Intro to Barrel Calorimeter Breakout Colin Jessop, L2 Barrel Calorimeter Project Manager February 2, 2016 Director's ¡Review ¡-‑ ¡U.S. ¡CMS ¡Contribtuions ¡(402) ¡ V. ¡O'Dell, ¡2 ¡February ¡2016 ¡ 1 ¡
402.03 Organization Chart to L3 402.03 ¡ Barrel ¡Calorimeter ¡ Colin ¡Jessop ¡ (Notre ¡Dame) ¡ 402.03.03 ¡ 402.03.03 ¡ ECAL ¡Barrel ¡ HCAL ¡Barrel ¡ Bob ¡Hirosky ¡(Virginia) ¡ Alberto ¡Belloni ¡(Maryland) ¡ Director's ¡Review ¡-‑-‑ ¡Barrel ¡Calorimeter ¡Overview ¡ 2 ¡ Colin ¡Jessop, ¡Febuary ¡2 ¡2016 ¡
Agenda § ECAL Barrel - Bob Hirosky. (Scientific motivations, scope description, conceptual design, R&D program, milestones, risks, QA, ES&H) • HCAL Barrel – Alberto Belloni (Scientific motivations, scope description, conceptual design, R&D program, milestones, risks, QA, ES&H) • Barrel Calorimeter Planning- Colin Jessop (Costing, Contingency, Planning, Schedule, Reviews) Director's ¡Review ¡-‑ ¡U.S. ¡CMS ¡Contribtuions ¡(402) ¡ V. ¡O'Dell, ¡2 ¡February ¡2016 ¡ 3 ¡
Charge Question 1 (CQ 1) § 1. Design and Scope. CQ1.1 Have the project ’ s performance requirements been sufficiently defined and do they flow down from the overall CMS plan? Addressed in L2 Jessop Plenary talk and in more detail in breakout talks CQ1.2 Are the conceptual designs sound and likely to meet the performance requirements? Addressed in more detail in L3 Hirosky and L3 Belloni Talks CQ1.3 Do the designs capture the entire scope and are they adequately defined to support the cost and schedule estimates? Scope defined in L2 Jessop plenary and in more detail in L3 Hirosky and L3 Belloni Talk Costing decsribed in detail Jessop BO session talk CQ1.4 Is there an adequate plan for design reviews? Plans for design reviews discussed in Jessop BO session talk CQ1.5 Is the R&D plan appropriate to mitigate technical risk on the project ’ s timescale? Technical Risks and mitigation strategies discussed in L2 Jessop plenary talk Director's ¡Review ¡-‑ ¡U.S. ¡CMS ¡Contribtuions ¡(402) ¡ V. ¡O'Dell, ¡2 ¡February ¡2016 ¡ 4 ¡
Charge Question 2 (CQ2) § 2 Cost and Schedule. CQ 2.1 Are the cost and schedule estimates credible and realistic? Addressed in Jessop breakout talk CQ2.2 Do the estimates meet the funding agency targets? Addressed in Vivian O ’ Dell ’ s plenary talk CQ2.3 Are the estimating methodologies clearly defined and appropriate? Addressed in Jessop breakout talk CQ2.4 Has adequate cost, scope and schedule contingency been identified to account for risk? Addressed in Jessop breakout talk CQ2.5 Are assumptions used in the estimates, such as support from the core research program, realistic Addressed in Jessop breakout talk but not sure what the “ core research program ” is ? Director's ¡Review ¡-‑ ¡U.S. ¡CMS ¡Contribtuions ¡(402) ¡ V. ¡O'Dell, ¡2 ¡February ¡2016 ¡ 5 ¡
Charge Question 3 (CQ3) § Management. CQ3.1 Is the project appropriately staffed and being effectively managed at this stage? Institutional involvement and staffing addressed in Jessop Plenary and breakout CQ3.2 Are the roles, responsibilities, and contributions of DOE, NSF, and International CMS defined and appropriate? Addressed in Jessop Plenary and in Hirosky breakout CQ3.3 Have management plan documents been developed? For ECAL we have completed first draft of project execution plan (NSF). Nothing equivalent for HCAL(DOE) requested yet. BOE ’ s for ECAL and HCAL produced to L3 CQ3.4 Do the NSF CDR and NSF Project Execution Plan fulfill the NSF ’ s expectations for conceptual design? See NSF PEP draft for ECAL. Director's ¡Review ¡-‑ ¡U.S. ¡CMS ¡Contribtuions ¡(402) ¡ V. ¡O'Dell, ¡2 ¡February ¡2016 ¡ 6 ¡
Charge Question 3 Continued § Management CQ3.5 Is there a credible plan for systems engineering functions such as requirements management, interface control, and QA? Not yet developed. CQ3.6 Are the projected resources sufficient to complete design, construction, and installation and are these resources likely to be available when needed? Costing for ECAL (NSF) and HCAL (DOE) fits within the funding agency profile(see Vivians plenary talk) CQ3.7 Are critical procurements sufficiently understood and coordinated across the organizations involved? There are no critical procurements necessary in next two years so procurement strategy needs to be developed soon (scintillators, fibers, FPGA ’ s) CQ3.8 s the risk management system in place and appropriate? Have risks been adequately identified We have begun developing a risk registry. Risks are identified in plenary and breakout talks Director's ¡Review ¡-‑ ¡U.S. ¡CMS ¡Contribtuions ¡(402) ¡ V. ¡O'Dell, ¡2 ¡February ¡2016 ¡ 7 ¡
Charge Question 4 Director's ¡Review ¡-‑ ¡U.S. ¡CMS ¡Contribtuions ¡(402) ¡ V. ¡O'Dell, ¡2 ¡February ¡2016 ¡ 8 ¡
Recommend
More recommend
