Impact of Sub-Prime Collapse
- n the Lending Market
Impact of Sub-Prime Collapse on the Lending Market Paul Meiring, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Impact of Sub-Prime Collapse on the Lending Market Paul Meiring, Prudential Capital Group Engin Okaya, Prudential Capital Group Michael Costakos, Scotia Capital Jim Beninger, Scotia Capital Robert Follis, Scotia Capital February 19, 2008 Is
2
– Citigroup, December 21, 2007
– Fitch Ratings, January 31, 2008
– S&PLCD, February 2008
– WSJ, February 6, 2008
– WSJ, February 11, 2008
3
Relationship focused buyside lender. Leading provider of private capital for more than 60 years. Middle market focus, target companies $50 – 500 million
$42B portfolio of investments as of 12/31/2007 spread
Originated $9.5 billion of Investment Grade, Below
4
$4.4 $4.5 $5.7 $5.3 $7.7
$1.3 $0.5 $1.6 $0.7 $0.5
$0.1 $0.2 $0.1 $0.3 $0.2
2 4 6 8 10 12
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
$ Billions
IG BIG Mezz $5.0 $5.2 $6.6 $6.9 $9.5
165 129 161 104
201
5
6
Guadalajara Singapore Hong Kong Mumbai Dubai London Dublin Gibraltar Toronto New York Halifax Montreal Vancouver Calgary Denver Houston Portland San Francisco Mexico City Monterrey Atlanta Chicago Boston Scotia Capital ScotiaMocatta (Precious Metals) Scotia Waterous (Oil & Gas M&A) Kuala Lumpur
7
8
9
10
Institutional lenders and Investment Banks provided large
Buyers of CDO tranches suffered mark-to-market writedowns
Both the leverage and equity component of CDO
Many CDO structures have begun to force liquidation of assets. Banks were also underwriting the debt of larger buyouts and
Many of these deals are now “hung.”
11
Source: S&P 1.17.2008
90,700 23,300 9,600 14,800 21,000 22,000 Amount of Writedown ($MM) 48,950 6,000 6,600 11,350 20,000 5,000 Amount of Equity Infusion ($MM) Total Others Morgan Stanley UBS Citigroup Merrill Lynch Bank
12
Source: S&P 1.17.2008 Loans by Banks 39% US GSE-Backed RMBS 2% ($3.2T) U.S. Sub-prime RMBS + CDOs of ABS 1% ($1.6T) Private Label RMBS, ABS, CMBS, CDOs 9% Public Sector Debt Securities 23% Private Sector Debt Securities* 25%
$43.2T $27.2T $25.6T $9.6T
*Excluding structured finance; RMBS, ABS, CMBS, CDO, and GSE
13
14
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Domestic Banks Finance Cos. Foreign Banks Institutional Investors Securities Firms Excludes left and right agent commitments (including administrative, syndication and documentation agent as well as arranger)
2008
Source: S&P
15
Source: S&P 1.17.2008
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 2004 2005 2006 2007 Amount ($B)
ABS CDO CMBS RMBS Single-name synthetic
16
133 81 148 186 84 78 188 64 77 80 50 42 38 44 30 15 26 30 42 49 58 52 71 58 60 58 85 54 69 53 54 44 62 34 44 46 48 34 49 75 65 76 74 118
$0B $125B $250B 1Q97 1Q98 1Q99 1Q00 1Q01 1Q02 1Q03 1Q04 1Q05 1Q06 1Q07
Institutional Pro Rata
Note: These numbers comprise U.S. dollar denominated loans and are subject to revision as LCD collects additional data.
Source: S&P 1.31.2008
17
L+0 L+100 L+200 L+300 L+400 L+500 L+600 L+700 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
BB Loans B Loans
Note: Excludes all loans trading at 70% of par or less and facilities in default 1997 – 1/25/08
Source: S&P 1.31.2008
18
350344 368 355 372 400391 419 533 437 508 447 359 292 319 266 249 273 256 271 254 287 272 220 236 387 399 253 284 300 383 383 378 287 285 284 387 401 417 374
L+200 L+300 L+400 L+500 L+600 1Q98 1Q99 1Q00 1Q01 1Q02 1Q03 1Q04 1Q05 1Q06 1Q07 Time Period Spread Straight Spread Upfront fee over three year assumed maturity Assumes upfront fee is amortized evenly over an assumed three-year life; Upfront fee includes original issue discount. As of 10/5/06 LCD began using Corporate Credit Ratings by S&P and Corporate Family Ratings by Moody’s for rated spread and rated upfront fee calculations.
Source: S&P 1.31.2008
19
Liquidity problems in the U.S. non-investment grade market
Canadian leveraged loan market not impacted as dramatically
However, certain degree of Canadian bank market tightening;
3.25x Senior Leverage and 4.5x Total Leverage Spreads have increased by 50 ~ 75 bps
20
Arrangers are unwilling to take underwriting risks without full
Reasonably structured transactions getting done; however, more
In some cases, the syndication processes prolonged due to lenders’
Credit spreads still at relative lows on a historical basis; however,
Some banks exiting long-time relationships due to the lack of
21
Loan Portfolio Management scrutiny (i.e. hold level and
Drawn credits are preferred as profitability models are
Terms at and beyond 3 years require significantly larger
As market pricing for bonds, CLO and CDS increases, banks
Relationship transactions continue to be well received.
22
Bank Rate (LHS) Mid Corporate Spreads (RHS)
At mid-year 2007, there was over US$1.15 trillion in asset backed CP – this level declined by 21% in just 2-months
30 Day A1/P1 Commercial Paper Spreads
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 9/23/99 9/23/00 9/23/01 9/23/02 9/23/03 9/23/04 9/23/05 9/23/06 9/23/07
Date
Spread
23
24
Source: Bank of Canada and British Bankers Association, Federal Reserve
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
3-month Libor 3-month CA BA
Fed makes 13 rate cuts from 6.50% to 1.00% between 1/3/2001 and 6/25/2003 Fed makes 5 rate cuts from 5.25% to 3.00% between 9/18/2007 and 1/30/2008 Bank of CA makes 2 rate cuts from 4.50% to 4.00% between 7/10/2007 and 1/22/2008 Bank of CA makes 4 rate cuts from 3.25% to 2% between 7/15/2003 and 4/13/2004 Bank of CA makes 9 rate cuts from 5.50% to 2.00% between 3/6/2001 and 1/15/2002
25
Source: Federal Reserve and Bank of Canada
2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 11% 12% 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008
Treasury Rate
US 10-yr Treasury CA 10-yr Treasury
26
Source: Federal Reserve
2 3 4 5 6 2 4 6 8 10
Years Spot Yields (%)
1/31/08 12/31/07 1/31/07
27
Jan 31, 2008 Dec 31, 2007 Jan 31, 2007
28
29
Source: Banker Survey and Lehman U.S. Credit Index
(100) (50) 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Spread (bps)
BBB Private BBB U.S. Credit Difference
30
Source: Scotia Capital – DEX
SPREADS
31
Source: Banker Survey and Lehman U.S. Credit Index
5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
All-in-Coupon
BBB All-in-Coupon
32
Source: Scotia Capital – DEX
YIELDS
33
34
Source: Banker Survey
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 All-in-Coupon
BB All-in-Coupon B All-in-Coupon
35
Source: S&P
2 4 6 8 10 12 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 All-in-Coupon (%)
Pro-Rata B Institutional B
36
37
Plenty of performing companies. Specific sectors more vulnerable (i.e. homebuilding,
Structured finance market still working through issues. Caution exists in market, however, we see plenty of capital
Although spreads are wide, all-in-coupons are very
38
39