Design-Build (DB) Professional Liability Risks and Risk Management - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

design build db professional liability risks and risk
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Design-Build (DB) Professional Liability Risks and Risk Management - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Design-Build (DB) Professional Liability Risks and Risk Management Profitable Practice For Engineers in Design-Build ACEC/MA October 25, 2017 David J. Hatem, PC Donovan Hatem LLP Boston | New York Presentation Overview Design-Build (DB):


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Profitable Practice For Engineers in Design-Build ACEC/MA October 25, 2017

David J. Hatem, PC

Donovan Hatem LLP

Boston | New York

Design-Build (DB) Professional Liability Risks and Risk Management

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Presentation Overview

Design-Build (DB): Professional Liability Risks and Risk Management

  • Background Discussion
  • Path Forward
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Background Discussion

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Design-Build (DB): Roles and Risks for

Consulting Engineers

Owner Consulting Engineer Design-Builder Consulting Engineer Member Consulting Engineer Subconsultant

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

DB: Roles and Risks for Consulting Engineers Consulting Engineer as Owner’s Consultant Primary Risk Factors:

  • Service scope
  • Degree of design development furnished to

Design-Builder

  • Clarity and consistency as to Design-Builder’s design

responsibility

  • Degree of Design-Builder’s discretion and judgment in

design development

  • Design-Builder’s reliance rights on work product of
  • wner’s design professional consultant / disclaimers
  • Role in design submittal review process
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

  • Distinctions between risk allocation and

professional responsibility for design adequacy

  • Distinctions between contractual terms and

practice performance realities: legal implications

Reference: Hatem, D., “Diverse and Bifurcated Design Roles: Distinguishing Design Responsibility and Design Risk Allocation.” Design and Construction Management Professional Reporter, Donovan Hatem LLP (Dec. 2016)

DB: Roles and Risks for Consulting Engineers Consulting Engineer as Owner’s Consultant

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Primary Risk Factors:

  • Construction risk and responsibility
  • Joint and several liability
  • Cross-indemnification
  • Insurance

– Will not cover all risks – Gaps in coverage

Reference: Hatem, D., “Design and Construct Integration: Design-Build Team Structure, Design Risk and Professional Liability Insurance Implications.” E&C Risk Management Conference (June 2015)

DB: Roles and Risks for Consulting Engineers Consulting Engineer as Member of Design-Builder

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Primary Risk Factors:

  • Client selection
  • Owner sophistication, experience and approach
  • Degree of Owner-furnished design development and

mandatory design criteria / standards

  • Reliance rights / disclaimers
  • Use of prototypical / standard design assumptions
  • v. project-specific design
  • Prime DB contract terms
  • Flow-down implications
  • Relational risk allocation

DB: Roles and Risks for Consulting Engineers

Consulting Engineer as Subconsultant to Design-Builder

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

  • Design development contingency
  • Design development deliverables: schedule and quality

control pressures and challenges

  • Heightened standard of care
  • Contractual risks for quantity overruns

DB: Roles and Risks for Consulting Engineers

Consulting Engineer as Subconsultant to Design-Builder

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

  • Liquidated damages exposure
  • Inapplicability of betterment defense
  • Owner role in design submittal review process

– Substantive comments – Intrusion / interference – Preferences / imposing judgments – Delays / disruption in review process

References: Hatem, D., & Gary, P., Public-Private Partnerships and Design-Build: Opportunities and Risks for Consulting Engineers, ACEC (2017); and Disputes Review Board, “Report and Recommendations – Disputed Change Notices 53, 53A, 62, 65, 74 and 76,” Port of Long Beach Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement Project, Contract No. ND-7962, July 12, 2014

DB: Roles and Risks for Consulting Engineers

Consulting Engineer as Subconsultant to Design-Builder

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Consulting Engineer Contractual Terms

  • 1. Flow-Down Provisions

8. Construction Phase Services

  • 2. Scope of Professional Services

9. Defense and Indemnification

  • 3. Professional Standard of Care
  • 10. Consequential

Damages/Limitation of Liability

  • 4. Disclaimer of Owner-Furnished

Design, Information and Reference Documents

  • 11. Dispute Resolution
  • 5. Subsurface Conditions Risk

Allocation

  • 12. Fee Withholding
  • 6. Design Development and Review
  • 13. Professional Liability

Insurance

  • 7. Schedule

DB: Roles and Risks for Consulting Engineers

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Design Development Risk Defined as the professional liability risk associated with cost or time increases (a) above “bid” or prime DB contracting price or cost terms and (b) attributable to the process of design development

12

DB: Roles and Risks for Consulting Engineers

Consulting Engineer as Subconsultant to Design-Builder

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Design Development Risk

  • Professional liability claims based on design development

risk

  • Severity
  • Frequency
  • Design development risk claims represent a major

professional liability exposure for design professionals in DB

13

DB: Roles and Risks for Consulting Engineers

Consulting Engineer as Subconsultant to Design-Builder

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The professional liability claims experience for Consulting Engineers in DB

What are the sources of professional liability claims against consulting engineers on DB projects?

70% 30%

  • 40% based on pre-award services
  • 30% based on post-award services
  • Claims asserted prior to

construction start and based on services performed prior to construction start

  • Construction and design

defects in completed project work

14

DB: Roles and Risks for Consulting Engineers

Consulting Engineer as Subconsultant to Design-Builder

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Design Development Risk

A = Actual cost of design and construction B = Design-Builder’s bid assumption based on conceptual design C = Difference – i.e., the foundation of a professional liability claim by the Design-Builder against the Consulting Engineer

15

A B C

DB: Roles and Risks for Consulting Engineers

Consulting Engineer as Subconsultant to Design-Builder

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Transformed Projects

  • The sequential combination of two different delivery methods for the

same project-specific scope.

  • For example, the first delivery method may be design-bid-build (or CM-At-

Risk) and subsequently transform to design-build (or a public-private partnership)

  • Transformation may be either planned or unplanned
  • Design and Construction Interface Risk
  • Risk issues for Design Professionals

– Design Responsibility – Professional Responsibility – Degree of Design Development – Prescriptive and Mandated Design – Interface and Coordination of Design Components – Third-party Reliance/Third-Party Beneficiary

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

What accounts for Transformed Projects?

  • Owner Dissatisfaction with Original Delivery Method
  • Owner Need or Desire to Compress the Design and Construction

Schedule

  • Budget Overruns and/or Concerns About Cost Overruns
  • Owner Desire to Transfer More Risk to Design Professionals and/or

Others

  • Loss or Reduction in Available Public Funding
  • Increased Opportunity Recognized for Private Financing

What Are Relevant Risk Factors for Design Professionals in Transformed Projects

  • Different from Risk Factors centric and specific to any singular project

delivery approach

  • Risk Identification and Evaluation is Essential

Transformed Projects

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Design-Bid-Build (CM-At-Risk) Design-Build (Public-Private Partnership) Roles, Responsibilities and Risks Design Characteristics

  • Level of Development

– Conceptual – 30+% – “100% Complete” (for all or only a portion of the project design)

  • Stamped or Sealed?
  • Prescriptive
  • Mandated
  • Critical or Ancillary Project Component?
  • Integration, Interface, Interdependency, and Coordination Considerations
  • Project-Specific v. Standard, Prototypical Design/Details

Transformed Projects

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Design-Bid-Build (CM-At-Risk) Design-Build (Public-Private Partnership) Roles, Responsibilities and Risks

Contractual and Legal Issues

  • Professional Responsibility
  • Contractual Responsibility
  • Ownership/Use Rights
  • Risk Allocation*
  • Permits and Approvals
  • Stakeholder Requirements and Expectations
  • Disclaimers, Reliance Rights
  • Implied Warranty

* Hatem, D., Diverse and Bifurcated Design Roles: Distinguishing Design Responsibility and Design Risk Allocation,

Design and Construction Management Professional Reporter (Donovan Hatem LLP (Dec. 2016).

Transformed Projects

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Design-Bid-Build (CM-At-Risk) Design-Build (Public-Private Partnership) Roles, Responsibilities and Risks

Design Professional Teams

  • Same or Different
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Novation
  • Assignments
  • Third-Party Beneficiaries
  • Indemnification
  • Design Revision and Modification
  • Submittal Review, RFIs, etc.

Owner’s Design Professional Team Design Professional Subconsultants of Design-Builder

Transformed Projects

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Design-Bid-Build (CM-At-Risk) Design-Build (Public-Private Partnership) Roles, Responsibilities and Risks Professional Liability Insurance

  • Practice
  • Project-Specific
  • Protective

Transformed Projects

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Path Forward

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Risk Management Strategies for Consulting Engineers in DB

  • DB is here to stay and owner utilization will increase.
  • DB: Successful solution? Jury still out.
  • Critical importance of Consulting Engineer risk and

practice management

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Risk Management Strategies for Consulting Engineers

Enabling, equipping and acculturating Consulting Engineers to successfully practice in DB

Key initiatives:

Scope of services and fee negotiation skills Importance of pre-award agreements with clearly defined scopes Adherence to contractual scope in actual service performance Timely notification and documentation regarding claims for additional compensation or time extensions Development of effective quality control procedures to address the accelerated pace and compressed cycle of design development in DB and P3s Timely addressing fee payment withholding Holding your “independent professional judgment” ground in the design submittal review process

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Risk Management Strategies for Consulting Engineers

  • Professional standard of care application and design

development risk

  • Relevance of design development contingency to

professional standard of care application

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Risk Management Strategies for Consulting Engineers

Design Development Risk

Design-Build Institute of America recommendations: “3. The contracts between the design-builder and its team members should

address the unique aspects of the DB process. In furtherance of this practice, the following implementing techniques apply: … b. The design-builder and its designer(s) should develop an understanding, at the outset of their relationship, of the key commercial aspects of their relationship, including: … (d) the designer’s right to use project contingency for its execution-related problems, and capture these understandings in the written teaming agreement.” Design-Build Done Right, DBIA (2014)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Risk Management Strategies for Consulting Engineers

  • Improving upstream and lateral risk allocation in DB
  • Transportation Research Board, Guidelines for Managing Geotechnical

Risks in Design-Build Projects, NCHRP 24-22 (12-1-17)

  • Mandated (allowance) design development contingency
  • Convocation with construction community to discuss

these issues

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Risk Management Strategies for Consulting Engineers

  • Project-specific professional liability insurance
  • Dedicated coverage for specific project
  • Joint and several liability mitigation
  • Project owner requirements
  • Consulting Engineer procurement
  • Aligning project-specific professional liability insurance with contractual

roles and risks of Consulting Engineers

  • Relevance of CPPI and protective insurance

Reference: Hatem, D., “Project-Specific Insurance Advisory: Recent Problematic Trends in Project-Specific Professional Liability Insurance Programs.” Design and Construction Management Professional Reporter, Donovan Hatem LLP (Feb. 2010)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Questions

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Contact Information

David J. Hatem, PC

dhatem@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4800

Donovan Hatem LLP

Exchange Place 53 State Street Boston, MA 02109

30