Fundamental symmetries studies with electron spectroscopy at FRIB l - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

fundamental symmetries studies with electron spectroscopy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Fundamental symmetries studies with electron spectroscopy at FRIB l - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 Fundamental symmetries studies with electron spectroscopy at FRIB l t t t FRIB Chi Chirality flipping interactions lit fli i i t ti Axial and tensor Fermi and scalar Tools: R B spectrometer p Cyclotron


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Fundamental symmetries studies with l t t t FRIB

1

electron spectroscopy at FRIB

Chi lit fli i i t ti

  • Chirality flipping interactions
  • Axial and tensor
  • Fermi and scalar
  • Tools:

R×B spectrometer p Cyclotron Radiation Emission Spectroscopy

  • Examples of other uses of beta spectroscopy:
  • Nuclear structure for 2 decays
  • Nuclear structure for 2 decays
  • Efficiency of some neutrino detectors

Alejandro Garcia

University of Washington

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fundamental symmetries studies with 6He

6He

0+

2

6Li

1+ Q~3.5 MeV

  • Simple decay (~100% to ground state)
  • Pure Gamow‐Teller decay
  • Half‐life ~1 sec → appropriate for trapping

pp p pp g

  • Large Q‐value → good for seeing effects of n
  • Noble gas → no worries about chemistry
  • Light nucleus → ab‐initio calculations

Compare to neutron:

  • No backgrounds from neutron captures
  • Pure GT transition (simpler decay, no polarization)

6He “little a”

  • P. Muller, A. Leredde

Argonne National Lab

6He “little b”

  • P. Muller, A. Leredde

Argonne National Lab

  • X. Fléchard, E. Liennard, LPC, CAEN, France
  • O. Naviliat-Cuncic, NSCL, MSU

A Knecht PSI Switzerland

  • A. Knecht, PSI, Switzerland
  • A. Hime, B. Vandebender, PNNL,
  • Y. Bagdasarova, A. Garcia, D. Hertzog, R. Hong, P.
  • A. Knecht, PSI, Switzerland
  • Y. Bagdasarova, A. Garcia, R. Hong, M. Sternberg, D.

Storm, H.E. Swanson, F. Wauters, D. Zumwalt University of Washington

  • Y. Bagdasarova, A. Garcia, D. Hertzog, R. Hong, P.

Kammel, J. Kofron, G. Rybka, M. Sternberg,

  • D. Storm, H.E. Swanson, F. Wauters, D.

Zumwalt University of Washington

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Now ~1010 atoms of 6He/s at Seattle via 7Li(d 3He)6He

3

Now 10 atoms of He/s at Seattle via Li(d, He) He

A K ht t l Most intense source of 6He in the world here at CENPA.

  • A. Knecht et al.

NIM A. 660, 43 (2011) Typical decay density is about 109 decays/s cm3… (Good neutron decay density i 1 d /

3)

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB is1 decay/s cm3)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

6He lifetime, ab-initio calculations, gA(nuclear)

4

 

2 2

1 V G

Several `ab initio’ calculations show agreement on matrix element at the

 

2 2

ˆ ) ( 1 i O f g K V G t E f

A ud F

i O f ˆ

With calculated and lifetime can extract gA

Several ab-initio calculations show agreement on matrix element at the few percent level:

Schiavilla & Wiringa PRC 65, 054302 (2002) Navratil & Ormand, PRC 68, 034305 (2003) Previn et al., PRC 76, 064319 (2007) Vaintraub et al., PRC 79, 065501 (2009)

But experimental situation was unclear.

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Knecht et al. ,

  • Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 122502 (2012);
  • Phys. Rev. C 86, 035506 (2012).

6He lifetime, ab-initio calculations, gA(nuclear)

  • We resolved the discrepancy.

Our result in combination with ab‐initio l l ti h th t t hi calculations shows that extraneous quenching is at most about 2%.

Now limited by theoretical uncertainty.

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Searches for Tensor currents.

6

Are nuclear weak decays carried only by W’s?

e+

Or chirality-flipping interactions?

d e+  d e+ e+

W

d u e+ e

?

u e

Lepto-Quark

u e

 

L e R T T R e L T T i f L e L A i f

e C C e C C e C H          

    

) ( ) ( 2

' ' 5 5

        

Finding these would be a

 

 

Decay rate:

   

2 2 2 '

2 Re

T T A

C C C b  

big deal

            

e e e e

E m b E p E p a dw dw

 

1

2 2 2 2 ' 2 2

2 3 1

T T A

C C C a    

2 ' 2 2

2

T T A

C C C  

2 ' 2 2

2 3

T T A

C C C  

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Electron and 6Li detected in coincidence

6He “little a”

  • P. Muller, A. Leredde

Argonne National Lab

7

  • Electron and 6Li detected in coincidence
  • E‐E scintillator system for electron (energy,

start of time‐of‐flight)

  • Micro‐channel plate for 6Li (position, TOF)
  • X. Fléchard, E. Liennard, LPC, CAEN, France
  • O. Naviliat-Cuncic, NSCL, MSU

A Knecht PSI S it erland

  • A. Knecht, PSI, Switzerland
  • Y. Bagdasarova, A. Garcia, R. Hong, M. Sternberg, D.

Storm, H.E. Swanson, F. Wauters, D. Zumwalt University of Washington

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Magneto‐Optical Trap

  • RF discharge in xenon/krypton to

excite into metastable state

  • Cycling on 1083 nm transition to slow

down and magneto‐optically trap

  • Based on experience from 6He, 8He

h di t b ANL charge radius measurements by ANL collaborators: L.‐B. Wang et al., PRL 93, 142501 (2004) P M ll l PRL 99 252501

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

  • P. Mueller et al., PRL 99, 252501

(2007)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Precision beta decay versus others: Can “precision” compete with “energy”? Yes

9

Can precision compete with energy ? Yes.

  • F. Wauters et al.

PRC 89, 025501 (2014)

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Detect little b 10 Is it possible to break the “b ~ 10-3 barrier” and reach into really interesting terrain?

            

e e e e

E m b E p E p a dw dw

 

1

2 ' 2 2

2 1 C C C   quadratic linear

2 ' 2 2

2 2 3 1

T T A T T A

C C C C C C a     

   

2 2 2 '

2 Re

T T A

C C C b  

2 ' 2 2

2

T T A

C C C b  

N b Ethres / 10 keV 200    

Can get stats with rates of about 104 Hz.

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Detect little b 11 Typical beta spectrometers work best with a `point’ source

From Knutson et al. submitted to PRC (Recent work on the shape of the beta shape of the beta spectrum of 14O.) Hard to apply this technique for 6He: Hard to apply this technique for 6He: presently we can load only ~1000 atoms in laser trap

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-12
SLIDE 12

R×B spectrometer for 6He (similar to idea being pursued by PERC): 12

B R B R p R D           cos 2 sin cos ) (

2 2 max

1  ) / ( 3 ) / ( Tesla B MeV pc

Existing device at PSI

100 kV platform

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Comparison of neutron to 6He shape measurement with R×B spectrometer 13

Parameter Neutron (PERC) 6He (CENPA) KeMax(MeV) 0.97 3.5 B3 (Tesla) 0.15 0.15 Effective decay rate (1/s) 106 105 T bl N Y Trappable No Yes Image size at p≈0 1×1 cm2 0.3×0.3 cm2

Systematic uncertainties:

  • Singles measurement: backgrounds? Looks ok.
  • Effects from unobserved backscattering? Looks ok
  • Effects from unobserved backscattering? Looks ok.
  • Non-trapped 6He? Looks manageable.
  • Trajectories in realistic configuration: any surprises? Needs more study

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

6He “little b”: Project 8 collaboration is aiming at detecting electrons from 3H decay.

P8 idea: Pick up cyclotron radiation

  • None of the usual problems of calorimetry: scattering, dead

layers, low resolution, etc…

  • Good linearity between cyclotron frequency and energy.
  • Excellent resolution

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

6He “little b”: Project 8 collaboration is aiming at detecting electrons from 3H decay.

P8 idea: Pick up cyclotron radiation Project 8 recently showed impressive lt f i l t results from a conversion electron source (Asner et al. arXiv:1408.5362)

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

6He “little b”: aiming for 10-4 with Project-8 like system

Intense production at CENPA (decay density up to about 109 decays/s cm3!) and 6He as gas make it well suited for P8-like approach. Pick up cyclotron radiation pp

Need larger guide (58x29 mm2 vs. 11x4 mm2)

  • -loose power prop to area
  • -but compensate due to higher energies

many alternative schemes to be considered

40 / 1 / 1   A P

 

2 2

1 B P   

  • -many alternative schemes to be considered

Isotope Decay t1/2 (days) Ee(keV)

Next: test with conversion lines at energies closer to 6He

sotope ecay t1/2 (days) e( e ) 131mXe IT 12 129,158,163 133mXe IT 2.2 233 Fundamental symmetries at FRIB 133Xe ‐ 5.3 346

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

6He “little b”: aiming for 10-4 with Project-8 like system

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

6He at CENPA summary:

Present and near future work (little a):

  • Several ongoing upgrades. Expect trapping about 1000 atoms with little bkgd.
  • Determination of apparatus parameters: E field, geometry, efficiencies, instabilities.

Present and near future work (little b):

  • Test “Project8-like” setup with higher energy conversion sources.
  • Put together similar system to detect betas in 200-900 keV range.
  • We would consider again the “R×B Spectrometer” idea if the above fails.

Goals 3 years: We would consider again the R B Spectrometer idea if the above fails. Goals 3 years: Determination of a to ~0.1%; R&D to determination of b. Determine b to ~10-3. Goals 6 years: Goals 6 years: Determine b to ~10-4.

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Examples of other applications of electron spectroscopy Benchmarks for 22 decays nuclear structure:

  • 22 decays

i l b t d

  • single beta decays
  • single electron capture decays

In 3 cases one can check all of the above for the same nucleus: good for understanding

  • verarching issues (role of p‐p,

p‐h correlations, deformation, etc...) We developed a device to determine the tiny EC branches.

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-20
SLIDE 20

We developed a device to determine the tiny EC branches using the radioactive beams available at IGISOL (JYFLTRAP).

20 Use ion trap for clean activity High-resolution Ge for x rays Scintillator for vetoing beta- decays

slide-21
SLIDE 21

100Tc EC decay: 116In EC decay:

21 y BR(EC) = (2.6±0.4)×10‐5 y BR(EC) = (2.3±0.6)×10‐4

Wrede et al., PRC 87, 032501 (2013).

  • S. Sjue, Thesis 2008;

Sjue et al., PRC 87, 032501 (2013).

Both of our results are consistent with complete ground state dominance: just using the ground state accounts for the measured dominance: just using the ground state accounts for the measured 2‐2decay rate

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Comparison with 2 different QRPA calculations

22

  • O. Moreno, R. Alvarez-Rodriguez, P.

Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra, F. Simkovic, A. Faessler ,

  • J. Phys. G 36, 015106 (2009)

Suhonen & Civitarese

  • Phys. Lett. B725, 753 (2013)

Our measurements

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

High resolution Auger spectroscopy would determine the efficiencies of solar pp neutrino detectors

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

High-resolution beta spectroscopy Perhaps FRIB would be the place for the most intense production of some gaseous molecular species or trapped ions that could be used for cyclotron-radiation detection in pure axial and pure Fermi decays to search for tensor and scalar currents. High-resolution Auger spectroscopy with ions of choice could help with spectroscopy relevant for neutrino physics (double beta decay, solar neutrinos).

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25 Backup slides

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Long range Short range

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-27
SLIDE 27

6He:

27

“recoil order”

       

   

  

f p r M f r C

WM V V

            2 ] [

… and radiative corrections.

    

     

l i g r i C M

A A

      5

Small and under control for 6He decay. y From theorists (Barry Holstein et al.): “no show stoppers”

Fundamental symmetries at FRIB

slide-28
SLIDE 28

We have already trapped ~500 atoms of 6He at UW!

28

Fundamental symmetries

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Precision beta decay versus pion and “LHC”: (Wauters et al.)

29

Fundamental symmetries with 6He

slide-30
SLIDE 30

MCPPSD (micro chanel plates with delay line anodes)

30

MCPs (micro channel plates) Delay line anodes

x X = c (tx1-tx2) tx2 tx1 5 polarization voltages: front MCP, back MCP, det. frame, anode ref, anode sig ( )

Fundamental symmetries with 6He

5 signals: charge emitted by MCPs, charge collected on anodes (x1,x2,y1,y2) p g , , , _ , _ g

slide-31
SLIDE 31

X&Y calibration:

31

  • Reconstruction with 2d order polynomial functions

Fundamental symmetries with 6He

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32 Detect little b. Betas in adiabatic motion in B: basic ideas

r B Flux  

2 2

constant sin ) 1   qB p r r B Flux    constant sin ) 1 

2) O bit l ti t d

constant sin2       B 

2) Orbital magnetic moment conserved:

 

constant 2 sin

2

       e r

3) A force F applied perpendicular to B generates a “drift velocity”:

2

) / ( B B e F u    

4) A solenoidal field with intensity varying as in the figure yields smaller pitch-angle betas, good for minimizing backscatter

Fundamental symmetries with 6He

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Comparison of neutron to 6He shape measurement with R×B spectrometer 33

Parameter Neutron 6He KeMax(MeV) 0.97 3.5 B3 (Tesla) 0 15 0 15 B3 (Tesla) 0.15 0.15 Effective decay rate (1/s) 106 105 Trappable No Yes

Backscattering front foil

Image size at p≈0 1×1 cm2 0.3×0.3 cm2

  • f a gas counter

Parameter Backscattered fraction (%) Ke(MeV)

Systematic uncertainties:

  • Singles measurement: backgrounds?
  • Effects from unobserved backscattering?

e(

) 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.07

  • Effects from unobserved backscattering?
  • Non-trapped 6He?
  • Trajectories in realistic configuration: any

surprises?

0.3 0.03 0.5 0.01 1.0 0.002 Fundamental symmetries with 6He

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Fundamental symmetries with 6He

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Trapping of 6He

35

  • RF discharge in xenon/krypton to excite

into metastable state

  • Cycling on 1083 nm transition to

transversely cool, slow down and trap magneto‐optically

  • Trapped atoms transferred to detection

chamber with 2nd MOT

  • Based on experience from 6He, 8He charge

radius measurements by ANL collaborators:

L.‐B. Wang et al., PRL 93, 142501 (2004) P Mueller et al PRL 99 252501 (2007) Fundamental symmetries with 6He

  • P. Mueller et al., PRL 99, 252501 (2007)
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Detection systems

36 E‐E scintillator system for electron detection (energy, start of time‐of‐flight) Micro‐channel plate d f detector for detection of 6Li recoil nucleus (position, time‐of‐

Fundamental symmetries with 6He

(p , flight)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Systematic uncertainties on little a (from MC simulations).

37 a/x (a/x)/a x a/a Z‐Position

<‐3e‐4 /0.1mm <0.1%/0.1mm z = 0.1 mm 0.1%

Timing (res)

‐7e‐4/1ns 0.2%/1ns = 1.0 ns 0.2%

MCP: mask

‐0.02 /mm 6.5%/mm r = 15 m 0.1%

for radius cut MCP: position 1.5e‐3 / mm

0.3%/mm pos = 0.3 mm 0.1%

Beta threshold

2e‐4/ 10 keV 0.065%/ 10 keV Th = 15 keV 0.1%

E Fi ld

1e 4/V 0 03%/V V 1 V 0 03%

E‐Field Stability

1e‐4/V 0.03%/V V = 1 V 0.03%

Total

0.3%

Fundamental symmetries with 6He