Lake Seventeen and Little Suction Creek Project Environmental - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Lake Seventeen and Little Suction Creek Project Environmental - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Lake Seventeen and Little Suction Creek Project Environmental Assessment Meeting Agenda 1. Project Location and Watershed Area 7. Preliminary Alternatives (4) 2. Project Background 8. Environmental Investigations 3. Current Design Facts
Meeting Agenda
1. Project Location and Watershed Area 2. Project Background 3. Current Design Facts 4. Existing Conditions 5. Purpose and Need 6. Previous Investigations 7. Preliminary Alternatives (4) 8. Environmental Investigations 9. Final Product 10. Outreach 11. Discussion
Project Location and Overall Watershed Area
Little Suction Creek Diversion
Lake 17 Watershed ~19 mi2 Little Suction Creek Watershed above diversion ~47 mi2
Project Background
- Constructed in 1930’s
- Built by CCC- Indian Division
- System has become cultural and historic
resource
- Dam was damaged during a storm event on
September 25, 1986
- Current state of disrepair with multiple breach
events and inadequate repairs Rehabilitation project in Fort Belknap
- New principal spillway conduit
- Concrete riser
- Rock plunge pool
- One-foot lift on the dam for overtop
protection Repairs Needed to Rehabilitate Dam
Lak ake 17 Dam Design Fac acts
- Lake 17 is created from a curved earthen embankment
- The dam is 16.0 feet high, with a top width of 16.0 feet and a
top of dam elevation of 3025.50’
- Its outlet works include a riser/barrel principal spillway and
earthen auxiliary spillway
- The length of the dam at the failure elevation of 3023.1’ is
~750 feet
- The valley width for a distance downstream at the failure
elevation is ~450 feet
- The average valley floor elevation is 3,005.0’
- The existing principal spillway configuration has a flow capacity
- f 50 cfs when the pool level is at the crest of the auxiliary
spillway
- When the pool level rises to the top of the embankment, the
principal spillway capacity increases to 106 cfs
- The auxiliary spillway is a vegetated open channel
General Characteristics
Existing Conditions Prompting Concern
Breach at the Little Suction Creek Diversion Outlet Pipe Protruding on the Dam at Lake 17
Purpose and Need Statement To enhance and utilize Lake 17 Reservoir for the benefit of the Fort Belknap Community.
Previous Investigations, Reports, & Surveys
2017 Watershed & Flood Prevention Operation Proposal Guidance 2014 Clean Water Act 404 Application 2014 Bureau of Indian Affairs Historic Preservation Office Findings & Report 2013 Operation & Maintenance Agreements 2012 NRCS Lake 17 Dam Plan and Little Suction Creek Diversion Drawing 2012 Breach Summary Report 2010 NRCS Biological Assessment 1987 Downstream Hazard Assessments by Bureau of Reclamation 1967 Water Resources Survey 1965 Geology and Hydrology Survey by the BIA
2-Year Minimum Sustained Flow
TWO YEAR MINIMUM SUSTAINABILITY Year 1 Cylcle Days Utilization ET Loss Net Loss/Gain NET VOLUME 18.1 83.3 32.6
- 32.6
18.1 83.3 32.6
- 32.6
18.1 104.2 11.7
- 11.7
15 62.5 114.6
- 43.0
43.0 46 325.7 135.4
- 327.2
327.2 76 683.8 145.8
- 695.6
2164.5 107 654.7 166.7
- 687.4
2898.5 138 314.7 208.3
- 389.0
2600.1 168 62.5 187.5
- 116.0
2327.1 183 42.3 187.5
- 95.8
2306.9 18.1 145.8
- 29.9
2241.1 18.1 104.2 11.7 2199.4 Year 2 Cylcle Days Utilization ET Loss Net Loss/Gain NET VOLUME 18.1 83.3 166.6 2032.8 18.1 83.3 166.6 2032.8 18.1 104.2 145.7 2053.7 15 62.5 114.6 91.0 2108.4 46 325.7 135.4
- 193.2
2392.5 76 683.8 145.8
- 561.6
4229.9 107 654.7 166.7
- 553.4
4591.4 138 314.7 208.3
- 255.0
4293.0 168 62.5 187.5 18.0 4020.0 183 42.3 187.5 38.2 3999.8 0.0 145.8 122.2 3915.8 0.0 104.2 163.8 3874.2
- El. = 3018.0
- El. = 3020.3
Preliminary Alternatives
Alternative #1: No Action
– Dam will breach. Downstream channel will headcut the reservoir and so it reverts back into a prairie pothole. Existing diversion breach will widen until the natural character of an intermittent stream channel is restored.
Alternative #3: Rehabilitate Dam & Decommission Diversion
– Dam rehabilitation following NRCS plans. Diversion decommissioned and footprint restored to a natural intermittent stream channel.
Preliminary Alternatives
Alternative #4: Rehabilitate Dam & Diversion –
Dam rehabilitation following NRCS plans. Diversion rehabilitation following NRCS plans.
Alternative #2 : Initially Considered But Determined
Not to Meet the Project Purpose:
Decommission Dam & Diversion – Dam
decommissioned and footprint restored to a natural prairie pothole. Diversion decommissioned and footprint restored to a natural intermittent stream channel.
ELIMINATED
Alternative #1 – No Action
Total Construction Cost = $0 Annual O&M Cost = $0 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Irrigation Based on DNRC $30 per Acre-Foot = $0 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Stock Water Based on $1 Gain per Calf = $650 Lake 17 Storage Volume = 351 Acre-Feet Potential Water Available for Irrigation Based on 19.99” of Water Required for Alfalfa = 0 Acres Potential Water Available for Livestock Based on NRCS 25 gallons per Day for Cow-Calf Pairs = 12,534 Cow-Calf Pairs *Max Cow-Calf Pairs for Grazing Acreage = 650
Alternative #1 – No Action
Wildlife Habitat Rated Overall Poor to Fair
- Vegetated Wetland Habitat = 123 Acres
- Open Water Habitat = 54 Acres
- Shoreline Distance = 4.3 Miles
- Potential to adversely affect 817 ac of habitat for 10
species of concern Recreation Potential Rated Poor
- Migratory Species Critical Habitat (Bird Watching) = Poor
- Wildlife Corridors (Hunting) = Poor
- Maximum Ponding Depth (Fishing) = 3.5 Feet
Alternative #2 : Initially Considered But Determined Not to Meet the Project Purpose: Decommission Dam & Diversion
Total Construction Cost = $340,817 Annual O&M Cost = $0 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Irrigation Based on DNRC $30 per Acre-Foot = $0 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Stock Water Based on $1 Gain per Calf = $650 Lake 17 Storage Volume = 351 Acre-Feet Potential Water Available for Irrigation Based on 19.99” of Water Required for Alfalfa = 0 Acres Potential Water Available for Livestock Based on NRCS 25 gallons per Day for Cow-Calf Pairs = 12,534 Cow-Calf Pairs *Max Cow-Calf Pairs for Grazing Acreage = 650
ELIMINATED
Alternative That Was Initially Considered But Determined Not to Meet the Project Purpose: Decommission Dam & Diversion
Wildlife Habitat Rated Overall Poor to Fair
- Vegetated Wetland Habitat = 123 Acres
- Open Water Habitat = 54 Acres
- Shoreline Distance = 4.3 Miles
- Potential to adversely affect 817 ac of habitat for 10 species of concern
Recreation Potential Rated Poor
- Migratory Species Critical Habitat (Bird Watching) = Poor
- Wildlife Corridors (Hunting) = Poor
- Maximum Ponding Depth (Fishing) = 3.5 Feet
Alternative #3 – Rehabilitate Dam & Decommission Diversion
Total Construction Cost = $1,238,281 Annual O&M Cost = $13,373 (1% of Dam Construction Cost + $15.00 O&M Costs per Acre of Irrigation) Annual Net Economic Benefit for Irrigation Based on DNRC $30 per Acre-Foot = $4,424 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Stock Water Based on $1 Gain per Calf = $650 Lake 17 Storage Volume = 934 Acre-Feet Potential Water Available for Irrigation Based on 19.99” of Water Required for Alfalfa = 147 Acres Potential Water Available for Livestock Based on NRCS 25 gallons per Day for Cow-Calf Pairs = 33,353 Cow-Calf Pairs *Max Cow-Calf Pairs for Grazing Acreage = 650
Alternative #3 – Rehabilitate Dam & Decommission Diversion
Wildlife Habitat Rated Overall Fair to Good
- Vegetated Wetland Habitat = 72 Acres
- Open Water Habitat = 279 Acres
- Shoreline Distance = 9.1 Miles
- Potential to adversely affect 643 ac of habitat for 10
species of concern Recreation Potential Rated Fair to Good
- Migratory Species Critical Habitat (Bird Watching) = Fair
- Wildlife Corridors (Hunting) = Fair
- Maximum Ponding Depth (Fishing) = 6.0 Feet
Alternative #4 – Rehabilitate Dam & Diversion
Total Construction Cost = $1,998,176 Annual O&M Cost = $29,071 (1% of Dam & Diversion Construction Costs + $15.00 O&M Costs per Acre of Irrigation) Annual Net Economic Benefit for Irrigation Based on DNRC $30 per Acre-Foot = $60,570 Annual Net Economic Benefit for Stock Water Based on $1 Gain per Calf = $650 Lake 17 Storage Volume = 4,038 Acre-Feet Potential Water Available for Irrigation Based on 19.99” of Water Required for Alfalfa = 606 Acres *457 Acres can be Sustained, but Agricultural Means & Methods Could Improve Potential Potential Water Available for Livestock Based on NRCS 25 gallons per Day for Cow-Calf Pairs = 72,098 Cow-Calf Pairs *Max Cow-Calf Pairs for Grazing Acreage = 650
Alternative #4 – Rehabilitate Dam & Diversion
Wildlife Habitat Rated Overall Good
- Vegetated Wetland Habitat = 254 Acres
- Open Water Habitat = 740 Acres
- Shoreline Distance = 20 Miles
Recreation Potential Rated Good
- Migratory Species Critical Habitat (Bird Watching) = Good
- Wildlife Corridors (Hunting) = Good
- Maximum Ponding Depth (Fishing) = 12.0 Feet
Environmental Investigations Required
Wetland Determination (CWA 404 jurisdictional determination & 401 EPA regulations) THPO Consultation T&E species Economics/Socioeconomics/Income Recreation uses (Improve and conserve public recreations and public fish & wildlife) Land Access Permissions & Land Ownership for Improvements Irrigation Uses, Water rights, applicability to Water Compact, and agricultural water management Cumulative Impacts
Existing Data: Drainage Areas
- 17 watershed alone yields snowmelt volumes of 336 & 1150 acre-feet
for snowfall depths expected from the 5-year & 25-year snowfall
- Lake 17 has a storage volume of 612 acre feet at a depth of 5-feet
- This increases to 4,111 acre-feet at a depth of 12 feet
There is a low likelihood of Lake 17 ever filling from its own watershed
- Snowmelt volume increases from 336 to 868 acre-feet expected from
the 5-year snowfall depth
- This increases from 1,150 to 3,704 acre-feet from the 25-year
snowfall depth
- The Lake 17 pool perimeter increases by 9 miles and pool surface
area increases by 460 acres as the depth increases from 5-feet to 12- feet
- Increased pool volumes, increased perimeter length, increased
surface area all increases the habitat value of the area
Directing Yields from Little Suction Creek into Lake 17 significantly increases yield
Annual Runoff Volumes and Peak Flows
Annual 2yr – 24hr 5yr – 24hr 10yr – 24hr 25yr – 24hr 50yr – 24hr 100yr – 24hr Runoff Volume (ac-ft) 2,820 Peak Flow (cfs) 29 50 136 222 367 504 665
Runoff Volumes and Peak Flows
- Mean monthly evapotranspiration from March to June = 1.61 inches
- Mean monthly evapotranspiration from June to October = 1.63 inches
- Mean annual precipitation = 19.80 inches
1967 Data: Water Budget
- Shows Peoples Creek (Hays Unit) as:
- Present Irrigated Acres = 1,151
- Acres Under Present Facilities = 258
- Maximum Irrigable Acres = 1,409
- Details Operation and Maintenance Costs for People Creek =
$2.00 per acre
- Shows 86 present users (in 1966) of the Peoples Creek (Hays)
Unit
1967 State Water Conservation Board Report
- Shows livestock demand of 0.5 cfs for 12 months = 361 acre-
feet per year
- Cattle (adult, dry) Average 17.6 gallons/day; therefore 361
acre-feet = 18,350 cattle
- Shows irrigation demand of 7.10 gross acre-feet per acre of
water needed
- Design shows 50 acres of irrigation = 355 acre-feet per year
BIA Design File
Existing Lake 17 Dam Characteristics
Existing Lake 17 Dam Characteristics Dam Height 16 feet Dam Length 750 feet Top Width 16 feet Top of Dam Elevation 3025.50 feet Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 3020.90 feet Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 3022.10 feet Surface Area at Top of Dam Elevation 41,267,533 Square Feet or 947.37 Acres Surface Area at Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 31,931,936 Square Feet or 733.06 Acres Surface Area at Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 34,551,241 Square Feet or 793.19 Acres Storage Volume at Top of Dam Elevation 7,925 Acre-Feet Storage Volume at Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 4,038 Acre-Feet Storage Volume at Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 4,954 Acre-Feet Estimated Average Annual Runoff Volume 2,820 Acre-Feet Estimated Average Annual Evaporation Volume 2,566 Acre-Feet (42 inches per Year) Estimated Average Annual Conveyance Loss Volume 4.97 Cubic Feet per Second per Mile Estimated Average Annual Storage Volume 1,461 Acre-Feet Estimated 2-Year Frequency Runoff Volume (50% Probability Occurrence) 3,088 Acre-Feet Estimated Storage Volume Expected Every Other Year 1,591 Acre-Feet
2013 Proposed Lake 17 Dam Characteristics
2013 Proposed Lake 17 Dam Characteristics Dam Height 17 feet Dam Length 1,800 feet Top Width 16 feet Top of Dam Elevation 3026.50 feet Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 3020.90 feet Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 3023.10 feet Surface Area at Top of Dam Elevation 43,286,799 Square Feet or 993.73 Acres Surface Area at Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 31,931,936 Square Feet or 733.06 Acres Surface Area at Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 36,762,883 Square Feet or 843.96 Acres Storage Volume at Top of Dam Elevation 8,894 Acre-Feet Storage Volume at Principal Spillway Crest Elevation 4,038 Acre-Feet Storage Volume at Auxiliary Spillway Crest Elevation 5,773 Acre-Feet Estimated Average Annual Runoff Volume 2,820 Acre-Feet Estimated Average Annual Evaporation Volume 2,566 Acre-Feet (42 inches per Year) Estimated Average Annual Conveyance Loss Volume 4.97 Cubic Feet per Second per Mile Estimated Average Annual Storage Volume 1,461 Acre-Feet Estimated 2-Year Frequency Runoff Volume (50% Probability Occurrence) 3,088 Acre-Feet Estimated Storage Volume Expected Every Other Year 1,591 Acre-Feet
Lake 17 Alternative Pool Characteristics
Lake 17 Pool Alternative Characteristics Characteristic With Diversion at Base Elevation of 3014 feet Without Diversion at Base Elevation of 3014 feet Removal of Diversion & Dam Pool Surface Area 467 Acre Feet 351 Acre Feet 279 Acre Feet Pool Volume 1,864 Acre Feet 934 Acre Feet 612 Acre Feet Pool Perimeter 60,130 feet 48,050 feet 38,153 feet
Existing Data: Lake 17 Dam
- Breach Parameters
- The projection used an 18-hour flow generated from the
principal spillway when the water surface is at the crest of the auxiliary spillway (400 cfs)
- The projection used an initial flow in the channel of 60 cfs
(the expected 2-year flow of Little Peoples Creek is 50 cfs)
- After 18-hours of flow, a time to fail of 2-hours was computed
- A Conservative time of 1-hour was used from the beginning of the
breach to the peak
- The breach was then carried out another 22-hours past the
start of the break to a low flow of 200 cfs
- The breach flow for hazard class was determined to
be 14,000 cfs
- The elevation at dam failure was 3023.1 feet
Breach Characteristics
Existing Data: Lake 17 Dam & Little Suction Creek Rehabilitation Anticipated Costs
- The construction cost for Lake 17 Dam improvements
were estimated at $877,022 in 2013
- The construction cost for Little Suction Creek Diversion
improvements were estimated at $681,145 in 2013
Total Construction Costs for the project were estimated to be $1,558,167 in 2013
- The construction cost for Lake 17 Dam improvements
were estimated at $1,116,136 in 2017
- The construction cost for Little Suction Creek Diversion
improvements were estimated at $882,040 in 2017
Total Construction Costs for the project were estimated to be $1,998,176 in 2017
Project Purpose & Scope
Watershed Project Plan
Plan of work and development of alternatives to restore functions of the dam
EA
Evaluate all reasonable alternatives so that plan is sound
Watershed Project Plan- EA
Develop Sound Project Plan Developed Alternatives Environmental Assessments Economic Impact Analysis Restore Functions of the Dam
Schedule/Workflow
Preliminary Investigations Oct 2018 – April 2019
- Initial Environmental Evaluation
- Initial Alternative identification and conceptual layout
- Preliminary Screening
Prepare Draft EA April 2019 – June 2019
- Environmental investigations and consultations
- Economic analysis
- Dam/Detention structure planned improvements/alternatives
- Flood conveyance planned improvements/alternatives
- Select preferred alternative
June 2019 – August 2019
- Incorporate comments
- Record of Decision
Prepare Final EA
P u b l i c & I n t e r a g e n c y I n p u t
Watershed Project Plan- Environmental Assessment
- Furthering the conservation, development, utilization and disposal of
water
- Furthering the conservation and proper utilization of the land
- Public Recreation
- Public Fish & Wildlife
- Agricultural Water Management
Document Project Purpose and Need Document Project Purpose and Need
- Maintain proper utilization of the land
- Repair the existing Dam/Diversion
- Remove the existing Dam/Diversion
Investigate public response to Preliminary Alternatives (Today!) Investigate public response to Preliminary Alternatives (Today!) Develop a physically, environmentally, socially & economically sound project plan Develop a physically, environmentally, socially & economically sound project plan
- Environmental impact analysis
- Economic impact analysis
- All reasonable alternatives
NEPA Assessment Includes: NEPA Assessment Includes:
Time Lapse Photos from 2005, 2006, 2009, 2012 shows how dep ependent Lake e 17 is on the e Little Suction Cree eek Diversion to have water throughout the e year to provide for vegetation and wildlife
These photos when looked at closely show no, or very little water as well as the completely dried up reaches of the reservoir (the dark green shown in the photos is from plant life)
Irrigation Potential: 1967 Water Report Map Overliad by 2019 Hydrography from the Montana State Library
Lake 17
Irrigation Potential: 1967 Water Report Map Overlaid by 2017 Irrigated Acres Potentially Affected By or Affecting Lake 17
Watershed Project Plan-EA Final Product
Alternative Analysis
- Economic Considerations
(understand and quantify benefits to ensure feasibility)
- Alternatives selected on basis of
technical, environmental, social, and economic factors
Summarize in EA & FONSI
Public/Interagency Outreach
Potentially Interested Parties
- Residents
- Local Governments
- Elected Officials
- Local, State, and Federal
Regulatory Agencies
- Other Interest Groups
- Media
Potential Outreach Methods
- Meetings
- Comment Cards
- Interviews
- Flyers
- Direct Mailings/Emails
- Media – Facebook, websites
- Notice of Intent, Notice of
Availability, & Other Publications