Israel 2 Households in Which a Member Visited Israel (Jewish - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

israel
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Israel 2 Households in Which a Member Visited Israel (Jewish - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 1 Israel 2 Households in Which a Member Visited Israel (Jewish Households) Jewish Trip 36% General Trip 27% Not to Israel 37% 3 Households in Which a Member Visited Israel (Jewish Households) Miami 71% Detroit 2018 63% Bergen 62%


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1 1

Israel

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Households in Which a Member Visited Israel

(Jewish Households)

Jewish Trip 36% General Trip 27% Not to Israel 37%

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Households in Which a Member Visited Israel

(Jewish Households) 71% 63% 62% 61% 61% 59% 58% 56% 55% 54% 52% 51% 51% 50% 49% 45% 45% 44% 43% 43% 42% 42% 41% 40% 37% 35% 34% 33% Miami Detroit 2018 Bergen Broward South Palm Beach Houston Detroit 2005 Sarasota West Palm Beach Middlesex Minneapolis Indianapolis Washington New Haven

  • St. Paul

Omaha Lehigh Valley Westport Tucson Hartford San Antonio Atlantic County Rhode Island Tidewater Jacksonville Portland (ME)

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Jewish Trip General Trip

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

36% 32% 31% 29% 28% 28% 26% 26% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 24% 24% 23% 22% 22% 22% 20% 20% 20% 19% 17% 17% 13% 12% 10% Detroit 2018 Indianapolis Houston Detroit 2005 South Palm Beach Sarasota Miami Bergen Omaha Broward West Palm Beach Minneapolis Washington Middlesex

  • St. Paul

Hartford Lehigh Valley Atlantic County Tidewater New Haven San Antonio Rhode Island Westport Tucson Jacksonville Portland (ME)

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Households in Which a Member Visited Israel on a Jewish Trip

(Jewish Households)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

45% 36% 36% 32% 30% 30% 29% 29% 28% 28% 28% 27% 26% 26% 25% 25% 23% 22% 22% 22% 22% 21% 20% 20% 20% 19% 19% 18% Miami Broward Bergen South Palm Beach New Haven West Palm Beach Middlesex Detroit 2005 Detroit 2018 Houston Sarasota Minneapolis Washington Tucson

  • St. Paul

Westport Lehigh Valley

  • St. Petersburg

Portland (ME) San Antonio Las Vegas Rhode Island Omaha Jacksonville Hartford Indianapolis Atlantic County Tidewater 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Households in Which a Member Visited Israel on a General Trip

(Jewish Households)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

63% 57% 56% 55% 54% 54% 52% 50% 50% 49% 49% 49% 49% 48% 47% 47% 47% 46% 45% 44% 42% 41% 40% 39% 37% 36% 35% 31% Indianapolis Detroit 2018 Omaha Tidewater Atlantic County Hartford Houston Detroit 2005 Sarasota Lehigh Valley Minneapolis Washington Rhode Island

  • St. Paul

San Antonio South Palm Beach Jacksonville West Palm Beach Middlesex Westport Bergen Broward New Haven Tucson Miami Portland (ME)

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Jewish Trip Market Share for Households Who Visited Israel

(Jewish Households)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Households in Which a Member Visited Israel

(Jewish Households) 63% 70% 46% 73% 62% 75% 77% 70% 32% 64% 74% 75% 50% 64% 61% 55% 40% 68% 65% 77% 98% 68% 68% 43% 55% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County Household with Children Household with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Income under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Jewish Trip General Trip

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Households in Which a Member Visited Israel

(Jewish Households) 63% 81% 73% 48% 87% 45% 82% 58% 85% 61% 97% 59% 84% 74% 42% 46% 83% 75% 99% All In‐married Conversionary Intermarried Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100 ‐ $500 Donated $500 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Jewish Trip General Trip

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Correlations with Trips to Israel ‐ I

(Jewish Households)

91% 98% 87% 25% 81% 16% 9% 12% 79% 84% 81% 35% 88% 30% 26% 19% 51% 49% 50% 5% 52% 3% 1% 42% Mezuzah on Front Door Passover Seder Chanukah Candles Sabbath Candles Observe Sabbath Kosher Home Kosher In/Out of Home Christmas Tree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% An Adult Visited Israel on a: Jewish Trip General Trip No Adult to Israel

Seder, Chanukah, and Sabbath Candles: Always/Usually Sabbath and Tree: Always/Usually/Sometimes

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

31% 87% 65% 90% 14% 14% 61% 30% 70% 30% 64% 56% 88% 24% 11% 60% 16% 60% 6% 43% 17% 43% 6% 4% 34% 2% 20% Synagogue Services 1X/Month+ Inmarried Synagogue Member Synagogue Participant Attended Chabad JCC Member Participated in a JCC Program Jewish Organization Member Associated 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

An Adult Visited Israel on a: Jewish Trip General Trip No Adult to Israel

Correlation with Trips to Israel ‐ II

(Jewish Households)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

49% 73% 64% 42% 86% 42% 73% 50% 27% 84% 7% 26% 19% 11% 41% Attended Adult Jewish Education in the Past Year Extremely/Very Attached to Israel Donated to Federation in the Past Year Donated $100+ to Federation in the Past Year Donated to Any Jewish Charity in the Past Year 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% An Adult Visited Israel on a: Jewish Trip General Trip No Adult to Israel

Correlation with Trips to Israel ‐ III

(Jewish Households)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Trips to Israel by Jewish Children

Jewish Trip 7% General Trip 25% Not to Israel 67%

(Households with Jewish Children Age 6‐17)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Trips to Israel by Jewish Teenagers

Jewish Trip 11% General Trip 24% Not to Israel 64%

(Households with Jewish Teenagers Age 13‐17)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Households in Which a Jewish Child Visited Israel

46% 38% 35% 33% 30% 26% 25% 25% 24% 24% 22% 22% 21% 19% 19% 18% 18% 17% 17% 16% 16% 16% 15% 14% 14% 14% 12% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 9% 9% 8% 7% 7% 6% 5% Miami Bergen New York Detroit 2018 Cleveland Baltimore Omaha Detroit 2005 Indianapolis New Haven Broward Middlesex Rhode Island

  • St. Petersburg

San Antonio Chicago Cincinnati

  • St. Paul

Minneapolis S Palm Beach Washington

  • St. Louis

Tucson Tidewater Hartford Las Vegas Houston Jacksonville Lehigh Valley Portland (ME) Sarasota Pittsburgh Westport Atlantic County Howard County Phoenix Detroit 1989 Columbus W Palm Beach 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Jewish Trip General Trip

(Households with Jewish Children Age 6‐17)

Communities with white bars did not ask type of trip

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

13% 12% 10% 10% 8% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% Tucson Miami Bergen Tidewater Hartford Detroit 2018 Jacksonville Middlesex New Haven San Antonio Lehigh Valley Portland (ME) Rhode Island

  • St. Paul

Sarasota Indianapolis Detroit 2005 Minneapolis S Palm Beach Westport Omaha Broward Atlantic County Washington Las Vegas

  • St. Petersburg

Houston W Palm Beach 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Households in Which a Jewish Child Visited Israel on a Jewish Trip

(Households with Jewish Children Age 6‐17)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16 Households in Which a Jewish Child Visited Israel on a General Trip

(Households with Jewish Children Age 6‐17) 34% 28% 25% 22% 21% 19% 19% 18% 17% 15% 15% 13% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 10% 6% 6% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 2% Miami Bergen Detroit 2018 Omaha Detroit 2005 Indianapolis Broward

  • St. Petersburg

New Haven Middlesex Rhode Island Washington Las Vegas Minneapolis San Antonio S Palm Beach

  • St. Paul

Houston Atlantic County Hartford Sarasota Westport Lehigh Valley Portland (ME) Tidewater W Palm Beach Jacksonville Tucson 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Trip to Israel Prevented by Cost

(Households with Jewish Children Age 6‐17 in Which No Child Has Visited Israel)

46% 40% 33% 33% 29% 25% 14% Detroit Miami Indianapolis Broward

  • St. Petersburg

Houston Omaha 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1,700 households

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Trip to Israel Prevented by Cost

(Households with Jewish Children Age 6‐17 in Which No Child Has Visited Israel) 46% 45% 49% 31% 29% 45% 38% 60% 68% 64% 11% 47% 40% 26% 63% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Under 50 50‐64 Income under $100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Reform Just Jewish In‐married Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Trip to Israel Prevented by Cost

(Households with Jewish Children Age 6‐17 in Which No Child Has Visited Israel) 46% 38% 56% 30% 49% 55% 19% 77% 57% 34% 57% 55% 54% 18% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Did Not Attend Chabad JCC Non‐Member Jewish Organization Non‐Member Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Emotional Attachment to Israel

Extremely 25% Very 24% Somewhat 32% Not Attached 19%

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Emotional Attachment to Israel

Extremely 33% Very 23% Somewhat 32% Not Attached 13%

(Jewish Respondents Age 65 and Over)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

(Jewish Respondents) 62% 61% 58% 56% 56% 55% 55% 55% 54% 54% 53% 53% 52% 51% 50% 50% 49% 49% 49% 47% 47% 44% 43% 42% 41% 40% 40% 36% 33% Miami South Palm Beach Middlesex Detroit 2005 Jacksonville Bergen Broward San Antonio Lehigh Valley West Palm Beach Omaha Rhode Island Minneapolis Atlantic County Detroit 2018

  • St. Paul

Sarasota Houston Washington Tucson New Haven Indianapolis

  • St. Petersburg

San Francisco Westport Tidewater Hartford Las Vegas Portland (ME) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Extremely Very

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Not Emotionally Attached to Israel

(Jewish Respondents) 26% 24% 21% 20% 19% 19% 18% 17% 16% 16% 15% 15% 15% 15% 13% 12% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 11% 11% 10% 10% 10% 10% 9% 7% San Francisco Las Vegas Portland (ME) Tidewater Detroit 2018

  • St. Petersburg

Indianapolis New Haven

  • St. Paul

Tucson Broward Washington Hartford Westport Houston Omaha San Antonio Detroit 2005 Bergen Miami Minneapolis Jacksonville Sarasota Middlesex Lehigh Valley Atlantic County Rhode Island West Palm Beach South Palm Beach 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Emotional Attachment to Israel by Age

(Jewish Respondents) 49% 41% 50% 48% 64% 55% 16% 35% 15% 17% 9% 13% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Extremely/Very Not

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Jewish Respondent Under Age 35

65% 58% 58% 56% 52% 51% 49% 48% 47% 47% 47% 47% 45% 44% 38% 38% 38% 35% 35% 33% 32% 31% 25% 23% Miami Middlesex Detroit 2005 Houston Broward New Haven Detroit 2018 Washington Omaha Jacksonville Tucson Bergen Indianapolis

  • St. Paul

Lehigh Valley San Antonio Rhode Island South Palm Beach Westport Minneapolis Las Vegas Tidewater West Palm Beach Hartford 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Based on small sample sizes in some communities

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

63% 56% 55% 54% 52% 51% 51% 46% 46% 45% 44% 44% 42% 41% 41% 39% 39% 36% 35% 35% 34% 33% 32% 31% 31% Miami Bergen San Antonio Jacksonville Broward Detroit 2005 Minneapolis Middlesex Washington South Palm Beach Houston Rhode Island Tucson Detroit 2018

  • St. Paul

Lehigh Valley Westport Indianapolis New Haven Hartford Tidewater West Palm Beach

  • St. Petersburg

Omaha Las Vegas 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Jewish Respondent Age 35‐49

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

68% 64% 57% 56% 56% 54% 54% 54% 53% 52% 52% 52% 52% 52% 50% 50% 48% 48% 48% 47% 46% 44% 43% 43% 40% 37% 36% 35% Omaha Miami

  • St. Paul

Lehigh Valley Rhode Island Broward Detroit 2005 South Palm Beach Bergen Indianapolis Middlesex San Antonio Washington Jacksonville Detroit 2018 West Palm Beach

  • St. Petersburg

Atlantic County Sarasota New Haven Minneapolis Houston Tucson Tidewater Hartford Las Vegas Westport Portland (ME) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Jewish Respondent Age 50‐64

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

73% 70% 64% 64% 63% 62% 62% 61% 61% 60% 58% 58% 56% 56% 55% 54% 54% 53% 52% 50% 49% 48% 48% 47% 47% 47% 38% 30% Jacksonville Rhode Island South Palm Beach

  • St. Paul

Detroit 2005 San Antonio Minneapolis Middlesex West Palm Beach Lehigh Valley Atlantic County Bergen Miami Sarasota Houston Indianapolis Omaha Broward Hartford Tucson New Haven Detroit 2018 Portland (ME) Washington Tidewater Westport Las Vegas

  • St. Petersburg

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Jewish Respondent Age 65‐74

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

68% 68% 66% 64% 64% 63% 63% 62% 61% 61% 61% 61% 60% 60% 59% 58% 57% 56% 55% 54% 53% 53% 52% 51% 48% 47% 44% 44% Middlesex Minneapolis South Palm Beach Detroit 2018 Miami Lehigh Valley Jacksonville Broward West Palm Beach Rhode Island Bergen Westport San Antonio Atlantic County Tucson

  • St. Petersburg

Detroit 2005 Tidewater New Haven

  • St. Paul

Washington Sarasota Houston Omaha Portland (ME) Indianapolis Las Vegas Hartford 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Jewish Respondent Age 75 and Over

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

67% 65% 65% 65% 64% 62% 61% 61% 60% 59% 59% 59% 58% 57% 55% 55% 55% 54% 54% 53% 53% 52% 51% 51% 48% 48% 41% 41% Jacksonville Middlesex South Palm Beach Minneapolis Rhode Island Lehigh Valley San Antonio West Palm Beach Miami Detroit 2005 Atlantic County Bergen Broward

  • St. Paul

Detroit 2018 Sarasota Westport Houston Tucson Omaha New Haven Tidewater Indianapolis Washington Portland (ME) Hartford

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Jewish Respondent Age 65 and Over

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Emotional Attachment to Israel by Jewish Identification

(Jewish Respondents) 80% 68% 45% 36% 45% 12% 8% 9% 37% 19% Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Extremely/Very Not

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Orthodox

(Jewish Respondents)

100% 99% 96% 96% 94% 94% 92% 89% 86% 85% 84% 84% 83% 80% 67% 62% 58% West Palm Beach Omaha Washington Bergen New Haven Detroit 2005 Middlesex San Antonio Miami Rhode Island South Palm Beach Hartford Broward Detroit 2018 Houston Las Vegas Indianapolis 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Conservative

(Jewish Respondents) 82% 76% 76% 73% 73% 70% 70% 69% 69% 69% 68% 68% 68% 67% 65% 65% 65% 64% 63% 62% 61% 60% 58% 55% 55% 54% 51% 49% Omaha Miami South Palm Beach Indianapolis Detroit 2005 Washington Jacksonville Middlesex West Palm Beach Rhode Island Detroit 2018 Lehigh Valley Minneapolis San Antonio Broward

  • St. Paul

Bergen Tucson Houston New Haven Atlantic County Sarasota Westport Tidewater Hartford Portland (ME)

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Reform

(Jewish Respondents) 56% 55% 53% 53% 52% 52% 52% 51% 51% 46% 46% 46% 45% 45% 45% 44% 43% 43% 42% 41% 41% 41% 40% 40% 36% 35% 32% 30% South Palm Beach Broward Miami Sarasota San Antonio Atlantic County Rhode Island Middlesex West Palm Beach Lehigh Valley Detroit 2005 Tucson Detroit 2018 Houston Minneapolis New Haven Omaha Bergen Washington

  • St. Petersburg

Jacksonville Westport Indianapolis

  • St. Paul

Las Vegas Portland (ME) Hartford Tidewater 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Just Jewish

(Jewish Respondents) 53% 51% 50% 45% 44% 44% 42% 41% 41% 40% 40% 39% 39% 38% 38% 38% 37% 36% 36% 36% 32% 32% 31% 29% 28% 27% 26% 24% Miami Jacksonville Omaha San Antonio Middlesex South Palm Beach Broward Minneapolis

  • St. Paul

Houston Lehigh Valley West Palm Beach Bergen Indianapolis

  • St. Petersburg

Atlantic County Tucson Detroit 2018 Rhode Island Sarasota Detroit 2005 Washington New Haven Westport Hartford Las Vegas Tidewater Portland (ME) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Emotional Attachment to Israel by Type of Marriage

(Jewish Respondents) 66% 44% 37% 7% 18% 17% In‐Married Conversionary In‐Married Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Extremely/Very Not

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

In‐married (2 born/raised Jews)

(Jewish Respondents) 71% 68% 67% 67% 67% 66% 66% 66% 65% 65% 64% 64% 64% 64% 62% 61% 61% 61% 59% 57% 56% 55% 54% 52% 52% 51% 51% 45% 43% Miami Detroit 2005 Indianapolis Jacksonville Rhode Island Detroit 2018 South Palm Beach Minneapolis Omaha Bergen Middlesex Lehigh Valley San Antonio

  • St. Paul

West Palm Beach Broward Houston Washington New Haven Sarasota Atlantic County Tucson

  • St. Petersburg

San Francisco Tidewater Hartford Westport Portland (ME) Las Vegas 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Conversionary

(Jewish Respondents)

64% 63% 60% 60% 56% 55% 55% 54% 54% 52% 49% 48% 46% 45% 44% 44% 43% 41% 39% 36% 35% 32% 30% 15% Omaha Jacksonville Miami Washington Lehigh Valley

  • St. Petersburg

Broward South Palm Beach

  • St. Paul

Tucson San Antonio Minneapolis New Haven Tidewater Detroit 2018 West Palm Beach Detroit 2005 Las Vegas Indianapolis Bergen Houston Westport Rhode Island Hartford 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Extremely/Very Emotionally Attached to Israel

Intermarried

(Jewish Respondents) 58% 50% 49% 49% 46% 42% 41% 38% 38% 37% 36% 35% 35% 34% 33% 32% 32% 31% 30% 30% 30% 29% 28% 28% 26% 25% 24% 24% 19% Omaha San Antonio Houston Miami Jacksonville Broward South Palm Beach Rhode Island Tucson Detroit 2018 Middlesex Atlantic County San Francisco Las Vegas Lehigh Valley Minneapolis Westport New Haven Indianapolis West Palm Beach Sarasota Washington

  • St. Petersburg
  • St. Paul

Portland (ME) Bergen Detroit 2005 Tidewater Hartford 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Extremely/Very Attached to Israel

(Jewish Respondents) 50% 54% 40% 57% 43% 57% 74% 49% 45% 39% 61% 49% 49% 41% 50% 48% 64% 55% 51% 48% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0‐9 Years in Detroit 10‐19 Years 20+ Years Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

50% 53% 48% 62% 43% 59% 64% 46% 45% 56% 52% 40% 80% 68% 45% 36% 45% 66% 44% 37% All Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Income under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Extremely/Very Attached to Israel

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

50% 67% 39% 68% 48% 67% 48% 69% 41% 93% 47% 54% 50% 61% 40% 60% 40% 79% 51% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member To Day School To Supplemental School To Jewish Education No Jewish Education To Overnight Camp Not to Overnight Camp Youth Group Participant Not Youth Group Participant Hillel/Chabad Participant Not Hillel/Chabad Participant 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Extremely/Very Attached to Israel

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

50% 73% 73% 26% 64% 57% 35% 38% 70% 54% 72% All Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100 ‐ $500 Donated $500 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Extremely/Very Attached to Israel

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Had Conversations with Other Jews in Detroit about Political Situation in Israel in the Past Year

(Jewish Respondents) 70% 80% 44% 79% 91% 87% 84% 69% 43% 60% 71% 70% 66% 62% 76% 74% 64% 69% 69% 71% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0‐9 Years in Detroit 10‐19 Years 20+ Years Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

70% 68% 81% 90% 54% 85% 55% 37% 56% 78% 71% 82% 82% 78% 71% 52% 93% 82% 86% 68% All Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Income under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Had Conversations with Other Jews in Detroit about Political Situation in Israel in the Past Year

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

70% 83% 59% 91% 63% 77% 69% 96% 61% 89% 72% 68% 81% 77% 58% 61% 82% 76% 84% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100 ‐ $500 Donated $500 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Had Conversations with Other Jews in Detroit about Political Situation in Israel in the Past Year

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Hesitate Expressing Views about Political Situation in Israel

(Jewish Households) 40% 39% 44% 37% 51% 30% 49% 41% 27% 67% 44% 39% 38% 46% 36% 43% 43% 43% 36% 44% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0‐9 Years in Detroit 10‐19 Years 20+ Years Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequently Sometimes

70% have conversations with other Jews about the situation in Israel

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Hesitate Expressing Views about Political Situation in Israel

(Jewish Households) 40% 46% 38% 40% 29% 44% 47% 41% 52% 42% 41% 45% 48% 47% 28% 52% 49% 45% 42% 31% All Household with Children Household with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Income under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequently Sometimes

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Hesitate Expressing Views about Political Situation in Israel

(Jewish Households) 40% 45% 35% 46% 39% 51% 39% 47% 49% 32% 37% 48% 39% 20% 38% 57% 39% 43% 44% 40% 28% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Perceive Great Deal of Antisemitism A Moderate Amount A Little None At All Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100 ‐ $500 Donated $500 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequently Sometimes

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Antisemitism

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

24% 21% 19% 18% 18% 18% 18% 17% 16% 16% 16% 16% 15% 15% 15% 14% 14% 14% 14% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 9% 8% 7% Denver Jacksonville San Diego Las Vegas

  • St. Paul

Tucson Tidewater Rhode Island Detroit 2018 Lehigh Valley Portland (ME) Minneapolis Omaha Houston Detroit 2005 Indianapolis

  • St. Petersburg

New Haven San Antonio Hartford Westport Broward Miami Washington Bergen Atlantic County Sarasota West Palm Beach Middlesex South Palm Beach 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Jewish Respondents)

Personally Experienced Antisemitism in Local Community in the Past Year

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

16% 15% 20% 23% 7% 12% 13% 16% 23% 6% 22% 17% 18% 14% 16% 19% 14% 17% 19% 14% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0‐9 Years in Detroit 10‐19 Years 20+ Years Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Personally Experienced Antisemitism in Detroit in the Past Year

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

16% 18% 14% 23% 24% 11% 18% 17% 9% 18% 22% 11% 17% 13% 14% 21% 1% 15% 6% 18% All Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Income under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Personally Experienced Antisemitism in Detroit in the Past Year

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

16% 13% 19% 25% 19% 15% 17% 33% 12% 19% 19% 15% 16% 26% 16% 9% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Under $100 Donated $100 ‐ $500 Donated $500 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Personally Experienced Antisemitism in Detroit in the Past Year

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Households in Which a Jewish Child Age 6‐17 Experienced Antisemitism in the Local Community in the Past Year

(Households with Jewish Children Age 6‐17) 34% 30% 29% 29% 28% 28% 23% 20% 20% 18% 18% 18% 18% 17% 15% 14% 13% 13% 13% 13% 12% 11% 10% 9% 9% 8% 6% 3% San Antonio Omaha Indianapolis Sarasota Houston West Palm Beach Tidewater Las Vegas Jacksonville Lehigh Valley Detroit 2005 Minneapolis Rhode Island New Haven Atlantic County Broward Detroit 2018 Middlesex Portland (ME) Hartford Westport Bergen

  • St. Paul

South Palm Beach Tucson Washington Miami

  • St. Petersburg

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Perception of Antisemitism in Detroit

A Great Deal 10% A Moderate Amount 35% A Little 45% None at All 10%

(Respondents)

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

Perception of Antisemitism in Detroit

A Great Deal 13% A Moderate Amount 44% A Little 36% None at All 7% Age 65 and Over

(Respondents)

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

Perceive a Great Deal/Moderate Amount

  • f Antisemitism in Local Community

(Respondents) 61% 48% 48% 46% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 43% 43% 42% 41% 41% 38% 37% 37% 36% 34% 34% 33% 33% 32% 31% 29% 28% 26% 24% Detroit 2005 Jacksonville Hartford Minneapolis Las Vegas Detroit 2018

  • St. Paul

Lehigh Valley Tidewater Rhode Island Houston

  • St. Petersburg

South Palm Beach Broward Miami Sarasota Bergen New Haven Atlantic County Portland (ME) Westport Omaha Indianapolis Middlesex Washington San Francisco San Antonio Tucson 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Great Deal Moderate Amount

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

Perceive a Great Deal of Antisemitism in Local Community

(Respondents) 13% 12% 12% 11% 11% 10% 9% 9% 8% 8% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% Detroit 2005 Minneapolis Jacksonville

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas Detroit 2018 Miami South Palm Beach Rhode Island Sarasota Broward New Haven Lehigh Valley Atlantic County

  • St. Paul

Tidewater San Francisco Bergen Hartford Indianapolis Houston Middlesex Portland (ME) San Antonio Westport Omaha Washington Tucson 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60

Perceive No Antisemitism at All in Local Community

(Respondents) 26% 23% 21% 21% 20% 19% 16% 16% 16% 15% 15% 15% 13% 13% 12% 11% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 9% 7% 7% 6% 6% 5% 5% South Palm Beach Atlantic County Middlesex Sarasota Miami

  • St. Petersburg

New Haven San Antonio Tucson Broward Houston Bergen Indianapolis Las Vegas Washington Westport Detroit 2018 Omaha Lehigh Valley Portland (ME) Tidewater Jacksonville San Francisco Hartford

  • St. Paul

Rhode Island Detroit 2005 Minneapolis 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

