M ETRORAIL S TATION D ESIGN Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

m etrorail s tation d esign
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

M ETRORAIL S TATION D ESIGN Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

P OTOMAC Y ARD M ETRORAIL S TATION D ESIGN Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group March 17, 2016 A GENDA I. Introductions II. Station Concept Update III. Potomac Yard Park IV. Small Group Discussion V. PYMIG Discussion VI.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

POTOMAC YARD METRORAIL STATION DESIGN

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group March 17, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

AGENDA

2

I. Introductions II. Station Concept Update

  • III. Potomac Yard Park
  • IV. Small Group Discussion

V. PYMIG Discussion

  • VI. Final EIS Update
  • VII. Temporary Construction Impacts

VIII.Next Steps

  • IX. Comments/Questions

X. Adjourn

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPT UPDATE

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION DESIGN - PRECEDENTS

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION DESIGN - PRECEDENTS

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPT - STUDIES

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPT - STUDIES

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPT - STUDIES

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPT - STUDIES

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPT – OPTION 1

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPT – OPTION 1

PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPT – OPTION 1

PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPT – OPTION 2

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPT – OPTION 2

PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPT – OPTION 2

PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

COMPARISON OF OPTIONS 1 AND 2

16

Option 1 Option 2

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

EAST ENTRY BRIDGE

17

*Images are for illustrative purposes only

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

SOUTH PAVILION CONCEPT

18

South Entrance Looking East from East Glebe

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES - CONCEPTS

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

POTOMAC YARD PARK

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

POTOMAC YARD PARK – WHAT WE HEARD…

21

  • 1. Would you prefer the space to be more structured (Option A) or

more flexible (Option B)? Structured = 44.0 % Flexible = 51.8 % Other = 4.2 %

  • 2. Do you want the design of the park area around the Metro station

to be consistent/continuous with the whole park? Or should this area have its own identity? Consistent with the whole park = 72.3% Should have its own identity = 23.5% Other = 4.2%

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

POTOMAC YARD PARK – CONCEPT (PLAN VIEW)

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

POTOMAC YARD PARK – CONCEPT (PERSPECTIVES)

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

STATION CONCEPTS

  • Several themes have been heard consistently :

– The Metro station should sit lightly in the landscape – The Metro station should be complementary to its surroundings (Potomac Yard, Potomac Greens, and the George Washington Memorial Parkway) – The Metro station design should minimize the visibility of the station from the Parkway – The Metro station design should take advantage of views from inside the station

  • Based on these themes, which concept best

achieves the objectives outlined above and why?

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

POTOMAC YARD PARK CONCEPT

  • Themes we heard from the February PYMIG:

– Split votes on if the space should be more structured

  • r more flexible.

– The design of the park area around the Metro station should be consistent/continuous with the whole park.

  • Based on these themes, please provide any

comments on the design concept?

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

GROUP FEEDBACK

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

PYMIG DISCUSSION

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

FINAL EIS UPDATE

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

FINAL EIS UPDATE

30

  • Second round of comments from FTA and NPS

received March 15

  • Final EIS will be circulated for public review and

comment for 30 days (anticipated Spring 2016)

  • Final EIS includes proposed mitigation
  • Public comments may affect mitigation

commitments formalized in Records of Decision (anticipated Summer 2016)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

CONSTRUCTION ACCESS

32

  • Construction Access Options studied for

the EIS:

  • Access from George Washington

Memorial Parkway

  • Access through Old Town Greens and

Potomac Greens

  • Use of cranes from the west side of

the CSX right-of-way

  • NPS prohibits construction access from

the GWMP and will not allow the use of the parkway by construction traffic.

  • No construction over active railroad

tracks.

  • All construction traffic will use Route 1.
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

CONSTRUCTION ACCESS

33

  • The following graphics are approximations of the breakdown by route of the amount of

anticipated construction traffic.

  • To reduce traffic to and from the station site, a location is being sought for construction

worker parking.

  • This off-site parking would be required for all construction workers, who would be bused to

the site.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

CONSTRUCTION ACCESS

34

  • Construction traffic traveling north on Potomac Greens Drive has 2 options once it reaches

the traffic circle at the intersection of Potomac Greens Drive and Carpenter Road: Potomac Greens Drive or Carpenter Road.

  • Community input is being sought on the selection of the preferred option.
  • The landscaped area of the traffic circle will be removed before construction and restored

at the end of construction.

  • The 2 playgrounds will be relocated and the tennis courts will be closed throughout the

period of construction.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

TEMPORARY PARK RELOCATION

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS

36

  • Overnight and weekend work will be required.
  • Additionally, some work will require that Blue & Yellow

Line service be suspended during weekends.

  • The construction schedule will be determined once the

contractor is determined.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE

37

  • Approx. Limits
  • f Disturbance
  • Approx. Limits
  • f Disturbance
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

CITY OVERSIGHT

38

  • Construction activities occurring during “off” hours will

require special permits and will have to comply with City processes.

  • The City will have a full time employee located on site

who will oversee activities to ensure that the community impacts are minimized to the fullest extent possible.

  • The City and WMATA personnel will keep the community

up to date on construction activities and will be readily available to answer questions and address concerns or complaints throughout the duration of construction.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

NEXT STEPS

  • Ongoing DSUP process

– June Public Hearing

  • BAR Work Sessions

– April 20

  • Finalize EIS
  • Update Boards and Commissions

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

COMMENTS / QUESTIONS

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

41

QUESTIONS?

For more information, visit:

www.alexandriava.gov/PotomacYard