Flexural Failure of Ice - What we have Learnt from Confederation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

flexural failure of ice what we have learnt from
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Flexural Failure of Ice - What we have Learnt from Confederation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Flexural Failure of Ice - What we have Learnt from Confederation Bridge T.G. Brown - Department of Civil Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary. - IFN Engineering Ltd. Outline Confederation Bridge and Ice


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Flexural Failure of Ice - What we have Learnt from Confederation Bridge

T.G. Brown

  • Department of Civil Engineering,

Schulich School of Engineering, University

  • f Calgary.
  • IFN Engineering Ltd.
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

— Confederation Bridge and Ice in Northumberland Strait. — The monitoring programme. — Ice force measurement. — Observations related to flexural failure. — Flexural failure loads, measurements and predictions. — Sidebar – ridges. — Conclusions.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Confederation Bridge

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Confederation Bridge

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Confederation Bridge

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Ice in Northumberland Strait

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ice in Northumberland Strait

Synthetic Aperture Radar Image of Ice in Northumberland Strait, 1988.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Typical Ice Conditions

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why is Confederation Bridge a good site for ice observations?

  • Ice is present for 100 to 120 days every year
  • Each pier “sees” something like 3000 km of ice a year.
  • Which means that each pier encounters something of

the order of 9000 ridges a year.

  • Ice floe diameters typically to 2 km but we have seen
  • ne floe measuring 5 km by 8 km
  • Level ice thicknesses to about 1 meter
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Why is Confederation Bridge a good site for ice observations?

  • Ice speeds have been measured to 1.6 m/sec
  • Ice is wind and tidal current driven, hence

much pressure in plane of ice cover

  • Ridge keel depths have been measured to 16

m.

  • Consolidated ice thicknesses measured to 2.5

m.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Monitoring Programme Elements

  • Ice forces were the controlling lateral load condition
  • Bridge designed to a Beta factor of 4.25 for single path load

systems – annual probability of failure of ~10-7

  • Uncertainty regarding design ice forces:

– Estimates ranged from 16 to 33 MN for unfactored 100-year design force!!

  • So:

– Measure ice forces – Measure ice pressures – Observe behaviour of ice against piers – Measure related ice and environmental parameters

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Measurements

  • Confederation Bridge, we measure:

– Tilt response of piers, and – Acceleration response of piers

  • Advantages:

– Highly accurate – Dynamic sensitivity

  • Disadvantages:

– Response contaminated by structure response to ice and other dynamic load effects – Attenuation of tiltmeter signal at frequencies >2 Hz

– How to calibrate? – Measure pressures – View interactions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Kinematic Instrumentation

Biaxial Tiltmeter Accelerometers

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Ice pressures

  • 14m
  • 10m
  • 9m
  • 5m
  • 1.575m

0m 1.575m Each Panel 1m by 2m (Typ.) Cone Panels Tapered to Match Conical Surface

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Behaviour

  • Closed-Circuit TV
  • Time-lapse recording
  • Focus on two piers
  • Initially analogue
  • Now digital
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Kinematic Instrumentation

Sensor Locations +24.56m +3.20m 10.0 m. 4.0 m

52° 78°

Group 4 Spare Group 3 Sensor Locations +24.56m +3.20m 10.0 m. 4.0 m

52° 78°

Group 4 Spare Group 3

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Calibration

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Calibration

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Then the rope broke!

  • Video taken during the pull test in 1997

showing the rope breaking.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

And we got:

  • 0.1
  • 0.08
  • 0.06
  • 0.04
  • 0.02

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 135 140 145 150 155 160

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Ice Flexural Behaviour

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Flexural failure

  • Analysis of video imagery

– Rubble piles and ride-up – Extent of both phenomena – Dynamics of rubble pile

  • Analysis of cone panel data

– Circumferential distribution – Slope distribution

  • Analysis of load traces

– Actual loads – Dynamics of loads

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Rubble Piles

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Ride-Up

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Maximum ride-up

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Rubble under ice sheet