limit shapes for interacting particle systems and their
play

Limit shapes for interacting particle systems and their universal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Limit shapes ICERM, April 13-17, 2015 Limit shapes for interacting particle systems and their universal fluctuations P.L. Ferrari in collaboration with A. Borodin http://wt.iam.uni-bonn.de/ ferrari An example of random tilings 1 An Aztec


  1. Limit shapes ICERM, April 13-17, 2015 Limit shapes for interacting particle systems and their universal fluctuations P.L. Ferrari in collaboration with A. Borodin http://wt.iam.uni-bonn.de/ ∼ ferrari

  2. An example of random tilings 1 An Aztec diamond of size N = 240 Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Random tilings Interacting particles

  3. An example of random tilings 2 The border of the four regular facets, as the size N → ∞ : has a circular limit shape (aka arctic circle) Jockush, Propp, Shor’98 the fluctuations of border of the four facets are O ( N 1 / 3 ) and (GUE) Tracy-Widom distributed As a process, it converges to the Airy 2 process on the ( N 2 / 3 , N 1 / 3 ) scale Johansson’03 Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Random tilings Interacting particles

  4. An example of interacting particle system 3 TASEP: Totally Asymmetric Simple Exclusion Process Configurations � 1 , if j is occupied , η = { η j } j ∈ Z , η j = 0 , if j is empty . Dynamics Independently, particles jump on the right site with rate 1 , provided the right is empty. Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Random tilings Interacting particles

  5. An example of interacting particle system 4 ⇒ Particles are ordered: position of particle n is x n ( t ) Step initial condition is x n (0) = − n , n ≥ 1 . Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Random tilings Interacting particles

  6. An example of interacting particle system 4 ⇒ Particles are ordered: position of particle n is x n ( t ) Step initial condition is x n (0) = − n , n ≥ 1 . Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Random tilings Interacting particles

  7. An example of interacting particle system 4 ⇒ Particles are ordered: position of particle n is x n ( t ) Step initial condition is x n (0) = − n , n ≥ 1 . Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Random tilings Interacting particles

  8. An example of interacting particle system 4 ⇒ Particles are ordered: position of particle n is x n ( t ) Step initial condition is x n (0) = − n , n ≥ 1 . Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Random tilings Interacting particles

  9. An example of interacting particle system 5 ⇒ Particles are ordered: position of particle n is x n ( t ) Step initial condition is x n (0) = − n , n ≥ 1 . Some known asymptotic results: law of large number: lim t →∞ x ηt ( t ) /t = 1 − 2 √ η , η ∈ [ − 1 , 1] Rost’81 the fluctuations of particles are O ( t 1 / 3 ) and (GUE) Tracy-Widom distributed As a process in n , it converges to the Airy 2 process on the ( t 2 / 3 , t 1 / 3 ) scale Johansson’03 (LPP); Borodin,Ferrari’07 (TASEP) Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Random tilings Interacting particles

  10. KPZ scaling theory 6 Given a height function of a model in the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality class in one-dimension: x �→ h ( x, t ) (example: n �→ x n ( t ) ) Deterministic limit shape h ma ( ξ ) = lim t →∞ h ( ξt, t ) /t Stationary spatial diffusivity lim t →∞ Var( h ( ξt, t ) − h ( ξt + x, t )) A = lim | x | x →∞ Define further Γ = | λ | A 2 λ = h ′′ ma ( ξ ) and Rescaled process ( u ) := h ( ξt + ut 2 / 3 , t ) − th ma ( ξ + ut − 1 / 3 ) h resc . t t 1 / 3 Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics

  11. KPZ scaling theory 7 Rescaled process ( u ) := h ( ξt + ut 2 / 3 , t ) − th ma ( ξ + ut − 1 / 3 ) h resc . t t 1 / 3 If h ′′ ma ( ξ ) � = 0 , one expects the following: � Au � t →∞ h resc ( u ) = sgn( λ )(Γ / 2) 1 / 3 A 2 lim t 2Γ 2 / 3 where A 2 is the Airy 2 process Pr¨ ahofer,Spohn’02 For flat interfaces (i.e., if h ′′ ( ξ ) = 0 ) one has similar formulas but with either the Airy 1 process Sasamoto’05; Borodin,Ferrari,Pr¨ ahofer,Sasamoto’06 or the Airy stat depending on the initial conditions Baik,Ferrari,P´ ech´ e’09 Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics

  12. Interacting particles and random tilings 8 With Alexei Borodin, in Anisotropic growth of random surfaces in 2+1 dimensions (arXiv:0804.3035), we introduced and studied a model of interacting particles in 2 + 1 -dimensions In discrete time, we have either parallel update or sequential update A discrete time parallel update includes (as different space-time projections) the Aztec diamond and the discrete time TASEP simultaneously Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Example Basics MC on GT N Properties

  13. A 2 + 1 -dimensional model - building bricks 9 The state space of our model is the Gelfand-Tsetlin pattern GT N = { X N = ( x 1 , . . . , x N ); x n = ( x n n ) | x n ≺ x n +1 , ∀ n } 1 , . . . , x n where x n ≺ x n +1 ⇔ x n +1 < x n 1 ≤ x n +1 < x n 2 ≤ . . . < x n n ≤ x n +1 1 2 n +1 means that x n and x n +1 interlace. x n is the called configuration at level n Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Example Basics MC on GT N Properties