Perceive a Great Deal/Moderate Amount

  • f Antisemitism in Detroit

(Respondents) 45% 73% 40% 49% 36% 54% 59% 40% 37% 53% 40% 29% 26% 49% All Experienced Antisemitism No Experience Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0‐9 Years in Detroit 10‐19 Years 20+ Years 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62

45% 27% 28% 54% 52% 63% 57% 41% 49% 34% 31% 52% 59% 58% 58% 69% 43% 48% 35% 38% 32% 53% 43% 43% 58% All Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female Household with Children Household with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Perceive a Great Deal/Moderate Amount

  • f Antisemitism in Detroit

(Respondents)

slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

45% 44% 33% 34% 45% 46% 31% 41% 52% 45% 53% 41% 49% 37% 59% 44% 41% 49% 48% 50% 39% 41% All In‐married Conversionary Intermarried Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated Under $100 Donated $100 ‐ $500 Donated $500 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Perceive a Great Deal/Moderate Amount

  • f Antisemitism in Detroit

(Respondents)

slide-64
SLIDE 64

64

Personally Experienced Antisemitism in Detroit in the Past Year Compared to Perception of Antisemitism in Detroit by Age

(Respondents) 18% 14% 16% 19% 14% 17% 27% 28% 54% 52% 63% 57% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Personally Experienced Perceive a Great Deal/Moderate Amount

slide-65
SLIDE 65

65

Holocaust Survivors

4.3% 3.4% 2.6% 2.2% 2.1% 1.9% 1.4% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Broward Bergen New York South Palm Beach Miami West Palm Beach Cleveland Washington Detroit Las Vegas Seattle 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% (Jewish Adults) 14% of households contain a survivor and/or the child of a survivor and/or the grandchild of a survivor

slide-66
SLIDE 66

66

Number of Holocaust Survivors

31,000 3,300 2,637 2,197 2,076 1,777 1,010 839 305 300 150 New York Broward South Palm Beach West Palm Beach Miami Bergen Washington Cleveland Las Vegas Detroit Seattle 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Number of Jewish Adults (Jewish Adults)

This is an underestimate. JFS serves about 525 survivors.

slide-67
SLIDE 67

67

Children of Survivors

19.6% 9.1% 9.0% 6.2% 5.8% 5.5% 3.1% 2.0% 1.3% Seattle Broward Bergen Washington Miami Las Vegas Detroit West Palm Beach South Palm Beach 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% (Jewish Adults)

slide-68
SLIDE 68

68

Number of Children of Holocaust Survivors

11,600 10,437 5,734 5,500 4,704 3,360 2,313 1,800 1,559 Broward Washington Miami Seattle Bergen Las Vegas West Palm Beach Detroit South Palm Beach 5,000 10,000 15,000 Number of Jewish Adults (Jewish Adults)

slide-69
SLIDE 69

69

Households with a Holocaust Survivor

  • r Child of a Survivor

15.6% 14.6% 10.9% 8.7% 6.6% 6.3% 5.8% 5.4% Bergen Broward Miami Washington Las Vegas West Palm Beach Detroit South Palm Beach 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% (Jewish Households)

slide-70
SLIDE 70

70

The Media

70

slide-71
SLIDE 71

71

Always 30% Usually 4% Sometimes 40% Never 27%

Readership of the Detroit Jewish News

(Jewish Respondents) The Detroit Jewish News is published by Jewish Renaissance Media and has a circulation of 17,000. Including people who read on‐line in addition to the paid subscriptions and who pick up copies at Jewish institutions, the 17,000 is generally consistent with the 23,000 who always/usually/sometimes read the paper.

slide-72
SLIDE 72

72

Always/Usually Read a Local Jewish Newspaper

(Jewish Respondents)

* The Jewish newspaper or one of the Jewish newspapers in the community is published by the Jewish Federation and is distributed to some or all of the households on the Jewish Federation mailing list.

57% 49% 49% 48% 47% 47% 42% 42% 39% 38% 37% 37% 36% 36% 35% 34% 33% 26% 26% 25% 25% 24% 22% 21% 14% 14% 28% 28% 28% 25% 20% 9% Detroit 2005 San Antonio * Rhode Island * Jacksonville * Tidewater * Lehigh Valley * Omaha * Tucson * Minneapolis * Bergen * Sarasota * Middlesex * West Palm Beach South Palm Beach

  • St. Paul *

Detroit 2018 Atlantic County Portland (ME) * New Haven *

  • St. Petersburg

Hartford Las Vegas * Indianapolis * Houston Washington Westport * Minneapolis ‐ American Jewish World

  • St. Paul ‐ Twin Cities Jewish Life *

Minneapolis ‐ Twin Cities Jewish Life *

  • St. Paul ‐ American Jewish World

Las Vegas ‐ Jewish Reporter * Las Vegas ‐ Israelite 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual Newspapers in Communities with More Than One Newspaper

slide-73
SLIDE 73

73

Never Read a Local Jewish Newspaper

(Jewish Respondents) 70% 66% 61% 61% 57% 56% 54% 53% 48% 48% 46% 44% 41% 39% 39% 37% 37% 37% 36% 34% 33% 31% 29% 29% 27% 22% 20% 81% 71% 52% 50% 47% 46% Westport * Washington

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas * Portland (ME) * New Haven * Sarasota * Houston Indianapolis Tucson * Atlantic County Hartford South Palm Beach West Palm Beach Bergen * Middlesex * Lehigh Valley * Tidewater *

  • St. Paul *

Minneapolis * Jacksonville * Rhode Island * Omaha * San Antonio * Detroit 2018 Detroit 2005 Detroit 1989 Las Vegas ‐ Las Vegas Israelite Las Vegas ‐ Jewish Reporter *

  • St. Paul ‐ American Jewish World

Minneapolis ‐ American Jewish World

  • St. Paul ‐ Twin Cities Jewish Life *

Minneapolis ‐ Twin Cities Jewish Life * 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

* The Jewish newspaper or one of the Jewish newspapers in the community is published by the Jewish Federation and is distributed to some or all of the households on the Jewish Federation mailing list.

Individual Newspapers in Communities with More Than One Newspaper

slide-74
SLIDE 74

74

34% 40% 11% 53% 44% 48% 21% 18% 5% 27% 9% 36% 16% 18% 35% 50% 47% 49% 25% 44% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0‐9 Years in Detroit 10‐19 Years 20+ Years Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Always/Usually Read the Detroit Jewish News

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-75
SLIDE 75

75

34% 20% 36% 39% 23% 55% 34% 24% 21% 31% 28% 44% 18% 46% 49% 13% 28% 49% 42% 13% All Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Income under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Always/Usually Read the Detroit Jewish News

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-76
SLIDE 76

76

34% 48% 24% 25% 35% 64% 31% 36% 31% 45% 38% 41% 30% 30% 41% 35% 32% 47% 38% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member To Day School To Supplemental School To Jewish Education No Jewish Education To Overnight Camp Not to Overnight Camp Youth Group Participant Not Youth Group Participant Hillel/Chabad Participant Not Hillel/Chabad Participant 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Always/Usually Read the Detroit Jewish News

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-77
SLIDE 77

77

34% 52% 44% 29% 47% 34% 12% 49% 21% 18% 19% 33% 61% 57% All Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Very Familiar with Federation Somewhat Familiar Not at All Familiar Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100 ‐ $500 Donated $500 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Always/Usually Read the Detroit Jewish News

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-78
SLIDE 78

78

Profile of Households in Which the Jewish Respondent Is a Reader

  • f the Detroit Jewish News

87% live in the Core Area; and 13% in the Non‐Core Area 90% live in Detroit for 20+ years 12% are under age 35; 18% are age 35‐49; 35% are age 50‐64; 20% are age 65‐74; and 15% are age 75 and over 28% are households with children 63% earn an annual household income of $100,000 and over 4% are Orthodox; 24%, Conservative; 38%, Reform; 28%, Just Jewish; and 4%, Humanist 19% of married couples are intermarried 47% are synagogue members and 10%, JCC members 14% attended Chabad in the past year 13% contain an adult who attended a Jewish day school as a child 66% contain an adult who visited Israel 53% donated to the Jewish Federation in the past year 72% donated to other Jewish charities in the past year 83% donated to non‐Jewish charities in the past year

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.

78

(Always/Usually/Sometimes Read)

slide-79
SLIDE 79

79

Print Only 84% On‐Line Only 5% Both 11%

Mode of Reading the Detroit Jewish News

(Respondents)

slide-80
SLIDE 80

80

84% 87% 62% 92% 74% 96% 81% 96% 31% 66% 62% 86% 55% 88% 85% 87% 95% 91% 80% 88% 5% 4% 12%

2%

8% 10%

1%

23% 12% 4% 5% 23%

2%

6%

2%

4% 4% 6% 11% 9% 26% 6% 18% 4% 8%

3%

46% 22% 34% 9% 22% 10% 15% 7% 3% 5% 16% 6% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0‐9 Years in Detroit 10‐19 Years 20+ Years Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Print Only On‐Line Only Both

Mode of Reading the Detroit Jewish News

(Respondents)

slide-81
SLIDE 81

81

84% 70% 95% 97% 79% 89% 93% 84% 68% 88% 81% 81% 76% 87% 88% 75% 100% 92% 91% 69% 5% 11%

1%

6%

2%

24% 4%

2%

8% 10% 4% 4% 6% 4% 3% 9% 11% 19% 4% 3% 21% 5% 5% 16% 8% 8% 17% 11% 14% 9% 8% 19% 4% 6% 22% All Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Income under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Print Only On‐Line Only Both

Mode of Reading the Detroit Jewish News

(Respondents)

slide-82
SLIDE 82

82

84% 89% 80% 79% 86% 88% 83% 87% 94% 88% 87% 70% 87% 91% 77% 80% 75% 96% 90% 5% 4% 5% 11% 3% 2% 5% 1% 2% 4% 1% 11% 3% 2% 7% 6% 3% 2% 7% 11% 7% 15% 10% 11% 10% 12% 12% 4% 8% 12% 19% 10% 7% 16% 14% 22% 2% 3% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member Very Familiar with Federation Somewhat Familiar Not at All Familiar Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100 ‐ $500 Donated $500 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Print Only On‐Line Only Both

Mode of Reading the Detroit Jewish News

(Respondents)

slide-83
SLIDE 83

83

Excellent 31% Good 50% Fair 16% Poor 3%

Perception of the Detroit Jewish News

(Jewish Respondents Who Always/Usually/Sometimes Read the Detroit Jewish News)

slide-84
SLIDE 84

84

Excellent Perceptions of Local Jewish Newspaper

(Jewish Respondents Who Always/Usually/Sometimes Read Local Jewish Newspaper)

39% 38% 37% 35% 33% 33% 31% 24% 24% 23% 20% 19% 19% 18% 18% 18% 17% 17% 16% 14% 14% 14% Omaha *

  • St. Petersburg

Detroit 2005 Jacksonville * Lehigh Valley * San Antonio * Detroit 2018 Atlantic County Rhode Island * Middlesex * Las Vegas ‐ Jewish Reporter * Indianapolis * West Palm Beach South Palm Beach Portland (ME) * Minneapolis ‐ American Jewish World New Haven * Las Vegas ‐ Israelite Minneapolis ‐ Twin Cities Jewish Life * Washington

  • St. Paul ‐ American Jewish World
  • St. Paul ‐ Twin Cities Jewish Life *

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

* The Jewish newspaper is published by the Jewish Federation and is distributed to some or all of the households on the Jewish Federation mailing list.

slide-85
SLIDE 85

85

Fair/Poor Perceptions of Local Jewish Newspaper

(Jewish Respondents Who Always/Usually/Sometimes Read Local Jewish Newspaper)

11% 11% 30% 28% 28% 26% 23% 23% 22% 22% 22% 21% 21% 20% 19% 19% 18% 18% 17% 17% 13% 12%

  • St. Paul ‐ Twin Cities Jewish Life *

Las Vegas ‐ Israelite

  • St. Paul ‐ American Jewish World

Washington Minneapolis ‐ American Jewish World Indianapolis * South Palm Beach New Haven * Portland (ME) * West Palm Beach Las Vegas ‐ Jewish Reporter * Detroit 2005 Detroit 2018 Minneapolis ‐ Twin Cities Jewish Life * Rhode Island * Omaha * Atlantic County Middlesex * San Antonio *

  • St. Petersburg

Lehigh Valley * Jacksonville * 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Fair Poor * The Jewish newspaper is published by the Jewish Federation and is distributed to some or all of the households on the Jewish Federation mailing list.

slide-86
SLIDE 86

86

31% 36% 50% 25% 32% 28% 31% 40% 29% 12% 26% 21% 34% 36% 31% 20% 37% 28% 26% 36% All Always Read Usually Read Sometimes Read Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Excellent Perceptions of the Detroit Jewish News

(Jewish Respondents Who Always/Usually/Sometimes Read the Detroit Jewish News)

slide-87
SLIDE 87

87

31% 39% 29% 16% 28% 33% 21% 17% 39% 29% 31% 12% 28% 36% 34% 30% 14% 57% All Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Income under $50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish In‐married Conversionary Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Excellent Perceptions of the Detroit Jewish News

(Jewish Respondents Who Always/Usually/Sometimes Read the Detroit Jewish News)

slide-88
SLIDE 88

88

31% 28% 34% 49% 29% 24% 28% 30% 34% 29% 28% 11% 39% 34% 38% 24% 20% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member Very Familiar with Federation Somewhat Familiar Not at All Familiar Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100 ‐ $500 Donated $500 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Excellent Perceptions of the Detroit Jewish News

(Jewish Respondents Who Always/Usually/Sometimes Read the Detroit Jewish News)

slide-89
SLIDE 89

89

Visited the Local Jewish Federation Website in the Past Year

33% 28% 27% 18% 15% 13% 13% 13% 13% 12% 11% 9% 9% 9% 8% 8% 4% 3% 1% Omaha Detroit 2018 Indianapolis Broward Miami Lehigh Valley Portland (ME) San Antonio

  • St. Paul

Detroit 2005 Minneapolis

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas Tucson New Haven Middlesex West Palm Beach South Palm Beach Atlantic County 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-90
SLIDE 90

90

28% 29% 24% 29% 36% 23% 29% 19% 40% 30% 43% 33% 17% 13% 15% 21% 37% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Visited the Jewish Federation Website in the Past Year

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-91
SLIDE 91

91

28% 25% 35% 44% 41% 20% 13% 19% 21% 27% 27% 38% 20% 35% 33% 24% 6% 39% 17% 13% All Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Income under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Visited the Jewish Federation Website in the Past Year

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-92
SLIDE 92

92

28% 39% 20% 38% 26% 38% 27% 47% 21% 49% 18% 7% 51% 29% 7% 10% 34% 53% 75% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100 ‐ $500 Donated $500 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Visited the Jewish Federation Website in the Past Year

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-93
SLIDE 93

93

21% 21% 21% 29% 9% 22% 25% 16% 23% 23% 21% 21% 31% 19% 30% 19% 21% 14% 29% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65+ Male Female Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Elderly Couple Income under $100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Excellent Perceptions of the Jewish Federation Website

(Jewish Respondents Who Visited the Jewish Federation Website)

slide-94
SLIDE 94

94

21% 23% 18% 19% 23% 24% 17% 21% 21% 17% 22% 26% 8% 22% 17% 19% 23% 24% All Conservative Reform Just Jewish In‐married Synagogue Member Non‐Member JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member Very Familiar with Federation Somewhat Familiar Donated to Federation Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100 ‐ $500 Donated $500 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Excellent Perceptions of the Jewish Federation Website

(Jewish Respondents Who Visited the Jewish Federation Website)