symmetries
play

Symmetries: Symmetries Explain . . . Symmetries Explain . . . A - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Symmetry: a . . . Basic Symmetries: . . . Basic Nonlinear . . . Symmetries: Symmetries Explain . . . Symmetries Explain . . . A General Approach to What Else We Do in . . . Integrated Uncertainty First Example: . . . Second Example: . . .


  1. Symmetry: a . . . Basic Symmetries: . . . Basic Nonlinear . . . Symmetries: Symmetries Explain . . . Symmetries Explain . . . A General Approach to What Else We Do in . . . Integrated Uncertainty First Example: . . . Second Example: . . . Management Towards an Optimal . . . Title Page Vladik Kreinovich 1 , 2 , Hung T. Nguyen 2 , 3 , ◭◭ ◮◮ and Songsak Sriboonchitta 2 ◭ ◮ 1 University of Texas at El Paso, USA, vladik@utep.edu Page 1 of 29 2 Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Thailand 3 New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, USA Go Back hunguyen@nmsu.edu Full Screen Close Quit

  2. Symmetry: a . . . 1. Symmetry: a Fundamental Property of the Physi- Basic Symmetries: . . . cal World Basic Nonlinear . . . Symmetries Explain . . . • One of the main objectives of science: prediction. Symmetries Explain . . . • Basis for prediction: we observed similar situations in What Else We Do in . . . the past, and we expect similar outcomes. First Example: . . . • In mathematical terms: similarity corresponds to sym- Second Example: . . . metry , and similarity of outcomes – to invariance. Towards an Optimal . . . Title Page • Example: we dropped the ball, it fall down. ◭◭ ◮◮ • Symmetries: shift, rotation, etc. ◭ ◮ • In modern physics: theories are usually formulated in Page 2 of 29 terms of symmetries (not diff. equations). Go Back • Natural idea: let us use symmetry to describe uncer- Full Screen tainty as well. Close Quit

  3. Symmetry: a . . . 2. Basic Symmetries: Scaling and Shift Basic Symmetries: . . . Basic Nonlinear . . . • Typical situation: we deal with the numerical values of Symmetries Explain . . . a physical quantity. Symmetries Explain . . . • Numerical values depend on the measuring unit. What Else We Do in . . . • Scaling: if we use a new unit which is λ times smaller, First Example: . . . numerical values are multiplied by λ : x → λ · x . Second Example: . . . Towards an Optimal . . . • Example: x meters = 100 · x cm. Title Page • Another possibility: change the starting point. ◭◭ ◮◮ • Shift: if we use a new starting point which is s units ◭ ◮ before, then x → x + s (example: time). Page 3 of 29 • Together, scaling and shifts form linear transforma- Go Back tions x → a · x + b . Full Screen • Invariance: physical formulas should not depend on Close the choice of a measuring unit or of a starting point. Quit

  4. Symmetry: a . . . 3. Basic Nonlinear Symmetries Basic Symmetries: . . . Basic Nonlinear . . . • Sometimes, a system also has nonlinear symmetries. Symmetries Explain . . . • If a system is invariant under f and g , then: Symmetries Explain . . . – it is invariant under their composition f ◦ g , and What Else We Do in . . . – it is invariant under the inverse transformation f − 1 . First Example: . . . Second Example: . . . • In mathematical terms, this means that symmetries Towards an Optimal . . . form a group . Title Page • In practice, at any given moment of time, we can only ◭◭ ◮◮ store and describe finitely many parameters. ◭ ◮ • Thus, it is reasonable to restrict ourselves to finite- Page 4 of 29 dimensional groups. Go Back • Question (N. Wiener): describe all finite-dimensional groups that contain all linear transformations. Full Screen • Answer (for real numbers): all elements of this group Close are fractionally-linear x → ( a · x + b ) / ( c · x + d ) . Quit

  5. Symmetry: a . . . 4. Symmetries Explain the Basic Formulas of Differ- Basic Symmetries: . . . ent Uncertainty Formalisms: Neural Networks Basic Nonlinear . . . Symmetries Explain . . . • What needs explaining: formula for the activation func- Symmetries Explain . . . tion f ( x ) = 1 / (1 + e − x ). What Else We Do in . . . • A change in the input starting point: x → x + s . First Example: . . . • Reasonable requirement: the new output f ( x + s ) equiv- Second Example: . . . alent to the f ( x ) mod. appropriate transformation. Towards an Optimal . . . Title Page • Reminder: all appropriate transformations are frac- tionally linear. ◭◭ ◮◮ • Conclusion: f ( x + s ) = a ( s ) · f ( x ) + b ( s ) ◭ ◮ c ( s ) · f ( x ) + d ( s ) . Page 5 of 29 • Differentiating both sides by s and equating s to 0, we Go Back get a differential equation for f ( x ). Full Screen • Its known solution is the above activation function – Close which can thus be explained by symmetries. Quit

  6. Symmetry: a . . . 5. Symmetries Explain the Basic Formulas of Differ- Basic Symmetries: . . . ent Uncertainty Formalisms: Fuzzy Logic Basic Nonlinear . . . Symmetries Explain . . . • Main quantity: certainty degree a = d ( S ). Symmetries Explain . . . • One way to define d ( S ) is by polling n experts and What Else We Do in . . . taking the fraction a = m/n of those who believe in S . First Example: . . . • To make this estimate more accurate, we can go beyond Second Example: . . . top experts and ask n ′ other experts as well. Towards an Optimal . . . Title Page • In the presence of top experts, other experts may ◭◭ ◮◮ – either remain shyly silent – or shyly confirm the majority’s opinion. ◭ ◮ • In the first case, the degree reduces from a = m/n to Page 6 of 29 a ′ = m/ ( n + n ′ ), i.e., to a ′ = λ · a , where λ = n/ ( n + n ′ ). Go Back • In the second case, a changes to a ′ = ( m + m ′ ) / ( n + m ′ ) Full Screen – a linear transformation. Close • In general, we get all linear transformations. Quit

  7. Symmetry: a . . . 6. Symmetries Explain the Basic Formulas of Differ- Basic Symmetries: . . . ent Uncertainty Formalisms: Fuzzy Logic (cont-d) Basic Nonlinear . . . Symmetries Explain . . . • Fact: we can describe the degree of certainty d ( S ) in a Symmetries Explain . . . statement S : What Else We Do in . . . – either by its own degree of certainty, First Example: . . . – or by a degree of certainty in, say, S & S 0 for some Second Example: . . . statement S 0 . Towards an Optimal . . . Title Page • Reasonable to require: the corresponding transforma- tion d ( S ) → d ( S & S 0 ) is appropriate. ◭◭ ◮◮ • Conclusion: the transformation d ( S ) → d ( S & S 0 ) is ◭ ◮ fractionally linear. Page 7 of 29 • Results: this conclusion explains many empirically ef- Go Back ficient t-norms and t-conorms. Full Screen • Comment: many other uncertainty-related formulas Close can also be similarly explained. Quit

  8. Symmetry: a . . . 7. What Else We Do in This Paper Basic Symmetries: . . . Basic Nonlinear . . . • We have shown: basic uncertainty-related formulas can Symmetries Explain . . . be explained in terms of symmetries. Symmetries Explain . . . • We show: many other aspects of uncertainty can be What Else We Do in . . . explained in terms of symmetries: First Example: . . . – heuristic and semi-heuristic approaches can be jus- Second Example: . . . tified by appropriate natural symmetries, and Towards an Optimal . . . Title Page – symmetries can help in designing optimal algorithms. ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ Page 8 of 29 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  9. Symmetry: a . . . 8. First Example: Practical Need for Uncertainty Prop- Basic Symmetries: . . . agation Basic Nonlinear . . . Symmetries Explain . . . • Practical problem: we are often interested in the quan- Symmetries Explain . . . tity y which is difficult to measure directly. What Else We Do in . . . • Solution: First Example: . . . – estimate easier-to-measure quantities x 1 , . . . , x n which Second Example: . . . are related to y by a known algorithm y = f ( x 1 , . . . , x n ); Towards an Optimal . . . Title Page – compute � y = f ( � x 1 , . . . , � x n ) based on the estimates � x i . ◭◭ ◮◮ • Fact: estimates are never absolutely accurate: � x i � = x i . ◭ ◮ • Consequence: the estimate � y = f ( � x 1 , . . . , � x n ) is differ- Page 9 of 29 ent from the actual value y = f ( x 1 , . . . , x n ). Go Back def • Problem: estimate the uncertainty ∆ y = � y − y . Full Screen Close Quit

  10. Symmetry: a . . . 9. Propagation of Probabilistic Uncertainty Basic Symmetries: . . . Basic Nonlinear . . . • Fact: often, we know the probabilities of different val- Symmetries Explain . . . ues of ∆ x i . Symmetries Explain . . . • Example: ∆ x i are independent normally distributed What Else We Do in . . . with mean 0 and known st. dev. σ i . First Example: . . . • Monte-Carlo approach: Second Example: . . . Towards an Optimal . . . – For k = 1 , . . . , N times, we: Title Page ∗ simulate the values ∆ x ( k ) according to the known i ◭◭ ◮◮ probability distributions for x i ; ∗ find x ( k ) x i − ∆ x ( k ) ◭ ◮ = � i ; i ∗ find y ( k ) = f ( x ( k ) 1 , . . . , x ( k ) n ); Page 10 of 29 ∗ estimate ∆ y ( k ) = y ( k ) − � y . Go Back – Based on the sample ∆ y (1) , . . . , ∆ y ( N ) , we estimate Full Screen the statistical characteristics of ∆ y . Close Quit

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend