utput
slide-9
SLIDE 9

08/12/2018 9

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Deep learning for inverse system modelling

Unknown

Learning the inverse mapping using deep neural networks

  • Problem if the mapping function is not bijective
slide-10
SLIDE 10

08/12/2018 10

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Raman amplifier for optical communication

Employing O, E, S and L band requires rethinking optical amplification

Raman pumps (wavelength, powers) Incoming signal

slide-11
SLIDE 11

08/12/2018 11

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

State-of-the-art: Raman amplifier optimization

Objective: given a Raman gain profile determine pump powers and wavelengths

Raman solver Parameter

  • ptimization

Repeat N times

  • High complexity due to Raman solver
  • Long convergence time
  • Restart optimization for new gain profile
  • Rely on genetic algorithms

[1] B. Neto, OpEx 2007, [2] X. Liu, OpEx 2004, [3] P. Xia, PTL 2003

slide-12
SLIDE 12

08/12/2018 12

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Raman amplifier design using machine learning

Zibar et al, submitted to OFC 2019 ( arXiv:1811.10381v1)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

08/12/2018 13

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Simulation set-up and results

  • In a multi-span system with hybrid EDFA Raman amplification, we

consider:

  • a single-span
  • counter-propagation multi-pumps
  • signals propagating in C-band (4 THz, 191-195 THz

→1538.5-1570.7 nm)

  • SMF fiber
slide-14
SLIDE 14

08/12/2018 14

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Results

The learned model works for any gain profile and the re-training is not required

(a) Gain versus frequency (b) Error for different input powers

slide-15
SLIDE 15

08/12/2018 15

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Phase noise estimation for quantum communication

Kleis and Schaeffer, Optics Letters 2018

Homodyne receiver: Phase diversity homodyne receiver: Received signal: Pilot tones have low power

Average num. of photons/symbol Gaussian modulation

Ultra-sensitive (optimal) detection of optical phase needed at the shot noise limit

slide-16
SLIDE 16

08/12/2018 16

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Phase estimation for quantum sensing

P

Ultra-sensitive (optimal) detection fixed phase shift

Courtesy of Prof. Achim Peters https://www.physics.hu-berlin.de/en/qom/research/sensor

slide-17
SLIDE 17

08/12/2018 17

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Quantum phase estimation

  • System limited by quantum noise only (shot-noise limited system)
  • Due to Heisenberg uncertainty, optical phase not a single numerical value
  • Number of photons Np instead of SNR:
  • SNR for shot-noise limited system:
  • Phasor diagram of light in coherent state:

Laser linewidth Receiver bandwidth

Np Vacum fluctuations (noise): Re Im Is this model valid for Np  1? Can we detect optical phase if SNR<1?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

08/12/2018 18

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

State-of-the-art: evaluation of the accuracy

  • Variance is employed for accuracy estimation (tricky in the experiements)
  • Laser phase noise artificially induced as Wiener process (highly problematic)
  • Receiver bandwidth and linewidth equal:
  • Same laser used as transmitter and LO
  • SNR is high as the linewidth is chosen to be relatively small
  • For homodyne detection quantum noise limited variance:

[1] Yonezawa, Science 2011

slide-19
SLIDE 19

08/12/2018 19

DTU Fotonik, Technical University of Denmark

Conclusion and outlook

  • Optical phase tracking has applications in various fields
  • General Bayesian framework for ultra-sensitive phase detection presented
  • Phase evolution model learned from data
  • Tracking of mean phase and also covariance matrix demonstrated
  • Quantum limited performance achieved
  • Significant improvement to standard frequency noise measurements