interpolated sequences and critical l values of modular
play

Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Minisymposium on Computer Algebra and Special Functions OPSFA-15, Hagenberg, Austria Armin Straub July 25, 2019 University of South Alabama n 2 n + k 2 n f ( ) =


  1. Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Minisymposium on Computer Algebra and Special Functions OPSFA-15, Hagenberg, Austria Armin Straub July 25, 2019 University of South Alabama n � 2 � n + k � 2 � n f ( τ ) = η (2 τ ) 4 η (4 τ ) 4 = � � α n q n A ( n ) = k k k =0 n � 1 1 , 5 , 73 , 1445 , 33001 , 819005 , 21460825 , . . . A ( p − 1 (mod p 2 ) 2 ) ≡ α p Joint work with: A ( − 1 2 ) = 16 π 2 L ( f, 2) Robert Osburn (University College Dublin) Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 1 / 11

  2. A victory for the French peasant. . . ∗ • The Ap´ ery numbers 1 , 5 , 73 , 1445 , . . . n � 2 � n + k � 2 � n � A ( n ) = k k satisfy k =0 ( n + 1) 3 u n +1 = (2 n + 1)(17 n 2 + 17 n + 5) u n − n 3 u n − 1 . ζ (3) = � ∞ 1 THM n 3 is irrational. n =1 Ap´ ery ’78 ∗ Someone’s “sour comment” after Henri Cohen’s report on Ap´ ery’s proof at the ’78 ICM in Helsinki. Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 2 / 11

  3. A victory for the French peasant. . . ∗ • The Ap´ ery numbers 1 , 5 , 73 , 1445 , . . . n � 2 � n + k � 2 � n � A ( n ) = k k satisfy k =0 ( n + 1) 3 u n +1 = (2 n + 1)(17 n 2 + 17 n + 5) u n − n 3 u n − 1 . ζ (3) = � ∞ 1 THM n 3 is irrational. n =1 Ap´ ery ’78 The same recurrence is satisfied by the “near”-integers proof   n n k � 2 � n + k � 2 ( − 1) m − 1 � n 1 � � �  . B ( n ) = j 3 +  2 m 3 � n �� n + m k k � m m k =0 j =1 m =1 Then, B ( n ) A ( n ) → ζ (3) . But too fast for ζ (3) to be rational. ∗ Someone’s “sour comment” after Henri Cohen’s report on Ap´ ery’s proof at the ’78 ICM in Helsinki. Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 2 / 11

  4. A victory for the French peasant. . . ∗ • The Ap´ ery numbers 1 , 5 , 73 , 1445 , . . . n � 2 � n + k � 2 � n � A ( n ) = k k satisfy k =0 ( n + 1) 3 u n +1 = (2 n + 1)(17 n 2 + 17 n + 5) u n − n 3 u n − 1 . ζ (3) = � ∞ 1 THM n 3 is irrational. n =1 Ap´ ery ’78 “ After a few days of fruitless effort the specific problem was Alfred van der Poorten — A proof that Euler missed. . . (1979) ” mentioned to Don Zagier (Bonn), and with irritating speed he showed that indeed the sequence satisfies the recurrence. ∗ Someone’s “sour comment” after Henri Cohen’s report on Ap´ ery’s proof at the ’78 ICM in Helsinki. Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 2 / 11

  5. A victory for the French peasant. . . ∗ • The Ap´ ery numbers 1 , 5 , 73 , 1445 , . . . n � 2 � n + k � 2 � n � A ( n ) = k k satisfy k =0 ( n + 1) 3 u n +1 = (2 n + 1)(17 n 2 + 17 n + 5) u n − n 3 u n − 1 . ζ (3) = � ∞ 1 THM n 3 is irrational. n =1 Ap´ ery ’78 “ After a few days of fruitless effort the specific problem was Alfred van der Poorten — A proof that Euler missed. . . (1979) ” mentioned to Don Zagier (Bonn), and with irritating speed he showed that indeed the sequence satisfies the recurrence. Nowadays, there are excellent implementations of this creative telescoping , including: • HolonomicFunctions by Koutschan (Mathematica) • Sigma by Schneider (Mathematica) • ore algebra by Kauers, Jaroschek, Johansson, Mezzarobba (Sage) (These are just the ones I use on a regular basis. . . ) ∗ Someone’s “sour comment” after Henri Cohen’s report on Ap´ ery’s proof at the ’78 ICM in Helsinki. Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 2 / 11

  6. Zagier’s search and Ap´ ery-like numbers n � 2 � n + k � n � � • The Ap´ ery numbers B ( n ) = for ζ (2) satisfy k k k =0 ( n + 1) 2 u n +1 = ( an 2 + an + b ) u n − cn 2 u n − 1 , ( a, b, c ) = (11 , 3 , − 1) . Q Are there other tuples ( a, b, c ) for which the solution defined by Beukers u − 1 = 0 , u 0 = 1 is integral? Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 3 / 11

  7. Zagier’s search and Ap´ ery-like numbers n � 2 � n + k � n � � • The Ap´ ery numbers B ( n ) = for ζ (2) satisfy k k k =0 ( n + 1) 2 u n +1 = ( an 2 + an + b ) u n − cn 2 u n − 1 , ( a, b, c ) = (11 , 3 , − 1) . Q Are there other tuples ( a, b, c ) for which the solution defined by Beukers u − 1 = 0 , u 0 = 1 is integral? • Apart from degenerate cases, Zagier found 6 sporadic integer solutions: * C ∗ ( n ) * C ∗ ( n ) n n � 3 � 2 � n + k � n � n � A � D � k k n k =0 k =0 � n ⌊ n/ 3 ⌋ n � (3 k )! � n �� 2 k �� 2( n − k ) � B � ( − 1) k 3 n − 3 k E � k ! 3 3 k k k n − k k =0 k =0 n n � 2 � 2 k � n � � n � C � F � ( − 1) k 8 n − k C A ( k ) k k k k =0 k =0 Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 3 / 11

  8. L -value interpolations THM For primes p > 2 , the Ap´ ery numbers for ζ (3) satisfy Ahlgren– Ono A ( p − 1 (mod p 2 ) , 2000 2 ) ≡ a f ( p ) with f ( τ ) = η (2 τ ) 4 η (4 τ ) 4 = a f ( n ) q n ∈ S 4 (Γ 0 (8)) . � n � 1 conjectured (and proved modulo p ) by Beukers ’87 Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 4 / 11

  9. L -value interpolations THM For primes p > 2 , the Ap´ ery numbers for ζ (3) satisfy Ahlgren– Ono A ( p − 1 (mod p 2 ) , 2000 2 ) ≡ a f ( p ) with f ( τ ) = η (2 τ ) 4 η (4 τ ) 4 = a f ( n ) q n ∈ S 4 (Γ 0 (8)) . � n � 1 conjectured (and proved modulo p ) by Beukers ’87 THM A ( − 1 2 ) = 16 π 2 L ( f, 2) Zagier 2016 ∞ � 2 � x + k � 2 � x • Here, A ( x ) = � is absolutely convergent for x ∈ C . k k k =0 • Predicted by Golyshev based on motivic considerations, the connection of the Ap´ ery numbers with the double covering of a family of K3 surfaces, and the Tate conjecture. D. Zagier Arithmetic and topology of differential equations Proceedings of the 2016 ECM, 2017 Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 4 / 11

  10. L -value interpolations, cont’d • Zagier found 6 sporadic integer solutions C ∗ ( n ) to: ∗ one of A - F ( n + 1) 2 u n +1 = ( an 2 + an + b ) u n − cn 2 u n − 1 u − 1 = 0 , u 0 = 1 n � 1 γ n, ∗ q n , so that There exists a weight 3 newform f ∗ ( τ ) = � THM 1985 - C ∗ ( p − 1 2019 2 ) ≡ γ p, ∗ (mod p ) . Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 5 / 11

  11. L -value interpolations, cont’d • Zagier found 6 sporadic integer solutions C ∗ ( n ) to: ∗ one of A - F ( n + 1) 2 u n +1 = ( an 2 + an + b ) u n − cn 2 u n − 1 u − 1 = 0 , u 0 = 1 n � 1 γ n, ∗ q n , so that There exists a weight 3 newform f ∗ ( τ ) = � THM 1985 - C ∗ ( p − 1 2019 2 ) ≡ γ p, ∗ (mod p ) . • C , D proved by Beukers–Stienstra (’85); A follows from their work • E proved using a result Verrill (’10); B through p -adic analysis • F conjectured by Osburn–S and proved by Kazalicki (’19) using Atkin–Swinnerton-Dyer congruences for non-congruence cusp forms Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 5 / 11

  12. L -value interpolations, cont’d • Zagier found 6 sporadic integer solutions C ∗ ( n ) to: ∗ one of A - F ( n + 1) 2 u n +1 = ( an 2 + an + b ) u n − cn 2 u n − 1 u − 1 = 0 , u 0 = 1 n � 1 γ n, ∗ q n , so that There exists a weight 3 newform f ∗ ( τ ) = � THM 1985 - C ∗ ( p − 1 2019 2 ) ≡ γ p, ∗ (mod p ) . • C , D proved by Beukers–Stienstra (’85); A follows from their work • E proved using a result Verrill (’10); B through p -adic analysis • F conjectured by Osburn–S and proved by Kazalicki (’19) using Atkin–Swinnerton-Dyer congruences for non-congruence cusp forms For ∗ one of A - F , except E , there is α ∗ ∈ Z such that THM Osburn S ’18 2 ) = α ∗ C ∗ ( − 1 π 2 L ( f ∗ , 2) . Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 5 / 11

  13. L -value interpolations, cont’d • Zagier found 6 sporadic integer solutions C ∗ ( n ) to: ∗ one of A - F ( n + 1) 2 u n +1 = ( an 2 + an + b ) u n − cn 2 u n − 1 u − 1 = 0 , u 0 = 1 n � 1 γ n, ∗ q n , so that There exists a weight 3 newform f ∗ ( τ ) = � THM 1985 - C ∗ ( p − 1 2019 2 ) ≡ γ p, ∗ (mod p ) . • C , D proved by Beukers–Stienstra (’85); A follows from their work • E proved using a result Verrill (’10); B through p -adic analysis • F conjectured by Osburn–S and proved by Kazalicki (’19) using Atkin–Swinnerton-Dyer congruences for non-congruence cusp forms For ∗ one of A - F , except E , there is α ∗ ∈ Z such that THM Osburn S ’18 2 ) = α ∗ C ∗ ( − 1 π 2 L ( f ∗ , 2) . x = − 1 / 2 C E ( x ) = 6 For sequence E , res π 2 L ( f E , 1) . Interpolated sequences and critical L -values of modular forms Armin Straub 5 / 11

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend