Kopeopeo Canal Remediation Project Community Liaison Group Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

kopeopeo canal remediation project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Kopeopeo Canal Remediation Project Community Liaison Group Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kopeopeo Canal Remediation Project Community Liaison Group Meeting 21 August 2018 1 Meeting agenda topics Welcome & introduction John Pullar Approval of minutes from previous meeting Communications update Abby Tozer


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Kopeopeo Canal Remediation Project

Community Liaison Group Meeting

21 August 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Meeting agenda topics

  • Welcome & introduction – John Pullar
  • Approval of minutes from previous meeting
  • Communications update – Abby Tozer
  • Tech talk on Bioremediation – Dr Chris Anderson/Dr Joanne Kelly
  • Project update – Brendon Love/Ken Tarboton
  • Independent Monitor – Pete McGowan/Andrew Kohlrusch
  • Cultural Monitor – Eula Toko
  • Health, Safety and Monitoring – Des McCleary
  • Other business
  • Light lunch
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Communications

  • Website www.boprc.govt.nz/kopeopeo
  • Project page updates
  • Public notices

Dredging trial, 2015 Open day, 2013

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Communications

Project page

(Find the link from our webpage)

  • Register to follow the project
  • Receive email alerts when updates

are published

  • You can unfollow at any time
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Roots, Microbes and Mycelia Part 2

  • Prof. Chris Anderson
  • Dr. Jo Kelly

21 August 2018

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Overview

  • Bioremediation summary
  • Implementation of full-scale Bioremediation of the Kopeopeo

Canal sediment

  • Frequently asked questions about Bioremediation
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Bioremediation

Definition: Use of microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) and plants to break down or degrade contaminants. Bioremediation goal: Detoxification of compound(s) and conversion to products that are no longer hazardous to human health and the environment.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Effective Bioremediation

Environmental conditions

  • Available moisture
  • Oxygen
  • Nutrients
  • pH
  • Temperature

Microorganisms and Plants

  • Fungi (white rot fungi

and soil fungi

  • Bacteria (beneficial

soil bacteria)

  • Trees (Poplar/Willow)

Contaminant

  • PCP (Soluble)
  • Dioxin/Furan
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Scientists Regional Council Engineers Ngati Awa

Healing of Sediment from Kopeopeo Canal

Gathering Information Communication 8 Years of Research and Development Development of protocol to monitor healing Developing relationships with each other and the land Implementation of bioremediation (2018-2019)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The remediation systems

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Fungal based remediation

Use of White rot fungi (Basidomycetes) and a soil fungus (Zygomycetes) to degrade contaminants These fungi are saprophytes (live on dead matter) and form complex mycelial networks in soil and wood The Lignin-degrading system is responsible for degradation of dioxin to CO2 Degradation is fortuitous – no energy gain

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Bacteria

Fungal mat

Geobag

  • The fungus will grow as a mat on the top surface
  • Fungal mycelium will grow downwards looking for
  • ther food sources (wood fibres added to sediment

during filling)

  • Fungi excrete enzymes into the contaminated

sediment

  • These enzymes break down the dioxin

al mat

Fungal Based Remediation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Phytoremediation

The use of plants to improve the environment Happens by way of extraction, degradation or management of soil contaminants For dioxin we are looking at degradation. The chemicals are broken down in the soil by microorganisms associated with plant roots

slide-14
SLIDE 14

How does plant-remediation work?

Water and contaminants out

  • f the soil

Sugars and organic material into the soil

Biopumps

Plant-remediation is driven by transpiration Remediation is linked to soil biological health

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Bacteria Bacteria Enzymes

  • Tree roots release sugars into soil which feed bacteria
  • Tree roots also regulate the water and oxygen content of

the sediment

  • The relationship between roots and bacteria is symbiotic
  • Added bacteria stimulate other naturally occurring

bacteria to grow (THE BACTERIAL WARS)

  • These added- and naturally-occurring bacteria produce

enzymes that break down the contaminant (dioxin)

Phytoremediation

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Full scale bioremediation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Preparation for bioremediation

Addition of lime Addition of wood pellets Addition of monitoring probe (One GEOBAG at CS1 will have set of monitoring Probes Sept 2018) Dewatering and equilibrium period Baseline testing (September 2018)

Preparation of bioremediation agents

The white rot will be prepared as pre-packaged fungal inocula (PRODUCTION STARTING August 2018) Soil fungus will be grown as a

  • liquid. Bacteria, enzymes and

trees will be sourced (PRODUCTION STARTING MAY 2019)

Implementation

  • f

bioremediation

Solid fungal inocula will be placed onto wood pellet layer on the surface of sediment through port-holes (8 bags of inocula per port-hole) (STARTING September 2018) Soil fungus, bacteria and enzymes will be injected into sediment when trees planted (STARTING JULY 2019) Poles of either willow or poplar species will be inserted into sediment. (STARTING JULY 2019)

Long term monitoring and evaluation

On going analyses of probe information PDCD and PCDF testing DNA testing

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2 weeks required for growth 2 weeks required for growth 3-4 weeks required for growth

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Wood pellet processing

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Bioremediation Implementation Summary

Addition of wood, lime to sediment as it is pumped into Geobags Addition of Solid fungal product Top soil layer added over Geobags Addition of Liquid fungal product, bacteria, enzymes and trees

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Bacteria Fungal mat Geobag

  • The fungus will grow as a mat on the top surface
  • Fungal mycelium will grow downwards looking for
  • ther food sources (wood fibres added to sediment

during filling)

  • Fungi excrete enzymes into the contaminated

sediment

  • These enzymes break down the dioxin

al mat

Fungal Based Remediation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Frequently asked Questions

Will dioxin be uptaken by the trees, and be in the leaves? What will happen to the tree roots? How long will bioremediation take? What is dioxin broken down to?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

What happens to dioxins in bioremediation?

Anaerobic Bacteria: Dechlorination OCDD→1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD→1,2,3,6,7,8- HxCDD→1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD→2,3,7,8-TCDD→2,3,7- TrCDD→2,7-DCDD→2MCDD→DD Basidiomycete Fungi Metabolise 2,3,7,8 TCDD and OCDD to 4,5-dichlorocatechol and tetrachlorocatechol, respectively

Degradation pathway will affect TEQ

slide-24
SLIDE 24

This is a completely natural process that will happen ‘naturally’ over time Bioremediation technology is all about speeding up this natural process

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Project update

Overview

  • Progress made over previous period
  • Dredging (progress, monitoring, validation)
  • Pump intake channel
  • Activities planned for upcoming period
slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Overview of progress

(25 May – 21 August)

Main dredging completed past SH30 bridge along Shaw Road (Approx. 2km to date or 38% of canal length )

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Dredging progress

  • S1. 270m
  • S2. 390m
  • S3. 520m
  • S4. 670m

FCS West Dredged to date 20-08-2018 Validated to 1850m Lift over bridge 1 Lift over bridge 2 Lift over Paroa Rd Bridge 3 Lift over SH30 Bridge 4 S1 to S4 1850m 2000m

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Section 4 completed

  • Several areas required

re-dredge

  • EMVP revision
  • DTM issues with

boundary and non- target material

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Section 5 underway

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Sampling with new push tube

  • New 1.2 m

sediment coring device provides visual evidence of material in canal.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Weed removal

  • Cut before removal to

leave roots in place

  • Same method of

removal as Kope Drain Road

  • Placed on banks to

drain off

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Pump station intake channel

  • Validation completed
slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Geobags filled

  • Equivalent of 14 geobags filled to

date

  • 611 bulk bags of o/s material
slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Activities planned for upcoming period

  • Trial new DTM in Section 5
  • Validate Section 5
  • Update to EMVP
  • Undertake flocculent trials
  • Clean up trial site on Kope Canal Road
  • Move water treatment plant to CS3
slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Independent Monitor monthly report available on website

See the Reports and Key documents page

July 2018 June 2018 May 2018

To be posted soon

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Independent Monitor update

  • HDPE liner installed
  • Earthworks complete
  • Canal armouring complete
  • Canal turbidity issues
  • Validation sampling
  • Section 4 validated
  • Section 5 started
slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Validation Sampling Methodology

  • New equipment
  • Versatile
  • Superior core recovery
  • Allows visual inspection of material
  • Used in conjunction with total station to acquire

location and levels

  • Team is developing enhanced re-validation

methodology for EMVP

  • Will provide superior information
  • But methodology must be applied fastidiously

and observations systematically documented

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Groundwater Monitoring

  • Five groundwater samples were collected from the five monitoring wells

located at CS1. Total PCDD/F I-TEQ Upperbound results between 5.68 and 8.61 pg/L were recorded in these water samples.

  • Six groundwater samples were collected from the six monitoring wells

located at CS3. Total PCDD/F I-TEQ Upperbound results between 4.28 and 10.6 pg/L were recorded in these water samples.

  • All results were below the adopted Tier-1 trigger level criteria of 13.5 pg/L
  • utlined in the Environmental Monitoring and Validation Plan (EMVP) and

the consented limit of 30 pg/g.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Canal sediment validation

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Canal sediment validation

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Canal sediment validation

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

Canal sediment validation

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Canal sediment validation

Before / After Redgredging & revalidation Before / After Redgredging & revalidation

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Canal sediment validation

Before / After Redgredging & revalidation

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Canal Sediment Dioxin Levels

Canal Section Statistic Sediment Dioxin Concentrations pg/g I-TEQ Section 1 count 7 min 20 max 51 mean 33.9 Section 2 count 12 min 20 max 64 mean 35.6 Section 3 count 16 min 21 max 61 mean 31.5 Section 4 count 21 min 21 max 57 mean 34.0

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Canal Sediment Dioxin Levels

In section 4, the canal sediment Total PCDD/F WHO-TEQ Upperbound results ranged between 21 and 57 pg/g which is below the remedial target of 60 pg/g. “The technical definition of a 95% UCL is “a number that one can be 95% confident that the true mean (average) concentration of the population is below that value” . The 95% UCL for Total PCDD/F I-TEQ Upperbound results from the first 2400 m validated section of the Kopeopeo Canal was 36 pg/g, which is below the remedial target of 60 pg/g.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

IM Observations

Canal Turbidity

Turbidity vs Dioxin FCS-E Turbidity Date Total PCDD/F I-TEQ - Upperbound (pg/L) Turbidity at MP8 (NTU) Turbidity at MP10 (NTU) 14-Jul 5.07 16.4 19.2 17-Jul 5.42 42.9 29.4 19-Jul 7.00 43.8 29.5

Canal turbidity (NTU, 5 minute average). from Ricado 25-Jul-2018 same day as following photographs were taken Canal turbidity vs dioxin levels. Samples collected by

  • B. Love (July 2018)
slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

IM Observations

MP3, Paroa Road bridge (102 NTU) MP2, Kope Drain Road (47 NTU) MP10, FCS-East (13.9 NTU) Te Rahu Drain (8km east along Paroa Road) Whakatane River, ~180m East and 180m upstream of MP8 Drain along Patuwai Road (~1km from Kopeopeo Drain)

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

IM Observations

Remedial works associated with the stopbank disturbance. Bailage was laid

  • ver the rebuilt stopbank to mitigate dust

risks. CS1, hose ruptured but sediments contained in cell Sand bug dredge pumping black sediment into the main canal as part of the dredging of the Kope pump station canal dredging works. These sediments will be dredged and delivered to the geobags at CS3 cell by the main dredge.

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

Cultural Monitor update

  • Low level monitoring during re-dredging of

Section 4

  • Continuing with monitoring of Section 5 as

needed

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Health & Safety

  • Additional security gate at

CS3 entrance

  • Bailage where bank disturbed
slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

  • CS3 remains locked
  • site is holding water to

prevent liner lifting

  • Attention to worker

safety

  • Rotation of staffing: 5day /

6day working week

Health & Safety

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Health & Safety: Worker Safety

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Environment

  • Noise monitoring - ongoing
  • Eel processing no adverse effects or

uncontrolled odours

Traffic Management

  • TMP working well, Shaw Rd WCL plan

cooperation, single one stop go as required.

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Other business

  • Next meeting: TBC