Figure 2 . Figure 3 . Figure 4 US Nuclear Industry Is Achieving - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Figure 2 .

Figure 3 .

Figure 4 US Nuclear Industry Is Achieving Record Levels of Performance (1980-2000) 90 89.6 85 Capacity Factor (%) 80 75 70 65 60 55 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 2000 All 103 Units

Figure 5 THE NEW U.S. NUCLEAR POWERS: Companies/Alliances That Will Be Running the Nation’s Nuclear Fleet After All Consolidations Announced To Date Take Effect ENTITY NUMBER OF NUCLEAR UNITS 19 2 Exelon Generation Company 1 10 Entergy 8 STARS Alliance 3 8 Nuclear Management Company 4 Duke Power 7 Dominion Generation 6 6 Southern Nuclear Operating Company 6 5 Tennessee Valley Authority 5 Carolina Power & Light/Florida Power Corp. 4 Constellation Nuclear First Energy Nuclear Operating Company 4 4 FPL Group Arizona Public Service Company 3 Public Service Electric & Gas 3 American Electric Power 2 PPL Corporation 2 2 Southern California Edison/San Diego Gas & Electric 1 Detroit Edison 1 Energy Northwest Nebraska Public Power District 1 1 6 North Atlantic Energy Service Corp. Omaha Public Power District 1 Rochester Gas & Electric 1 South Carolina Gas & Electric 1

Footnotes to Figure 5: 1 Merger of Unicom and PECO Nuclear. 2 This number includes two shutdown units (Zion), as well as three units owned or soon expected to be owned by AmerGen, a joint venture of PECO Nuclear and British Energy. 3 STARS is not an operating company, but an alliance among several operators for improved staffing efficiencies and procurement economies. However, member companies' executive management may decide to form an operating company in the future. Member companies include Ameren/UE Corp., TXU Electric, Pacific Gas & Electric, South Texas Project Operating Co., and Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Co. Arizona Public Service Co. has recently announced that it will soon join STARS as well. 4 A non-owning operator that now holds licenses of nuclear units of participating utilities. 5 This number includes one shutdown unit (Browns Ferry). It does not include three partially- completed units (two at Bellefonte and one at Watts Bar). 6 Unit currently up for sale.

Figure 6 Past and Present U.S. NRC Approvals of Thermal Power Uprates At Operating U.S. Reactors Uprate % (of Originally Already Approved Units Currently Pending Units licensed thermal power limit >10% 4 0 5-10 % 42 5 1-5 % 4 1 Source: U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff, September 18th, 2000. ______________________________________________________________________________ Numark Associates, Inc. April 2001 .

Figure 7 Average & Median Duration of Nuclear Refueling Outages in the US (1990-2000) 120 105 100 100 88 82 80 76 74 80 70 68 66 66 64 59 days 53 60 51 49 48 42.5 41.5 39.9 39 35 40 20 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 . Average outage duration Median outage duration Source: Institute of Nuclear Power Operators (INPO) Note: Values do not include data from shutdown units

Figure 8 NRC PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; ANNUAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE, 1986-1998 .

Figure 9 License Renewal: License Renewal: Unlocking Additional Value Unlocking Additional Value Approved Already filed 2001 2002 Calvert Cliffs 1,2 Hatch 1,2 Catawba 1,2 Point Beach 1,2 Oconee 1,2,3 Turkey Point 3,4 McGuire 1,2 St. Lucie 1,2 Arkansas Nuclear North Anna 1,2 Summer One Unit 1 Surry 1,2 Fort Calhoun Peach Bottom 2,3 Robinson 2 2003 Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 2 Browns Ferry 2,3 Cooper Farley 1,2 Dresden 2,3 Quad Cities 1,2 2004 Brunswick 1, 2 Beaver Valley 1,2 Pilgrim Davis-Besse 2007 Sequoyah 1,2

Figure 2 . Figure 3 . Figure 4 US Nuclear Industry Is Achieving - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Figure 2 . Figure 3 . Figure 4 US Nuclear Industry Is Achieving Record Levels of Performance (1980-2000) 90 89.6 85 Capacity Factor (%) 80 75 70 65 60 55 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 2000 All 103 Units Figure 5 THE

1 Figure 1. Figure 2. 2 Figure 3. Figure 4. 3 Figure 5. Figure 6. 4 Figure 7. Figure 8.

2018 Employer Health Benefits Survey Release Slides October 3, 2018 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure

1*1 Figure 1. Original Figure 2. After Figure 3. After Figure 4. After fog_ image first

Figure 1: Team Logo 2 Figure 2: AISC SSBC Event Logo [1] Figure 3: Vertical Load locations [1]

Figure 1c Figure 1d Figure 1g Figure 1f Supplementary Figure 1c Supplementary Figure 1g

1 Functional group classifications Chapter 2 - Alkanes Classification of hydrocarbons: aliphatic

Figure 4.1 Drawing hands by MC Escher Figure 1.2 The brain viewed from above, with right hemisphere

Devil Figures What is the devil figure archetype in a story? Definition: The devil figure

Figure 1: World prices of coltan and gold Figure 2: Local prices of coltan and gold Figure 6:

Plasmids are excellent cloning vectors Figure 5.21 Figure

Light from the West Figure: The upper limes germanicus , s. ii CE (CC-BY-SA: source) Figure: The

Determinism and Volition in Antiquity Figure: Unsourceable Internet image Free Will? Figure: The

Signal Theory Figure 2.1: The four-universe paradigm. Figure 2.2: Levels of abstraction in signal

Figure 1. Location map showing the Holbrook Basin in eastern Arizona. Figure 2. Map of northern

Statistical Exploration of Climate Data Figures from Module McGuire Air Force Base Figure 1:

Figure PET 1 from page 150 of Exploring the Heart of

Stacks Stack - a collection of ADT objects that stores Insertions 4

Public Service Enterprise Group PSEG Earnings Conference Call 2 nd Quarter 2016 July 29, 2016

ISSEP 2010 15 January 2010, 13:4014:00 Tom Verhoeff Eindhoven University of Technology

Quarterly Virtual Meeting #2 Apr. 20, 2018 Todays Agenda Welcome and Overview TOPIC:

Peanut Weed Control Update - 2017 Eric P. Prostko, Ph.D. Professor and Extension Weed Specialist

Peanut Weed Control Update - 2016 Eric P. Prostko, Ph.D. Professor and Extension Weed Specialist

Supply and Demand: Supply and Demand: Price and Quantity Price and Quantity Determination in

Snakemake Johannes K oster Genome Informatics, Institute of Human Genetics, Faculty of