Family History of Incarceration INCARCERATION & RECIDIVISM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

family history of incarceration incarceration recidivism
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Family History of Incarceration INCARCERATION & RECIDIVISM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Zo Zouk ukis S is Sum ummer er Inst Instit itut ute a e and nd R Resea esearch C Collabo borativ ive 2 0 2 019 Family History of Incarceration INCARCERATION & RECIDIVISM FAMILY HISTORY OF INCARCERATION RESEARCH GROUP


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Family History of Incarceration

Zo Zouk ukis S is Sum ummer er Inst Instit itut ute a e and nd R Resea esearch C Collabo borativ ive

2 0 2 019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

INCARCERATION & RECIDIVISM

FAMILY HISTORY OF INCARCERATION RESEARCH GROUP

slide-3
SLIDE 3

REPEAT OFFENDERS

  • A repeat offender is an individual who has already been

convicted for a crime, and who has been caught again for committing the crime and breaking the law for which he had been prosecuted in an earlier case.

  • Long periods being incarcerated have negative effects on the

families of the accused.

  • Individuals re-enter the penal system based on a variety of

factors, but our research focuses on how educational attainment, substance addiction, and household income adversely affect whether an individual is more probable in being a repeat offender.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

HYPOPTHESIS

H1: As household income increases, the probability of being a repeat offender decreases H2: As educational attainment increases, the probability of being a repeat

  • ffender decreases.

H3: Incarcerates with a history of addiction are more likely to be repeat

  • ffenders.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Variables Coefficient (Standard Error)

Educational Attainment

  • 0.140**

(0.067) Metropolitan Area

  • 0.180

(0.167) Household Income

  • 0.058***

(0.015) Homeownership 0.065 (0.103) Employment Status

  • 0.103

(0.064) Incarcerate Addiction History 1.664*** (0.114)

***p≤.01; **p≤.05; *p≤.10

  • Predictors of Repeat Offense

Among Incarcerated Family Members

  • All data was taken from

Family History of Incarceration Survey (FamHIS). The sample of respondents is 1, 975.

  • 62% of the sample offended
  • nce while the other 38%
  • ffended more than once.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

  • If the relative of the accused has

attained a higher education, or has a high school diploma, then the probability of the incarcerated relative being a repeat offender is less likely.

Variables Coefficient (Standard Error) Educational Attainment

  • 0.140**

(0.067)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

HOUSEHOLD INCOME

Variable Coefficient (Standard Error) Household Income

  • 0.058***

(0.015)

  • As household income increases,

the probability of a relative being a repeat offender decreases.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

DRUG ADDICTION

  • If the incarcerated family member has struggled with

addiction in the past, the probability of being a repeat

  • ffender greatly increases.

Variable Coefficient (Standard Error) Addiction History 1.664*** (0.114)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PREDICTED PROBABILITIES

  • Increasing educational attainment

from its minimum to maximum value results in a -0.10 probability of recidivism.

  • Increasing income from its minimum

to maximum value results in a -0.22 probability of recidivism.

  • Incarcerates who have struggled with

addiction have a +0.35 probability of recidivism.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Impact of Incarceration on Families

Undergraduate Students: Kara Nelson, LaJayla Parker, Joshua Buffa

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction and Background

  • Mass Incarceration
  • Families
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Design

  • Dependent Variable
  • Percentage of families members who

have been incarcerated for at least one night

  • !(#$$%&#'(% ')& %*(%)&%& +'$#,- #).'/.%/'(%&)

!(#$$%&#'(% ')& %*(%)&%& +'$#,- $%$1%/2)

  • Independent Variables
  • Socioeconomic predictors
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Predictors of Family Incarceration

Variables Coefficient (Standard Error) Educational Attainment

  • 0.047

(1.352) White

  • 7.159***

(2.281) Gender 6.261*** (2.243) Household Income

  • 3.807***

(0.994) Metropolitan Area

  • 7.423***

(0.773) Household Size

  • 0.310

(0.773) Marital Status 3.261*** (1.567) ***p ≤.01; **p ≤..05; *p[≤..10

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Percentage of Family Members Incarcerated by Race

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Percentage of Family Members Incarcerated by Gender

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Percentage of Family Members Incarcerated by Income

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Percentage of Family Members Incarcerated by Metropolitan Area

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Percentage of Family Members Incarcerated by Marital Status

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Discussion

  • Impact on Marginalized Communities
  • Limitations of the Data
  • Where do we from here?
  • Better Policy
  • Understanding the Realities of Incarceration
slide-20
SLIDE 20

FAMILIES AND INCARCERATION

Undergraduates: Meeyabonyui Aneneba, Elice Agostini, Noor Smadi, Chris Valley, Gaia Harper Graduates: Bailey Fairbanks, Kristina LaPlant

slide-21
SLIDE 21

FAMILIES AND NARRATIVES:

  • Background on the effects
  • f incarceration
  • Collateral Damage
  • Theory and methods
  • Data Collection
  • Coding
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Research Question

■ What is the emotional impact of visiting an incarcerated family member? ■ Do different racial groups experience different emotions during visits? ■ Do people experience different emotions when the incarcerated family member is a parent, sibling, or child? ■ Do family members experience different emotions during visits if the incarcerated struggles with addiction or is a repeat offender?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Key Words for Coding Emotional Sentiment:

■ Sadness: sad, sorrow, depression, heartbreaking, awful, terrible, emotionally drained, lonely, hurtful, painful, dehumanizing. ■ Anxiety: embarrassment, discomfort, discouraging, awkwardness, shame, scary, monitored, unpleasant, unsettling, confined/controlled, shocking. ■ Anger: degrading, disgust, resentful, unfair/unjust, frustration.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

DEMOGRAPHIC BREAKDOWN:

Bl Black Wh White Hi Hispanic Ot Other 25.29% (106) 51.78% (217) 15.99% (67) 6.92% (29) Sample characteristics N= 419

slide-25
SLIDE 25

FAMILY RELATIONS BREAKDOWN:

Mo Mother er Fa Father Si Sibling Chi Child ld Pa Partner 19 45 142 136 57 4.53% 10.7% 33.89% 32.45% 13.6%

slide-26
SLIDE 26

BLACK FAMILIES

slide-27
SLIDE 27

HISPANIC FAMILIES

slide-28
SLIDE 28

WHITE FAMILIES

slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32