Lake Seventeen and Little Suction Creek Project Environmental - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lake seventeen and little suction creek project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Lake Seventeen and Little Suction Creek Project Environmental - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lake Seventeen and Little Suction Creek Project Environmental Assessment Meeting Agenda 1. Project Location and Watershed Area 7. Preliminary Alternatives (4) 2. Project Background 8. Environmental Investigations 3. Current Design Facts


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lake Seventeen and Little Suction Creek Project Environmental Assessment

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Meeting Agenda

1. Project Location and Watershed Area 2. Project Background 3. Current Design Facts 4. Existing Conditions 5. Purpose and Need 6. Previous Investigations 7. Preliminary Alternatives (4) 8. Environmental Investigations 9. Final Product 10. Outreach 11. Discussion

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Location and Overall Watershed Area

Little Suction Creek Diversion

Lake 17 Watershed ~19 mi2 Little Suction Creek Watershed above diversion ~47 mi2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project Background

  • Constructed in 1930’s
  • Built by CCC- Indian Division
  • System has become cultural and historic

resource

  • Dam was damaged during a storm event on

September 25, 1986

  • Current state of disrepair with multiple breach

events and inadequate repairs Rehabilitation project in Fort Belknap

  • New principal spillway conduit
  • Concrete riser
  • Rock plunge pool
  • One-foot lift on the dam for overtop

protection Repairs Needed to Rehabilitate Dam

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lak ake 17 Dam Design Fac acts

  • Lake 17 is created from a curved earthen embankment
  • The dam is 16.0 feet high, with a top width of 16.0 feet and a

top of dam elevation of 3025.50’

  • Its outlet works include a riser/barrel principal spillway and

earthen auxiliary spillway

  • The length of the dam at the failure elevation of 3023.1’ is

~750 feet

  • The valley width for a distance downstream at the failure

elevation is ~450 feet

  • The average valley floor elevation is 3,005.0’
  • The existing principal spillway configuration has a flow capacity
  • f 50 cfs when the pool level is at the crest of the auxiliary

spillway

  • When the pool level rises to the top of the embankment, the

principal spillway capacity increases to 106 cfs

  • The auxiliary spillway is a vegetated open channel

General Characteristics

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Existing Conditions Prompting Concern

Breach at the Little Suction Creek Diversion Outlet Pipe Protruding on the Dam at Lake 17

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Purpose and Need Statement To enhance and utilize Lake 17 Reservoir for the benefit of the Fort Belknap Community.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Previous Investigations, Reports, & Surveys

2017 Watershed & Flood Prevention Operation Proposal Guidance 2014 Clean Water Act 404 Application 2014 Bureau of Indian Affairs Historic Preservation Office Findings & Report 2013 Operation & Maintenance Agreements 2012 NRCS Lake 17 Dam Plan and Little Suction Creek Diversion Drawing 2012 Breach Summary Report 2010 NRCS Biological Assessment 1987 Downstream Hazard Assessments by Bureau of Reclamation 1967 Water Resources Survey 1965 Geology and Hydrology Survey by the BIA

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2-Year Minimum Sustained Flow

TWO YEAR MINIMUM SUSTAINABILITY Year 1 Cylcle Days Utilization ET Loss Net Loss/Gain NET VOLUME 18.1 83.3 32.6

  • 32.6

18.1 83.3 32.6

  • 32.6

18.1 104.2 11.7

  • 11.7

15 62.5 114.6

  • 43.0

43.0 46 325.7 135.4

  • 327.2

327.2 76 683.8 145.8

  • 695.6

2164.5 107 654.7 166.7

  • 687.4

2898.5 138 314.7 208.3

  • 389.0

2600.1 168 62.5 187.5

  • 116.0

2327.1 183 42.3 187.5

  • 95.8

2306.9 18.1 145.8

  • 29.9

2241.1 18.1 104.2 11.7 2199.4 Year 2 Cylcle Days Utilization ET Loss Net Loss/Gain NET VOLUME 18.1 83.3 166.6 2032.8 18.1 83.3 166.6 2032.8 18.1 104.2 145.7 2053.7 15 62.5 114.6 91.0 2108.4 46 325.7 135.4

  • 193.2

2392.5 76 683.8 145.8

  • 561.6

4229.9 107 654.7 166.7

  • 553.4

4591.4 138 314.7 208.3

  • 255.0

4293.0 168 62.5 187.5 18.0 4020.0 183 42.3 187.5 38.2 3999.8 0.0 145.8 122.2 3915.8 0.0 104.2 163.8 3874.2

  • El. = 3018.0
  • El. = 3020.3
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Preliminary Alternatives

Alternative #1: No Action

– Dam will breach. Downstream channel will headcut the reservoir and so it reverts back into a prairie pothole. Existing diversion breach will widen until the natural character of an intermittent stream channel is restored.

Alternative #3: Rehabilitate Dam & Decommission Diversion

– Dam rehabilitation following NRCS plans. Diversion decommissioned and footprint restored to a natural intermittent stream channel.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Preliminary Alternatives

Alternative #4: Rehabilitate Dam & Diversion –

Dam rehabilitation following NRCS plans. Diversion rehabilitation following NRCS plans.

Alternative #2 : Initially Considered But Determined

Not to Meet the Project Purpose:

Decommission Dam & Diversion – Dam

decommissioned and footprint restored to a natural prairie pothole. Diversion decommissioned and footprint restored to a natural intermittent stream channel.

ELIMINATED

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Alternative #1 – No Action

Total Construction Cost = $0 Annual O&M Cost = $0 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Irrigation Based on DNRC $30 per Acre-Foot = $0 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Stock Water Based on $1 Gain per Calf = $650 Lake 17 Storage Volume = 351 Acre-Feet Potential Water Available for Irrigation Based on 19.99” of Water Required for Alfalfa = 0 Acres Potential Water Available for Livestock Based on NRCS 25 gallons per Day for Cow-Calf Pairs = 12,534 Cow-Calf Pairs *Max Cow-Calf Pairs for Grazing Acreage = 650

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Alternative #1 – No Action

Wildlife Habitat Rated Overall Poor to Fair

  • Vegetated Wetland Habitat = 123 Acres
  • Open Water Habitat = 54 Acres
  • Shoreline Distance = 4.3 Miles
  • Potential to adversely affect 817 ac of habitat for 10

species of concern Recreation Potential Rated Poor

  • Migratory Species Critical Habitat (Bird Watching) = Poor
  • Wildlife Corridors (Hunting) = Poor
  • Maximum Ponding Depth (Fishing) = 3.5 Feet
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Alternative #2 : Initially Considered But Determined Not to Meet the Project Purpose: Decommission Dam & Diversion

Total Construction Cost = $340,817 Annual O&M Cost = $0 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Irrigation Based on DNRC $30 per Acre-Foot = $0 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Stock Water Based on $1 Gain per Calf = $650 Lake 17 Storage Volume = 351 Acre-Feet Potential Water Available for Irrigation Based on 19.99” of Water Required for Alfalfa = 0 Acres Potential Water Available for Livestock Based on NRCS 25 gallons per Day for Cow-Calf Pairs = 12,534 Cow-Calf Pairs *Max Cow-Calf Pairs for Grazing Acreage = 650

ELIMINATED

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Alternative That Was Initially Considered But Determined Not to Meet the Project Purpose: Decommission Dam & Diversion

Wildlife Habitat Rated Overall Poor to Fair

  • Vegetated Wetland Habitat = 123 Acres
  • Open Water Habitat = 54 Acres
  • Shoreline Distance = 4.3 Miles
  • Potential to adversely affect 817 ac of habitat for 10 species of concern

Recreation Potential Rated Poor

  • Migratory Species Critical Habitat (Bird Watching) = Poor
  • Wildlife Corridors (Hunting) = Poor
  • Maximum Ponding Depth (Fishing) = 3.5 Feet
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Alternative #3 – Rehabilitate Dam & Decommission Diversion

Total Construction Cost = $1,238,281 Annual O&M Cost = $13,373 (1% of Dam Construction Cost + $15.00 O&M Costs per Acre of Irrigation) Annual Net Economic Benefit for Irrigation Based on DNRC $30 per Acre-Foot = $4,424 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Stock Water Based on $1 Gain per Calf = $650 Lake 17 Storage Volume = 934 Acre-Feet Potential Water Available for Irrigation Based on 19.99” of Water Required for Alfalfa = 147 Acres Potential Water Available for Livestock Based on NRCS 25 gallons per Day for Cow-Calf Pairs = 33,353 Cow-Calf Pairs *Max Cow-Calf Pairs for Grazing Acreage = 650

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Alternative #3 – Rehabilitate Dam & Decommission Diversion

Wildlife Habitat Rated Overall Fair to Good

  • Vegetated Wetland Habitat = 72 Acres
  • Open Water Habitat = 279 Acres
  • Shoreline Distance = 9.1 Miles
  • Potential to adversely affect 643 ac of habitat for 10

species of concern Recreation Potential Rated Fair to Good

  • Migratory Species Critical Habitat (Bird Watching) = Fair
  • Wildlife Corridors (Hunting) = Fair
  • Maximum Ponding Depth (Fishing) = 6.0 Feet
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Alternative #4 – Rehabilitate Dam & Diversion

Total Construction Cost = $1,998,176 Annual O&M Cost = $29,071 (1% of Dam & Diversion Construction Costs + $15.00 O&M Costs per Acre of Irrigation) Annual Net Economic Benefit for Irrigation Based on DNRC $30 per Acre-Foot = $60,570 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Stock Water Based on $1 Gain per Calf = $650 Lake 17 Storage Volume = 4,038 Acre-Feet Potential Water Available for Irrigation Based on 19.99” of Water Required for Alfalfa = 606 Acres *457 Acres can be Sustained, but Agricultural Means & Methods Could Improve Potential Potential Water Available for Livestock Based on NRCS 25 gallons per Day for Cow-Calf Pairs = 72,098 Cow-Calf Pairs *Max Cow-Calf Pairs for Grazing Acreage = 650

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Alternative #4 – Rehabilitate Dam & Diversion

Wildlife Habitat Rated Overall Good

  • Vegetated Wetland Habitat = 254 Acres
  • Open Water Habitat = 740 Acres
  • Shoreline Distance = 20 Miles

Recreation Potential Rated Good

  • Migratory Species Critical Habitat (Bird Watching) = Good
  • Wildlife Corridors (Hunting) = Good
  • Maximum Ponding Depth (Fishing) = 12.0 Feet
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Environmental Investigations Required

Wetland Determination (CWA 404 jurisdictional determination & 401 EPA regulations) THPO Consultation T&E species Economics/Socioeconomics/Income Recreation uses (Improve and conserve public recreations and public fish & wildlife) Land Access Permissions & Land Ownership for Improvements Irrigation Uses, Water rights, applicability to Water Compact, and agricultural water management Cumulative Impacts

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Existing Data: Drainage Areas

  • 17 watershed alone yields snowmelt volumes of 336 & 1150 acre-feet

for snowfall depths expected from the 5-year & 25-year snowfall

  • Lake 17 has a storage volume of 612 acre feet at a depth of 5-feet
  • This increases to 4,111 acre-feet at a depth of 12 feet

There is a low likelihood of Lake 17 ever filling from its own watershed

  • Snowmelt volume increases from 336 to 868 acre-feet expected from

the 5-year snowfall depth

  • This increases from 1,150 to 3,704 acre-feet from the 25-year

snowfall depth

  • The Lake 17 pool perimeter increases by 9 miles and pool surface

area increases by 460 acres as the depth increases from 5-feet to 12- feet

  • Increased pool volumes, increased perimeter length, increased

surface area all increases the habitat value of the area

Directing Yields from Little Suction Creek into Lake 17 significantly increases yield

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Annual Runoff Volumes and Peak Flows

Annual 2yr – 24hr 5yr – 24hr 10yr – 24hr 25yr – 24hr 50yr – 24hr 100yr – 24hr Runoff Volume (ac-ft) 2,820 Peak Flow (cfs) 29 50 136 222 367 504 665

Runoff Volumes and Peak Flows

  • Mean monthly evapotranspiration from March to June = 1.61 inches
  • Mean monthly evapotranspiration from June to October = 1.63 inches
  • Mean annual precipitation = 19.80 inches
slide-23
SLIDE 23

1967 Data: Water Budget

  • Shows Peoples Creek (Hays Unit) as:
  • Present Irrigated Acres = 1,151
  • Acres Under Present Facilities = 258
  • Maximum Irrigable Acres = 1,409
  • Details Operation and Maintenance Costs for People Creek =

$2.00 per acre

  • Shows 86 present users (in 1966) of the Peoples Creek (Hays)

Unit

1967 State Water Conservation Board Report

  • Shows livestock demand of 0.5 cfs for 12 months = 361 acre-

feet per year

  • Cattle (adult, dry) Average 17.6 gallons/day; therefore 361

acre-feet = 18,350 cattle

  • Shows irrigation demand of 7.10 gross acre-feet per acre of

water needed

  • Design shows 50 acres of irrigation = 355 acre-feet per year

BIA Design File

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Existing Lake 17 Dam Characteristics

Existing Lake 17 Dam Characteristics Dam Height 16 feet Dam Length 750 feet Top Width 16 feet Top of Dam Elevation 3025.50 feet Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 3020.90 feet Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 3022.10 feet Surface Area at Top of Dam Elevation 41,267,533 Square Feet or 947.37 Acres Surface Area at Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 31,931,936 Square Feet or 733.06 Acres Surface Area at Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 34,551,241 Square Feet or 793.19 Acres Storage Volume at Top of Dam Elevation 7,925 Acre-Feet Storage Volume at Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 4,038 Acre-Feet Storage Volume at Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 4,954 Acre-Feet Estimated Average Annual Runoff Volume 2,820 Acre-Feet Estimated Average Annual Evaporation Volume 2,566 Acre-Feet (42 inches per Year) Estimated Average Annual Conveyance Loss Volume 4.97 Cubic Feet per Second per Mile Estimated Average Annual Storage Volume 1,461 Acre-Feet Estimated 2-Year Frequency Runoff Volume (50% Probability Occurrence) 3,088 Acre-Feet Estimated Storage Volume Expected Every Other Year 1,591 Acre-Feet

slide-25
SLIDE 25

2013 Proposed Lake 17 Dam Characteristics

2013 Proposed Lake 17 Dam Characteristics Dam Height 17 feet Dam Length 1,800 feet Top Width 16 feet Top of Dam Elevation 3026.50 feet Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 3020.90 feet Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 3023.10 feet Surface Area at Top of Dam Elevation 43,286,799 Square Feet or 993.73 Acres Surface Area at Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 31,931,936 Square Feet or 733.06 Acres Surface Area at Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 36,762,883 Square Feet or 843.96 Acres Storage Volume at Top of Dam Elevation 8,894 Acre-Feet Storage Volume at Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 4,038 Acre-Feet Storage Volume at Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 5,773 Acre-Feet Estimated Average Annual Runoff Volume 2,820 Acre-Feet Estimated Average Annual Evaporation Volume 2,566 Acre-Feet (42 inches per Year) Estimated Average Annual Conveyance Loss Volume 4.97 Cubic Feet per Second per Mile Estimated Average Annual Storage Volume 1,461 Acre-Feet Estimated 2-Year Frequency Runoff Volume (50% Probability Occurrence) 3,088 Acre-Feet Estimated Storage Volume Expected Every Other Year 1,591 Acre-Feet

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Lake 17 Alternative Pool Characteristics

Lake 17 Pool Alternative Characteristics Characteristic With Diversion at Base Elevation of 3014 feet Without Diversion at Base Elevation of 3014 feet Removal of Diversion & Dam Pool Surface Area 467 Acre Feet 351 Acre Feet 279 Acre Feet Pool Volume 1,864 Acre Feet 934 Acre Feet 612 Acre Feet Pool Perimeter 60,130 feet 48,050 feet 38,153 feet

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Existing Data: Lake 17 Dam

  • Breach Parameters
  • The projection used an 18-hour flow generated from the

principal spillway when the water surface is at the crest of the auxiliary spillway (400 cfs)

  • The projection used an initial flow in the channel of 60 cfs

(the expected 2-year flow of Little Peoples Creek is 50 cfs)

  • After 18-hours of flow, a time to fail of 2-hours was computed
  • A Conservative time of 1-hour was used from the beginning of the

breach to the peak

  • The breach was then carried out another 22-hours past the

start of the break to a low flow of 200 cfs

  • The breach flow for hazard class was determined to

be 14,000 cfs

  • The elevation at dam failure was 3023.1 feet

Breach Characteristics

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Existing Data: Lake 17 Dam & Little Suction Creek Rehabilitation Anticipated Costs

  • The construction cost for Lake 17 Dam improvements

were estimated at $877,022 in 2013

  • The construction cost for Little Suction Creek Diversion

improvements were estimated at $681,145 in 2013

Total Construction Costs for the project were estimated to be $1,558,167 in 2013

  • The construction cost for Lake 17 Dam improvements

were estimated at $1,116,136 in 2017

  • The construction cost for Little Suction Creek Diversion

improvements were estimated at $882,040 in 2017

Total Construction Costs for the project were estimated to be $1,998,176 in 2017

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Project Purpose & Scope

Watershed Project Plan

Plan of work and development of alternatives to restore functions of the dam

EA

Evaluate all reasonable alternatives so that plan is sound

Watershed Project Plan- EA

Develop Sound Project Plan Developed Alternatives Environmental Assessments Economic Impact Analysis Restore Functions of the Dam

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Schedule/Workflow

Preliminary Investigations Oct 2018 – April 2019

  • Initial Environmental Evaluation
  • Initial Alternative identification and conceptual layout
  • Preliminary Screening

Prepare Draft EA April 2019 – June 2019

  • Environmental investigations and consultations
  • Economic analysis
  • Dam/Detention structure planned improvements/alternatives
  • Flood conveyance planned improvements/alternatives
  • Select preferred alternative

June 2019 – August 2019

  • Incorporate comments
  • Record of Decision

Prepare Final EA

P u b l i c & I n t e r a g e n c y I n p u t

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Watershed Project Plan- Environmental Assessment

  • Furthering the conservation, development, utilization and disposal of

water

  • Furthering the conservation and proper utilization of the land
  • Public Recreation
  • Public Fish & Wildlife
  • Agricultural Water Management

Document Project Purpose and Need Document Project Purpose and Need

  • Maintain proper utilization of the land
  • Repair the existing Dam/Diversion
  • Remove the existing Dam/Diversion

Investigate public response to Preliminary Alternatives (Today!) Investigate public response to Preliminary Alternatives (Today!) Develop a physically, environmentally, socially & economically sound project plan Develop a physically, environmentally, socially & economically sound project plan

  • Environmental impact analysis
  • Economic impact analysis
  • All reasonable alternatives

NEPA Assessment Includes: NEPA Assessment Includes:

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Time Lapse Photos from 2005, 2006, 2009, 2012 shows how dep ependent Lake e 17 is on the e Little Suction Cree eek Diversion to have water throughout the e year to provide for vegetation and wildlife

These photos when looked at closely show no, or very little water as well as the completely dried up reaches of the reservoir (the dark green shown in the photos is from plant life)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Irrigation Potential: 1967 Water Report Map Overliad by 2019 Hydrography from the Montana State Library

Lake 17

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Irrigation Potential: 1967 Water Report Map Overlaid by 2017 Irrigated Acres Potentially Affected By or Affecting Lake 17

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Watershed Project Plan-EA Final Product

Alternative Analysis

  • Economic Considerations

(understand and quantify benefits to ensure feasibility)

  • Alternatives selected on basis of

technical, environmental, social, and economic factors

Summarize in EA & FONSI

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Public/Interagency Outreach

Potentially Interested Parties

  • Residents
  • Local Governments
  • Elected Officials
  • Local, State, and Federal

Regulatory Agencies

  • Other Interest Groups
  • Media

Potential Outreach Methods

  • Meetings
  • Comment Cards
  • Interviews
  • Flyers
  • Direct Mailings/Emails
  • Media – Facebook, websites
  • Notice of Intent, Notice of

Availability, & Other Publications

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Discussion