accretion buoyancy and chaos abcs of galaxy formation
play

Accretion, Buoyancy, and Chaos: ABCs of Galaxy Formation Ben Keller - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Accretion, Buoyancy, and Chaos: ABCs of Galaxy Formation Ben Keller Universitt Heidelberg Diederik Kruijssen, James Wadsley, Samantha Benincasa, Hugh Couchman, Liang Wang Outfmows, Buoyancy, and Chaos: OBCs of Galaxy Formation Ben Keller


  1. Accretion, Buoyancy, and Chaos: ABCs of Galaxy Formation Ben Keller Universität Heidelberg Diederik Kruijssen, James Wadsley, Samantha Benincasa, Hugh Couchman, Liang Wang

  2. Outfmows, Buoyancy, and Chaos: OBCs of Galaxy Formation Ben Keller Universität Heidelberg Diederik Kruijssen, James Wadsley, Samantha Benincasa, Hugh Couchman, Liang Wang

  3. MUGS2: 18 L* Galaxies ● Cosmological zoom-in simulations, run using GASOLINE2 (Wadsley+ 2017), in a WMAP3 cosmology ● Initial conditions identical to MUGS (Stinson+ 2010), run with “classic” SPH and blast-wave feedback ● Virial Masses range from 3.7x10 11 to 2.1x10 12 M sun ● Variety of merger histories, spin parameters ● 320pc softening, baryon mass resolution of 2.2x10 5 M sun Keller+ 2016

  4. MUGS2: 18 L* Galaxies Keller+ 2016

  5. Feedback Models Matter! ● 4 test cases: ● g1536 – No Feedback – 8x10 11 M sun virial mass – Blastwave (Stinson+ 2006) – Last major merger at z=4 feedback – Equal SN energy for Blastwave – Superbubble Feedback and Superbubble – Superbubble Feedback 2X Energy – Details in Keller+ 2015 Keller+ 2015

  6. Superbubble Feedback ● Hot bubble is heated by multiple SN ● As bubble expands, forms a cold & radiative shell ● Shell is evaporated by thermal conduction ∂ M B ∂ t = 4 πμ 5 / 2 A B κ 0 T 25 k B Keller+ 2014

  7. Correct Stellar Mass, Small Bulge Stellar Mass Halo Mass Flat rotation curve == no major bulge component Stellar Mass Evolution (B/T ratio of 0.09 vs. 0.46, Matches Behroozi+ 2012 MW B/T ~0.14) abundance matching Keller+ 2015

  8. Superbubbles drive outfmows well Keller+ 2015

  9. High-z outfmows prevent bulges, preserve disks Keller+ 2015

  10. High-z outfmows prevent bulges, preserve disks Disk Forming Gas Bulge Forming Gas Keller+ 2015

  11. Can Supernovae do it all? Moster+ 2010

  12. Can Supernovae do it all? Moster+ 2010

  13. Can Supernovae do it all? Moster+ 2010

  14. Can Supernovae do it all? Stellar Mass (10 11 M sun ) Halo Mass (10 12 M sun ) Answer: No! Keller+ 2016

  15. Mass loading has universal scaling ● Mass-loading begins to fall from ~10 when disc is Mass Loading ~10 10 M sun , halo is ~2x10 11 M sun to << 1 in halos above ~10 12 M sun ● SDSS observations fjnd powerful AGN kick in here! Disc Mass ● Dubois+ 2015 simulations found AGN regulation began at 280 km/s bulge v esc at high z Keller+ 2016

  16. How Gas Moves Through the CGM ● Do outfmows escape the halo? – Wind vs. Fountain ● Are they driven by energy, momentum, or something else? ● How does accreted material interact with outfmowing material?

  17. What Governs CGM Flow? ● Physics at work ● Critical Timescales – Energy/Momentum – Cooling t cool injected by FB – Gravitational Freefall t f – Gravity/Accretion Shock – Brunt-Väisälä t buouy – Hydrodynamic Drag – Radiative Cooling – Buoyancy Feedback Cooling ● Buoyancy can add OR remove radial momentum! Drag Gravity

  18. What Governs CGM Flow? ● Physics at work ● Critical Timescales – Energy/Momentum – Cooling t cool injected by FB – Gravitational Freefall t f – Gravity/Accretion Shock – Brunt-Väisälä t buouy – Hydrodynamic Drag – Radiative Cooling – Buoyancy ● Buoyancy can add OR remove radial momentum!

  19. Buoyancy is all about Entropy! “Entropy” Entropy − 2 / 3 Δ S =Δ ln ( K ) K = k B T n Brünt-Väisälä Frequency Schwarzchild Criterion ω= √ ∂ S 3 ∂ r > 0 5 ∇ ϕ∇ S Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  20. Buoyancy determines fmow direction Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  21. Entropy-Driven Fountains Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  22. EoM for Entropy-Driven Fountains Drag Buoyancy r =∇ ϕ ¨ Gravity Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  23. Can We Derive the Entropy of a SB? Superbubble Density − 3 L 38 − 3 cm 6 / 35 n 0 19 / 35 t 7 − 22 / 35 n SB = 9.6 ∘ 10 Superbubble Temperature Superbubble Radius T SB = 10 μ m p 1 / 5 n 0 − 1 / 5 t 7 3 / 5 Lt R SB = 267 pc L 38 33 k B m SB Weaver+ 1977, Mac Low & McCray 1988

  24. Superbubble Entropy Entropy at breakout (R~h) 26 / 36 h 2 / 63 n 0 − 14 / 63 2 ( K SB = 5.84 keV cm 267 pc ) L 38 Halo Entropy 2 ( 12 M sun ) 2 / 3 M vir K vir = 30.06 keV cm 10 Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  25. Integrating the Buoyant EoM

  26. Buoyant Outfmows Recycle Slowly! Entropy-Driven Energy-Driven Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  27. Buoyancy determines recycling time

  28. A “Reproducibility Crisis” In Numerical Astrophysics? Monya Baker, Nature News, 2016

  29. How Sensitive Are Galaxy Properties to Small Perturbations? ● N-Body Chaos ● Infjnitesimal Initial Condition Perturbations ● Random Number Generator seeds ● Poisson Noise ● Floating Point Roundof

  30. Chaos Rules Everything Around Me Laskar & Gastineau 2009

  31. Chaos is Important in Protoplanetary Discs: Why Not Galactic Discs? Hofgmann+ 2017

  32. Chaos is Universal! Isolated Dwarf Galaxy Cosmological MW Zoom Difgerence in Stellar Mass Between Runs ● All codes ● All subgrid feedback models ● All initial conditions ● See also Genel+ 2018 Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  33. Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  34. Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  35. Feedback & Gas Exhaustion Constrain Stochasticity No Feedback: Feedback: Gas Exhaustion Self-Regulation Variance in Stellar Mass Time Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  36. Starbursts & Mergers Pump Chaos Merger Isolated/ Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  37. T emporal ~ Numerical Stochasticity Stellar Surface Density Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  38. T emporal ~ Numerical Stochasticity Run-to-Run Step-to-Step Variation Variation Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  39. What does “simulation” mean? Model 1 Model 2 n o i t a l u Final m i Initial S State Conditions Confjguration Space Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  40. What does “simulation” mean? Model 1 Model 2 n o i Final t a l u State a m i Initial S Conditions Final State b Confjguration Space Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  41. What does “simulation” mean? Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  42. What does “simulation” mean? Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  43. Read My Papers Here :) Conclusions ● Highly mass-loaded outfmows, especially at high-z, are essential to forming realistic L* galaxies – These outfmows cannot be driven by SN alone in halos more massive than 10 12 M sun ● Entropy-driven winds, driven by buoyancy, behave quite diferently than ballistic outfmows – Gentle acceleration, low velocities – Long recycling times – Halo entropy exceeds superbubble entropy near 10 12 M sun , halting outfmows ● Galaxy evolution involves chaotic physics: small-scale stochasticity can pump large-scale changes

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend