Improvements Project Hopkinton-Westborough- Southborough December, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

improvements project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Improvements Project Hopkinton-Westborough- Southborough December, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I-90 / I-495 Interchange Improvements Project Hopkinton-Westborough- Southborough December, 2014 Introduction / Welcome Paul Matthews, Executive Director, 495 MetroWest Partnership Renata Welch, MassDOT Project Manager Jonathan


slide-1
SLIDE 1

I-90 / I-495 Interchange Improvements Project Hopkinton-Westborough- Southborough

December, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Paul Matthews, Executive Director, 495 MetroWest

Partnership

  • Renata Welch, MassDOT Project Manager
  • Jonathan Gulliver, MassDOT District Highway Director

Introduction / Welcome

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Historic congestion at interchange associated with toll

plaza

  • MassDOT planning study (2012-2013) identified

deficiencies and need for improvements

  • Implementation of All Electronic Toll System (AETS)

July 15, 2016

  • Subsequent elimination of toll plaza will not eliminate

congestion and safety issues Background

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project Area

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Immediate Study Area

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Based upon 2035 Priority

Development Areas scenario

  • Weekday AM and PM peak

hours

2035 Design Volumes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Previous Concept from Planning Study

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Safety and Operational Issues

  • Substandard geometry
  • Magnitude of passenger vehicle traffic
  • Magnitude of truck traffic
  • Vehicle conflicts (weaving sections) within interchange

area Background

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Advocacy

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Advocacy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Advocacy

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Advocacy

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What Are We Trying to Do

  • Eliminate Weaving Movement Conflicts
  • Improve Interstate-to-Interstate Design
  • Reduce Congestion and Travel Time
  • Minimize Resource Impacts

Project Goals

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Existing Conditions

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Environmental Concerns

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Environmental Concerns

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Environmental Concerns

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Environmental Concerns

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Environmental Concerns

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • MassDOT internal working group started with a blank

slate to envision new interchange configurations

  • New interchange configurations were then modified

while still maintaining appropriate design speeds and geometry

  • All design standards are met
  • New ramp designs to provide direct connections and

eliminate weaves

Concept Development

slide-21
SLIDE 21

DIRECTIONAL (60MPH)

Concept Development

slide-22
SLIDE 22

FULL CLOVERLEAF

Concept Development

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Design/Operations

  • Eliminate weaves
  • Direct connections
  • Ramp geometry
  • Reduce congestion
  • Stormwater BMPs

Cost/Construction

  • Construction cost
  • Mitigation cost
  • Bridge maintenance
  • Phasing
  • Maintaining traffic

Environmental

  • Wetlands
  • Flood zone
  • Habitat
  • ACEC
  • Open space
  • Riverfront area
  • Historic /

Archaeological

  • Hazardous materials
  • Air quality
  • Water quality

Socioeconomic

  • Noise / distance

from residences

  • Neighborhood

impacts

  • Visual impacts
  • Environmental justice
  • ROW impacts

Regulatory

  • Meets Purpose &

Need

  • Permit requirements
  • Mitigation needs

Screening Categories and Considerations

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Initial Screening

Concept Development

  • Concept 22-3
  • Concept 14-5
  • Concept 14-4

Eight Initial Concepts 30+ Variations of Initial Concepts

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Concept 22-3

Existing Ramp to Remain (with Modifications)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Concept 22-3

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Concept 14-5

Existing Ramps to Remain (with Modifications) Existing Ramp to Remain (with Modifications)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Concept 14-5

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Concept 14-4

Existing Ramps to Remain (with Modifications) Existing Ramp to Remain (with Modifications) Existing Ramps to Remain (with Modifications)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Concept 14-4

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Based upon 2035 Priority

Development Areas scenario

  • Baseline (No Build)

represents conditions with toll plazas removed

  • Weekday AM and PM peak

hours analyzed

  • All three concepts provide

acceptable operations and address weaving and congestion concerns

Preliminary Traffic Modeling

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Insert video clip 2035 No Build PM

Future PM Peak Hour Conditions (2035) –No Build

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Future PM Peak Hour Conditions (2035) – Concept 14-4

slide-34
SLIDE 34

2035 Operational Benefits

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Resource Impacts

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • Concept 22-3 $285,400,000*
  • Concept 14-5 $215,800,000*
  • Concept 14-4 $162,000,000*

note: does not include engineering, mitigation or ROW costs

* 2014 Dollars

Conceptual Cost Estimates

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • Project has historically been included in Central Mass

MPO / CMRPC Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) but not fully funded

  • Project has been included by reference in Boston MPO

LRTP

  • Need to continue efforts to include in both plans and

eventual Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

  • Funding expected to include Western Turnpike funds

Programming

slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • November 18th – initial discussion with FHWA

environmental and programming staff

  • December 2nd – initial discussion with State and

Federal environmental agencies

  • December 18th – initial discussion with 495 MetroWest

Partnership, local and regional officials and stakeholders

Outreach

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Overall Project Schedule

1 2 3 4 5 6

Planning Study Feasibility Study/ Conceptual Design EA / EIR / 25% Design Final Design and Permitting Early Action Construction Construction Complete

Current Stage

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Next Steps

  • Continue to refine concepts and impact calculations
  • Prepare ENF for Winter 2015 filing
  • Work with MPOs (Boston, Central Mass) to include

project in Long Range Plans

  • Procure consultant services for environmental

documentation / 25% / permitting

  • Prepare Environmental Assessment / Environmental

Impact Report for NEPA and MEPA and obtain permits

  • Design and Construction
slide-41
SLIDE 41

QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS