July 8, 2014 Agenda Capital Outlay Program Collaborative Design - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

july 8 2014 agenda capital outlay program collaborative
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

July 8, 2014 Agenda Capital Outlay Program Collaborative Design - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Collaborative Design Build July 8, 2014 Agenda Capital Outlay Program Collaborative Design Build Project Delivery Q&A Capital Outlay Program Sources of funding State funding Fee funding GO bond Self funding


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Collaborative Design Build

July 8, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Capital Outlay Program
  • Collaborative Design Build Project Delivery
  • Q&A
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Capital Outlay Program

  • Sources of funding
  • State funding
  • Fee funding
  • GO bond
  • Self funding (CSU bonds) New
  • Projects
  • Infrastructure $1.1B 5 years
  • Academic Facilities
  • Ancillary Facilities – Housing – Rec Centers - SU
slide-4
SLIDE 4

CSU Capital Budget Website

  • www.calstate.edu/cpdc/Facilities_Planning
  • Revenue funded projects such as housing,

parking, student unions can be added mid year

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Present Delivery Methods

  • CSU major projects are delivered by either:
  • Construction Manager at Risk (GMP)
  • Design Build (Lump Sum)
  • Good methods – could be better
  • CSU’s solution – Design Risk
slide-6
SLIDE 6

CM at Risk

  • Good
  • Early involvement of the contractor when they

take advantage – takes work to change mentality

  • Three way collaboration – A/E, GC, Owner
  • GMP
  • Not Good
  • GMP after construction docs – too late
  • Poor options when bids are over budget
  • Difficult to start construction early
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Design - Build

  • Good
  • GC and A/E self select
  • Design and construction in one contract
  • Lump Sum
  • Not Good
  • Design competition, expensive (A/E & Owner)

takes time, results, questionable benefit

  • Detailed program and criteria, cost and time
  • Merging of ideas results in change orders
slide-8
SLIDE 8

CSU’s Solution: Collaborative Design-Build

  • Combine the best of CMR and DB
  • and get rid of the worst
  • The process:
  • 1. Owner establishes project criteria same as DB.
  • 2. Select a DB team (GC and A/E).
  • 3. Design contract for SD/DD, GMP at 75% SD.
  • 4. DB contract to finish design and construction.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Project Criteria

  • Owner defines the project
  • Program
  • Design and construction criteria
  • Budget
  • Schedule
slide-10
SLIDE 10

D/B Team Selection

  • GC and A/E propose together as a team.
  • From RFQ short list to max of 4
  • Proposals include:
  • qualification and experience
  • fees to fully design and manage the construction
  • Interviews
  • Selection
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Schematic Design

  • Service contract for SD, DD, GMP
  • Program, budget, schedule verification
  • SD plans and specifications
  • OK to use DA and DB subs – must bid
  • BOT approval to award DB contract based on

schematic design and GMP

  • Continue with DD while DB contract is approved

and executed.

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

D/B Contract

  • Contract to finish design and construction
  • Trades must be bid
  • Trade bids in any form (DA, DB, full bid docs)
  • Standard design-build contract
slide-14
SLIDE 14

The Money

  • Fees for design and GC per proposal
  • lump sum for specified project
  • Direct construction cost is actual against GMP
  • Unused GMP returns to the owner
  • Contingency
  • 5% of direct construction cost
  • Contractor retains 30% of unused contingency
  • Adjust money for unforeseen conditions
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Summary of Collaborative Design Build

  • Select a design-build team
  • Pay a fee to establish a design, specifications

and GMP

  • Convert to design-build contract at CD’s
  • Pay direct construction cost based on bid

amounts

  • Performance incentive based on contingency

savings

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Q & A

Design-Risk

slide-17
SLIDE 17

www.calstate.edu