installations mission
play

Installations & Mission Support Colonel Roy Agustin, FSAME HQ - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

United States Air Force Reserve I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Air Force Reserve Command Installations & Mission Support Colonel Roy Agustin, FSAME HQ AFRC Civil Engineer 19 Jun 2013 1 1 Overview Viable


  1. United States Air Force Reserve I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Air Force Reserve Command Installations & Mission Support Colonel Roy Agustin, FSAME HQ AFRC Civil Engineer 19 Jun 2013 1 1

  2. Overview  Viable & relevant capabilities enabling Global Vigilance, Reach & Power  Developing & sustaining our Air Force Reserve missions & Airmen  Posturing for the future 2

  3. Force Provider 14% ARTs 12% 65% IMAs TRs 4% AGRs 5% Civilian 0.5% AD & ANG Air Reserve Team 48.6K Traditional Reservists 10.4K Air Reserve Techs 9.0K IMAs 2.9K Active Guard Reserve 4.0K Civil Service 0.3K Active Duty HQ Mgmt 0.1K ANG 33 flying wings, 12 flying groups, 1 space wing 3

  4. Reserve Total Force Contributions Aerial Spray 100% Theater Airlift 21% Weather Reconnaissance 100% Pilot Training 19% Port Mortuary Affairs 63% In-flight Refueling 18% Aeromedical Evacuation 60% Air Ops Center 15% Flight Inspection 50% AWACS 15% Aerial Port 47% CE Prime BEEF 15% Strategic Airlift 40% EOD 15% CE RED HORSE 27% Personnel Recovery 15% Aerial Fire Fighting 25% Security Forces 12% Bomber 21% Space Operations 12% 4

  5. Prime BEEF Capabilities

  6. Prime BEEF Locations Youngstown ARS Peterson AFB Minn-St Paul IAP Grissom ARB Niagara Falls IAP McConnell AFB JB Lewis-McChord Scott AFB Pittsburg ARS Hill AFB Westover ARB Beale AFB JB McGuire/Dix/Lakehurst Travis AFB Dover AFB JB Andrews Nellis AFB Wright-Patterson AFB March ARB Seymour-Johnson AFB Luke AFB JB Charleston Whiteman AFB Tinker AFB Dobbins ARB NAS Fort Worth JRB (Carswell) JB San Antonio (Lackland) Homestead ARB Keesler AFB Duke Field JB Elmendorf-Richardson Barksdale AFB Maxwell AFB JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam Black - 4 AF, RED - 10 AF, Blue - 22 AF 30 CES & 4 CEFs encompassing 13 AF specialites 6

  7. 622 Civil Engineer Group 583 RHS Beale AFB 567 RHS Seymour Johnson AFB 560 RHS JB Charleston 922 CEF 555 RHS 622 CEG March ARB Nellis AFB ECS-TCC 822 CEF 556 RHS & FSCTC 307 RHS Carswell JRB Hurlburt AFB 622 CEF Barksdale AFB Dobbins ARB 3 RED HORSE Squadrons,12 S-Teams & 2 Training Centers

  8. Enabling Global Vigilance, Reach & Power  Installations enable AF capabilities  Enable air, space, cyberspace superiority  Assure cyberspace access & dominance  Host robust C2 networks  Serve as power projection platforms — garrison & expeditionary  Provide infrastructure necessary to hold targets at risk globally  Facilitate partnerships w/ allies & developing nations by basing US forces forward “Air bases are a determining factor in the success of air ops. The two -legged stool of men & planes would topple over without this equally important third leg.” General of the Air Force Henry H. “Hap” Arnold 8

  9. Host & Tenant Installations Alaska  ARPC Guam 22AF 4AF HQ AFRC Hawaii 10AF 9 Host installations – 57 Tenant Locations/Ranges  Over 21,000 acres  Nearly 3,000 facilities  $6.13B plant replacement value 9

  10. Current Mission MILCON Funding vs. Requirements Programmed Appropriated $ M 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Congressional Programmatic Plus Up Requirement President’s Budget Congressional Inserts As of 11 Jun 13 10

  11. FY12-14 MILCON Projects Legend Whiteman AFB MO * Prior year savings reprogrammed *FY12 Logistics Readiness Sq replace storm damaged facilities ** P-341 MILCON McConnell AFB KS **FY12 Medical Admin Hill AFB UT Niagara Falls ARS NY **FY12 Fire Station *FY12 Vehicle Maintenance FY13 C-130 Simulator March ARB CA Charleston AFB SC FY12 Control Tower / Base Ops FY12 TFI RED HORSE Sq FY14 Deploy Process Terminal Tinker AFB OK FY14 Air Control Gp Sq Ops Homestead ARB FL Naval AS Ft Worth JRB TX **FY12 F-16 Simulator Addition **FY13 F-16 Simulator Addition **FY13 Live Ordnance Load Area FY14 Entry Control Gate Ensuring our Installations are Ready, Capable & Viable 11 11

  12. DLA MILCON at AFRC Installations  FY12 Westover Hydrant Fuel System Project  Replaces existing hydrant fuel system  New 2,400 gpm Type III system with 14 outlets, fill stand with canopy, & 2 each 5,000 barrel above ground JP8 storage tanks with containment  Awarded 28 May 13  FY13 Grissom Hydrant Fuel System Project  Construct 16 outlet Type III jet fuel (JP-8) hydrant system with two 3,500-barrel operating fuel tanks, pump house, hydrant hose truck checkout station, & fill stand at airfield  Also replace transfer pipeline, pump house, 4-position off-load facility, & 2-position fill stand at bulk fuel storage area  Awaiting Award Jul/Aug 13 Ensuring our Installations are Ready, Capable & Viable 12

  13. Future MILCON Projects  44 Projects, $447.5M Current Mission  3 Projects, $6.4M, New Mission  Representative Projects Base State Title Robins GA AFRC CONSOLIDATED MISSION COMPLEX - PH 1, 2 & 3 Hickam HI CONSOLIDATED TRAINING FACILITY Westover MA MAINTENANCE SHOP COMPLEX Seymour Johnson NC TANKER PARKING APRON EXPANSION Youngstown OH INDOOR SMALL ARMS FIRING RANGE Tinker OK AIR CONTROL GROUP SQUADRON OPERATIONS Davis Monthan AZ RESCUE SQUADRON OPERATIONS Lackland TX MEDICAL TRAINING ANNEX TO CLINIC Dobbins GA FIRE STATION AND SECURITY COMPLEX Keesler MS AEROMEDICAL STAGING SQUADRON Ensuring our Installations are Ready, Capable & Viable 13

  14. Future AFRC Consolidated Mission Complex  Effectively & efficiently meets AF, AFMC & AFRC needs  Saves WR-ALC MILCON by reusing vacated facilities  Reduces AFRC footprint — 9 buildings to 1 Duck Lake Phase I Ph 1 DRTC Ph 2 Ph 3 Phases II & III Clinic 14 14

  15. FSRM Project Funding Profile 250 200 $M 150 Planned 100 50 0 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 PB 21.5 23.1 53.2 57.3 48.7 57.5 45.7 47.2 Actual 118.2 96.2 108.6 177.9 224.4 194.1 205 126 Leverage O&M Facilities Sustainment, Restoration & Modernization (FSRM) to Recapitalize, Retain/Sustain & Reduce 15

  16. FY12 FSRM vs Historical Funding FSRM Host Vs Tenant Funding FSRM Funding By Category 160 100 140 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 75 120 Percent Funding 100 $ Million 50 80 60 25 40 0 20 Host Tenant 0 Energy Infrastr Airfield Msn Spt Design Demo QoL FY08 0 42 17.2 35 5.5 0 2.7 FY09 0 56.3 20.7 69 9.8 2.8 17.3 FY10 2 35.6 23.6 110.5 28.7 4.9 19.2 FY11 2.7 35.4 29.4 96.5 14.6 1.5 13.6 FY12 2.5 19.6 29.5 146.8 7.2 0.2 6.2 Energy improvements included in major facility renovations 16

  17. FY12/Projected FY13 O&M FSRM Facility Project Totals ($M by State) Host Installation 0.2/0.1 1.7/ 24.6/ 5.4 14.5 16.2/0.9 8.2/ 3.4/6.1 12.8/ 5.7 0.1/ 6.2/ 11.3 18.1/ 0.7 0.9/1.5 0.3/0.6 2.6 3.3/1.5 11.0 1.2/2.6 1.5/3.5 4.1/9.4 18.6/2.9 1.3/1.6 1.0/0 2.7/1.2 0/0.4 1.0/ 0.2/ 16.1/ 7.4 1.4 9.8 AK 0/0.8 17.3/1.4 HI 3.4/0.5 2.2/2.2 37.7/ 19.9 What we’re buying: beddowns/TFI $14M; airfields $27M; renovations $31M; infrastructure $37M; & mission support $31M 17

  18. Energy Program  Prior Investments in Energy Projects  NRG Projects for 2011- $ 2.7M  NRG Projects for 2012 - $2.5M  NRG Projects for 2013- $ 2.5M  FY14 planned investment in Energy Projects  $5.5M in energy projects under O&M (Grissom, March, Niagara & Westover)  $3.5M in Energy projects under NRG (Dobbins, Grissom, Homestead, Niagara, March, Westover & Youngstown) The Air Force spent over $10 billion on energy in 2012; Jet fuel accounted for 86% of energy used by the Air Force 18

  19. Energy Reduction Prediction FY 13 1 st Qtr Goal: 30% reduction in energy use per SF at AF installations by 2015 Metric: 3% / yr increased energy efficiency from a 2003 baseline Outcome: Achieve EISA, EPAct, EO & OSD mandated goals7 AFRC Energy Intensity Reduction Percentage 0.3 Percent Reduction GOOD 0.2 0.1 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Energy Intensity Forecast Actua (MBTU/SF) Goal NRG 19

  20. E.O.13423 Water Reduction Status FY 13 1 st Qtr Goal: 16% reduction in water use per SF at AF installations by 2015 Metric: 2%/yr increased water efficiency from a 2007 baseline Outcome: Achieve EO & OSD mandated goals AFRC Water Intensity Reduction Percentage 0.35 0.3 0.25 Water Intensity Percent Reduction (MGal/SF) 0.2 0.15 GOOD 0.1 0.05 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Actual Forecast Goal 20

  21. Environmental Programs 10 9 8 7 $ Million 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Pollution Compliance Conservation Prevention FY11 Oblig 9.3 0.3 0.4 FY12 Oblig 7.8 0.3 0.4 FY13 PB 7.8 0.3 0.4 21

  22. Dissemination of Information  Request for Information (RFI)  Sources Sought Synopsis  Pre-solicitation Notices  Award Notices  Requests for Quotes/Proposals  Government-wide Point of Entry (GPE)  http://www/fedbizopps.gov  http://www.ebuy.gsa.gov 22

  23. Contracting Execution Host Base $ Awarded 125 $120M 100 $96M FY10 $ Millions 75 FY11 $59M FY12 50 25 0 CAR DOB GRI HOM MAR MSP NIA PIT WES YOU A7KA  Total contracting obligations: FY10 $256M; FY11 $268M; FY12 $265M Sequestration expected to reduce year end contracting surge capacity 23

  24. MILCON Execution Corps of Engineers Louisville District is AFRC’s primary USACE Program Manager 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend