Human Factors at Level Crossings Results of questionaire UN-ECE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

human factors at level crossings results of questionaire
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Human Factors at Level Crossings Results of questionaire UN-ECE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Human Factors at Level Crossings Results of questionaire UN-ECE Group of Experts on Safety at Level Crossings Subgroup on Human factors: M. Cale - CogniTo G. Dinhobl - BB-Infrastruktur AG J. Grippenkoven - German Aerospace Center e.V. (DLR)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Human Factors at Level Crossings Results of questionaire

UN-ECE Group of Experts on Safety at Level Crossings Subgroup on Human factors:

  • M. Cale - CogniTo
  • G. Dinhobl - ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG
  • J. Grippenkoven - German Aerospace Center e.V. (DLR)

Geneva, 23.10.2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Content

  • Results of human factors - questionnaire
  • Conclusion
  • Next steps - establish a LC-model
  • Next steps – LCAD (Level Crossing Appreciation Device)
  • Outlook: future steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Schedule & Milestones

1. Review of (existing) studies: – Human Factors at level crossings – Psychological models 2. Model(s) for level crossing application, including a list about derived assumptions and hypotheses about human (mis-)behaviour at level crossings 3. Human Factors solutions  List of Tools existing tools and ‚theoretical‘ ones

  • 4. Suggestion(s) for further work/research: towards proving that our tools

work

Draft paper available

9/2014 1/2015 5/2015 5/2015

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Results of human factors - questionnaire

  • 24 feedbacks received
  • from 22 countries
  • not included here: issues on ‘survey of technology and technological solutions’

(see Section III-e of report of last meeting) – questions

  • Question # 38: LC layout
  • Question #39: railside protection equipment
  • Question #44: ITS-solutions
  • results by question:
slide-5
SLIDE 5

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

5 10 15 20 25

Failure & lack of risk awareness of driver/pedestrians Lack of care/distraction Education Legal Sun glare/weather condition Responsability Finance Failure of technology Speed road Drunk driving Miscalculation Fainting

Q1: What are the three main causes behind level crossing accidents in your country?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Q2: Does your country have any solutions and/or creative and innovative countermeasures to solve these problems?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

No Awareness campaign Removal / over-&underpass Obstacle detection devices Illusion at LC Presence of Police Technical measures 300mm STOP Line 2 m before track ‚snake‘ path for pedestrians Complete covering by long barriers Delay of closure of barrier Design rules LED lights Action plan Rumble strips Reduce width and number of lanes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Q3: Do you have any research studies or papers on human factors relating to the behaviour of road users around level crossings which you could share?

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

No Some (but not named) ILLUSION ON RAILWAY TRACK, 2012 Painting sleepers by yellow Train whistling Hoardings at LC Eric Schoene, TU Dresden Rumble strips E.C.Willeworth, 1978 RSSB: Improving behaviour at LC

slide-8
SLIDE 8

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Q4: Are there any educational programmes in your country that focus on the awareness of the road users concerning level crossings safety?

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

No General awareness campaign Schools/children "SieBabWe" (GeyseV) Strategy

slide-9
SLIDE 9

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Q5: Referring to the list of human factors at the start of this section E, has your country taken any action to improve safety at level crossings on the basis of these causative factors?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

No General awareness campaigns Visability improvement Wide angle LED Control by police Vertical signing for better attention Elastic plates instead of asphalt Rail side protection system (IE) Barrier Social advertising of the rules

slide-10
SLIDE 10

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Q6: Do you have any other comments?

5 10 15 20 25

No Education for road drivers and pedest... Expert group to identify solutions More Research, like illusions on LC Campaign ‚Stop and live‘

slide-11
SLIDE 11

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Results of questionnaire - conclusion (1): What did we get?

  • causes (Q1):

– lack of risk awareness – care(less) – distraction

  • solutions (Q2 & Q5):

– awareness – removal of LC – enhance visability! (site-specific & wide-angle LED lights)

  • research (Q3): only few existing
  • LC-educational programmes (Q4): often included in general awareness

campaigns

  • general (Q6): education
slide-12
SLIDE 12

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Observations from the survey results

– Human factors as priority area in level crossing accidents identified by all responses – Tools and solutions often have a technological focus and do not focus on human factors – Tools and solutions are often based on impressions of singular incidents and

  • …Not theory driven
  • …Not structured
  • … but by „trial & error“-method

Theories and models from the field of human factors can be used in order to describe the process of crossing a LX

slide-13
SLIDE 13

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Next Steps of LC-human factors subgroup

  • establish a LC-model (of human information procassing):

the basics / foundation of a ‘toolbox’

  • LC assessment device: the ‚toolbox‘
slide-14
SLIDE 14

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

establish a LC-model - useful models

  • Fast and Slow: Systems 1 and 2 (Kahnemann, 2011)
  • 3-Levels of performance (Rasmussen, 1983)
  • Model of information processing (Wickens &

Hollands, 1999)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

„Fast and Slow“: Systems 1 and 2 (Kahnemann, 2011) System 1 – „Fast“

  • Defining Characteristivs:

– Automatic – Effortless – Unconscious

  • No sense of voluntary

control

  • „Seeing and acting“

System 2 – „Slow“

  • Defining Characteristics

– Controlled mental process – Effortful – Deliberate and conscious

  • With Control or self-

awareness

  • „Reasoning and acting“
slide-16
SLIDE 16

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

The „Toolbox“ 1st draft

System 1 - Fast System 2 - Slow

slide-17
SLIDE 17

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

„3-Levels of performance“ (Rasmussen, 1983)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

System 1 – Fast System 2 - Slow Skill – based behavior Rule – based behavior Knowledge – based behavior

The „Toolbox“ 1st draft

slide-19
SLIDE 19

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Information processing (Wickens & Hollands, 1999)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Attention System 1 – Fast System 2 - Slow Skill – based behavior Rule – based behavior Knowledge – based behavior Sensory processing Perception Cognition Motivation Performance

The „Toolbox“ 1st draft

slide-21
SLIDE 21

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

LCAD

Level Crossing Appreciation Device The birth of a human factors tool box

28

slide-22
SLIDE 22

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

29

  • 1. Attention
  • 2. Perception
  • 3. Cognition
  • 4. Motivation
  • 5. Performance

Five groups of functions

LCAD

slide-23
SLIDE 23

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

30

  • 1. Attention

Monitoring the road Refraining from distracting activities (cell phones, GPS, radio, food, drink etc.) Influence of problematic factors (fatigue, alcohol, emotional state etc.) Factors competing for attention ( kids in car, advertisements, other vehicles, radio program etc. )

LCAD

slide-24
SLIDE 24

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

31

  • 2. Perception

Perception of signs, lights, markings and barriers Perception of distance, speed, changes in road etc. Perception of the behavior of other road users

LCAD

slide-25
SLIDE 25

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

32

  • 3. Cognition

Realizing that one is approaching a LX and what is expected Recognizing dangers and limitations Being able to predict occurrences and the behavior of

  • ther road users

Availability of knowledge relating to level crossings

LCAD

slide-26
SLIDE 26

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

33

  • 4. Motivation

Understanding dangers entailed Social pressure, current and/or local norms Self esteem Target risk Exaggerated feeling of control

LCAD

slide-27
SLIDE 27

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

34

  • 5. Performance

Ability to control the vehicle over the rails Choice of speed and distance from the curb Being able to choose when to stop Adaptation to road surface, visual clarity, opposing traffic etc.

LCAD

slide-28
SLIDE 28

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

35

Function ac 1 ac 2 ac 3 ac 4 ac 5 Attention X X Perception X X X Cognition X Motivation X X Performance X Accident Types

LCAD

slide-29
SLIDE 29

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

36

LCAD

Accident Driver History and Environment LX in accident direction /

  • pposite direction

Date of accident Fatigue indicator How many additional accidents are known from the past five years? What is the average speed 500 m before the lx ? Exact position File of driver Fatalities / injured / damage / damage to LX What is the average speed 250 m before? Season Does driver live close to lx? Is the setting urban or rural ? What is the average speed 150 m before? Time 00:00-06:00 07:00- 18:00 18:00-22:00 22:00-24:00 Age How many other accident were recorded during the past five years in a 2km radius ? What is the average speed 50 m before? Reason for trip Gender Estimate the number of vehicles passing lx daily How many meters before lx do you recognize it clearly ? Number of people in vehicle Years of Education What is the average speed in a 2km radius Are the required signs available ? Estimated speed of vehicle Driver’s explanation (if available) Estimate the number of accidents per vehicle in a 2km radius Are there additional or not standard signs ? Vehicle condition Estimate number of DUI per vehicle in a 2km radius How many signs are there in the 150 m before the lx ? Third party involvement What is the recommended speed at the LX ? How many signs are there in the 50 m before the lx ? Other Estimate enforcement/driven km in a 2km radius

slide-30
SLIDE 30

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Outlook: Future Steps of LC-human factors subgroup

Up to next meeting in January 2015

  • model:

to finish a model to identify and evaluate solutions for different LC-situations (accident investigation and LC planning) - as presented at spring meeting 2014

  • LCAD:

first steps with ‚Austrian accident investigation body‘ to get experience and first examples

slide-31
SLIDE 31

> Cale / Dinhobl / Grippenkoven – UN-ECE LC-expert group, human factors subgroup (23.10.2014, Geneva)

Thank you for your attention & your (future) support!