Implementation of CDISC standards supported by global mapping - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

implementation of cdisc standards supported by global
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Implementation of CDISC standards supported by global mapping - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Implementation of CDISC standards supported by global mapping process and metadata library (Case Study) Dimitri Kutsenko (Entimo AG) Global teams Different time zones North America Europe Asia Africa Latin America Australia Central Front


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Implementation of CDISC standards supported by global mapping process and metadata library

(Case Study)

Dimitri Kutsenko (Entimo AG)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

10-Oct-2011

2

Africa Latin America Asia Australia North America Europe Central “Front Office" Hub Supporting Hubs

Global teams – Different time zones

slide-3
SLIDE 3

10-Oct-2011

Outline

§ Past situation

§ Challenges of mapping to CDISC SDTM with

global, virtual teams

§ Implementation approach

§ Global process § Enabling environment with meta library

§ Results | Conclusions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

10-Oct-2011

Cost of Change Curve

Early QC Paradigm

QC Tasks

slide-5
SLIDE 5

10-Oct-2011

Mapping to CDISC SDTM with global, virtual teams Past challenges (1/2)

§ Teams and team members distributed globally § Multiple tasks involved

§ Creating specifications § Programming SDTM datasets § Technical review of specifications and programs § Functional review of the datasets

§ Working differently

§ No consistent approach in creating specifications and

programs (examples: data transfer, define)

§ Re-usability was difficult to achieve

§ Strict time lines

slide-6
SLIDE 6

10-Oct-2011

Mapping to CDISC SDTM with global, virtual teams Past challenges (2/2)

§ Studies:

§ New and legacy § Coming from different systems § Source database extracts available in different structures § Have to be made ready for CDISC submissions § Metadata are often limited/not available § No re-usable objects available

§ Standards:

§ Many levels and versions simultaneously § Multiple customer specific standard enhancements § Growing complexity of standards

slide-7
SLIDE 7

10-Oct-2011

Mapping to CDISC SDTM with global, virtual teams § Efficient generation of SDTM

compliant data sets requires establishment of new processes!!!

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10-Oct-2011

Approach: Global process for global, virtual teams Working Worldwide – Goals (1/2)

§ Consistency and re-usability of standards

(incl. sponsor-specific)

§ Definition of a global process:

§ Start from existing local best practices

  • Example: Set-up for blinded vs. unblinded

programmers, technical programming code review

§ Create common use cases

  • Example: Creating consistent test cases for quality and

efficiency

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10-Oct-2011

Approach: Global process for global, virtual teams Working Worldwide – Goals (2/2)

§ Definition of a global process:

§ Streamline processes

  • Create process maps for all data conversion scenarios

§ Use advantages of a global player

  • Global teams to follow the streamlined process
  • Convert data consistently across the globe

§ Look for productive tool to support processes

  • All components available in one central location to

easier implement best practices

  • Global accessibility of the enabling environment
  • 21 CFR Part 11 compliant and validated
  • Flexible and scalable
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10-Oct-2011

Approach: Global process for global, virtual teams Mapping Process (1/2) – Generic View

§ Face-lifting: Designed to allow for task splitting

§ Intellectual mapping

  • Determine how to map trial data into SDTM
  • Detect and create re-usable mapping templates

§ Program generation

  • Automate generation of mapping programs

§ Program execution

  • Create environment for controlled and traceable program

execution (SCE) § QC

  • Multi-stage QC
slide-11
SLIDE 11

10-Oct-2011

Approach: Global process for global, virtual teams Mapping Process (2/2) – Generic View

§ Roles

§ Librarian § SDTM Mapper § Reviewer(s) § IT

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10-Oct-2011

Mapping Process: Maintain Library (1)

§ Library:

§ Common global library § Customer specific models

§ Supports of different standard types:

§ Terminology, codelists, format catalogs § Study folder structures § Standard macros, mappings § Central lab specifications § Sponsor guidelines…

§ Standards governance:

§ Versioned storage of parallel versions § Controlled access via roles

slide-13
SLIDE 13

10-Oct-2011

Mapping Process: Maintain Library (2) - Librarian

§ Role Types:

§ Data Standards librarian § SDTM Mapping librarian § TLF Shells librarian

§ Tasks:

§ Maintain information model and logical data models § Develop mapping templates and standard algorithms § Develop standard codelists, macros § Maintain consistency of variables (content, process) § Prepare recommendations for standards governance

slide-14
SLIDE 14

10-Oct-2011

Mapping Process: Maintain Library (3)

§ Requests are submitted via standard electronic

request form (including links to spec and code)

§ User group evaluates requests § Decision is communicated to requester § If decided, object is created/amended § After documented QC by independent librarian,

new standard is released

slide-15
SLIDE 15

10-Oct-2011

“Metametadata” Concept

§ “Metametadata” – Rules for metadata definitions

§ Define content/column structure for domain definitions § Define values for column content to support checks § Contain check rules for domain definitions

Rule examples: CDISC type – character, mandatory, {value space} attribute sequence – integer, unique, starts with 1

slide-16
SLIDE 16

10-Oct-2011

Mapping Process: Define Dataset Structures

§ Define Dataset Structures: § Use SDTM domain templates

to create target structures

§ Optional: Derive source structures

from datasets

§ Import codelists and create format

catalogs

§ Metadata check rules apply!

slide-17
SLIDE 17

10-Oct-2011

Mapping Process: Define Mapping

§ Intellectual mapping - Define mapping

specification

§ Define mapping with entimICE for each domain

§ Standards exploited for:

§ Dataset structures § Standard conversion algorithms § Pre- / post-processing tasks

§ Quality means:

§ Consistency checks in the mapping definition § Interactive review mode § Source side data in the mapping program

slide-18
SLIDE 18

10-Oct-2011

Mapping Process: Generate and Run Mapping Program

§ Mapping programs are generated from

mapping definitions

§ Programs contain parameters for datasets

§ Programs are executed with set parameters § Logs are reviewed § SDTM check program is executed with standard

and additional checks

§ Mapping program is marked as ready for 1st

QC step

slide-19
SLIDE 19

10-Oct-2011

Mapping Process: Quality Control

§ 3-stage QC:

§ Internal review § Functional QC § Technical QC

§ QC steps includes:

§ Logical checks (e.g. dates, visits) § Runs of SDTM check program § Assessment of pre-defined check criteria

(e-forms)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

10-Oct-2011

Mapping Process: Generate Define Documents

§ Necessary elements are created (value

level metadata, algorithms…)

§ Domain metadata are reused to create

define (used for mapping definition)

§ All SDTM domains are linked to elements § CRF annotation are scanned for pages § Define is generated § QC of define documentation is done

workflow-based

slide-21
SLIDE 21

10-Oct-2011

Archive Study

§ Requested study is exported as

hierarchy with all reports and objects

§ Access rights are removed § Requester is notified

slide-22
SLIDE 22

10-Oct-2011

Data Standards How does it fit together

Standard Data Elements & Coding LIBRARY & Conventions Standard eCRF LIBRARY Standard TLF shell LIBRARY eCRF data TLF data sets SDTM in XPT ADAM ADaM

SDTM Mapping

Protocol Design

MedDRA LOINC

Define.xml CDASH SDTM

Mapping Library

Standard eCRF LIBRARY Standard eCRF LIBRARY

Rave DataLabs INFORM

(consistent definition

  • f common

information across system (e.g. site id, user id) + MASTER/ SLAVE Information Model

entimICE

Source: Priya Gopal, PhUSE SDE Boston 2010

slide-23
SLIDE 23

10-Oct-2011

Results

§ Teams work consistently across the globe

§ Process is defined and broken down

into smaller tasks

§ Clear task responsibilities defined

§ Same look and feel

§ Easier training of new colleagues § Tasks shared between remote team members

§ Re-use of standard elements

§ Growing library saves time, increases quality § Efficiency in the data conversion process

§ Continuous QC with multiple QC stops

§ Secures outcome quality

slide-24
SLIDE 24

10-Oct-2011

Conclusions

§ Providing SDTM data transfers to sponsors is

becoming habitual task

§ Processes and tools to support this task need

to be in place

§ QC has crucial importance

(the earlier, the better!)

§ Flexibility required to support

  • ngoing development and changes

§ Vision: Standard eCRF plus

a well-filled metadata store make life much easier

slide-25
SLIDE 25

10-Oct-2011

END

Many thanks for your attention! Questions…?

VISION STARTS NOW!