Graphene Oxide Embedded Reverse Osmosis Membrane in Both Active and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

graphene oxide embedded reverse osmosis membrane in both
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Graphene Oxide Embedded Reverse Osmosis Membrane in Both Active and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Graphene Oxide Embedded Reverse Osmosis Membrane in Both Active and Support Layers Hee-Ro Chae 1 , Chung-Hak Lee 1,* , Pyung-Kyu Park 2 , In-Chul Kim 3 1 Seoul National University, Seoul , Republic of Korea 2 Yonsei University, Wonju,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Graphene Oxide Embedded Reverse Osmosis Membrane in Both Active and Support Layers

Hee-Ro Chae1, Chung-Hak Lee1,*, Pyung-Kyu Park2,

In-Chul Kim3

1 Seoul National University, Seoul , Republic of Korea 2 Yonsei University, Wonju, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea 3 Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • The key properties of a RO membrane
  • Water permeability, salt rejection,

anti-biofouling, chlorine resistance

  • Graphene oxide (GO)

: Numerous hydrophilic & negatively charged functional groups

  • Thin-film composite (TFC) membrane with GO

Introduction

2

RO: reverse osmosis MPD: m-phenylenediamine

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Notation of the TFC membranes

 TFC membrane with GO embedded in Active and/or Support layers  : TFC membrane  : S-GO-TFC membrane  : A-GO-TFC membrane : AS-GO-TFC membrane

GO GO GO GO

PSf PA

Notation

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

AS A S AS A S

Characterization of the TFC membranes

  • Most hydrophilic & negatively charged AS-GO-TFC membrane

 Numerous functional groups of GO

4

TFC TFC

(n=6) (n=3)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Surface roughness of the TFC membranes

  • Decrease of surface roughness with GO in active layer

Increase of surface roughness with GO in support layer

5

GO Concentration in MPD solution

(n = 9)

AS A S

TFC

AS A (∝GO Conc. in Active layer)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Water permeability of the TFC membranes (n = 3)

Hydrophilicity ↑ Roughness ↑

6

15.5 bar 2000 ppm NaCl, 30 min Aggregation of GO

  • Higher GO-affinity of the GO-support layer

 Higher dispersity of GO in active layer

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Anti-biofouling of the TFC membranes

  • CLSM images of the bacteria fouled on membranes

Green: bacteria

7

A-GO-TFC TFC S-GO-TFC AS-GO-TFC

CLSM: confocal laser scanning microscopy Cell attachment test at 37℃, 48 h

76 ppm GO in MPD solution

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Anti-biofouling of the TFC membranes

(n = 9)

Hydrophilicity

 Hydrophobic-hydrophobic interaction ↓

Negative surface zeta potential  Net negatively charged bacteria surface  Electrostatic repulsion ↑

8

AS A S TFC

slide-9
SLIDE 9

After Before

Chlorine Resistance of the TFC membranes

Hydrogen bonding between GO and PA  Impeding replacement of amidic hydrogen with chlorine GO nanosheets  Barrier against chlorine for underlying PA

9

(n = 3)

AS A S

Only GO in active layer was effective for chlorine resistance

TFC

In active layer 5000 ppm NaOCl, 16 h 2000 ppm NaCl, 15.5 bar 30 min

2000 ppm NaCl, 15.5 bar

1

30 min

1
slide-10
SLIDE 10

This research was supported by the Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2010-0029075) and the Convergence Technology Program funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (2015001640001).

Acknowledgment

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Thank you for your attention!