Local Planning Panel 3 April 2019 180, 182 St Johns Road, Glebe - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Local Planning Panel 3 April 2019 180, 182 St Johns Road, Glebe - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Local Planning Panel 3 April 2019 180, 182 St Johns Road, Glebe D/2018/1074 Applicant: Mr Giovanni Cirillo Owner: Kenrich Holdings Pty Ltd Architect: Mark Shapiro Architects proposal Alterations/additions to existing pub (Roxbury Hotel) and
proposal
- Zoning: B1 (Neighbourhood Centre) permissible with consent
Alterations/additions to existing pub (Roxbury Hotel) and adjoining terrace, and use as boarding house and commercial tenancy:
- Partial demolition and construction of three storey building
- alterations to existing terrace
- 33 room boarding house
- separate ground floor commercial tenancy
recommendation
approved subject to conditions/refusal
2
notification information
- 24 September to 16 October 2019
- 173 owners and occupiers notified
- 16 submissions received
exhibition period
3
submissions
- loss of amenity (privacy, noise, overshadowing)
- parking and traffic generation
- heritage
- housing diversity
- safety and crime
- economic impacts
4
subject site submitters
submissions
site
view from St Johns Road looking east
view from St Johns Road looking south east
view from Forest Street looking north
boundary between 178 (left) and 180 (right) St Johns Road
site (left) and 25 Forest Street (right)
basement floor plan
proposal
ground floor plan
first floor plan
second floor plan
roof plan
north (St Johns Road) elevation
west (Forest Street) elevation
south elevation
east elevation
long section
St Johns Road photomontage
Forest Street photomontage
materials
compliance with key LEP development standards
control proposed compliance
height 12m 10.6m yes floor space ratio 1.5:1 (NB: additional 0.5 per SEPP) 1.99:1 LEP no SEPP yes
compliance with DCP controls
control proposed compliance height in storeys 3 3 yes room size (self contained) 16.9 sqm single 20.9 sqm double 16.8-17.05m 20.22-29.89 no - minor no - minor
compliance with DCP controls
control proposed compliance communal living area 74sqm 59.4sqm no communal
- pen space
20sqm 58sqm yes bicycle parking 34 (1 per dwelling 1 commercial) 20 no
SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing)
control proposed compliance floor space ratio 2:1 1.99:1 yes building height 12m SLEP max 10.6 yes solar access
- min. 3hrs to communal
living area 6hrs yes
- n site
manager On-site for >20 lodgers
- n-site
manager yes
SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing)
control Proposed compliance private open space 20sqm communal 8sqm manager 58sqm 8sqm yes motorcycle parking 1 per 5 rooms nil no room size (excl kitchen /bathroom) 12sqm single 16sqm double Not >25sqm ~12.8sqm ~15.8sqm yes no – minor yes
Design Advisory Panel Residential Subcommittee
DAPRS reviewed the application on 6 November 2018 The panel generally supported the proposal for its response to context, scale and well resolved internal planning but raised the following concerns:
- lack of setback to NE boundary
- second floor open corridor not supported
- privacy and activation at ground floor level
- encroachments over the footway
30
DAPRS continued...
- preserve heritage integrity of the terrace
- attenuate noise of a/c units
- bbq area to be undercover
these issues have been addressed in amended plans
31
issues
- loss of amenity (privacy, noise, overshadowing)
- parking and traffic generation (clause 4.6)
- heritage
32
loss of amenity
- privacy and overlooking addressed to NE through:
– 2m to 3m setbacks – reduced glazing, use of obscure glass and privacy screens
- operable screen design for ground floor windows to Forest St
- communal areas and a/c units positioned to attenuate noise to residential
receivers
- scale of building consistent with context and significantly below
maximum height, mitigating overshadowing
33
seperation to NE boundary
3m 2m
seperation to NE boundary
3m second floor 2m ground and first floor
- perable ground floor screens to Forest St
parking and traffic
- clause 4.6 request to vary motorcycle parking standard
- compliance unreasonable and unnecessary because
– location well served by public transport – provision of parking would have adverse impact on streetscape – provision made for in excess of SEPP bicycle parking requirements
- no provision for car parking
– not inconsistent with City provisions which are maximums – condition of consent restrict participation in resident parking permits – recomended condition requires additional bicycle parking
37
heritage
- exterior of terrace at No.180 to be restored consistent with period
- awning heights and fenestration to new building works amended to adopt
cues from neighbouring contributory buildings
38
heritage
39
refurbishment works to 180 St Johns Road
recommendation
- approval subject to conditions
40