  14. A 2 + 1 -dimensional model - building bricks 10 The Markov chain at level n (discrete time) is given by x n 1 , . . . , x n n being one-sided random walk conditioned to stay forever in W n = { x n ∈ Z n | x n 1 < x n 2 < . . . < x n n } . It is the Doob h-transform of the free walk with h function the Vandermonde determinant ∆ n ( x n ) = � ( x n j − x n i ) , 1 ≤ i<j ≤ n i.e., it has the one-time transition probability given by P n ( x n , y n ) = ∆ n ( y n ) ∆ n ( x n ) det( P ( x n i , y n j )) n i,j =1 with P ( x, y ) = pδ y,x +1 + (1 − p ) δ y,x . Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Example Basics MC on GT N Properties

  15. A 2 + 1 -dimensional model - building bricks 11 The chain at fixed time t is the one that, given x N , it generates the uniform measure on the interlacing configurations: Λ n n − 1 ( x n , x n − 1 ) : = P ( x n − 1 | x n ) = #GT n − 1 with given x n − 1 ✶ x n − 1 ≺ x n #GT n with given x n = ( n − 1)!∆ n − 1 ( x n − 1 ) ✶ x n − 1 ≺ x n ∆ n ( x n ) Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Example Basics MC on GT N Properties

  16. A 2 + 1 -dimensional model - building bricks 12 The key property used below is the intertwining property of the chains: Diaconis, Fill ’90 ∆ n n − 1 := P n Λ n n − 1 = Λ n n − 1 P n − 1 Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Example Basics MC on GT N Properties

  17. A 2 + 1 -dimensional model - sequential update 13 The sequential update is the following: x 1 ( t ) → x 1 ( t + 1) according to P 1 ( x 1 ( t ) , x 1 ( t + 1)) , 1 x 2 ( t ) → x 2 ( t + 1) to be the middle point of the chain 2 ( P 2 ◦ Λ 2 1 )( x 2 ( t ) , x 1 ( t + 1)) and so on 3 Projection on { x 1 1 , x 2 1 , . . . , x N 1 } is TASEP in discrete time with sequential update Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Example Basics MC on GT N Properties

  18. A 2 + 1 -dimensional model - conserved measures 14 There is a class of measure which form is invariant under P N Λ . Let µ N ( x N ) be a probability measure on W N and define M N ( X N ) := µ N ( x N )Λ N N − 1 ( x N , x N − 1 ) · · · Λ 2 1 ( x 2 , x 1 ) . Then, applying t times P N Λ we have ( M N ( P N Λ ) t )( Y N ) = ( µ N ( P N ) t )( y N )Λ N N − 1 ( y N , y N − 1 ) · · · Λ 2 1 ( y 2 , y 1 ) This is a consequence of the intertwining properties of the Markov chains! Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Example Basics MC on GT N Properties

  19. ✶ A 2 + 1 -dimensional model - conserved measures 15 Consider further the ”packed” initial condition: x n k (0) = − n + k , 1 ≤ k ≤ n ≤ N . One can see that it can be written as above with µ N of the form µ N ( x N ) = ∆ N ( x N ) det(Ψ j ( x N i , 0)) N i,j =1 . Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Example Basics MC on GT N Properties

  20. A 2 + 1 -dimensional model - conserved measures 15 Consider further the ”packed” initial condition: x n k (0) = − n + k , 1 ≤ k ≤ n ≤ N . One can see that it can be written as above with µ N of the form µ N ( x N ) = ∆ N ( x N ) det(Ψ j ( x N i , 0)) N i,j =1 . ⇒ The measure at time t has the form N − 1 � ✶ [ x n ≺ x n +1 ] det(Ψ j ( x N i , t )) N i,j =1 n =1 ⇒ The measure at fixed level N and times t 1 < . . . < t m has the form m − 1 � det(Ψ j ( x N i ( t 1 ) , t 1 )) N det( P t k ,t k +1 ( x N ( t k ) , x N ( t k +1 ))∆ N ( x N ( t m )) i,j =1 k =1 Measure of this form have determinantal correlations as they are conditional L -ensembles Borodin, Rains’06 Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Example Basics MC on GT N Properties

  21. A 2 + 1 -dimensional model - correlations 16 Correlation structure of the blue lozenges / particles Theorem (arXiv:0804.3035) Consider any N triples ( x j , n j , t j ) such that t 1 ≤ t 2 ≤ . . . ≤ t N , n 1 ≥ n 2 ≥ . . . ≥ n N . Then, � at each ( x j , n j , t j ) , j = 1 , . . . , N, P � there exists a blue lozenge / particle = det[ K ( x i , n i , t i ; x j , n j , t j )] 1 ≤ i,j ≤ N for an explicit kernel K . Introduction Scaling theory 2d seq dynamics 2d par dynamics Example Basics MC on GT N Properties

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend