from galaxy formation to kinematics
play

From Galaxy Formation to Kinematics christopher erick moody In - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

From Galaxy Formation to Kinematics christopher erick moody In collaboration with: Joel Primack, Aaron Romanowsky, Greg Novak and TJ Cox. SAURON / ATLAS 3D Fast rotator Anisotropy diagram rotation= Fas Slow rotator Slo


  1. From Galaxy Formation to Kinematics christopher erick moody In collaboration with: Joel Primack, Aaron Romanowsky, Greg Novak and TJ Cox.

  2. SAURON / ATLAS 3D Fast rotator Anisotropy diagram “rotation”= Fas λ Slow rotator Slo ellipticit =“projected shape” • Fast rotators are above the isotropic, oblate rotator line • Slow rotators are not scaled-down fast rotators • More massive • Round, have ϵ ~ 0.0-0.2 How do slow rotators form? (Emsellem et al. 2011)

  3. Simulated Binary Mergers • Simulated binary mergers and remergers with varying mass ratios, initial conditions, and orbital parameters at high resolution • Form galaxies with λ <0.1, λ but are far too elongated ϵ =0.0-0.4 ϵ → Do not form slow & round rotators in binary simulations (Bois et al. 2011)

  4. Simulated Multiple Repeated mergers • Bournaud et al. 2007 simulated 10 1:10 mergers, 5 1:5 mergers, etc. • Multiple mergers decrease remnant v/ σ , form rounder f v/ σ o r e remnants b m • Results are independent of mass u n g ratio; only dependent on remnant n i s a s mass e r e r c g n r e I m 0.1 ellipticity → Did not reach slow or round rotators, but there is a trend towards slow/round with multiple mergers (Bournaud et al. 2007)

  5. Simulations: Progenitors Model spiral galaxies • All late-type galaxy models • Designed to model SDSS galaxies • D, Y, Z series are bulgeless • G3, G2, G1, G0 in order of f gas descending mass • G3 also a gas fraction series • G3BL is a G3 without a bulge (not shown) • Sbc series have small bulges log stellar mass (B/D ∝ size of blue circle) → Progenitors cover a range of gas fractions (‘gf’) and mass ranges, and may be bulgeless (‘BL’)

  6. Schematic: Assembly Binary mergers Sequential mergers Remergers • Two progenitors • Either G2 or G1 • Either G2 or G1 • Minor, major • Either 4 or 8 • Also, 4 and 8 mergers overlapping major+ progenitors • R peri , ϵ , • Every merger a is minor mergers always a remerger Randomly chosen initial orientations, Cosmologically- impact parameters. Idealized simulations. motivated orbits. Not statistical.

  7. With increasing gas fraction: faster rotators, higher ellipticity rotation - Increasing gas fraction λ dispersio n- supporte round elongate ellipticit

  8. Binary Mergers: Orbital Variations λ ellipticit • Varying orbital initial conditions: • Spin (pro/retrograde), varying pericenter, orbital ellipticities • Only specially constructed initial zero angular momentum case is a slow rotator - but quite elongated

  9. Multiple mergers: Major vs. minor Major (re)mergers Minor (sequential) mergers λ λ ellipticit ellipticit • Both sets of simulations have same number of identical progenitors • Multiple minor merger remnants are slower and rounder

  10. Misalignments • Fast rotators ~5° • Slow rotators 0°-90° λ SAURO photometric- kinemetric • SAURON and simulations in good agreement (Emsellem et al. 2007)

  11. Kinematic Classification • ATLAS 3D finds kinematically decoupled Slow cores and other non regular rotators with high frequency in their slow rotator sample • How do these features arise? • 82% Fast Rotators • 17% Slow Rotators, many with either KDC Fast or CRC features ATLAS 3D Kinematic Classification (Krajnovi ć et al. 2011)

  12. Polar orbits yield fast rotators but also KDCs Face on velocity • Polar orbits impart significant Fiducial momentum out of the plane of the progenitor galaxy Fiducial Polar0 Polar0

  13. Sequential Merger KDCs 4xG2 Face-on 8xG1 Face-on Velocity Velocity X/R e fg X/R e fg X/R e fg X/R e fg • Small-scale KDCs present in many velocity maps for sequential series • Major mergers result in a more disrupted remnant kinematic structure

  14. Overall kinematic twist incidences t i b r o r a l o m p u y t l n l a e t m o t o m y r r a a l u n g n i b a l a i t i n i o r e z e l p i t l u m • Multiple mergers have KT rates of 20%-90% • Binary mergers have KT <30% , with exceptions

  15. Conclusions • Binary mergers generically form fast rotators • Slow rotators are in general not formed in dissipational binary major mergers. The exceptions depend on unique initial conditions: } still quite • Bulgeless galaxies that are essentially dry mergers • Zero initial angular momentum elongated • Sequential multiple mergers can form round slow rotators • Kinematic twists much more prevalent in polar orbits and slow rotators

  16. Overall Trends (averaged over all projections) < λ y r a n i b e l p i t l u m

  17. Multiple Mergers Semi-analytic model SDSS mass function predictions 10 E fg ective number Numbe of r progenito density rs stellar mass log stellar mass • Spiral progenitors are at least 1:10 stellar mass ratio • E fg ective number of progenitors is mass-weighted • Semi-analytic models predict that the most massive systems form by multiple mergers • Multiple, minor mergers are a relevant scenario (Left: Bell et al. 2003, Right: de Lucia et al. 2006)

  18. Title • (Cites)

  19. Simulation parameters Extra (Covington 2008, Cox 2004, Cox et al. 2006)

  20. Simulation parameters Extra (Covington 2008, Cox 2004, Cox et al. 2006)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend