FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD FOOD STORAGE FACILITY FLOODING BANK Erik - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

flagstaff family food
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD FOOD STORAGE FACILITY FLOODING BANK Erik - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD FOOD STORAGE FACILITY FLOODING BANK Erik Henricksen, Elena Smith, Garrett Ribas, and Meshal Alotaibi Client: Joshua Spears TA: Dr. Wilbert Odem 1 BACKGROUND Figure 1: Food Bank Front Entrance Problem Statement Food


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD BANK

FOOD STORAGE FACILITY FLOODING

Erik Henricksen, Elena Smith, Garrett Ribas, and Meshal Alotaibi Client: Joshua Spears TA: Dr. Wilbert Odem

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

BACKGROUND

Problem Statement – Food Bank is experiencing significant flooding at the entrance of the building. Purpose – Find a solution which will alleviate the flooding.

2 Figure 1: Food Bank Front Entrance

slide-3
SLIDE 3

LOCATION

Figure 2: Flagstaff Network Figure 3: Aerial View of Food Bank Property 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

❖Neighboring Companies

➢Neighborhood Survey

▪ Past and Present Flooding Issue

❖City of Flagstaff

➢Rick Barrett, City Engineer ➢Donna Curry, Engineering Specialist

▪ Official Documents

  • City Plans
  • Elevational Data
  • Letters
  • Hydrology Data

COLLABORATIO N

[3] 4 Figure 4: Official Documents Example [2]

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

FLOODING

Figure 7: BEFORE HEAVY RAIN EVENT [1] Figure 8: DURING HEAVY RAIN EVENT: Monsoon (July and August) [1] 5

High Intensity Flooding

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 6 6 66

POTENTIAL FLOODING SOURCE

6 Figure 5: Watershed Near Humphreys Peak [2] Figure 6: Existing Pipelines Near Food Bank [2] 6

Historic Watershed

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

ON-SITE EVALUATION

  • Understand the physical

topography of the property and neighborhood

  • Determine how water

comes onto property

  • Current flooding alleviation
  • Determine how water flows
  • ff of the property
  • E. Huntington Rd. elevation

compared to Food Bank Property Elevation.

7 Figure 9: North-West Corner of Food Bank Property (Food Bank Property meets E. Huntington Rd.)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

OBSERVED FLOODING

Figure 10: Front Entrance Figure 11: Front Concrete Barricades Figure 12: Further Flooding Prevention (Sandbags)

Low Intensity Flooding

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 9 9 99 9

PROJECT EVOLUTION

❖ Flooding Area

➢ Neighborhood Assessment ➢ Collaboration with the City of Flagstaff

▪ Stakeholders ▪ Liability ▪ Legal Terms: Property rights, right of way, ADOT

9 9 Figure 13: Property Breakdown

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 10 10 1 10

SURVEYING: Planning

Figure 14: On-site Evaluation Figure 15: Survey Point Grid Figure 16: Surveying Property 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 11 11 11 11 11 11

SURVEYING: Topographical Map

11 Figure 17: Topographic Map of Property Figure 18: Topographic Map of Property W/ Food Bank Buildings

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 12 12

❖ Title 13 – Engineering Design Standards and Specifications for New Infrastructure ❖ 13-08-001-0001 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

  • “The design and construction of all

public and private stormwater management facilities shall be in accordance… with the City of Flagstaff Stormwater Management Design Manual and these Standards.”

❖ City of Flagstaff Stormwater Management Design Manual (2000)

➢Chapter 3: Hydrology ➢ Chapter 5: Culverts ➢ Chapter 6: Pavement Drainage ➢ Chapter 7: Storm Drains ➢ Chapter 8: Storage and Detention Facilities ➢ Chapter 10: Erosion and Sediment Control ➢ Chapter 11: Energy Dissipaters

CODES AND STANDARDS

1 2 12 12 [4] [4] [4]

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 13 13 1 3 13 13 13 13

HYDROLOGY ANALYSIS

City of Flagstaff Stormwater Management Design Manual

Rationale Formula Partially Full Flowing Pipes Criteria Runoff Coefficients

NOAA Atlas 14 Data

Rainfall Intensities

Coconino County Maps Online

Property Boundaries 13 [4] [5] [6] 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14 14 14 14

STORMWATER RUNOFF EVALUATION

14 Table 1: Runoff Intensity, NOAA Atlas 14 [5] Figure 19: Area of Property (Red)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 15 15 1 5 15 15 15 15

DESIGN CALCULATIONS

  • 15

15 Figure 20: Hydraulic Elements Calculations

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16 16 16 1 6 16 16 16 16

DESIGN CALCULATIONS

16 16 16 Figure 21: Pipe Sizing Calculations Using Q Figure 22: Verification Calculations

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17 17 17 1 7 17 17 17 17

DESIGN CALCULATIONS

17 17 17

Table 4: FS for Sliding = 1.73 > 1.5 Table 5: FS for Bearing Capacity = 7.22 > 3

Retaining Wall Calculations

Table 3: FS for Overturning = 3.3 > 2

Figure 23 : Stability Failure Checks for Retaining Walls [7]

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Design Option 1

18 18 1 8 18 18 18 18 18

Design Option 1: Retaining Wall W/ Commercial Drainage System

Figure 25: Design Option 1 Retaining Wall Detail Figure 26: Aerial View of Design Option 1

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Design Option 1 Details

19 19 1 9 19 19 19 19 19

Design Option 1: Retaining Wall W/ Commercial Drainage System

Figure 27: Design Option 1 Cross Sectional View Figure 28: Top and Side View of Commercial Drain

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Design Option 2

20 20 2 20 20 20 20 20

Design Option 2: Retaining Wall W/ Valley Gutters

Figure 29: Design Option 2 Retaining Wall Detail Figure 30: Aerial View of Design Option 2

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Design Option 2 Details

21 21 2 1 21 21 21 21 21

Design Option 2: Retaining Wall W/ Valley Gutters

Figure 30: Design Option 2 Valley Gutter Detail

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Pros and Cons

22 22 2 2 22 22 22 22 22 Figure 31: Design 1 Figure 32: Design 2

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Offsite Recommendations to City of Flagstaff

❖Initiate the Vegetated Swale Design ❖Increase Catch Basin Size ❖Additional Catch Basins ❖Continued Maintenance

23 23 23 2 3 23 23 23 23 Figure 33: City of Flagstaff Stormwater Division Retention Basin Design

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24 24 24 2 4 24 24 24 24

ECONOMICS

24 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

PROJECT IMPACT

25 25 25 25 25 25

Final Design Alleviate Flooding Avoid Neighbo r Runoff Avoid Front Entry Flooding Avoidance

  • f Future

Flooding Food Bank Continue to Serve Public No Governmenta l Impacts ADOT City of Flagstaff

Figure 34: Project Impact Flow Chart

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

STAFFING HOURS

26 26 2 6 26 26 26 26 26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

PROJECT SCHEDULE

27 27 2 7 27 27 27 27 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

COST

28 28 2 8 28 28 28 28 28

❖Within 10% Difference ❖Senior Engineer

  • vs. Engineer

❖$840.00 Difference

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

REFERENCES

[1](2016) Donna Curry, Engineering Specialist [2](2016) Rick Barrett, City of Flagstaff, City Engineer [3] (2016). City of Flagstaff. Available: http://www.flagstaff.az.gov/. [4] (July 2000) City of Flagstaff Engineering Division, "Stormwater management," in City

  • f Flagstaff Stormwater Design Manual Anonymous City of Flagstaff, pp. 43.

[5] (August 27, 2014). NOAA ATLAS 14 POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES: AZ [NOAA Atlas 14]. Available: http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=az. [6](2016). County Maps [Coconino Parcel Viewer]. Available: https://gismaps.coconino.az.gov/ParcelViewer/. [7] (2016). CE-RE. Available: http://www.ce- ref.com/Foundation/Retaining_wall/Retaining_wall.html

29 29 2 9 29 29 29 29 29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

THANK YOU

RESEARCH ANALYSIS DESIGN

30