m etrorail s tation d esign
play

M ETRORAIL S TATION D ESIGN Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

P OTOMAC Y ARD M ETRORAIL S TATION D ESIGN Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group March 17, 2016 A GENDA I. Introductions II. Station Concept Update III. Potomac Yard Park IV. Small Group Discussion V. PYMIG Discussion VI.


  1. P OTOMAC Y ARD M ETRORAIL S TATION D ESIGN Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group March 17, 2016

  2. A GENDA I. Introductions II. Station Concept Update III. Potomac Yard Park IV. Small Group Discussion V. PYMIG Discussion VI. Final EIS Update VII. Temporary Construction Impacts VIII.Next Steps IX. Comments/Questions X. Adjourn 2 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  3. STATION CONCEPT UPDATE 3 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  4. S TATION D ESIGN - P RECEDENTS 4 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  5. S TATION D ESIGN - P RECEDENTS 5 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  6. S TATION C ONCEPT - S TUDIES 6 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  7. S TATION C ONCEPT - S TUDIES 7 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  8. S TATION C ONCEPT - S TUDIES 8 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  9. S TATION C ONCEPT - S TUDIES 9 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  10. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 1 10 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  11. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 1 PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM 11 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  12. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 1 PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM 12 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  13. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 2 13 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  14. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 2 PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM 14 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  15. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 2 PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM 15 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  16. C OMPARISON OF O PTIONS 1 AND 2 Option 1 Option 2 16 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  17. E AST E NTRY B RIDGE *Images are for illustrative purposes only 17 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  18. S OUTH P AVILION C ONCEPT South Entrance Looking East from East Glebe 18 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  19. P EDESTRIAN B RIDGES - C ONCEPTS 19 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  20. POTOMAC YARD PARK 20 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  21. P OTOMAC Y ARD P ARK – W HAT WE H EARD … 1. Would you prefer the space to be more structured (Option A) or more flexible (Option B)? Structured = 44.0 % Flexible = 51.8 % Other = 4.2 % 2. Do you want the design of the park area around the Metro station to be consistent/continuous with the whole park? Or should this area have its own identity? Consistent with the whole park = 72.3% Should have its own identity = 23.5% Other = 4.2% 21 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  22. P OTOMAC Y ARD P ARK – C ONCEPT (P LAN V IEW ) 22 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  23. P OTOMAC Y ARD P ARK – C ONCEPT (P ERSPECTIVES ) 23 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  24. SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION 24 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  25. S TATION C ONCEPTS • Several themes have been heard consistently : – The Metro station should sit lightly in the landscape – The Metro station should be complementary to its surroundings (Potomac Yard, Potomac Greens, and the George Washington Memorial Parkway) – The Metro station design should minimize the visibility of the station from the Parkway – The Metro station design should take advantage of views from inside the station • Based on these themes, which concept best achieves the objectives outlined above and why? 25 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  26. P OTOMAC Y ARD P ARK C ONCEPT • Themes we heard from the February PYMIG: – Split votes on if the space should be more structured or more flexible. – The design of the park area around the Metro station should be consistent/continuous with the whole park. • Based on these themes, please provide any comments on the design concept? 26 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  27. GROUP FEEDBACK 27 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  28. PYMIG DISCUSSION 28 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  29. FINAL EIS UPDATE 29 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  30. F INAL EIS U PDATE • Second round of comments from FTA and NPS received March 15 • Final EIS will be circulated for public review and comment for 30 days (anticipated Spring 2016) • Final EIS includes proposed mitigation • Public comments may affect mitigation commitments formalized in Records of Decision (anticipated Summer 2016) 30 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  31. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS 31 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  32. C ONSTRUCTION A CCESS • Construction Access Options studied for the EIS: • Access from George Washington Memorial Parkway • Access through Old Town Greens and Potomac Greens • Use of cranes from the west side of the CSX right-of-way • NPS prohibits construction access from the GWMP and will not allow the use of the parkway by construction traffic. • No construction over active railroad tracks. • All construction traffic will use Route 1. 32 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  33. C ONSTRUCTION A CCESS • The following graphics are approximations of the breakdown by route of the amount of anticipated construction traffic. • To reduce traffic to and from the station site, a location is being sought for construction worker parking. • This off-site parking would be required for all construction workers, who would be bused to the site. 33 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  34. C ONSTRUCTION A CCESS • Construction traffic traveling north on Potomac Greens Drive has 2 options once it reaches the traffic circle at the intersection of Potomac Greens Drive and Carpenter Road: Potomac Greens Drive or Carpenter Road. • Community input is being sought on the selection of the preferred option. • The landscaped area of the traffic circle will be removed before construction and restored at the end of construction. • The 2 playgrounds will be relocated and the tennis courts will be closed throughout the period of construction. 34 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  35. T EMPORARY P ARK R ELOCATION 35 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  36. C ONSTRUCTION I MPACTS Overnight and weekend work will be required. • Additionally, some work will require that Blue & Yellow • Line service be suspended during weekends. The construction schedule will be determined once the • contractor is determined. 36 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  37. A PPROXIMATE L IMITS OF D ISTURBANCE Approx. Limits of Disturbance Approx. Limits of Disturbance 37 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  38. C ITY O VERSIGHT Construction activities occurring during “off” hours will • require special permits and will have to comply with City processes. The City will have a full time employee located on site • who will oversee activities to ensure that the community impacts are minimized to the fullest extent possible. The City and WMATA personnel will keep the community • up to date on construction activities and will be readily available to answer questions and address concerns or complaints throughout the duration of construction. 38 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  39. N EXT S TEPS • Ongoing DSUP process – June Public Hearing • BAR Work Sessions – April 20 • Finalize EIS • Update Boards and Commissions 39 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  40. COMMENTS / QUESTIONS 40 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  41. Q UESTIONS ? For more information, visit: www.alexandriava.gov/PotomacYard 41 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend