ho using l e g a l upda te da ng e ro us anima ls a nd
play

Ho using L e g a l Upda te : Da ng e ro us Anima ls a nd Bre e ds - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ho using L e g a l Upda te : Da ng e ro us Anima ls a nd Bre e ds Sc o tt Pa rrish Mo o re Anima ls Se rvic e Anima l E mo tio na l Suppo rt Anima l T he ra py Anima l Co mfo rt Anima l Co mpa nio n Anima ls Anima ls


  1. Ho using L e g a l Upda te : Da ng e ro us Anima ls a nd Bre e ds Sc o tt Pa rrish Mo o re

  2. Anima ls • Se rvic e Anima l • E mo tio na l Suppo rt Anima l • T he ra py Anima l • Co mfo rt Anima l • Co mpa nio n Anima ls

  3. Anima ls • Only o ne type o f a nima l de fine d in a ny fe de ra l sta tute "SE RVI CE ANI MAL "

  4. Wha t is a “se rvic e a nima l”? • “[A]ny do g tha t is individua lly tra ine d to do wo rk o r pe rfo rm ta sks fo r the b e ne fit o f a n individua l with a disa b ility, inc luding a physic a l, se nso ry, psyc hia tric , inte lle c tua l, o r o the r me nta l disa b ility.”

  5. Wha t is a “se rvic e a nima l”? • Only do g s – “Othe r spe c ie s o f a nima ls, whe the r wild o r do me stic , tra ine d o r untra ine d, a re no t se rvic e a nima ls fo r the purpo se s o f this de finitio n.”

  6. “Wo rk” o r “T a sks” • T he wo rk o r ta sks pe rfo rme d b y a se rvic e a nima l must b e dire c tly re la te d to the individua l´s disa b ility.

  7. DOE S NOTINCL UDE DOGS NE CE SSARY SOL E L Y F OR E MOT IONAL SUPPORT / COMF ORT / COMPANIONSHIP “T he c rime de te rre nt e ffe c ts o f a n a nima l´s pre se nc e a nd the pro visio n o f e mo tio na l suppo rt, we ll-b e ing , c o mfo rt, o r c o mpa nio nship do no t c o nstitute wo rk o r ta sks fo r the purpo se s o f this de finitio n.”

  8. Anima ls • No e xpre ss re fe re nc e to a nima ls in F HA o r HUD's re g ula tio ns • No e xpre ss re fe re nc e to a nima ls in Se c tio n 504 o r HUD's re g ula tio ns

  9. F a ir Ho using Ac t • "A re fusa l to ma ke re a so na b le a c c o mmo da tio ns in rule s, po lic ie s, pra c tic e s, o r se rvic e s, whe n suc h a c c o mmo da tio ns ma y b e ne c e ssa ry to a ffo rd suc h pe rso ns e q ua l o ppo rtunity to use a nd e njo y a dwe lling "

  10. Se c tio n 504 • "A re c ipie nt sha ll mo dify its ho using po lic ie s a nd pra c tic e s to e nsure tha t the se po lic ie s a nd pra c tic e s do no t disc rimina te , o n the b a sis o f ha ndic a p, a g a inst a q ua lifie d individua l with ha ndic a ps."

  11. "Assista nc e Anima ls" HUD's "Se rvic e a nd Assista nc e Anima ls fo r Pe o ple with Disa b ilitie s in Ho using a nd HUD-F unde d Pro g ra ms

  12. Assista nc e Anima ls • HUD Guida nc e – Diffe re nc e b e twe e n a "se rvic e a nima l" a nd "a ssista nc e a nima l" – Applic a b ility o f F HA, Se c tio n 504, a nd ADA – Guida nc e re g a rding e va lua ting re q ue sts fo r a nima ls in ho using

  13. Assista nc e Anima l • HUD Guida nc e – Ja nua ry 25, 2018 • De pa rtme nt c ivil litig a to rs a re pro hib ite d fro m using g uida nc e do c ume nts—o r no nc o mplia nc e with g uida nc e do c ume nts—to e sta b lish vio la tio ns o f la w in a ffirma tive c ivil e nfo rc e me nt a c tio ns.

  14. T hre e L a ws/ T hre e Ob lig a tio ns • HUD Guida nc e : • "I n situa tio ns whe re the ADA a nd the F HAc t/ Se c tio n 504 a pply (e .g ., a pub lic ho using a g e nc y, sa le s o r le a sing o ffic e s, o r ho using a sso c ia te d with a unive rsity o r o the r pla c e s o f e duc a tio n), ho using pro vide r must me e t the ir o b lig a tio ns unde r [a ll thre e la ws]"

  15. T hre e L a ws/ T hre e Ob lig a tio ns • I t ma tte rs b e c a use – De finitio n o f Disa b ility is diffe re nt – T ype o f a nima l re q uire d is diffe re nt – Ve rific a tio n pro c e dure s a re diffe re nt

  16. Assista nc e Anima l • HUD Guida nc e – "I t is a n a nima l tha t wo rks, pro vide s a ssista nc e , o r pe rfo rms ta sks fo r the b e ne fit o f a pe rso n with a disa b ility, o r pro vide s e mo tio na l suppo rt tha t a lle via te s o ne o r mo re ide ntifie d sympto ms o r e ffe c ts o f a pe rso n's disa b ility."

  17. Assista nc e Anima ls • I s this de finitio n a c c ura te ? – pe rfo rms wo rk, a ssista nc e , o r ta sks "fo r the b e ne fit o f a pe rso n with a disa b ility" – "a lle via te s o ne o r mo re ide ntifie d sympto ms o r e ffe c ts" o f the disa b ility • Do e s this write o ut "e q ua l o ppo rtunity"

  18. "Disa b ility" • All thre e la ws ha ve the sa me b a sic de finitio n: – A me nta l o r physic a l impa irme nt tha t sub sta ntia lly limits o ne o r mo re ma jo r life a c tivitie s

  19. "Disa b ility" • ADA a nd Se c tio n 504 ha ve sa me de finitio n a nd c o nstruc tio n – 2008 ADA/ Se c tio n 504 Ame ndme nt • Ove rturne d Supre me Co urt de c isio ns tha t re stric te d who is a pe rso n with a disa b ility • Co nstrue d in fa vo r o f b ro a d c o ve ra g e

  20. "Disa b ility" • Co ng re ss did no t a me nd the de finitio n o f disa b ility unde r the F HA – Sto we ll v. Ope n Do o r Missio n , 2017 WL 1380537 (D. Ne b . 2017) ("As the F HA de finitio n o f ha ndic a p wa s no t c o rre spo nding ly a me nde d whe n the a me ndme nts we re ma de to the ADA in 2008, pre -a me ndme nt ADA c a se s c o ntinue to g uide the inte rpre ta tio n o f F HA c a se s."

  21. "Disa b ility" • A pe rso n ma y b e e ntitle d to a n a nima l in fe de ra lly funde d pro pe rtie s b ut no t c o nve ntio na l • A pe rso n ma y b e e ntitle d to ha ve a "se rvic e a nima l" in the re nta l o ffic e b ut no t a s a re side nt o f the pro pe rty

  22. Ve rific a tio n • "Ho using pro vide rs a re to e va lua te a re q ue st fo r re a so na b le a c c o mmo da tio n to po sse ss a n a ssista nc e a nima l in a dwe lling using the g e ne ra l princ iple s a pplic a b le to a ll re a so na b le a c c o mmo da tio n re q ue sts."

  23. Ve rific a tio n "Do e s the pe rso n se e king to use a nd live with the a nima l ha ve a disa b ility– i.e . , a physic a l o r me nta l impa irme nt tha t sub sta ntia lly limits o ne o r mo re ma jo r life a c tivitie s? "

  24. Ve rific a tio n • HUD Guida nc e do e s no t disting uish b e twe e n the F HA a nd Se c tio n 504 • Sho uld it?

  25. Ve rific a tio n Ob vio us v. No t Ob vio us

  26. Ve rific a tio n • Who c a n pro vide it? – "the ho using pro vide r ma y a sk pe rso ns who a re se e king . . . a n a ssista nc e a nima l tha t pro vide s e mo tio na l suppo rt to pro vide do c ume nta tio n fro m a physic ia n, psyc hia trist, so c ia l wo rke r, o r o the r me nta l he a lth pro fe ssio na l . . ."

  27. "Ve rific a tio n" • Wha t c a n a ho using pro vide r a sk a b o ut Disa b ility? – I de ntify the disa b ility? – I de ntify the impa irme nt? – I de ntify ho w the impa irme nt sub sta ntia lly limits o ne o r mo re ma jo r life a c tivitie s? – I de ntify mitig a ting me a sure s?

  28. Ve rific a tio n • "A ho using pro vide r a lso ma y no t a sk a n a pplic a nt o r te na nt to pro vide a c c e ss to me dic a l re c o rds o r me dic a l pro vide rs o r pro vide de ta ile d o r e xte nsive info rma tio n o r do c ume nta tio n o f a pe rso n's physic a l o r me nta l impa irme nts." – I s this a c c ura te ? – Wha t do e s this me a n?

  29. "Ve rific a tio n" "Do e s the pe rso n ma king the re q ue st ha ve a disa b ility-re la te d ne e d fo r a n a ssista nc e a nima l? " "I n o the r wo rds, do e s the a nima l wo rk, pro vide a ssista nc e , pe rfo rm ta sks o r se rvic e fo r the b e ne fit o f a pe rso n with a disa b ility, o r pro vide e mo tio na l suppo rt tha t a lle via te s o ne o r mo re o f the ide ntifie d sympto ms o r e ffe c ts o f a pe rso n's e xisting disa b ility?

  30. What is “necessary”? It makes me feel better

  31. Re a so na b le • "the F HAc t a nd Se c tio n 504 re q uire the ho using pro vide r . . . to pe rmit a pe rso n with a disa b ility to live with a nd use a n a ssista nc e a nima l(s) in a ll a re a s o f the pre mise s whe re pe rso ns a re no rma lly a llo we d to g o . . ."

  32. Re a so na b le • Unre a so na b le if: – Wo uld impo se a n undue fina nc ia l a nd a dministra tive b urde n – Wo uld funda me nta lly a lte r the na ture o f the ho using pro vide r's se rvic e s

  33. Re a so na b le • Wha t is funda me nta l? – Pe a c e a nd q uite e njo yme nt – L e a se pro visio ns – Wha t e lse ?

  34. Re a so na b le • "the spe c ific a ssista nc e a nima l in q ue stio n po se s: – A dire c t thre a t to the he a lth a nd sa fe ty o f o the rs/ to c a use sub sta ntia l pro pe rty da ma g e to the pro pe rty o f o the rs – tha t c a nno t b e re duc e d o r e limina te d b y a no the r re a so na b le a c c o mmo da tio n

  35. Da ng e ro us Bre e ds "Bre e d, size , a nd we ig ht limita tio ns ma y no t b e a pplie d to a n a ssista nc e a nima l"

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend