DESIGN BID BUILD CSD HDR Contractor Sub Sub Sub - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
DESIGN BID BUILD CSD HDR Contractor Sub Sub Sub - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
DESIGN BID BUILD CSD HDR Contractor Sub Sub Sub DESIGN-BID-BUILD Most common approach in the US Entirely sequential Can be single-prime or multi-prime District holds all contracts Cost is the only criteria for selection
DESIGN-BID-BUILD
Most common approach in the US Entirely sequential Can be single-prime or multi-prime District holds all contracts Cost is the only criteria for selection (low bid process)
OWNERS IN DESIGN-BID-BUILD
Selects the Architect, Inspector, Project Manager Serves as a single point of feedback during design Awards contact to low bid contractor Must oversee all contract relationships; active participation
ARCHITECT DESIGN-BID-BUILD
Prepares and interprets Plans and Specs Manages bid process(if not by owner) Provides some level of construction admin Approves/verifies pay requests and change orders
GC IN DESIGN-BID-BUILD
Coordinates subcontractors Delivers project at bid price Completes building on time
PROS OF DESIGN-BID-BUILD
Best understood Longest legal history Can produce highly competitive pricing; bottom line costs Auditors, attorneys, public officials are most comfortable
with this method
Default method for government; need special permission
to use other methods
Well suited to uncomplicated projects with straightforward
- bjectives and adequate time; owner knows what they will
get
Least personality driving of all the choices
CONS OF DESIGN-BID-BUILD
Inherently antagonistic Can create significant legal issues where unforeseen problems arise Lows bids can encourage high change orders Can be difficult for inexperienced contractors in constrained
environments
Owner liable for design errors and change orders Delay claims and disputes are common Guaranteed price late in process Can be dangerous for inexperienced owners Potential philosophical disconnect The books are closed. Profitability is the goal for the Contractors to
take advantage of “competitive process”
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER @ RISK SCHEDULE
Begin Design 30% Design Workshop CM@R RFQ and Selection CM@R Award Design - Estimate Construction Value; Construction Review;Value Engineering; Prepare Trade Bid Package 100% Design Completion Trade Bidding & Award by CM@R Award Trade Contracts Start Construction Complete Construction 6/1/13 7/18/13 9/18/13 11/18/13 1/15/13 2/1/14 6/1/13
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK
CSD HDR CM@R Sub Sub Sub
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER @ RISK
The CM assumes the financial risk for construction in
addition to consultation during design and construction
The selection is based on both cost and qualifications CM is involved at onset of design Separate bid packages and contracts for trades Possible fast tracking Ability to pre-purchase long lead items
OWNERS IN CM@RISK
Determines CM@R selection criteria and makes selection Negotiates the Guaranteed Maximum Price and CM@R
Incentives
Contracts with Building Trades
ARCHITECTS IN CM@RISK
Designs project according to Owner requirements Provides participatory feedback Prepares construction documents Acts as owners rep during construction
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER@ RISK
Works as a team member consulting during design and
construction
Keeps the architect informed on costs, schedule and
implications of alternative designs, systems, and materials used
Bids Trade packages and recommends Trade contracts Coordinates all work and completes project on time
PROS OF CM@RISK
Can work well for projects where early construction contractor
participation is desirable for coordination among trades
Complex scheduling addressed early Resolving challenging constructability issues early in the process Provides more certainty to the owner than design/build Clear schedule under control of CM@R Explicit design geared for various trades Suitable where facility must continue to operate during construction Pricing and cost model are developed along with design Owners gets to select designer and construction manager Opportunities for fast tracking
CONS OF CM@RISK
Architect and CM@R still have separate contractual relationships with
the owner and can be a source of conflict
Owner must invest equal degrees of control to both parties Needs to have the right mesh of personalities Project staff turnover can create problems Owners needs to have sufficient expertise to manage both CM@R and
Architect
DESIGN BUILD BID SCHEDULE
Begin Design 30% Design Workshop 100% Design Completion Advertise for Bids Open Bids Award Contract Start Construction Complete Construction 6/1/13 7/18/13 9/1/13 9/15/13 10/15/13 11/20/13 1/1/14 5/1/13